Abstract
This paper presents a novel methodology to develop itinerary choice models (ICM) for air travelers that addresses the limitations of the traditional utility-maximization approach. The methodology integrates a reinforcement learning algorithm and an airline network competition analysis model. The reinforcement learning algorithm searches for the values of parameters of the itinerary choice model while considering maximizing a reward function. The reward function is measured as the negative of the difference between the estimated and observed system metrics. The airline network competition analysis model is used to calculate the estimated system metrics. It is a simulation model that represents passenger-itinerary assignment. It captures the demand–supply interactions at the network level while considering the competition among all airlines. An ICM system is calibrated using the developed framework considering the global airline network, which includes more than 500,000 airport pairs. Validating the model against ground truth data shows that the developed model adequately captures the travelers’ itinerary choice behavior and replicates the competition pattern among airlines.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdelghany, A., and K. Abdelghany. 2007. Evaluating airlines ticket distribution strategies: A simulation-based approach. International Journal of Revenue Management 1 (3): 231–246.
Abdelghany, A., and K. Abdelghany. 2008. A micro-simulation approach for Airline Competition Analysis and Demand Modelling. International Journal of Revenue Management 2 (3): 287–306.
Abdelghany, A., and K. Abdelghany. 2016. Modeling applications in the airline industry. London: Routledge.
Abdelghany, A., and K. Abdelghany. 2018. Airline network planning and scheduling. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Abrahams, M. 1983. A service quality model of air travel demand: An empirical study. Transportation Research Part A 17 (5): 385–393.
Algers, S., & Beser, M. 1997. A model for air passengers choice of flight and booking class a combined stated preference and reveled preference approach. In ATRG Conference Proceedings, Vancouver.
Anderson, J.E., and M. Kraus. 1981. Quality of service and the demand for air travel. The Review of Economics and Statistics 92: 533–540.
Ben-Akiva, M. E. & Lerman, S. R. (1985). Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand (Vol. 9). MIT Press.
Busoniu, L., Babuska, R., De Schutter, B., & Ernst, D. (2010). Reinforcement learning and dynamic programming using function approximators (Vol. 39). CRC press.
Carrier, E. (2008). Modeling the choice of an airline itinerary and fare product using booking and seat availability data (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering).
Coldren, G.M., F.S. Koppelman, K. Kasturirangan, and A. Mukherjee. 2003. Modeling aggregate air-travel itinerary shares: Logit model development at a major US airline. Journal of Air Transport Management 9 (6): 361–369.
Coldren, G.M., and F.S. Koppelman. 2005. Modeling the competition among air-travel itinerary shares: GEV model development. Transportation Research Part A 39 (4): 345–365.
Corsi, T., Dresner, M., & Windle, R. (1997). Air passenger forecasts: Principles and practices. In Journal of the Transportation Research Forum (Vol. 36, No. 2).
Ghobrial, A., and S.Y. Soliman. 1992. An assessment of some factors influencing the competitive strategies of airlines in domestic markets. International Journal of Transport Economics 24: 247–258.
Delahaye, T., R. Acuna-Agost, N. Bondoux, A.Q. Nguyen, and M. Boudia. 2017. Data-driven models for itinerary preferences of air travelers and application for dynamic pricing optimization. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management 16 (6): 621–639.
Diio by Cirium (2020), Diio Mi https://www.diio.net/products/diio-mi/index.html, Retrieved March 1st, 2020.
Hess, S., T. Ryley, L. Davison, and T. Adler. 2013. Improving the quality of demand forecasts through cross nested logit: A stated choice case study of airport, airline and access mode choice. Transportmetrica A 9 (4): 358–384.
Ippolito, R.A. 1981. Estimating airline demand with quality of service variables. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 13: 7–15.
Nason, S. D. (1981). The airline preference problem: an application of disaggregate logit. In AGIFORS PROCEEDINGS.
Nako, S.M. 1992. Frequent flyer programs and business travellers: An empirical investigation. Logistics and Transportation Review 28 (4): 395.
Nikseresht, A., and K. Ziarati. 2017. A demand estimation algorithm for inventory management systems using censored data. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research 7 (6): 2215–2221.
Proussaloglou, K., and F. Koppelman. 1995. Air carrier demand. Transportation 22 (4): 371–388.
Proussaloglou, K., and F.S. Koppelman. 1999. The choice of air carrier, flight, and fare class. Journal of Air Transport Management 5 (4): 193–201.
Sabre (2020). Sabre Intelligence 6.3 https://www.sabreairlinesolutions.com/home/software_solutions/product/intelligence_exchange/, Retrieved March 1st, 2020.
Sutton, R.S., and A.G. Barto. 2018. Reinforcement learning: An introduction. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Suzuki, Y., J.E. Tyworth, and R.A. Novack. 2001. Airline market share and customer service quality: A reference-dependent model. Transportation Research Part A 35 (9): 773–788.
Szepesvári, C. 2010. Algorithms for reinforcement learning. Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning 4 (1): 1–103.
Vulcano, G., G. Van Ryzin, and R. Ratliff. 2012. Estimating primary demand for substitutable products from sales transaction data. Operations Research 60 (2): 313–334.
Warburg, V., C. Bhat, and T. Adler. 2006. Modeling demographic and unobserved heterogeneity in air passengers’ sensitivity to service attributes in itinerary choice. Transportation Research Record 1951 (1): 7–16.
Wiering, M., and M. Van Otterlo. 2012. Reinforcement learning. Adaptation, Learning, and Optimization 12: 3.
Yoo, K.E., and N. Ashford. 1996. Carrier choices of air passengers in pacific rim: Using comparative analysis and complementary interpretation of revealed preference and stated preference data. Transportation Research Record 1562 (1): 1–7.
Zeni, R. H. (2001). Improved forecast accuracy in airline revenue management by unconstraining demand estimates from censored data. Universal-Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abdelghany, A., Abdelghany, K. & Huang, CW. An integrated reinforced learning and network competition analysis for calibrating airline itinerary choice models with constrained demand. J Revenue Pricing Manag 20, 227–247 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41272-021-00309-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41272-021-00309-y