Abstract
This paper discusses educational insights drawn from a mixed-methods study in Religious Education (RE). The study involved 238 teachers and school leaders, working in 65 Catholic schools in Western Australia (WA). The focus of the study was the educators’ perceptions of a large-scale, standardised assessment (LSA) called The Bishops’ Religious Literacy Assessment (BRLA). The assessment is developed by the Catholic Education Office in WA for the purpose of measuring student learning in RE. Students enrolled in Years Three, Five and Nine in Catholic schools across WA participate in the assessment each year in August. The study revealed six themes, two of which are specific to the educators’ perceptions of the administration of the BRLA. The other four themes relate to the perceived nature and role of RE and the use of LSAs in education. The themes signal complexity, based on diverse experiences about teaching and assessment practices in RE. These experiences provide empirical evidence specific to the context of RE as an academic learning area, reserved for the classroom. The evidence is new knowledge that builds on research in RE, identifying existing complexity and challenging, presuppositions and motivations that appear to cause misalignment between policy expectations and school-based practices. Given national interest in education about progressing student learning and the Catholic education agenda about addressing the quality of RE, the new knowledge acts as a springboard for classroom, school and system level dialogue about teaching and assessment practices in RE that can promote progress in student learning in Catholic schools.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrich, D. (1988). Rasch models for measurement. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2020). Assessment. http://www.acara.edu.au/assessment
Buchanan, M. T., & Gellel, A. (Eds.). (2015). Global perspectives on Catholic religious education in schools. Vic, Australia: Springer.
Buchanan, M. T., & Gellel, A. (Eds.). (2019). Global perspectives on Catholic religious education in schools, Volume II: Learning and leading in a pluralist world. Vic, Australia: Springer.
Caldwell, B. J. (2018). The alignment premium, benchmarking Australia’s student achievement, professional autonomy and system adaptivity. Vic, Australia: ACER Press.
Catholic Education Commission of Western Australia. (2009). Mandate: Catholic Education Commission of Western Australia 2009–2015. https://www.cewa.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Bishops-Mandate-2009-2015.pdf
Catholic Education Commission of Western Australia. (2017). Religious education policy. https://www.cewa.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Religious-Education.pdf
Catholic Education Western Australia (2014). Annual report 2014. http://www.ceo.wa.edu.au/Publications/Documents/Annual%20Report/AnnualReport2014.pdf
Catholic Education Western Australia. (2020). Religious Education. https://www.cewa.edu.au/learning-and-wellbeing/learning-programs/religious-education/
Congregation for Catholic Education. (1977). The Catholic school. Homebush, NSW: St Pauls Publications.
Congregation for Catholic Education. (1982). Lay Catholics in schools: Witness to faith. Homebush, NSW: St Pauls Publications.
Congregation for Catholic Education. (1988). The religious dimension of education in a Catholic school. Homebush, NSW: St Pauls Publications.
Congregation for Catholic Education. (1997). The Catholic school on the threshold of the third millennium. http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/ccatheduc/documents/rc_con_ccatheduc_doc_27041998_school2000_en.html
Congregation for Catholic Education. (2014). Educating today and tomorrow: A renewing passion. Instrumentum laboris. http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/ccatheduc/documents/rc_con_ccatheduc_doc_20140407_educare-oggi-e-domani_en.html
Congregation for the Clergy. (1997). General directory for catechesis (Australian). Homebush, NSW: St Paul Publications.
Convey, J. J. (2012). Perceptions of Catholic identity: Views of Catholic school administrators and teachers. Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 16(1), 187–214.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research, meaning and perspective in the research process. NSW Australia: Allen & Unwin.
Cullen, S. (2019). The religious education of the religion teacher in Catholic schools. Learning and leading in a pluralist world. In M. T. Buchanan & A. Gellel (Eds.), Global perspectives on Catholic religious education in schools (Vol. II, pp. 75–86). Singapore: Springer.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York, NY: Teachers’ College Record.
Department of Education and Training (2018) Through Growth to Achievement: Report of the review to achieve educational excellence in Australian schools. Australian Government. https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/662684_tgta_accessible_final_0.pdf
Dinham, S. (2016). Leading learning and teaching. Vic, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Dulfer, N., Polesel, J., & Rice, S. (2012). The experience of education: The impacts of high stakes testing on school students and their families. Sydney: Whitlam Institute.
Forster, M. (2009). Assessment: The heart of effective practice. Professional Educator, 8(4), 11–14.
Francis I. (2013) Apostolic exhortation, Evangelii Gaudium of the Holy Father Francis to the bishops, clergy, consecrated persons and the lay faithful on the proclamation of the Gospel in today’s world. http://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/apost_exhortations/documents/papa-francesco_esortazione-ap_20131124_evangelii-gaudium.html
Frey, N., Hattie, J., & Fisher, D. (2018) Developing assessment-capable visible learners, grades K-12. CA, USA: Corwin Press; and Toronto: Ontario Principals’ Council.
Fullan, M. (2019) Nuance, why some leaders succeed and others fail. CA, USA: Corwin Press; and Toronto: Ontario Principals’ Council.
Fullan, M., & Quinn, J. (2016) Coherence making. CA, USA: Corwin Press; and Toronto: Ontario Principals’ Council.
Gardner, J. (2012). Assessment and learning (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
Goldburg, P. (2019). Pedagogical content knowledge: A missing piece of the puzzle that is religious education in Catholic schools. Learning and leading in a pluralist world. In M. T. Buchanan & A. Gellel (Eds.), Global perspectives on Catholic religious education in schools (Vol. II, pp. 245–258). Singapore: Springer.
Grajczonek, J. (2019). Early childhood religious education: It matters, but what is its matter? In M. T. Buchanan & A. Gellel (Eds.), Global perspectives on Catholic religious education in schools. Learning and leading in a pluralist world (Vol. II, pp. 259–270). Singapore: Springer.
Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2007). Statistics for the behavioural sciences (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth.
Hackett, C. (2006) A longitudinal study of the personal and professional responses of recently assigned secondary religious education teachers to curriculum demands. (Doctoral thesis, The University of Notre Dame Australia). http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theses/1
Hackett, C. (2010). The role of experiential content knowledge in the formation of beginning RE teachers. Journal of Religious Education, 58(1), 38–49.
Hackett, C., Sayce, D., & Alteri, D. (2017). Curriculum overview “The truth will set you free”: Religious education in Western Australia. In R. Rymarz & A. Belmonte (Eds.), Religious education in Australian Catholic schools, exploring the landscape (pp. 264–283). Australia: Vaughan Publishing.
Harlen, W. (2007). Assessment of learning. London, UK: Sage.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. London, UK: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Healy, H., & Bush, H. (2010). Moderation: Making learning a priority in primary religious education. Journal of Religious Education, 58(1), 29–37.
Hill, P., & Barber, M. (2014). Preparing for a renaissance in assessment. London, UK: Pearson.
Holohan, G. J. (1999). Australian religious education: Facing the challenge. Canberra, ACT: National Catholic Education Commission.
Hyde, B., & Rymarz, R. (2009). Religious education in Catholic primary schools: Contemporary issues and perspectives for RE teachers. Terrigal, NSW: David Barlow Publishing.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
Kelly, A. V. (2009). The curriculum. Theory and practice (6th ed.). London, UK: Sage.
Lee, J. (2008). Is test-driven external accountability effective? Synthesizing the evidence from cross-state causal-comparative and correlational studied. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 608–644.
Libreria Editrice Vaticana. (1983) Codex Iuris Canonici. Code of Canon Law. http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/_INDEX.HTM
Lingard, B., Martino, W., & Rezai-Rashti, G. (2013). Testing regimes, accountabilities and education policy: commensurate global and national developments. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 539–556.
Liu, S. X. (2014). Statistical power analysis for the social and behavioral sciences: Basic and advanced techniques. New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
MacDonald, M. (1990). Assessment and reporting in religious education. Canberra, ACT: National Catholic Education Commission.
Masters, G. N. (2018). A Commitment to growth. Essays on education. Victoria: Australian Council of Educational Research Press.
McKinney, S. J., & Sullivan, J. (Eds.). (2013) Education in a catholic perspective. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Moran, G. (2016) Missed opportunities: Rethinking Catholic education. IN USA: iUniverse.
National Catholic Education Commission. (2018) Framing paper, Religious Education in Australian Catholic schools. https://www.ncec.catholic.edu.au/images/NCEC_Framing_Paper_Religious_Education.pdf
O’Donoghue, T. A., & Byrne, D. (2014) Historical inquiry into the construction of religion as a school subject for Catholic schools in Australia. eJournal of Catholic Education in Australasia, 1(2). http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/ecea/vol1/iss1/2
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2005). On becoming a pragmatic researcher: The importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(5), 357–387.
Paul VI. (1975) Evangelii nuntiandi. Apostolic exhortation. http://w2.vatican.va/content/paul-vi/en/apost_exhortations/documents/hf_p-vi_exh_19751208_evangelii-nuntiandi.html
Pettit, P. (2010). From data-informed to data-led? School leadership within the context of external testing. Leading & Managing, 16(2), 90–107.
Poncini, A. (2018) Perceptions of large-scale, standardised testing in religious education: How do religious educators perceive The Bishops’ Religious Literacy Assessment? (Doctoral thesis, The University of Notre Dame Australia). https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theses/210
Punch, K. F. (2009). Introduction to research methods in education. London, UK: Sage.
Rossiter, G. (2017). A personal, critical perspective on the development of Australian Catholic school religious education: Where to from here? In R. Rymarz & A. Belmonte (Eds.), Religious education in Australian Catholic schools, exploring the landscape (pp. 264–283). Australia: Vaughan Publishing.
Ryan, M. (2013). A common search. The history and forms of religious education in Catholic schools (2nd ed.). Brisbane, Qld: Lumino Press.
Rymarz, R. (2011). Catechesis and religious education in Canadian Catholic schools. Religious Education, 106(5), 537–549.
Rymarz, R., & Sharkey, P. (2019). Moving from theory to practice. Religious educators in the classroom. Australia: Vaughan Publishing.
Scott, K. (2019). The teacher of religion: Choosing between professions in Catholic schools. Learning and leading in a pluralist world. In M. T. Buchanan & A. Gellel (Eds.), Global perspectives on Catholic religious education in schools (Vol. II, pp. 3–14). Singapore: Springer.
Shaddock, A. (2014). Using data to improve learning: A practical guide for busy teachers. Vic, Australia: Australian Council of Educational Research.
Sullivan, J. (2016). A space like no other. In M. Shanahan, (Ed.), Does religious education matter? (pp. 7–24). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Thompson, G. (2012). The effects of NAPLAN (National Assessment Program, Literacy and Numeracy): Executive summary. Perth, WA: Murdoch University.
Thompson, G., & Harbaugh, A. (2013). A preliminary analysis of teacher perceptions of the effects of NAPLAN on pedagogy and curriculum. Australian Education Researcher, 40(3), 299–314.
Thompson, G., & Mockler, N. (2016). Principals of audit: testing, data and implicated advocacy. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 48(1), 1–18.
Timperley, H. (2013). Leading teachers’ professional learning. In J. Robertson & H. Timperley (Eds.), Leadership and learning (pp. 118–130). Victoria, Australia: Hawker-Brownlow Education.
Vatican Council II. (1965d). Declaration on christian education, Gravissimum educationis. http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decl_19651028_gravissimum-educationis_en.html
White, D. (2004). Pedagogy – The missing link in religious education: Implications of brain-based learning theory for the development of a pedagogical framework for Religious Education. (Doctoral thesis, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, NSW). http://researchbank.acu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1102&context=theses
Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing measures: An item response modelling approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wu, M., Tam, H. P., & Jen, T. (2016). Educational measurement for applied researchers: Theory into practice. Singapore: Springer Nature.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Poncini, A. Research insights: perceived differences about teaching and assessment practices in religious education. j. relig. educ. 69, 37–56 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-020-00129-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-020-00129-z