Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Research insights: perceived differences about teaching and assessment practices in religious education

  • Published:
Journal of Religious Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses educational insights drawn from a mixed-methods study in Religious Education (RE). The study involved 238 teachers and school leaders, working in 65 Catholic schools in Western Australia (WA). The focus of the study was the educators’ perceptions of a large-scale, standardised assessment (LSA) called The Bishops’ Religious Literacy Assessment (BRLA). The assessment is developed by the Catholic Education Office in WA for the purpose of measuring student learning in RE. Students enrolled in Years Three, Five and Nine in Catholic schools across WA participate in the assessment each year in August. The study revealed six themes, two of which are specific to the educators’ perceptions of the administration of the BRLA. The other four themes relate to the perceived nature and role of RE and the use of LSAs in education. The themes signal complexity, based on diverse experiences about teaching and assessment practices in RE. These experiences provide empirical evidence specific to the context of RE as an academic learning area, reserved for the classroom. The evidence is new knowledge that builds on research in RE, identifying existing complexity and challenging, presuppositions and motivations that appear to cause misalignment between policy expectations and school-based practices. Given national interest in education about progressing student learning and the Catholic education agenda about addressing the quality of RE, the new knowledge acts as a springboard for classroom, school and system level dialogue about teaching and assessment practices in RE that can promote progress in student learning in Catholic schools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrich, D. (1988). Rasch models for measurement. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2020). Assessment. http://www.acara.edu.au/assessment

  • Buchanan, M. T., & Gellel, A. (Eds.). (2015). Global perspectives on Catholic religious education in schools. Vic, Australia: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, M. T., & Gellel, A. (Eds.). (2019). Global perspectives on Catholic religious education in schools, Volume II: Learning and leading in a pluralist world. Vic, Australia: Springer.

  • Caldwell, B. J. (2018). The alignment premium, benchmarking Australia’s student achievement, professional autonomy and system adaptivity. Vic, Australia: ACER Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catholic Education Commission of Western Australia. (2009). Mandate: Catholic Education Commission of Western Australia 2009–2015. https://www.cewa.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Bishops-Mandate-2009-2015.pdf

  • Catholic Education Commission of Western Australia. (2017). Religious education policy. https://www.cewa.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Religious-Education.pdf

  • Catholic Education Western Australia (2014). Annual report 2014. http://www.ceo.wa.edu.au/Publications/Documents/Annual%20Report/AnnualReport2014.pdf

  • Catholic Education Western Australia. (2020). Religious Education. https://www.cewa.edu.au/learning-and-wellbeing/learning-programs/religious-education/

  • Congregation for Catholic Education. (1977). The Catholic school. Homebush, NSW: St Pauls Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congregation for Catholic Education. (1982). Lay Catholics in schools: Witness to faith. Homebush, NSW: St Pauls Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congregation for Catholic Education. (1988). The religious dimension of education in a Catholic school. Homebush, NSW: St Pauls Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congregation for Catholic Education. (1997). The Catholic school on the threshold of the third millennium. http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/ccatheduc/documents/rc_con_ccatheduc_doc_27041998_school2000_en.html

  • Congregation for Catholic Education. (2014). Educating today and tomorrow: A renewing passion. Instrumentum laboris. http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/ccatheduc/documents/rc_con_ccatheduc_doc_20140407_educare-oggi-e-domani_en.html

  • Congregation for the Clergy. (1997). General directory for catechesis (Australian). Homebush, NSW: St Paul Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Convey, J. J. (2012). Perceptions of Catholic identity: Views of Catholic school administrators and teachers. Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 16(1), 187–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research, meaning and perspective in the research process. NSW Australia: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, S. (2019). The religious education of the religion teacher in Catholic schools. Learning and leading in a pluralist world. In M. T. Buchanan & A. Gellel (Eds.), Global perspectives on Catholic religious education in schools (Vol. II, pp. 75–86). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York, NY: Teachers’ College Record.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Training (2018) Through Growth to Achievement: Report of the review to achieve educational excellence in Australian schools. Australian Government. https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/662684_tgta_accessible_final_0.pdf

  • Dinham, S. (2016). Leading learning and teaching. Vic, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulfer, N., Polesel, J., & Rice, S. (2012). The experience of education: The impacts of high stakes testing on school students and their families. Sydney: Whitlam Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, M. (2009). Assessment: The heart of effective practice. Professional Educator, 8(4), 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis I. (2013) Apostolic exhortation, Evangelii Gaudium of the Holy Father Francis to the bishops, clergy, consecrated persons and the lay faithful on the proclamation of the Gospel in today’s world. http://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/apost_exhortations/documents/papa-francesco_esortazione-ap_20131124_evangelii-gaudium.html

  • Frey, N., Hattie, J., & Fisher, D. (2018) Developing assessment-capable visible learners, grades K-12. CA, USA: Corwin Press; and Toronto: Ontario Principals’ Council.

  • Fullan, M. (2019) Nuance, why some leaders succeed and others fail. CA, USA: Corwin Press; and Toronto: Ontario Principals’ Council.

  • Fullan, M., & Quinn, J. (2016) Coherence making. CA, USA: Corwin Press; and Toronto: Ontario Principals’ Council.

  • Gardner, J. (2012). Assessment and learning (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldburg, P. (2019). Pedagogical content knowledge: A missing piece of the puzzle that is religious education in Catholic schools. Learning and leading in a pluralist world. In M. T. Buchanan & A. Gellel (Eds.), Global perspectives on Catholic religious education in schools (Vol. II, pp. 245–258). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grajczonek, J. (2019). Early childhood religious education: It matters, but what is its matter? In M. T. Buchanan & A. Gellel (Eds.), Global perspectives on Catholic religious education in schools. Learning and leading in a pluralist world (Vol. II, pp. 259–270). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2007). Statistics for the behavioural sciences (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackett, C. (2006) A longitudinal study of the personal and professional responses of recently assigned secondary religious education teachers to curriculum demands. (Doctoral thesis, The University of Notre Dame Australia). http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theses/1

  • Hackett, C. (2010). The role of experiential content knowledge in the formation of beginning RE teachers. Journal of Religious Education, 58(1), 38–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackett, C., Sayce, D., & Alteri, D. (2017). Curriculum overview “The truth will set you free”: Religious education in Western Australia. In R. Rymarz & A. Belmonte (Eds.), Religious education in Australian Catholic schools, exploring the landscape (pp. 264–283). Australia: Vaughan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlen, W. (2007). Assessment of learning. London, UK: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. London, UK: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, H., & Bush, H. (2010). Moderation: Making learning a priority in primary religious education. Journal of Religious Education, 58(1), 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P., & Barber, M. (2014). Preparing for a renaissance in assessment. London, UK: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holohan, G. J. (1999). Australian religious education: Facing the challenge. Canberra, ACT: National Catholic Education Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, B., & Rymarz, R. (2009). Religious education in Catholic primary schools: Contemporary issues and perspectives for RE teachers. Terrigal, NSW: David Barlow Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, A. V. (2009). The curriculum. Theory and practice (6th ed.). London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. (2008). Is test-driven external accountability effective? Synthesizing the evidence from cross-state causal-comparative and correlational studied. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 608–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Libreria Editrice Vaticana. (1983) Codex Iuris Canonici. Code of Canon Law. http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/_INDEX.HTM

  • Lingard, B., Martino, W., & Rezai-Rashti, G. (2013). Testing regimes, accountabilities and education policy: commensurate global and national developments. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 539–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S. X. (2014). Statistical power analysis for the social and behavioral sciences: Basic and advanced techniques. New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, M. (1990). Assessment and reporting in religious education. Canberra, ACT: National Catholic Education Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, G. N. (2018). A Commitment to growth. Essays on education. Victoria: Australian Council of Educational Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, S. J., & Sullivan, J. (Eds.). (2013) Education in a catholic perspective. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com

  • Moran, G. (2016) Missed opportunities: Rethinking Catholic education. IN USA: iUniverse.

  • National Catholic Education Commission. (2018) Framing paper, Religious Education in Australian Catholic schools. https://www.ncec.catholic.edu.au/images/NCEC_Framing_Paper_Religious_Education.pdf

  • O’Donoghue, T. A., & Byrne, D. (2014) Historical inquiry into the construction of religion as a school subject for Catholic schools in Australia. eJournal of Catholic Education in Australasia, 1(2). http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/ecea/vol1/iss1/2

  • Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2005). On becoming a pragmatic researcher: The importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(5), 357–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul VI. (1975) Evangelii nuntiandi. Apostolic exhortation. http://w2.vatican.va/content/paul-vi/en/apost_exhortations/documents/hf_p-vi_exh_19751208_evangelii-nuntiandi.html

  • Pettit, P. (2010). From data-informed to data-led? School leadership within the context of external testing. Leading & Managing, 16(2), 90–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poncini, A. (2018) Perceptions of large-scale, standardised testing in religious education: How do religious educators perceive The Bishops’ Religious Literacy Assessment? (Doctoral thesis, The University of Notre Dame Australia). https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theses/210

  • Punch, K. F. (2009). Introduction to research methods in education. London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, G. (2017). A personal, critical perspective on the development of Australian Catholic school religious education: Where to from here? In R. Rymarz & A. Belmonte (Eds.), Religious education in Australian Catholic schools, exploring the landscape (pp. 264–283). Australia: Vaughan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M. (2013). A common search. The history and forms of religious education in Catholic schools (2nd ed.). Brisbane, Qld: Lumino Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rymarz, R. (2011). Catechesis and religious education in Canadian Catholic schools. Religious Education, 106(5), 537–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rymarz, R., & Sharkey, P. (2019). Moving from theory to practice. Religious educators in the classroom. Australia: Vaughan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, K. (2019). The teacher of religion: Choosing between professions in Catholic schools. Learning and leading in a pluralist world. In M. T. Buchanan & A. Gellel (Eds.), Global perspectives on Catholic religious education in schools (Vol. II, pp. 3–14). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shaddock, A. (2014). Using data to improve learning: A practical guide for busy teachers. Vic, Australia: Australian Council of Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, J. (2016). A space like no other. In M. Shanahan, (Ed.), Does religious education matter? (pp. 7–24). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com

  • Thompson, G. (2012). The effects of NAPLAN (National Assessment Program, Literacy and Numeracy): Executive summary. Perth, WA: Murdoch University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G., & Harbaugh, A. (2013). A preliminary analysis of teacher perceptions of the effects of NAPLAN on pedagogy and curriculum. Australian Education Researcher, 40(3), 299–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G., & Mockler, N. (2016). Principals of audit: testing, data and implicated advocacy. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 48(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timperley, H. (2013). Leading teachers’ professional learning. In J. Robertson & H. Timperley (Eds.), Leadership and learning (pp. 118–130). Victoria, Australia: Hawker-Brownlow Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatican Council II. (1965d). Declaration on christian education, Gravissimum educationis. http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decl_19651028_gravissimum-educationis_en.html

  • White, D. (2004). Pedagogy – The missing link in religious education: Implications of brain-based learning theory for the development of a pedagogical framework for Religious Education. (Doctoral thesis, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, NSW). http://researchbank.acu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1102&context=theses

  • Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing measures: An item response modelling approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M., Tam, H. P., & Jen, T. (2016). Educational measurement for applied researchers: Theory into practice. Singapore: Springer Nature.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonella Poncini.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Poncini, A. Research insights: perceived differences about teaching and assessment practices in religious education. j. relig. educ. 69, 37–56 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-020-00129-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-020-00129-z

Keywords

Navigation