Skip to main content
Download PDF

Inhibition of PAD4 enhances radiosensitivity and inhibits aggressive phenotypes of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells

Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters volume 26, Article number: 9 (2021) Cite this article

A Correction to this article was published on 04 April 2023

A Correction to this article was published on 30 December 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a tumor deriving from nasopharyngeal epithelium. Peptidyl-arginine deiminase 4 (PAD4) is a vital mediator of histone citrullination and plays an essential role in regulating disease process. Radiotherapy is an essential method to treat NPC. In this research, we explored the effect of PAD4 on NPC radiosensitivity.

Methods

We enrolled 50 NPC patients, established mice xenograft model, and purchased cell lines for this study. Statistical analysis and a series of experiments including RT-qPCR, clonogenic survival, EdU, Transwell, and wound healing assays were done.

Results

Our data manifested that PAD4 (mRNA and protein) presented a high expression in NPC tissues and cells. GSK484, an inhibitor of PAD4, could inhibit activity of PAD4 in NPC cell lines. PAD4 overexpression promoted the radioresistance, survival, migration, and invasion of NPC cells, whereas treatment of GSK484 exerted inhibitory effects on radioresistance and aggressive phenotype of NPC cells. Additionally, GSK484 could attenuate the effect of PAD4 of NPC cell progression. More importantly, we found that GSK484 significantly inhibited tumor size, tumor weight and tumor volume in mice following irradiation.

Conclusions

PAD4 inhibitor GSK484 attenuated the radioresistance and cellular progression in NPC.

Background

Recent studies have revealed that genetic factors, viral infection, and environment are main factors resulting in the occurrence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) [1,2,3,4]. The incidence rate of NPC ranks the first in the ear, nose and throat malignant tumors in China [5], and the major factors leading to mortality are local relapse and distant metastasis [6]. The 5-year survival rate is about 10% for radiation-resistant patients and 30% for radiation-sensitive patients [7]. Radioresistance severely hampers the efficacy of radiotherapy for patients. Therefore, understanding potential mechanism of NPC radioresistance is of great significance to exploring new strategies for treatment of NPC.

Peptidyl-arginine deiminase (PAD), including five isozymes (PAD1−4 and PAD6), can catalyze the reaction of protein citrullination, a process where arginine is converted into residue citrulline [8, 9]. PAD-mediated citrullination can modify multiple cell processes through altering tertiary structure of peptide chain, protein-protein interaction, or generation of neo-epitopes [10, 11]. Protein citrullination plays a key role in mediating protein to exert various pathophysiological effects within one polypeptide chain [12, 13]. Current studies show that protein citrullination is closely related to cancer pathogenesis [14, 15]. Emerging evidence suggests that citrullinated proteins are promising biomarkers for cancer therapy [16]. PAD4 belongs to PAD family [17], converting peptidyl arginine to peptidyl citrulline [18]. The upregulation of PAD4 was reported in varied malignancies, such as rectal adenocarcinoma, breast cancer, and ovarian cancer [19]. Studies have shown that PAD4-catalyzed neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation is upregulated in multiple tumors [20]. Multiple components (such as matrix metalloproteinase-9, neutrophil elastase and cathepsin G) in Nets can increase cancer cell growth, angiogenesis and distant metastasis [21, 22]. PAD4 is co-expressed with cytokeratin (CK) in a variety of cancer tissues. CK 8, CK 18, and CK 19 are citrullinated by PAD4, and citrullinated CK antagonizes the cytoskeleton depolymerization process mediated by aspartic acid-specific cysteine proteolytic enzyme, thereby inhibiting tumor cell apoptosis [23]. PAD4 can also affect the metastasis and erosion of tumor cells. The interleukin-8 generated by tumor and microenvironment exerts a critical effect in cancer cell survival, migration, and invasion. PAD4 can convert arginine at the fifth position of interleukin-8 to citrulline to restrain the biological activity of citrullinated interleukin-8 [24]. The generation of tumor-associated thrombosis is related to PAD4 and is usually accompanied by hypercitrullinated levels of histones in plasma in patients with tumor-associated thrombotic microangiopathy [25]. Additionally, PAD4 inhibitors fluoramidine or chloramidine are cytotoxic to a variety of tumor cells, including breast cancer cells, leukemia cells, and colorectal cancer cells [26]. Although numerous studies reveal the essential role of PAD4 in human cancers, its role in NPC is not identified.

In this investigation, we explored the role of PAD4 and its inhibitor GSK484 in radioresistance and phenotypes of NPC cells, which demonstrates the potential of PAD4 inhibition for treatment of NPC.

Materials and methods

Tissue specimens

NPC tumor specimens were collected from 50 patients with NPC at the Second Nanning People’s Hospital. Informed consent was signed by every participant enrolled in this research. The Ethics Committee of the Second Nanning People’s Hospital approved this study. Approval number: 2019-055 April 9, 2019.

Cell culture

NPC cells (C666-1, 6-10B and 5-8F) and a normal human nasopharyngeal cell line NP69 were procured from the ATCC (MA, USA). They were grown in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco, USA) with 10% FBS (Gibco) in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2 at 37 ℃. NPC cells were treated with gradient concentrations of GSK484 (0, 5, 10, and 20 µm), respectively, for 3 h.

Cell transfection

The pcDNA3.1/PAD4 and pcDNA3.1 were synthesized by Invitrogen. 0.2 µg of vectors were transfected into NPC cells utilizing Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, USA). After 48 h, the transfection efficiency was tested by RT-qPCR. The cells subjected to transfection was treated with 10 µm GSK484 for 3 h.

RT-qPCR

RNA from NPC tissues or cells was isolated by a TRIzol kit (Invitrogen, USA). NanoDrop (Thermo Scientific, USA) was employed for RNA quantification at an A260/A280 ratio. 1 µg RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA by a M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen). A SYBR Premix Ex Taq II Kit (Takara, Japan) was used for RT-qPCR. GAPDH served as an endogenous control for PAD4. Relative expression of PAD4 (Forward: CCCAAACAGGGGGTATCAGT; Reverse: CCACGGACAGCCAGTCAGAA) was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method [27].

Clonogenic survival

NPC cells were planted into 6-well plates (Shanghai Zengyou, biotechnology, Shanghai, China) (8000 cells/well) for 24 h. Next, a medical linear accelerator (Precise accelerator, Elekta, Sweden) was used to treat cells with 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 Gy X-ray irradiation at room temperature, respectively. Afterwards, cells were further incubated for 14 days and stained with 1% crystal violet (Beijing Solaibo Technology, China). The colonies over 50 cells were recorded using a light microscope (Olympus Corporation). Surviving fraction was analyzed by the formula: Surviving fraction = amount of colonies/number of total cells × seeding efficiency of the control group.

EdU assay

The transfected C666-1 cells were inoculated in a 24-well plate (Shanghai Zengyou, biotechnology) and cultured with 50 µM of EdU reagent (RiboBio, Guangzhou, China) for 2 h. Cells were fixed with paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich), and treated with 100 µl of Apollo solution (Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 min. After that, cell nuclei were dyed by DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich) for 5 min. A fluorescence microscope (Nikon Corporation, Japan) was employed to record EdU positive cells.

Wound healing assay

The transfected C666-1 cells were cultured in a 6-well plate (Shanghai Zengyou, biotechnology) in serum-free medium (Gibco). When the culture reached 85%, a 20 µL sterile pipette tip (Gene Era Biotech, USA) was used to scratch the cell layer. After washing, cells were incubated in 1% FBS culture medium (Gibco). After 48 h, images were obtained at different time points by a light microscope (Nikon).

Transwell assay

Briefly, the upper chamber was pre-coated with Matrigel (BD Biosciences, USA), and then 1 × 104 cells were plated in the top chamber of Transwell (Corning Life Sciences, USA) while 500 µL of RPMI 1640 medium with 20% FBS was added to the bottom chamber. After 24 h, the invaded cells were fixed with pre-cooled methanol (Sigma-Aldrich) for 5 min and stained with 1% crystal violet (Beijing Solaibo Technology) for 5 min at room temperature. Images were obtained utilizing a light microscope (magnification, ×100; Nikon).

Xenograft mouse model

The animal study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of The Second Nanning People’s Hospital. Briefly, 5-week-old BALB/C nude mice (Vital River Laboratories Co., Ltd, Beijing, China) were administrated with subcutaneous injection of 3 × 106 C666-1 cells. For GSK484 in vivo treatment, mice were treated with GSK484 (4 mg/kg) or vehicle (10% DMSO in PBS) through intraperitoneal injection 1 week after tumor implantation, followed by daily dose. The tumor growth was measured using a caliper every 10 days. Tumor volume was calculated by the formula: volume = length× width2 × 0.5.

Tumor radiosensitivity study

As described previously [28], mice were grouped into no irradiation group (n = 4) or irradiation group (n = 4). Irradiation was given 20 days later. Mice in each group were irradiated with 8 Gy irradiation. All mice were killed 20 days following irradiation. Then, tumors were photographed and weighed. Tumor volume was determined by the formula: V = 0.5 × longitudinal diameter × latitudinal diameter2.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted with SPSS 20.0 software (IBM Inc., USA). Data are displayed as the mean ± SD and all experiments were repeated three times. Student’s test was employed for comparing statistics between two groups while one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s post hoc test were used for comparing differences among three or more groups. p < 0.05 was statistically significant.

Results

PAD4 is highly expressed in NPC

First, the PAD4 level in NPC tissues was evaluated by RT-qPCR and western blot, and the data demonstrated that PAD4 was high in NPC tissues (Fig. 1a, b). Similarly, the elevated expression of PAD4 was also detected in NPC cells (C666-1, 6-10B and 5-8F) (Fig. 1c, d). Additionally, we also tested the expression levels of the other PAD isozymes (including PAD1, PAD2, and PAD3) in NPC cells, and found that these PAD isozymes had no observable expression change in NPC cells (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Therefore, we hypothesize that PAD4 is the major isozyme in NPC.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The expression of PAD4 in NPC. a, b RT-qPCR and western blot for the PAD4 level in NPC tissues and normal tissues. Paired Student’s test. c, d RT-qPCR and western blot for the PAD4 level in NPC cells and NP69 cells. One‑way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01

Full size image

PAD4 overexpression promotes the radioresistance and cellular processes in NPC

The role of PAD4 in NPC was then investigated. PAD4 expression at mRNA and protein level was significantly upregulated by pcDNA3.1/PAD4 in C666-1 and 6-10B cells (Fig. 2a, b). To probe the function of PAD4 on the radiosensitivity of NPC, we performed colony formation assay which revealed that highly expressed PAD4 significantly increased the survival fraction of NPC cells exposed to different dose of radiation (Fig. 2c). EdU assay showed that 6 Gy dose of irradiation repressed the proliferation of C666-1 cells, while overexpressed PAD4 promoted cell proliferation at 24 h after irradiation (Fig. 2d, e). Subsequently, through wound healing assay, PAD4 overexpression facilitated the migratory potential of C666-1 cells at 24 h under irradiation (Fig. 2f). Moreover, Transwell assay indicated that the invasive ability of C666-1 cell after irradiation was increased after PAD4 overexpression (Fig. 2g). Overall, overexpression of PAD4 inhibits radiosensitivity and promotes malignant character of NPC cells.

Fig. 2
figure 2

PAD4 overexpression promotes the radioresistance and cellular processes in NPC. a, b The PAD4 level in NPC cells transfected with pcDNA3.1/PAD4 by RT-qPCR and western blot. c Colony formation assay for cell survival under different doses of radiation. d, e Cell proliferation in NPC cells transfected pcDNA3.1/PAD4 by EdU assay, at 24 h after 6 Gy irradiation. f, g Migration and invasion in NPC cells transfected pcDNA3.1/PAD4 by wound healing and Transwell, at 24 h after 6 Gy irradiation. Unpaired Student’s test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01

Full size image

Inhibition of PAD4 promotes the radiosensitivity and cellular processes in NPC

Next, different concentrations of PAD4 inhibitor (GSK484) was used to treat C666-1 and 6-10B cells. The data delineated that GSK484 concentration-dependently decreased the expression of PAD4 (Fig. 3a, b). As shown in Fig. 3b, the survival fraction of NPC cells exposed to irradiation was significantly inhibited after treatment of GSK484 (Fig. 3c). The results from EdU assay showed that treatment of GSK484 suppressed cell proliferation after irradiation (Fig. 3d). Furthermore, analysis of migration and invasion revealed that treatment of GSK484 restrained the migratory and invasive ability of C666-1 cells (Fig. 3e, f). We further detected the changes of histone citrullination (citH3) to examine whether the activity of PAD4 is in relation to treatment or no treatment with PAD4 inhibitor. Western blot demonstrated that the citH3 protein levels were markedly reduced by PAD4 inhibition (Fig. 3g). The above findings suggested that GSK484 exerts inhibitory effects on radioresistance and aggressive phenotypes of NPC cells through inhibiting the activity of PAD4.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Inhibition of PAD4 promotes the radiosensitivity and cellular processes in NPC. a, b The PAD4 level after treatment with GSK484 by RT-qPCR and western blot. c Colony formation assay of NPC cells treated with different concentrations of GSK484. One‑way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. d Cell proliferation in NPC cells treated with GSK484 or not by EdU assay, at 24 h after 6 Gy irradiation. e, f Migration and invasion in NPC cells treated with GSK484 or not by wound healing and Transwell assays, at 24 h after 6 Gy irradiation. g The level of citH3 protein in NPC cell treated with GSK484 or not was measured by western lot. Unpaired Student’s test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01

Full size image

Treatment of GSK484 attenuates the effect of PAD4 overexpression of NPC cell progression

As observed in Fig. 4a, b, GSK484 treatment significantly downregulated the expression of PAD4 upregulated by pcDNA3.1/PAD4 in C666-1 cells. Colony formation assay demonstrated that GSK484 treatment reversed the promotive effect of PAD4 overexpression on the survival fraction of C666-1 cells (Fig. 4c). Moreover, the effects on the increase of aggressive phenotypes of C666-1 cells caused by PAD4 were abrogated after treatment of GSK484 (Fig. 4d, f). Furthermore, in Fig. 4g, citH3 was significantly elevated in PAD4 overexpressed cells but knocked down by GSK484, suggesting that histone citrullination occurs in a PAD4-dependent way. These results suggested the key role of GSK484 in inhibiting the effects of PAD4 on radiosensitivity and malignant phenotype of NPC cells.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Treatment of GSK484 attenuates the effect of PAD4 overexpression of NPC cell functions. a, b The PAD4 level in NPC cells treated differently by RT-qPCR and western blot analyses. c Colony formation assay for the survival of NPC cells treated differently. d Cell proliferation in NPC cells treated differently by EdU assay. e, f Migration and invasion ability in NPC cells treated differently by wound healing and Transwell. g The citH3 protein levels in NPC cell treated differently by western lot. One‑way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

GSK484 inhibits tumor growth and reverses radioresistance in vivo. C666-1 cells treated with 10 µm GSK484 or 0 µm GSK484 were injected into mice, n = 4, tumor growth curves (a), weights (b) and images (c). Unpaired Student’s test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01

Full size image

GSK484 inhibits tumor growth and reverses radioresistance in vivo

Since GSK484 could reverse the effect of PAD4 on radioresistance of NPC in vitro, we intended to verify whether it is applicable in vivo. Tumor grow curves revealed that the tumors grew significantly slower in mice treated with GSK484 than in the control group. Additionally, the mice treated with GSK484 were more sensitive to irradiation (Fig. 5a). The weights and images of the tumors further suggested that GSK484 significantly suppressed tumor growth after irradiation (Fig. 5b, c). Overall, GSK484 inhibits tumor growth and reverses radioresistance in vivo.

Discussion

NPC is an epithelial malignancy with a high mortality and is a major cause of cancer-associated death in South China, North Africa, and Southeast Asia [29]. Since cancers cells are sensitive to ionizing radiation (IR), up to date, radiotherapy has become a preferred method for cancer treatment [30, 31]. NPC patients at early stage tend to be efficiently subjected to radiotherapy [32]. Additionally, radiotherapy in combination with immunotherapy or chemotherapy may affect tumor immune response, giving rise to clinical improvement in various tumors [33]. Although better tumor localization through advanced radiotherapy techniques can help improving local control of NPC, radioresistance, which may result in tumor recurrence and metastasis, is a major barrier to long-term survival [34, 35]. One and a half years after radiotherapy, most patients with NPC suffer from local recurrence and distant metastasis [34]. Thus, exploring the mechanisms of radioresistance in NPC is essential for identifying more effective therapies for NPC.

More and more reports have indicated that PAD4 was a possible gene involved in epigenetic and phenotypic alteration in various cancers [36,37,38]. In the present study, the upregulated mRNA and protein expression of PAD4 in NPC was demonstrated, which is in line with the previous results that PAD4 is overexpressed in a variety of malignancies [39]. Since different cancers do have different PAD isozyme dominance, we performed an assessment on this through measuring the expression of the other isozymes in NPC cells. Our data revealed that these PAD isozymes had no significant expression change in NPC cells. Therefore, we concluded that PAD4 is the major isozyme in NPC. NPC cells were transfected with stable overexpression vector of PAD4 to determine the role of PAD4 in NPC progression. Interestingly, our findings showed that upregulated PAD4 promoted malignant character of NPC cells. As reported previously, inhibition of PAD4 suppresses the invasive and migratory phenotypes of lung cancer cells [40]. Silencing PAD4 attenuates gastric cancer cell proliferation, invasion, and cell cycle [38]. PAD4 facilitates gastric tumorigenesis via enhancing the expression of several oncogenes [41]. These literatures demonstrate the oncogenic property of PAD4 in tumorigenesis.

GSK484 hydrochloride suppresses the PAD4 target protein citrullination and reduces NETs formation by binding to low-calcium form of PAD4 in a selective and reversible way [42]. GSK484 is selective for PAD4 over PAD1–3. It binds at a different site from the amidines, a conformation of the PAD4 active site where part of the site is re-ordered to form a β-hairpin [42]. To test the phenotypes of NPC cells in the absence of PAD4, we used GSK484 to treat NPC cells. As expected, GSK484 treatment of cell lines decreased the expression of PAD4 (mRNA and protein) in a concentration-dependent manner. Moreover, GSK484 markedly inhibited the malignant character of NPC cells. Previous studies proved the regulatory role of PAD4 in cancers through citrullination. PAD4-driven citrullination of a key matrix component collagen type I contributes to mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (EMT), a phenotypic conversion that occurs in cancer cells, and liver metastasis in colorectal cancer [16]. Ectopically expressing wild type PAD4 promotes osteosarcoma cell invasion and migration while PAD4 mutation with no citrullination activity fails to affect cell phenotypes [43]. Subsequently, to examine whether this effect is associated with its citrullination activity, the changes of citH3 were detected to examine the citrullination activity of PAD4 in the context of GSK484. The results revealed treatment with GSK484 reduced the levels of citH3 protein, which is also an indicator of PAD4 activity, suggesting that GSK484 exerts inhibitory effects on NPC progression through inhibiting the citrullination activity of PAD4. However, since GSK484 is a reversible inhibitor of PAD4, prolong the incubation time between GSK484 and PAD4 may prevent the inactivation of PAD4. A deeper investigation verifying this point should be performed in the future. Interestingly, a study indicated that loss of PAD4 accelerates induction of EMT and invasion of tumors in breast cancer by the citrullination of nuclear GSK3β activating TGF-β pathway [44]. This finding is contrary to our study. The differences in cancer cell response to PAD4 may be due to the function diversity of PAD4 in different cancers.

However, there are certain limitations to our work. The mechanism by which PAD4 regulates its targets in NPC is unclear. Additionally, it is unknown whether there are other PAD isozymes or molecules such as GSK3β involved in PAD4-mediated phenotypic alternation in NPC. PAD4 has been shown to act as a transcriptional coregulator of many factors including p53, ING4, ELK1, p21, p300,and CIP1 [45,46,47]. Studies have indicated that the link between PAD4 and carcinogenesis is mediated through the p53 tumor suppressor gene via citrullination of citH3 [45] or the ELK1 oncogene to activate cFos [48]. Therefore, a significant future direction is to identify the potential targets or signaling pathways that PAD4 mediates in NPC.

Conclusions

In summary, PAD4 was upregulated in NPC, and its upregulation increased the radioresistance, and cellular processes in NPC, whereas its inhibitor GSK484 elicited inhibitory effects on these phenotypes. Moreover, GSK484 significantly inhibited tumor growth in vivo. Therefore, PAD4 may be a novel biomarker for NPC treatment. Other enzymes or molecules may participate in the PAD4-mediated NPC progression and further investigation could be done in the future.

Availability of data and materials

All data from this study are available in this published article.

Change history

Abbreviations

NPC:

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PAD4:

Peptidyl-arginine deiminase 4

References

  1. Liu D, Wang Y, Zhao Y, Gu X. LncRNA SNHG5 promotes nasopharyngeal carcinoma progression by regulating miR-1179/HMGB3 axis. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):178.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Vaughan TL, Shapiro JA, Burt RD, Swanson GM, Berwick M, Lynch CF, et al. Nasopharyngeal cancer in a low-risk population: defining risk factors by histological type. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 1996;5(8):587–93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chua MLK, Wee JTS, Hui EP, Chan ATC. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet. 2016;387(10022):1012–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. He XS, Deng M, Yang S, Xiao ZQ, Luo Q, He ZM, et al. The tumor supressor function of STGC3 and its reduced expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2008;13(3):339–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Wei KR, Zheng RS, Zhang SW, Liang ZH, Li ZM, Chen WQ. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma incidence and mortality in China, 2013. Chin J Cancer. 2017;36(1):90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim YS, Kim BS, Jung SL, Lee YS, Kim MS, Sun DI, et al. Radiation therapy combined with (or without) cisplatin-based chemotherapy for patients with nasopharyngeal cancer: 15-years experience of a single institution in Korea. Cancer Res Treat. 2008;40(4):155–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Bruce JP, Yip K, Bratman SV, Ito E, Liu FF. Nasopharyngeal cancer: molecular landscape. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(29):3346–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bicker KL, Thompson PR. The protein arginine deiminases: structure, function, inhibition, and disease. Biopolymers. 2013;99(2):155–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Asaga H, Ishigami A. Microglial expression of peptidylarginine deiminase 2 in the prenatal rat brain. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2007;12(4):536–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Vossenaar ER, Zendman AJ, van Venrooij WJ, Pruijn GJ. PAD, a growing family of citrullinating enzymes: genes, features and involvement in disease. BioEssays. 2003;25(11):1106–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Witalison EE, Thompson PR, Hofseth LJ. Protein arginine deiminases and associated citrullination: physiological functions and diseases associated with dysregulation. Curr Drug Targets. 2015;16(7):700–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Henderson B, Martin AC. Protein moonlighting: a new factor in biology and medicine. Biochem Soc Trans. 2014;42(6):1671–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jeffery CJ. Protein moonlighting: what is it, and why is it important? Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 2018;373(1738): 20160523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yuzhalin AE. Citrullination in cancer. Cancer Res. 2019;79(7):1274–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mohanan S, Cherrington BD, Horibata S, McElwee JL, Thompson PR, Coonrod SA. Potential role of peptidylarginine deiminase enzymes and protein citrullination in cancer pathogenesis. Biochem Res Int. 2012;2012:895343.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Yuzhalin AE, Gordon-Weeks AN, Tognoli ML, Jones K, Markelc B, Konietzny R, et al. Colorectal cancer liver metastatic growth depends on PAD4-driven citrullination of the extracellular matrix. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):4783.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Anzilotti C, Pratesi F, Tommasi C, Migliorini P. Peptidylarginine deiminase 4 and citrullination in health and disease. Autoimmun rev. 2010;9(3):158–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nakashima K, Hagiwara T, Ishigami A, Nagata S, Asaga H, Kuramoto M, et al. Molecular characterization of peptidylarginine deiminase in HL-60 cells induced by retinoic acid and 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3). J Biol Chem. 1999;274(39):27786–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chang X, Han J. Expression of peptidylarginine deiminase type 4 (PAD4) in various tumors. Mol Carcinog. 2006;45(3):183–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Erpenbeck L, Schön MP. Neutrophil extracellular traps: protagonists of cancer progression? Oncogene. 2017;36(18):2483–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang Q, Li J, Liu F, Li Z, Comments on Li H, et al. A systematic review of matrix metalloproteinase 9 as a biomarker of survival in patients with osteosarcoma. Tumour Biol. 2015;36(1):5–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Houghton AM, Rzymkiewicz DM, Ji H, Gregory AD, Egea EE, Metz HE, et al. Neutrophil elastase-mediated degradation of IRS-1 accelerates lung tumor growth. Nat Med. 2010;16(2):219–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Chang X, Han J, Pang L, Zhao Y, Yang Y, Shen Z. Increased PADI4 expression in blood and tissues of patients with malignant tumors. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Nierodzik ML, Karpatkin S. Thrombin induces tumor growth, metastasis, and angiogenesis: Evidence for a thrombin-regulated dormant tumor phenotype. Cancer Cell. 2006;10(5):355–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Demers M, Wagner DD. NETosis: a new factor in tumor progression and cancer-associated thrombosis. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2014;40(3):277–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Slack JL, Causey CP, Thompson PR. Protein arginine deiminase 4: a target for an epigenetic cancer therapy. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2011;68(4):709–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shen L, Xia M, Deng X, Ke Q, Zhang C, Peng F, et al. A lectin-based glycomic approach identifies FUT8 as a driver of radioresistance in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cell Oncol. 2020;43(4):695–707.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tang LL, Chen WQ, Xue WQ, He YQ, Zheng RS, Zeng YX, et al. Global trends in incidence and mortality of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2016;374(1):22–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jagsi R. Progress and controversies: radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer. Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(2):135–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. He Y, Jing Y, Wei F, Tang Y, Yang L, Luo J, et al. Long non-coding RNA PVT1 predicts poor prognosis and induces radioresistance by regulating DNA repair and cell apoptosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(2):235.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Peng H, Chen L, Chen YP, Li WF, Tang LL, Lin AH, et al. The current status of clinical trials focusing on nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A comprehensive analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov database. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(5):e0196730.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Rekers NH, Troost EG, Zegers CM, Germeraad WT, Dubois LJ, Lambin P. Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy: present status and future perspectives. Cancer Radiother. 2014;18(5–6):391–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lee AW, Poon YF, Foo W, Law SC, Cheung FK, Chan DK, et al. Retrospective analysis of 5037 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated during 1976–1985: overall survival and patterns of failure. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1992;23(2):261–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kristensen CA, Kjaer-Kristoffersen F, Sapru W, Berthelsen AK, Loft A, Specht L. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Treatment planning with IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy. Acta Oncol (Stockholm Sweden). 2007;46(2):214–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kolodziej S, Kuvardina ON, Oellerich T, Herglotz J, Backert I, Kohrs N, et al. PADI4 acts as a coactivator of Tal1 by counteracting repressive histone arginine methylation. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3995.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Christophorou MA, Castelo-Branco G, Halley-Stott RP, Oliveira CS, Loos R, Radzisheuskaya A, et al. Citrullination regulates pluripotency and histone H1 binding to chromatin. Nature. 2014;507(7490):104–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Xin J, Song X. Role of peptidylarginine deiminase type 4 in gastric cancer. Exp Ther Med. 2016;12(5):3155–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Chang X, Fang K. PADI4 and tumourigenesis. Cancer Cell Int. 2010;10:7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Liu M, Qu Y, Teng X, Xing Y, Li D, Li C, et al. PADI4-mediated epithelial–mesenchymal transition in lung cancer cells. Mol Med Rep. 2019;19(4):3087–94.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Zheng Y, Zhao G, Xu B, Liu C, Li C, Zhang X, et al. PADI4 has genetic susceptibility to gastric carcinoma and upregulates CXCR2, KRT14 and TNF-α expression levels. Oncotarget. 2016;7(38):62159–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Lewis HD, Liddle J, Coote JE, Atkinson SJ, Barker MD, Bax BD, et al. Inhibition of PAD4 activity is sufficient to disrupt mouse and human NET formation. Nat Chem Biol. 2015;11(3):189–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhai Q, Qin J, Jin X, Sun X, Wang L, Du W, et al. PADI4 modulates the invasion and migration of osteosarcoma cells by down-regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Life Sci. 2020;256:117968.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Stadler SC, Vincent CT, Fedorov VD, Patsialou A, Cherrington BD, Wakshlag JJ, et al. Dysregulation of PAD4-mediated citrullination of nuclear GSK3β activates TGF-β signaling and induces epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(29):11851–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Tanikawa C, Ueda K, Nakagawa H, Yoshida N, Nakamura Y, Matsuda K. Regulation of protein Citrullination through p53/PADI4 network in DNA damage response. Cancer Res. 2009;69(22):8761–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Yao H, Li P, Venters BJ, Zheng S, Thompson PR, Pugh BF, et al. Histone Arg modifications and p53 regulate the expression of OKL38, a mediator of apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(29):20060–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Guo Q, Fast W. Citrullination of inhibitor of growth 4 (ING4) by peptidylarginine deminase 4 (PAD4) disrupts the interaction between ING4 and p53. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(19):17069–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang X, Gamble MJ, Stadler S, Cherrington BD, Causey CP, Thompson PR, et al. Genome-wide analysis reveals PADI4 cooperates with Elk-1 to activate c-Fos expression in breast cancer cells. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(6):e1002112.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province (Grant number: 2017GXNSFBA198072), Science Research and Technology Development Key Program of Nanning City (Grant number: 20173018-4), Nanning Excellent Young Scientist Program and Guangxi Beibu Gulf Economic Zone Major Talent Program (Grant number: RC20190104) and Self-funded Scientific Research Project of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Health and Family Planning Commission (Grant number: Z20190381).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Hao Chen and Min Luo contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Endoscopy, The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, China

    Hao Chen, Min Luo, Xiangping Wang, Ting Liang, Chaoyuan Huang & Changjie Huang

  2. Department of Oncology, The Second Nanning People’s Hospital, No.13 Dancun Road, Jiangnan District, Nanning, 530031, Guangxi, China

    Lining Wei

Authors
  1. Hao Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Min Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiangping Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ting Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chaoyuan Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Changjie Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Lining Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HC, ML, CH and LW were the main designers of this study. HC, ML, XW, TL, CH, CH, and LW performed the experiments and analyzed the data. HC, ML, CH and LW drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Changjie Huang or Lining Wei.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of The Second Nanning People’s Hospital (No. 2018016; Approve date: April 12, 2018).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original version of this article was revised: We have assign the correct affiliation to the authors: Hao Chen and Lining Wei

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1. 

The expression level of the other PAD isozymes in NPC. RT-qPCR for the expression of PAD1 (A), PAD2 (B), and PAD3 (C) in NPC cell lines and NP69 cells. One‑way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, H., Luo, M., Wang, X. et al. Inhibition of PAD4 enhances radiosensitivity and inhibits aggressive phenotypes of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Cell Mol Biol Lett 26, 9 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11658-021-00251-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s11658-021-00251-2

Keywords

Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters

ISSN: 1689-1392

Contact us