Abstract
Peirce’s Syllabus is examined and used to interpret metaphoric iconic stereotypes applied to Indigenous people: “noble savage,” “bloodthirsty savage,” “domestic dependent nation,” “vanishing race,” “Indian tribe,” and “ecological Indian.” Efforts on the part of the Indigenous to replace the these stereotypes with different icons such as “Native American,” “First Nations,” and, most recently, “water protectors,” are also examined. The usefulness of representamen categories from Peirce’s Syllabus, “rhematic,” “Argument,” “dicent,” “indexical,” “qualisign,” “legisign,” and “sinsign,” is demonstrated. Greimas’ observations about the functions of modalities are brought in to explain how graphic images and portraiture, fictional and memoir narratives, legal discourses, and popular media representations implement various sections of the Syllabus. Putting Peirce’s Syllabus into action confirms its ability to perform dynamic, diachronic, and diagrammatic functions.
References
Altick, Richard. 1978. The shows of London. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University.Search in Google Scholar
Berkhofer, Robert. 1978. The white man’s Indian. New York: Knopf.Search in Google Scholar
Billington, Ray Allen. 1985. Land of savagery, land of promise. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Search in Google Scholar
Clemmer-Smith, Richard, Alan Gilbert, David Fridtjof Halaas, Billy J. Stratton, George E. Tinker & Nancy D. Wadsworth. 2014. Report of the John Evans study committee, University of Denver. Denver: DU Portfolio.Search in Google Scholar
Cornell, Stephen. 1988. The return of the native. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
d’Errico, Peter. 2009. American Indian sovereignty: Now you see it, now you don’t. In Adolfo de Oliveira (ed.), Decolonising indigenous rights, 105–121. New York: Routledge.10.2307/j.ctt6wr9rm.16Search in Google Scholar
Ding, Ersu. 2016. Rethinking the Peircean trichotomy of icon, index, and symbol. Semiotica 213(1/4). 165–175.10.1515/sem-2015-0134Search in Google Scholar
Dixon, Joseph K. 1913. The vanishing race. Garden City: Doubleday.Search in Google Scholar
Earthjustice. 2016. Standing Rock Sioux tribe takes action to protect culture and environment from massive crude oil pipeline. https://earthjustice.org/news/press/2016/standing-rock-sioux-tribe-takes-action-to-protect-culture-and-environment-from-massive-crude-oil-pipeline (accessed 3 August 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Earthjustice. 2017. FAQ: Updates & frequently asked questions: The Standing Rock Sioux tribe’s litigation on the Dakota Access Pipeline. https://earthjustice.org/features/faq-standing-rock-litigation (accessed 3 August 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1980. The name of the rose. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Search in Google Scholar
Ellington, Terry Ray. 2001. The myth of the noble savage. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/california/9780520222687.003.0018Search in Google Scholar
Farias, Priscilla & João Queiroz. 2014. On Peirce’s diagrammatic models for ten classes of signs. Semiotica 202(1/4). 657–671.10.1515/sem-2014-0038Search in Google Scholar
Greimas, Algirdas Julien. 1970. Semantique, semiotiques et semiologies. In A. J. Greimas, R. Jakobson, M. R. Mayenowa, S. K. Saumjan, W. Steinitz & S. Zolkiewski (eds.), Sign language culture, 13–27. The Hague: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Greimas, Algirdas Julien. 1990. The social sciences: A semiotic view. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar
Guenther, Mathias. 2006. Discussion: The concept of indigeneity. Social Anthropology 14. 17–19.10.1017/S0964028205001849Search in Google Scholar
Hardt, Michael & Antonio Negri. 2000. Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Howard, Bradley Reed. 2003. Indigenous peoples and the state: The struggle for native rights. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hughes, J. Donald. 1996 [1983]. North American Indian ecology. El Paso: Texas Western Press.Search in Google Scholar
Jappy, Tony. 2017. Peirce’s twenty-eight classes of signs and the philosophy of representation: Rhetoric, interpretation, and hexadic semiosis. London: Bloomsbury Academic.10.5040/9781474264860Search in Google Scholar
Johansen, Jorgen Dines & Svend Erik Larsen. 2001. Signs in use. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Kades, Eric. 2001. History and interpretation of the great case of Johnson v. M’Intosh. Law and History Review 19(1). 67–118.10.2307/744212Search in Google Scholar
Kaiser, Rudolf. 1984. “A fifth gospel, almost”: Chief Seattle’s speech(es). In Paper presented at Biennial Conference. Rome: European Association for American Studies.Search in Google Scholar
Kaiser, Rudolf. 1999 [1989]. “A fifth gospel, almost’: Chief Seattle’s speech(es): American origins and European reception. In Christian Feest (ed.), Indians and Europe: An interdisciplinary collection of essays, 505–526. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kelman, Ari. 2013. A misplaced massacre. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674067172Search in Google Scholar
Krech, ShepardIII. 1999. The ecological Indian. New York: W. W. Norton.Search in Google Scholar
Kuper, Adam. 2003. The return of the native. Current Anthropology 44(3). 389–395.10.1086/368120Search in Google Scholar
Kuper, Adam. 2006. Discussion: The concept of indigeneity. Social Anthropology 14. 21–22.10.1017/S0964028205001849Search in Google Scholar
Landowski, Eric & Algirdas Julien Greimas. 1990. The semiotic analysis of legal discourse: Commercial laws that govern companies and groups of companies. In Algirdas Julien Greimas (ed.), The social sciences: A semiotic view, 102–138. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lattman, Claas. 2012. Icons and novel thought: A new perspective on Peirce’s definition of metaphor. Semiotica 192(1/4). 535–556.10.1515/sem-2012-0074Search in Google Scholar
Lescarbot, Marc. 1609a. Nova Francis or, the description of that part of New France which is one continent with Virginia. P. E Rondelle (trans.). London: Georgii Bishop.Search in Google Scholar
Lescarbot, Marc. 1609b. Histoire de la Nouvelle France. Paris: Iean Milot.Search in Google Scholar
Leza, Christina. 2018. Representing indigenous lifeways and beliefs in U.S.-Mexico border indigenous activist discourse. Semiotica 224(1/4). 223–248.10.1515/sem-2016-0205Search in Google Scholar
Lindbergh, Charles A. 1953. The spirit of St. Louis. New York: Scribner.Search in Google Scholar
McClintock, Anne. 1995. Imperial leather. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Miller, Daniel J., Patricia R. Miller & Robert Hahn. 1989. What did Chief Seattle really say? [radio broadcast]. Cupertino, CA: KKUP.Search in Google Scholar
Minde, Henry. 2008. The destination and the journey: Indigenous peoples and the United Nations from the 1960s through 1985. In Minde Henry, Harald Gaski & Svein Jentoft (eds.), Indigenous peoples: Self-determination, knowledge, indigeneity, 49–86. Delft: Eboron.Search in Google Scholar
Morgan, Thomas J. 1889. Report of the commissioner of Indian affairs. In Annual report of the commissioner of Indian affairs to the secretary of the interior, 3–114. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.Search in Google Scholar
Newcomb, Steven T. 2008. Pagans in the promised land. Golden: Fulcrum.Search in Google Scholar
Novak, Barbara. 1995. Nature and culture: American landscape and painting 1825–1875. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Parry, Ellwood. 1974. The image of the Indian and the black man in American art, 1590–1900. New York: George Braziller.Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1982. In M. Fisch, E. Moore & C. Kloesel (eds.), Writings of Charles S. Peirce, vol. 8. Bloomington: Indiana University Press [Reference to Peirce’s writings will be designated W followed by volume and page number].Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1998. Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, vol. 2, 1893–1913, Peirce Edition Project (eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to vol. 2 of Essential Peirce will be designated EP 2].Search in Google Scholar
Perry, Ted. 1989. Chief Seattle speaks again. Middlebury Magazine (Winter). 29–30.Search in Google Scholar
Philp, Kenneth R. 1977. John Collier’s crusade for Indian reform, 1920–1954. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Search in Google Scholar
Rusco, Elmer R. 2000. A fateful time: The background and legislative history of the Indian Reorganization Act. Reno: University of New Mexico Press.Search in Google Scholar
Stratton, Billy J. 2013. Buried in shades of night: Contested voices, Indian captivity, and the legacy of King Philip’s war. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Search in Google Scholar
United Nations. 2007. Declaration on the rights of Indigenous peoples, A/RES/61/295. http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf (accessed 14 September 2007).Search in Google Scholar
Vecsey, Christopher. 1980. American Indian environmental religions. In Christopher Vecsey & Robert Venables (eds.), American Indian environments: Ecological issues in Native American history, 1–37. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Wernitzig, Dagmar. 2003. Going native or going naive? White shamanism and the neo-noble savage. Lanham: University Press of America.Search in Google Scholar
Williams, Garrath. n.d. Thomas Hobbes: Moral and political philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/hobmoral/ (accessed 26 April 2018).Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
