Skip to content
Publicly Available Published by De Gruyter February 19, 2019

On the solvability of a nonlocal problem for the system of Sobolev-type differential equations with integral condition

  • Anar T. Assanova EMAIL logo

Abstract

Sufficient conditions for the existence and uniqueness of a classical solution to a nonlocal problem for a system of Sobolev-type differential equations with integral condition are established. By introducing a new unknown function, we reduce the considered problem to an equivalent problem consisting of a nonlocal problem for the system of hyperbolic equations of second order with a functional parameter and an integral relation. We propose the algorithm for finding an approximate solution to the investigated problem and prove its convergence.

1 Introduction

In this paper, in the domain Ω=[0,T]×[0,ω], we consider the following nonlocal problem for a system of Sobolev-type differential equations with integral condition:

(1.1)3ux2t=A(t,x)2ux2+B(t,x)2uxt+C(t,x)ux+D(t,x)u+f(t,x),
(1.2)M2(x)2u(0,x)x2+M1(x)u(0,x)x+L2(x)2u(a,x)x2+L1(x)u(a,x)x+0b[K2(τ,x)2u(τ,x)x2+K1(τ,x)u(τ,x)x]dτ=φ(x),x[0,ω],
(1.3)u(t,0)=ψ1(t),t[0,T],
(1.4)u(t,x)x|x=0=ψ2(t),

where u(t,x)=col(u1(t,x),u2(t,x),,un(t,x)) is an unknown function, the n×n matrices A(t,x), B(t,x), C(t,x), D(t,x) and the n vector function f(t,x) are continuous on Ω, the n×n matrices K1(t,x) and K2(t,x) are continuous on Ω, the n×n matrices M2(x), M1(x), L2(x), L1(x) and the n vector function φ(x) are continuous on [0,ω], 0aT, 0bT, the n vector functions ψ1(t) and ψ2(t) are continuously differentiable on [0,T].

Let C(Ω,Rn) be a space of vector functions u(t,x), continuous on Ω, with the norm

u0=max(t,x)Ωu(t,x),u(t,x)=maxi=1,n¯|ui(t,x)|.

Let C([0,ω],Rn) be a space of vector functions φ(x), continuous on [0,ω], with the norm

φ0=maxx[0,ω]φ(x).

Let C1([0,T],Rn) be a space of vector functions ψ(t), continuously differentiable on [0,T], with the norm

ψ1=max(maxt[0,T]ψ(t),maxt[0,T]ψ˙(t)).

The function u(t,x)C(Ω,Rn) that has the partial derivatives

u(t,x)xC(Ω,Rn),u(t,x)tC(Ω,Rn),2u(t,x)x2C(Ω,Rn),2u(t,x)xtC(Ω,Rn),3u(t,x)x2tC(Ω,Rn)

is called a classical solution to problem (1.1)–(1.4) if it satisfies system (1.1) for all (t,x)Ω and boundary conditions (1.2), (1.3) and (1.4).

Nonlocal problems for a system of Sobolev-type differential equations appear while studying a variety of physical problems [1, 2, 6, 32, 33, 34]. Some classes of nonlocal problems for partial differential equations of third order are investigated in the papers [10, 23, 28, 33]. Depending on the methods applied, conditions for the solvability of nonlocal problems are obtained in different terms. In [25], an initial-boundary value problem for linear hyperbolic equations of higher orders with two independent variables is studied. Conditions for the well-posedness of the considered problem in terms of the well-posedness of the boundary value problem for ordinary differential equations with parameter are established. In [14, 16, 15, 17, 19, 20, 25, 24, 21, 22, 29, 31], the solvability questions are investigated for initial-boundary value problems for linear and nonlinear hyperbolic equations of higher order with two variables. The study of the questions of solvability and construction of approximate solutions to nonlocal problems for Sobolev-type differential equations and systems with integral condition is very important and relevant in connection with numerous applications.

In the present paper, we study the existence of classical solutions to a nonlocal problem with an integral condition for the system of Sobolev-type differential equations (1.1)–(1.4) and propose the methods of constructing their approximate solutions. A nonlocal boundary value problem for a system of Sobolev-type differential equations has not previously been considered.

In [4], a linear boundary value problem with integral condition for a system of hyperbolic equations of second order was investigated for the case a=b=T. The sufficient conditions for unique solvability were obtained, and a method for finding solutions to the considered problem was proposed. Subsequently, the well-posedness criteria for that problem was established in terms of initial data. For this, some new unknown functions, which are related to the first-order derivatives of the sought functions, were introduced. Thus the problem was reduced to an equivalent problem involving a family of boundary value problems for ordinary differential equations and the integral relations. The equivalence of the well-posedness of the considered problem to the well-posedness of a family of boundary value problems is proved.

In this paper, the results and methods of [4] are extended to a new class of problems, namely, nonlocal problems with integral condition for a system of Sobolev-type differential equations. The nonlocal problem for the system of Sobolev-type differential equations with integral condition is reduced to a nonlocal problem with integral condition for a system of hyperbolic equations of second order and the integral relation. We establish the sufficient conditions for the unique solvability of a nonlocal boundary value problem with integral condition (1.1)–(1.4) in terms of the system’s right-hand side, boundary functions and integral kernels. Algorithms for finding a solution to the considered problem are constructed, and their convergence is shown. The results can be used for the numerical solution of applied problems.

2 Reduction to an equivalent problem and the algorithm

In this section, we introduce the new unknown function v(t,x)=u(t,x)x and reduce problem (1.1)–(1.4) to the equivalent problem

(2.1)2vxt=A(t,x)vx+B(t,x)vt+C(t,x)v+D(t,x)u+f(t,x),
(2.2)M2(x)v(0,x)x+M1(x)v(0,x)+L2(x)v(a,x)x+L1(x)v(a,x)+0b[K2(τ,x)v(τ,x)x+K1(τ,x)v(τ,x)]dτ=φ(x),x[0,ω],
(2.3)v(t,0)=ψ2(t),t[0,T],
(2.4)u(t,x)=ψ1(t)+0xv(t,ξ)dξ,(t,x)Ω.

For problem (2.1)–(2.4), the condition u(t,0)=ψ1(t) is taken into account in relation (2.4).

A pair {v(t,x),u(t,x)} of functions, continuous on Ω, is called a solution to problem (2.1)–(2.4) if the function v(t,x) belonging to C(Ω,Rn) has the continuous partial derivatives v(t,x)x, v(t,x)t, 2v(t,x)xt on Ω and satisfies the nonlocal problem with integral condition for a system of hyperbolic equations of second order (2.1)–(2.3), where the function u(t,x) is connected with v(t,x) by the functional relation (2.4).

Let u(t,x) be a classical solution to problem (1.1)–(1.4). Then the pair {v(t,x), u(t,x)}, where v(t,x)=u(t,x)x, is a solution to problem (2.1)–(2.4). Conversely, if the pair {v~(t,x),u~(t,x)} is a solution to problem (2.1)–(2.4), then u~(t,x) is a classical solution to problem (1.1)–(1.4).

For fixed u(t,x), problem (2.1)–(2.3) is a nonlocal problem with integral condition for a system of hyperbolic equations of second order. Nonlocal problems with and without integral condition for the system of hyperbolic equations (2.1) were studied by many authors [4, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 18, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 35, 36, 37]. A general linear boundary value problem with integral condition for a system of hyperbolic equations was investigated in [4] for a=b=T.

System (2.1) depends on the unknown function u(t,x). For fixed v(t,x), the function u(t,x) is determined from the integral relation (2.4).

If we know v(t,x)C(Ω,Rn), then we find u(t,x)C(Ω,Rn) from the integral relation (2.4). Conversely, if we know u(t,x)C(Ω,Rn), then we can find v(t,x)C(Ω,Rn) from problem (2.1)–(2.3). Since v(t,x) and u(t,x) are unknown, to find a solution to problem (2.1)–(2.4), we use an iterative method. Determine a pair {v(t,x), u(t,x)}C(Ω,Rn)×C(Ω,Rn) as a limit of the sequence {v(m)(t,x),u(m)(t,x)}C(Ω,Rn)×C(Ω,Rn), m=0,1,2,, by the following algorithm:

  1. Solving the nonlocal problem with integral condition for a hyperbolic equation of second order (2.1)–(2.3) for u(t,x)=ψ1(t), we find the initial approximation v(0)(t,x)C(Ω,Rn). Further, from the integral relation (2.4), under v(t,x)=v(0)(t,x), we determine u(0)(t,x)C(Ω,Rn).

  2. From the nonlocal problem (2.1)–(2.3) for u(t,x)=u(0)(t,x) on Ω, we find v(1)(t,x)C(Ω,Rn). Further, from the integral relation (2.4), under v(t,x)=v(1)(t,x), we determine u(1)(t,x)C(Ω,Rn).

    And so on.

  3. From the nonlocal problem (2.1)–(2.3), for u(t,x)=u(m-1)(t,x) on Ω, we find v(m)(t,x)C(Ω,Rn). Further, from the integral relation (2.4), under v(t,x)=v(m)(t,x), we determine u(m)(t,x)C(Ω,Rn), m=1,2,.

This algorithm divides the process of finding unknown functions into two parts:

  1. From the nonlocal problem with integral condition for a system of hyperbolic equations of second order (2.1)–(2.3), we find the introduced function v(t,x).

  2. From the integral relation (2.4), we find the unknown function u(t,x).

3 Solvability conditions for problem (1.1)–(1.4)

In this section, we use an auxiliary problem for establishing conditions of unique solvability to problem (1.1)–(1.4). Consider the family of boundary value problems with integral condition for the system of ordinary differential equations

(3.1)Vt=A(t,x)V+F(t,x),
(3.2)M2(x)V(0,x)+L2(x)V(a,x)+0bK2(τ,x)V(τ,x)dτ=Φ(x),

where V(t,x) is an unknown function, the n vector function F(t,x) is continuous on Ω, the n vector function Φ(x) is continuous on [0,ω], x[0,ω].

A continuous function V:Ωn that has a continuous derivative with respect to t on Ω is called a solution to the family of boundary value problems with integral condition (3.1), (3.2) if it satisfies system (3.1) and condition (3.2) for all (t,x)Ω and x[0,ω], respectively.

For fixed x[0,ω], problem (3.1), (3.2) is a linear boundary value problem with integral condition for the system of ordinary differential equations. Suppose a variable x takes values on the interval [0,ω]; then we obtain a family of boundary value problems with an integral condition for ordinary differential equations.

The following theorem provides the conditions of unique solvability to problem (1.1)–(1.4) in terms of the solvability of family of problems (3.1), (3.2).

Theorem 3.1.

Problem (1.1)–(1.4) is uniquely solvable, and its solution u(t,x) admits the estimate

max(u0,ux0,ut0,2uxt0,2uxx0,3ux2t0)Mmax(f0,φ0,ψ11,ψ21)

for some M>0 if the n×n matrix

N(x)=M2(x)Z(0,x)+L2(x)Z(a,x)+0bK2(τ,x)Z(τ,x)dτ

is invertible for every x[0,ω], where Z is the solution of the Cauchy problem

Zt=A(t,x)Z,Z(0,x)=I,

and I is the identity matrix.

Proof.

Let Z be the solution of the Cauchy problem

Zt=A(t,x)Z,Z(0,x)=I.

Consider the family of boundary value problems (3.1), (3.2). According to the Cauchy formula [13, p. 48], the vector function

(3.3)V(t,x)=Z(t,x)[c(x)+0tZ-1(τ,x)F(τ,x)dτ]

is a solution of system (3.1) for every c(x)C([0,ω],n). Vice versa, for every solution of this system, there exists c(x)C([0,ω],n) such that representation (3.3) is valid.

Substituting representation (3.3) into condition (3.2), we have

[M2(x)Z(0,x)+L2(x)Z(a,x)+0bK2(τ,x)Z(τ,x)dτ]c(x)+L2(x)Z(a,x)0aZ-1(τ,x)F(τ,x)dτ+0bK2(τ,x)Z(τ,x)0τZ-1(τ1,x)F(τ1,x)dτ1dτ=Φ(x),x[0,ω].

Hence we obtain

(3.4)N(x)c(x)=Φ(x)-L2(x)Z(a,x)0aZ-1(τ,x)F(τ,x)dτ-0bK2(τ,x)Z(τ,x)0τZ-1(τ1,x)F(τ1,x)dτ1dτ,x[0,ω].

If the n×n matrix N(x) is invertible for all x[0,ω], then the system of functional equations (3.4) has a unique solution

c(x)=N-1(x){Φ(x)-L2(x)Z(a,x)0aZ-1(τ,x)F(τ,x)dτ-0bK2(τ,x)Z(τ,x)0τZ-1(τ1,x)F(τ1,x)dτ1dτ},x[0,ω].

Replacing c(x) by c(x) in (3.3), we obtain the representation of a unique solution of the family of problems (3.1), (3.2)

V(t,x)=Z(t,x)[N-1(x){Φ(x)-L2(x)Z(a,x)0aZ-1(τ,x)F(τ,x)dτ-0bK2(τ,x)Z(τ,x)0τZ-1(τ1,x)F(τ1,x)dτ1dτ}+0tZ-1(τ,x)F(τ,x)dτ].

The solution V satisfies the estimate

(3.5)V0Kmax(F0,Φ0),

where the constant K is independent of F, Φ and x[0,ω].

Therefore, under the condition that the matrix N(x) is invertible for all x[0,ω], the family of problems (3.1), (3.2) is uniquely solvable, and its solution V admits estimate (3.5), i.e., problem (3.1), (3.2) is well-posed.

Further, we apply the results of [4] for the case N=1 without partitioning the domain Ω and 0aT, 0bT.

Similarly to [4, Theorem 1], the well-posed solvability of problem (3.1), (3.2) implies the well-posed solvability for the nonlocal problem (2.1)–(2.4). In addition, the solution of problem (2.1)–(2.4) satisfies the estimate

max(v0,vt0,2vxt0,2vxx0,u0)Mmax(f0,φ0,ψ11,ψ21),

where the constant M is independent of f, φ, ψ1 and ψ2.

Then, from the equivalence of problem (2.1)–(2.4) and (1.1)–(1.4), we obtain the well-posed solvability of the original problem (1.1)–(1.4) and the following estimate is valid:

max(u0,ux0,ut0,2uxt0,2uxx0,3ux2t0)Mmax(f0,φ0,ψ11,ψ21).

The proof of Theorem 3.1 is complete. ∎

Now let us state the main theorem on the feasibility and convergence of the proposed algorithm. The assertion also provides the sufficient conditions for the unique solvability of problem (1.1)–(1.4).

Let Ps(t,x) be a matrix of the form

Ps(t,x)=I+0tA(τ1,x)dτ1++0tA(τ1,x)0τs-2A(τs-1,x)0τs-1A(τs,x)dτsdτ1,

where s. It is clear that Ps(t,x)Z(t,x) as s on Ω (see [11, p. 145]).

Introduce the notations

α(x)=maxt[0,T]A(t,x),(t,x)Ω,h=max(a,b),L~(x)=L2(x)+maxt[0,T]K2(t,x)b.

Theorem 3.2.

Suppose that, for s>s0 with some s0>0, the n×n matrix

Qs(x)=M2(x)+L2(x)Ps(a,x)+0bK2(τ,x)Ps(τ,x)dτ

is invertible for all x[0,ω], and the following inequalities hold:

  1. [Qs(x)]-1γs(x), where γs(x) is a positive continuous function on [0,ω];

  2. qs(x)=γs(x)L~(x)[eα(x)h-1-j=1s[α(x)h]jj!]χ<1, where χ is constant.

Then the nonlocal problem (1.1)–(1.4) has a unique classical solution u(t,x)C(Ω,Rn).

Proof.

By the assumptions of the theorem, the n×n matrix

Qs(x)=M2(x)+L2(x)Ps(a,x)+0bK2(τ,x)Ps(τ,x)dτ

is invertible for all x[0,ω], and the inequalities (i), (ii) hold.

Then the nonlocal problem with integral condition for the system of hyperbolic equations

(3.6)2vxt=A(t,x)vx+B(t,x)vt+C(t,x)v+F0(t,x),
(3.7)M2(x)v(0,x)x+M1(x)v(0,x)+L2(x)v(a,x)x+L1(x)v(a,x)+0b[K2(τ,x)v(τ,x)x+K1(τ,x)v(τ,x)]dτ=φ(x),x[0,ω],
(3.8)v(t,0)=ψ2(t),t[0,T],

has a unique classical solution for any F0(t,x)C(Ω,Rn), φ(x)C([0,ω],Rn) and ψ2(t)C1([0,T],Rn).

We use the equivalence of problems (1.1)–(1.4) and (2.1)–(2.4). Find a solution {v(t,x),u(t,x)} to problem (2.1)–(2.4) by the algorithm given above. Take ψ1(t) as the initial approximation of u(t,x), and then find v(0)(t,x) by solving the problem

(3.9)2vxt=A(t,x)vx+B(t,x)vt+C(t,x)v+D(t,x)ψ1(t)+f(t,x),
(3.10)M2(x)v(0,x)x+M1(x)v(0,x)+L2(x)v(a,x)x+L1(x)v(a,x)+0b[K2(τ,x)v(τ,x)x+K1(τ,x)v(τ,x)]dτ=φ(x),x[0,ω],
(3.11)v(t,0)=ψ2(t),t[0,T].

Under conditions (i), (ii) of the theorem, problem (3.9)–(3.11) has a unique classical solution v(0)(t,x). Then, from the integral relation (2.4), we determine u(0)(t,x) as follows:

u(0)(t,x)=ψ1(t)+0xv(0)(t,ξ)dξ,(t,x)Ω.

Accordingly, from the (m-1)-th step of the algorithm, we find v(m-1)(t,x) and u(m-1)(t,x) for all (t,x)Ω. Then v(m)(t,x) can be found by solving problem (2.1)–(2.3), where u(t,x)=u(m-1)(t,x), m=1,2,. Once v(m)(t,x) is found, successive approximations for u(t,x) are found from the integral relation (2.4):

u(m)(t,x)=ψ1(t)+0xv(m)(t,ξ)dξ,(t,x)Ω.

Construct the differences Δv(m)(t,x)=v(m)(t,x)-v(m-1)(t,x), Δu(m)(t,x)=u(m)(t,x)-u(m-1)(t,x), and establish the estimates

(3.12)maxt[0,T]Δv(m+1)(t,x)Hd(x)maxt[0,T]Δu(m)(t,x),
(3.13)maxt[0,T]Δu(m)(t,x)0xmaxt[0,T]Δv(m)(t,ξ)dξ,

where

H=max(eH0H1ω[1+ωH0],H2[H1(1+ωH0)+1]),H0=max(H2,A0H2+1),
H1=maxx[0,ω]max(maxt[0,T]B(t,x)+maxt[0,T]C(t,x),M1(x)+L1(x)+bmaxt[0,T]K1(t,x)),
H2=maxx[0,ω][k1(x,s)+k2(x,s)],
k1(x,s)=γs(x)1-qs(x)L~(x)[α(x)h]ss!k0(x,s)+hγs(x)max{1+L~(x)j=0s-1[α(x)h]jj!,j=0s-1[α(x)h]jj!},
k2(x,s)={[eα(x)h-1]γs(x)1-qs(x)L~(x)[α(x)h]ss!+1}k0(x,s),
k0(x,s)=[eα(x)h-1]γs(x)max{1+L~(x)j=0s-1[α(x)h]jj!,j=0s-1[α(x)h]jj!}h+heα(x)h,
d(x)=maxt[0,T]D(t,x),

and they are independent of f, ψ1, ψ2 and φ.

This implies the main inequality

maxt[0,T]Δv(m+1)(t,x)Hd(x)0xmaxt[0,T]Δv(m)(t,ξ)dξ.

It follows from (3.12) that the sequence {v(m)(t,x)} is convergent in the space C(Ω,Rn) as k. Then the uniform convergence on Ω of the sequence {u(m)(t,x)} follows from estimate (3.13).

Therefore, the limit functions v(t,x) and u(t,x) are continuous on Ω, and the pair {v(t,x), u(t,x)} is a solution to problem (2.1)–(2.4). We obtain

(3.14)max(v0,u0)(1+ω)eHd0ωmax(f0,ψ11,ψ21,φ0),

where d0=maxx[0,ω]d(x).

Now let {v~(t,x),u~(t,x)} be a solution to problem (2.1)–(2.4), where f(t,x)=0, ψ1(t)=0, ψ2(t)=0 and φ(x)=0 for all (t,x)Ω. Then the unique solvability of problem (3.6)–(3.8) in combination with (2.4) implies v~(t,x)=0 and u~(t,x)=0 for all (t,x)Ω. Thus, it follows from estimate (3.14) that problem (2.1)–(2.4) is uniquely solvable. Then, from the equivalence of problem (2.1)–(2.4) and (1.1)–(1.4), the unique solvability to problem (1.1)–(1.4) follows. The classical solution u(t,x)C(Ω,Rn) to problem (1.1)–(1.4) satisfies the inequality

u0(1+ω)eHd0ωmax(f0,ψ11,ψ21,φ0).

Note that conditions (i), (ii) guarantee the invertibility of the matrix N(x) for all x[0,ω].


Dedicated to the 100th anniversary of academician Yu. A. Mitropol’skiĭ


Award Identifier / Grant number: 0822/ΓΦ4

Award Identifier / Grant number: AP05131220

Funding statement: This research is partially supported by Grants No. 0822/ΓΦ4 and No. AP05131220 of Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic Kazakhstan.

Acknowledgements

The author thanks the referees for their careful reading of the manuscript and for giving constructive comments which helped essentially to improve the paper.

References

[1] A. I. Aristov, On the Cauchy problem for a Sobolev-type equation with a quadratic nonlinearity (in Russian), Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk Ser. Mat. 75 (2011), no. 5, 3–18; translation in Izv. Math. 75 (2011), no. 5, 871–887. Search in Google Scholar

[2] A. I. Aristov, On the Cauchy problem for a nonlinear Sobolev type equation (in Russian), Differ. Uravn. 50 (2014), no. 1, 117–120; translation in Differ. Equ. 50 (2014), no. 1, 117–121. 10.1134/S0012266114010157Search in Google Scholar

[3] A. T. Asanova, On solvability of nonlinear boundary value problems with integral condition for the system of hyperbolic equations, Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. 2015 (2015), Paper No. 63. 10.14232/ejqtde.2015.1.63Search in Google Scholar

[4] A. T. Asanova and D. S. Dzhumabaev, Well-posedness of nonlocal boundary value problems with integral condition for the system of hyperbolic equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 402 (2013), no. 1, 167–178. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2013.01.012Search in Google Scholar

[5] A. K. Aziz, Periodic solutions of hyperbolic partial differential equations, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 17 (1966), 557–566. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1966-0196268-XSearch in Google Scholar

[6] H. Brill, A semilinear Sobolev evolution equation in a Banach space, J. Differential Equations 24 (1977), no. 3, 412–425. 10.1016/0022-0396(77)90009-2Search in Google Scholar

[7] L. Byszewski, Theorem about existence and uniqueness of continuous solution of nonlocal problem for nonlinear hyperbolic equation, Appl. Anal. 40 (1991), no. 2–3, 173–180. 10.1080/00036819108840001Search in Google Scholar

[8] L. Byszewski and V. Lakshmikantham, Monotone iterative technique for nonlocal hyperbolic differential problem, J. Math. Phys. Sci. 26 (1992), no. 4, 345–359. Search in Google Scholar

[9] L. Cesari, Periodic solutions of partial differential equations, Qualitative Methods in the Theory of Non-linear Vibrations, Izdat. Akad. Nauk Ukrain. SSR, Kiev (1961), 440–457. 10.1016/B978-0-12-395651-4.50010-6Search in Google Scholar

[10] D. Colton, Pseudoparabolic equations in one space variable, J. Differential Equations 12 (1972), 559–565. 10.1016/0022-0396(72)90025-3Search in Google Scholar

[11] Y. L. Daletskiĭ and M. G. Kreĭn, Stability of Solutions of Differential Equations in Banach Space (in Russian), Nonlinear Anal. Appl. Ser., Izdat. “Nauka”, Moscow, 1970. Search in Google Scholar

[12] N. D. Golubeva and L. S. Pul’kina, On a nonlocal problem with integral conditions (in Russian), Mat. Zametki 59 (1996), no. 3, 456–458; translation in Math. Notes 59 (1996), no. 3-4, 326–328. 10.1007/BF02308548Search in Google Scholar

[13] P. Hartman, Ordinary Differential Equations, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1964. Search in Google Scholar

[14] R. Hryniv and I. Kmit, On a nonclassical problem for some quasilinear hyperbolic equation, Nonlinear Anal. 51 (2002), no. 8, 1405–1419. 10.1016/S0362-546X(01)00905-1Search in Google Scholar

[15] S. Kharibegashvili, Some multidimensional problems for hyperbolic partial differential equations and systems, Mem. Differ. Equ. Math. Phys. 37 (2006), 1–136. Search in Google Scholar

[16] S. S. Kharibegashvili, On the well-posedness of some nonlocal problems for the wave equation (in Russian), Differ. Uravn. 39 (2003), no. 4, 539–553, 575; translation in Differ. Equ. 39 (2003), no. 4, 577–592. Search in Google Scholar

[17] I. Kiguradze and T. Kiguradze, On solvability of boundary value problems for higher order nonlinear hyperbolic equations, Nonlinear Anal. 69 (2008), no. 7, 1914–1933. 10.1016/j.na.2007.07.033Search in Google Scholar

[18] T. Kiguradze, Some boundary value problems for systems of linear partial differential equations of hyperbolic type, Mem. Differ. Equ. Math. Phys. 1 (1994), 1–144. Search in Google Scholar

[19] T. Kiguradze, On some boundary value problems for nonlinear degenerate hyperbolic equations of higher order, Mem. Differ. Equ. Math. Phys. 31 (2004), 117–122. Search in Google Scholar

[20] T. Kiguradze, On solvability and well-posedness of boundary value problems for nonlinear hyperbolic equations of the fourth order, Georgian Math. J. 15 (2008), no. 3, 555–569. 10.1515/GMJ.2008.555Search in Google Scholar

[21] T. Kiguradze and V. Lakshmikantham, On the Dirichlet problem for fourth-order linear hyperbolic equations, Nonlinear Anal. 49 (2002), no. 2, 197–219. 10.1016/S0362-546X(01)00101-8Search in Google Scholar

[22] T. Kiguradze and V. Lakshmikantham, On the Dirichlet problem in a characteristic rectangle for higher order linear hyperbolic equations, Nonlinear Anal. 50 (2002), no. 8, 1153–1178. 10.1016/S0362-546X(01)00806-9Search in Google Scholar

[23] T. Kiguradze and V. Lakshmikantham, On initial-boundary value problems in bounded and unbounded domains for a class of nonlinear hyperbolic equations of the third order, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 324 (2006), no. 2, 1242–1261. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.12.067Search in Google Scholar

[24] T. I. Kiguradze and T. Kusano, On ill-posed initial-boundary value problems for higher-order linear hyperbolic equations with two independent variables (in Russian), Differ. Uravn. 39 (2003), no. 10, 1379–1394, 1438–1394; translation in Differ. Equ. 39 (2003), no. 10, 1454–1470. 10.1023/B:DIEQ.0000017918.27580.bdSearch in Google Scholar

[25] T. I. Kiguradze and T. Kusano, On the well-posedness of initial-boundary value problems for higher-order linear hyperbolic equations with two independent variables (in Russian), Differ. Uravn. 39 (2003), no. 4, 516–526, 575; translation in Differ. Equ. 39 (2003), no. 4, 553–563. Search in Google Scholar

[26] V. Lakshmikantham and S. G. Pandit, Periodic solutions of hyperbolic partial differential equations. Hyperbolic partial differential equations. II, Comput. Math. Appl. 11 (1985), no. 1–3, 249–259. 10.1016/0898-1221(85)90150-6Search in Google Scholar

[27] Y. A. Mitropol’skiĭ and L. B. Urmancheva, The two-point problem for systems of hyperbolic equations (in Russian), Ukrain. Mat. Zh. 42 (1990), no. 12, 1657–1663; translation in Ukrainian Math. J. 42 (1990), no. 12, 1492–1498. 10.1007/BF01060820Search in Google Scholar

[28] A. M. Nakhushev, Problems with Shift for a Partial Differential Equations (in Russian), Nauka, Moskow, 2006. Search in Google Scholar

[29] B. I. Ptashnik, Ill-Posed Boundary Value Problems for Partial Differential Equations (in Russian), “Naukova Dumka”, Kiev, 1984. Search in Google Scholar

[30] A. M. Samoilenko and B. P. Tkach, Numerical-Analytical Methods in the Theory of Periodical Solutions of Equations with Partial Derivatives (in Russian), “Naukova Dumka”, Kiev, 1992. Search in Google Scholar

[31] Q. Sheng and R. P. Agarwal, Existence and uniqueness of periodic solutions for higher order hyperbolic partial differential equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 181 (1994), no. 2, 392–406. 10.1006/jmaa.1994.1030Search in Google Scholar

[32] R. E. Showalter, Existence and representation theorems for a semilinear Sobolev equation in Banach space, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 3 (1972), 527–543. 10.1137/0503051Search in Google Scholar

[33] S. L. Sobolev, On a new problem of mathematical physics (in Russian), Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR. Ser. Mat. 18 (1954), 3–50. 10.1007/978-0-387-34149-1_9Search in Google Scholar

[34] B. Soltanalizadeh, H. Roohani Ghehsareh and S. Abbasbandy, A super accurate shifted Tau method for numerical computation of the Sobolev-type differential equation with nonlocal boundary conditions, Appl. Math. Comput. 236 (2014), 683–692. 10.1016/j.amc.2014.03.044Search in Google Scholar

[35] B. P. Tkach and L. B. Urmancheva, A numerical-analytic method for finding solutions of systems with distributed parameters and an integral condition (in Russian), Nelīnīĭnī Koliv. 12 (2009), no. 1, 110–119; translation in Nonlinear Oscil. (N. Y.) 12 (2009), no. 1, 113–122. 10.1007/s11072-009-0064-6Search in Google Scholar

[36] G. Vidossich, Periodic solutions of hyperbolic equations using ordinary differential equations, Nonlinear Anal. 17 (1991), no. 8, 703–710. 10.1016/0362-546X(91)90207-HSearch in Google Scholar

[37] S. V. Zhestkov, The Goursat problem with integral boundary conditions (in Russian), Ukrain. Mat. Zh. 42 (1990), no. 1, 132–135; translation in Ukrainian Math. J. 42 (1990), no. 1, 119–122. 10.1007/BF01066375Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-02-01
Revised: 2017-07-25
Accepted: 2017-09-07
Published Online: 2019-02-19
Published in Print: 2021-02-01

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 20.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/gmj-2019-2011/html
Scroll to top button