Abstract
The study sought to assess user expectations and acceptance of library services at the African Union Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights. The study, which targeted 94 library users, employed LibQUAL and SERVQUAL protocols to collect data, which were subsequently analysed using descriptive statistics. The findings revealed that users have the lowest expectations of the physical aspects of the library, namely the library as a place and of its tangibles. By contrast, users had the highest expectations in aspects associated with people and of the library collection, namely the effect of service, information control, responsiveness and reliability. The study recommends the allocation of resources in a way that ensures that the human aspects of the library remain at high levels of service quality, while shortcomings related to information control, library space and equipment should be addressed. Further, the library should invest in electronic content that users can access remotely. The findings have implications for information practice, in that studying user expectations enables libraries to understand individual and group expectations. These, in turn, will inform decision-making processes in respect of service provision, and provide justification and accountability for the resources used during such service provision.
References
Adam, R. 2017. “Assessment of Library Service Quality and User Satisfaction Among Undergraduate Students of Yusuf Maitama Sule University (YMSU) Library.” Library Philosophy and Practice 9 (14): 1–5. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1675 (accessed June, 2016).Search in Google Scholar
African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights. 2018. Basic Facts about the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights. Arusha: African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights.Search in Google Scholar
African Union. 1998. Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights. Banjul: African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights.Search in Google Scholar
Anyira, I. E. 2011. “The Anatomy of Library Users in the 21st Century.” Library Philosophy and Practice 1 (1): 1–5. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/535 (accessed June, 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Asogwa, B. E. 2014. “Use of SERVQUAL in the Evaluation of Service Quality of Academic Libraries in Developing Countries.” Library Philosophy and Practice. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1146 (accessed March, 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Boykin, J. F. 2012. “LibQUAL+ TM as a Confirming Resource.” Performance Measurement and Metrics 3 (2): 74–8.10.1108/14678040210429946Search in Google Scholar
Cherere, T. W., F. C. O. Buluma, and P. Mwaura. 2016. “An Assessment of the Relationship between Service Quality Dimensions and Judicial Performance at Eldoret Law Courts.” International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management 4 (10): 1–15.Search in Google Scholar
Clow, K. E., and D. W. Vorhies. 1993. “Building a Competitive Advantage for Service Firms: Measurement of Consumer Expectations of Service Quality.” Journal of Services Marketing 7 (1): 22–32, https://doi.org/10.1108/08876049310026079.Search in Google Scholar
Cook, C., F. Heath, and B. Thompson. 2001. “Users’ Hierarchical Perspectives on Library Service Quality: A LibQUAL+ Study.” College and Research Libraries 62 (2): 147–53, https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.62.2.147.Search in Google Scholar
Cristobal, A. S. 2018. “Expectations on Library Services, Library Quality (LibQUAL) Dimension and Library Customer Satisfaction: Relationship to Customer Loyalty.” Library Philosophy and Practice. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1706 (accessed April 27, 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Cullen, R. 2001. “Perspectives on User Satisfaction Surveys.” Library Trends 49 (4): 662–86.Search in Google Scholar
Damtew, G. 2006. Assessment of Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction: Federal Supreme Court in Focus. Masters Dissertation. Addis Ababa: St. Mary’s University.Search in Google Scholar
Desta, B. K. 2019. “Investigation of Judicial Jervice Quality and Customer Catisfaction: The Case of Dire Dawa City Courts, Ethiopia.” Journal of Law, Policy and Globalisation 84: 16–7.Search in Google Scholar
European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (ECEJ). 2016. Measuring the Quality of Justice. Strasbourg: Council for Europe. https://rm.coe.int/1680747548 (accessed September 6, 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Enakrire, R. T., and D. N. Ocholla. 2017. “Information and Communication Technologies for Knowledge Management in Academic Libraries in Nigeria and South Africa.” South African Journal of Information Management 19 (1): 1–9, https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v19i1.750.Search in Google Scholar
Eteng, U. 2018. “Public Libraries during Economic Recession: The Nigerian Experience.” International Journal of Library and Information Science Studies 4 (1): 24–31.Search in Google Scholar
Farkas, M. G. 2013. “Accountability vs. Improvement: Seeking Balance in the Value of Academic Libraries Initiative.” OLA Quarterly 19 (1): 4–7, https://doi.org/10.7710/1093-7374.1378.Search in Google Scholar
Fons, T. 2016. “Making Libraries Visible on the Web.” Library Journal 141 (13): 44–6.Search in Google Scholar
Gathoni, N., and T. Van der Walt. 2019. “Evaluating Library Service Quality at the Aga Khan University Library: Application of a Total Quality Management Approach.” Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 51 (1): 123–36, https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000616679725.Search in Google Scholar
Haliso, Y., and R. F. Aina. 2012. “Quality Collection of Library Resources in Meeting Users’ Needs in Academic Institutions: Competitive Intelligence Approach.” Global Journal of Human Social Science Linguistics and Education 12 (12): 24–32.Search in Google Scholar
Hernon, P., E. Altman, and R. E. Dugan. 2015. Assessing Service Quality: Satisfying the Expectations of Library Customers, 3rd ed. Chicago: American Library Association.Search in Google Scholar
Hussain, A., M. A. Khan, and N. F. Zaidi. 2013. “The ICT-Based Library and Information Services: A Case Study of B-Schools in Delhi and NCR Region.” Library Philosophy and Practice 1 (10): 1–45. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1011 (accessed February, 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Jeyalakshmi, S. S., and S. Meenakumari. 2016. “Service Quality Management: A Literature Review.” Shanlax International Journal of Management 3 (4): 22–45.Search in Google Scholar
Jones, S., and J. Kayongo. 2008. “Identifying Student and Faculty Needs through LibQUAL: An Analysis of Quantitative Survey.” College and Research Libraries 69 (6): 493–509, https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.69.6.493.Search in Google Scholar
Kachoka, N., and R. Hoskins. 2009. “Measuring the Quality of Service: A Case of Chancellor College Library, University of Malawi.” South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science 75 (2): 170–8, https://doi.org/10.7553/75-2-97.Search in Google Scholar
Kaushik, A. 2013. “Emerging Library User Characteristics, Behaviors and Expectations Convergence in Collection Management and Technical Services: A Case Study of C.C.S. University, Meerut.” International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science Invention 2 (6): 55–67.Search in Google Scholar
Kayongo, J., and C. Helm. 2012. “Relevance of Library Collections for Graduate Student Research: A Citation Analysis Study of Doctoral Dissertations at Notre Dame.” College and Research Libraries 73 (1): 45–67, https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-211.Search in Google Scholar
Kekana, M. D. 2016. “Postgraduate Students’ Perception of the Library as an Environment for Reading, Studying and Researching at the University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg Campus.” Master’s thesis. Pietermaritzburg Campus, South Africa: University of KwaZulu-Natal.Search in Google Scholar
Ladhari, R. 2008. “Alternative Measures of Service Quality: A Review.” Managing Service Quality 18 (1): 65–86, https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520810842849.Search in Google Scholar
Landrum, H., V. Prybutok, X. Zhang, and D. Peak. 2009. “Measuring IS System Service Quality with Servqual: Users’ Perceptions of Relative Importance of the Five SERVPERF Dimensions.” Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline 12: 17–35, https://doi.org/10.28945/426.Search in Google Scholar
Makori, E. O., and O. Mauti. 2016. “Digital Technology Acceptance in Transformation of University Libraries and Higher Education Institutions in Kenya.” Library Philosophy and Practice. Paper 1379: 1–20. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3779&context=libphilprac (accessed April, 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Mallya, J., and V. Patwardhan. 2018. “Hospitality Students’ Perception of College Library Service Quality: Importance-Performance Analysis.” Journal of Library and Information Technology 38 (2): 125–31, https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.38.2.11449.Search in Google Scholar
Matthews, J. R. 2017. Evaluation and Measurement of Library Services, 2nd ed. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.Search in Google Scholar
McKoy, G. A. 2018. “An Investigation into Service Quality in the Supreme Court Civil Registry in Jamaica.” Doctoral thesis. Edinburg, Scotland: Edinburgh Napier University.Search in Google Scholar
Mkhonta, M. Z. 2015. “Assessing Service Quality at the American Embassy Swaziland Information Resource Centre.” Master’s diss., South Africa: Regent Business School.Search in Google Scholar
Murillo, R. 2014. “Understanding the Service Quality Perception Gaps between Judicial Servants and Judiciary Users.” International Journal for Court Administration 6 (2): 1–22, https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.146.Search in Google Scholar
Naidu, Y. 2009. “User Perceptions of Service Quality and the Level of User Satisfaction at the Mangosuthu University of Technology Library, Umlazi, Durban.” MIS thesis. South Africa: University of KwaZulu-Natal.Search in Google Scholar
Netherlands Council for the Judiciary. 2008. Quality of the Judicial System in the Netherlands. https://www.rechtspraak.nl (accessed September 9, 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Nitecki, D. A. 1996. “Changing the Concept and Measure of Service Quality in Academic Libraries.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 22 (3): 181–90, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0099-1333(96)90056-7.Search in Google Scholar
Nuridin, S. E. 2018. “Effect of Service Quality and Quality of Products to Customer Loyalty with Customer Satisfaction as Intervening Variable in PT Nano Coating, Indonesia.” International Journal of Business and Applied Social Science 4 (1): 19–31.Search in Google Scholar
Obulemire, T. A., P. King’ori, and A. B. Ondieki. 2014. “Applicability of SERVQUAL/RATER Model in Assessment of Service Quality Among Local Authorities in Kenya: A Survey of Residents of Nakuru Town.” International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management 2 (12): 1–16.Search in Google Scholar
Oliver, R. L. 1980. “A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions.” Journal of Marketing Research 17 (4): 460–9, https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378001700405.Search in Google Scholar
Parasuraman, A., V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry. 1988. “SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality.” Journal of Retailing 64 (1): 12–40.Search in Google Scholar
Patil, S. 2017. “Service Quality Expectations of Academic Library Users.” In Paper Presented at the National Conference on Enhancing the Role of the Library in Teaching and Learning, January 24–25, Pune, India. Badlapur: Aarhat.Search in Google Scholar
Patterson, C. T. 2009. Toward Service Excellence: A Preliminary Assessment of Service Quality in Georgia Courts. Atlanta (Georgia). Atlanta, Georgia: Institute for Court Management.Search in Google Scholar
Pedramnia, S., P. Modiramani, and V. G. Ghanbarabadi. 2012. “An Analysis of Service Quality in Academic Libraries Using LibQUAL Scale: Application Oriented Approach, a Case Study in Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (MUMS) Libraries.” Library Management 33 (3): 159–67, https://doi.org/10.1108/01435121211217144.Search in Google Scholar
Pretorius, H. F. 2011. “Developing a Service Quality Model for an Academic Library: A Case Study of the North-West University Vaal Triangle Campus Library.” Master’s diss., Pretoria, South Africa: University of South Africa.Search in Google Scholar
Rehman, S. U. 2012. “Understanding the Expectations of Pakistani Libraries’ Users: A LibQUAL Study.” Library Philosophy and Practice. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/732 (accessed May, 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Seebaluck, A., L. Vencataya, L. S. M. D. Lai Wai, and V. Teeroovengadum. 2012. “Improving Quality of Legal Services in Mauritius.” In European Business Research Conference Proceedings. Berwick: World Business Institute. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2149395 (accessed September 10, 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Shoeb, Z. H. 2012. “Identifying Service Superiority, Zone of Tolerance and Underlying Dimensions: Service Quality Attributes in a Private University Library in Bangladesh.” Library Review 60 (4): 293–311.10.1108/00242531111127857Search in Google Scholar
Simba, C. A. 2006. “User Perceptions of the Quality of Service at Iringa University College Library, Tumaini University.” Master’s diss., Durban, South Africa: University of KwaZulu-Natal.Search in Google Scholar
Tajer, P. 2014. “Using LibQUAL+ as a Qualitative Method: Taking One Iranian Academic Library as an Example.” Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries (QQML) 3 (1): 173–81.Search in Google Scholar
Thompson, B., C. Cook, and F. Heath. 2003. “Two Short Forms of the LibQUAL+™ Survey Assessing Users’ Perceptions of Library Service Quality.” The Library Quarterly 73 (4): 453–65, https://doi.org/10.1086/603441.Search in Google Scholar
Tillack, T. J. 2014. “Pressures, Opportunities and Costs Facing Research Library Acquisitions Budgets: An Australian Perspective.” Australian Library Journal 63 (3): 206–19, https://doi.org/10.1080/00049670.2014.915498.Search in Google Scholar
Zeithaml, V. A., L. L. Berry, and A. P. Parasuraman. 1993. “The Nature and Determinants of Customer Expectations of Service.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 21 (1): 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070393211001.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
