Abstract
Kant makes and elaborates upon a distinction between active citizenship and passive citizenship. Active citizens enjoy the right to vote and rights of political participation generally. Passive citizens do not, though they still enjoy the protection of the law as citizens. Kant’s examples have left commentators puzzling over how these distinctions follow from his stated rationale or justification for active citizenship, namely, that active citizens possess a kind of political and economic self-sufficiency. This essay focuses on one subset passive citizenry – that of traveling blacksmiths, barbers, and day laborers in order to examine Kant’s distinctions. I argue that these examples show that Kant’s concerns regarding dependence are, at least in some cases, pragmatic rather than political.
References
Benson, Paul (1991), “Autonomy and Oppressive Socialization”, in: Social Theory and Practice 84, 385–408.10.5840/soctheorpract199117319Search in Google Scholar
Byrd, B. Sharon and Hruschka, Joachim (2010), Kant’s Doctrine of Right: A Commentary. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511712050Search in Google Scholar
Byrd, Sharon (2002), “Kant’s Theory of Contract”, in: Kant’s ‘Metaphysics of Morals’: Interpretative Essays. Ed. Mark Timmons. Oxford, 111–131.10.1111/j.2041-6962.1998.tb01784.xSearch in Google Scholar
Cholbi, Michael (2002), “A Felon’s Right to Vote”, in: Law and Philosophy 21, 543–564.10.2307/3505059Search in Google Scholar
Cudd, Anne (2006), Analyzing Oppression. New York.10.1093/0195187431.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Goldstein, R. (1983), Political Repression in 19th Century Europe. London.10.4324/9780203706060Search in Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2006), Kant. London.10.4324/9780203966624Search in Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996), Doctrine of Right. In: Political Philosophy. Trans. Mary Gregor. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
Kant (1799), Doctrine of Right.Trans. William Richardson. London: Royal Exchange.Search in Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline (2012), Kant and Cosmopolitanism: The Philosophical Ideal of World Citizenship. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139015486Search in Google Scholar
Maliks, Reidar (2014), Kant’s Politics in Context. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199645152.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Mendus, Susan (1992), “An Honest But Narrow-Minded Bourgeois?” in: Essays in Kant’s Political Philosophy. Ed. Howard Williams. Chicago.Search in Google Scholar
Shell, Susan (2016), “Kant on Citizenship, Community, and Redistribution”, in: Kant and Social Policies. Ed. Andrea Faggion. New York.10.1007/978-3-319-42658-7_1Search in Google Scholar
Sieyes, Emmanuel Joseph (2014), The Essential Political Writings. Boston.Search in Google Scholar
Sonnerat, Pierre (1783), Reise nach Ostindien und China vol. 1. Zürich: Drell.Search in Google Scholar
Sweet, Kristi (2013), Kant on Practical Life: From Duty to History. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139583886Search in Google Scholar
Weinrib, Jacob (2008), “Kant on Citizenship and Universal Independence”, in: Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 33, 1–25.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
