Skip to main content
Log in

An integrated reinforced learning and network competition analysis for calibrating airline itinerary choice models with constrained demand

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management Aims and scope

Abstract

This paper presents a novel methodology to develop itinerary choice models (ICM) for air travelers that addresses the limitations of the traditional utility-maximization approach. The methodology integrates a reinforcement learning algorithm and an airline network competition analysis model. The reinforcement learning algorithm searches for the values of parameters of the itinerary choice model while considering maximizing a reward function. The reward function is measured as the negative of the difference between the estimated and observed system metrics. The airline network competition analysis model is used to calculate the estimated system metrics. It is a simulation model that represents passenger-itinerary assignment. It captures the demand–supply interactions at the network level while considering the competition among all airlines. An ICM system is calibrated using the developed framework considering the global airline network, which includes more than 500,000 airport pairs. Validating the model against ground truth data shows that the developed model adequately captures the travelers’ itinerary choice behavior and replicates the competition pattern among airlines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdelghany, A., and K. Abdelghany. 2007. Evaluating airlines ticket distribution strategies: A simulation-based approach. International Journal of Revenue Management 1 (3): 231–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdelghany, A., and K. Abdelghany. 2008. A micro-simulation approach for Airline Competition Analysis and Demand Modelling. International Journal of Revenue Management 2 (3): 287–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdelghany, A., and K. Abdelghany. 2016. Modeling applications in the airline industry. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Abdelghany, A., and K. Abdelghany. 2018. Airline network planning and scheduling. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahams, M. 1983. A service quality model of air travel demand: An empirical study. Transportation Research Part A 17 (5): 385–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Algers, S., & Beser, M. 1997. A model for air passengers choice of flight and booking class a combined stated preference and reveled preference approach. In ATRG Conference Proceedings, Vancouver.

  • Anderson, J.E., and M. Kraus. 1981. Quality of service and the demand for air travel. The Review of Economics and Statistics 92: 533–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva, M. E. & Lerman, S. R. (1985). Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand (Vol. 9). MIT Press.

  • Busoniu, L., Babuska, R., De Schutter, B., & Ernst, D. (2010). Reinforcement learning and dynamic programming using function approximators (Vol. 39). CRC press.

  • Carrier, E. (2008). Modeling the choice of an airline itinerary and fare product using booking and seat availability data (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering).

  • Coldren, G.M., F.S. Koppelman, K. Kasturirangan, and A. Mukherjee. 2003. Modeling aggregate air-travel itinerary shares: Logit model development at a major US airline. Journal of Air Transport Management 9 (6): 361–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coldren, G.M., and F.S. Koppelman. 2005. Modeling the competition among air-travel itinerary shares: GEV model development. Transportation Research Part A 39 (4): 345–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsi, T., Dresner, M., & Windle, R. (1997). Air passenger forecasts: Principles and practices. In Journal of the Transportation Research Forum (Vol. 36, No. 2).

  • Ghobrial, A., and S.Y. Soliman. 1992. An assessment of some factors influencing the competitive strategies of airlines in domestic markets. International Journal of Transport Economics 24: 247–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delahaye, T., R. Acuna-Agost, N. Bondoux, A.Q. Nguyen, and M. Boudia. 2017. Data-driven models for itinerary preferences of air travelers and application for dynamic pricing optimization. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management 16 (6): 621–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diio by Cirium (2020), Diio Mi https://www.diio.net/products/diio-mi/index.html, Retrieved March 1st, 2020.

  • Hess, S., T. Ryley, L. Davison, and T. Adler. 2013. Improving the quality of demand forecasts through cross nested logit: A stated choice case study of airport, airline and access mode choice. Transportmetrica A 9 (4): 358–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ippolito, R.A. 1981. Estimating airline demand with quality of service variables. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 13: 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nason, S. D. (1981). The airline preference problem: an application of disaggregate logit. In AGIFORS PROCEEDINGS.

  • Nako, S.M. 1992. Frequent flyer programs and business travellers: An empirical investigation. Logistics and Transportation Review 28 (4): 395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikseresht, A., and K. Ziarati. 2017. A demand estimation algorithm for inventory management systems using censored data. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research 7 (6): 2215–2221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proussaloglou, K., and F. Koppelman. 1995. Air carrier demand. Transportation 22 (4): 371–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proussaloglou, K., and F.S. Koppelman. 1999. The choice of air carrier, flight, and fare class. Journal of Air Transport Management 5 (4): 193–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabre (2020). Sabre Intelligence 6.3 https://www.sabreairlinesolutions.com/home/software_solutions/product/intelligence_exchange/, Retrieved March 1st, 2020.

  • Sutton, R.S., and A.G. Barto. 2018. Reinforcement learning: An introduction. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, Y., J.E. Tyworth, and R.A. Novack. 2001. Airline market share and customer service quality: A reference-dependent model. Transportation Research Part A 35 (9): 773–788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szepesvári, C. 2010. Algorithms for reinforcement learning. Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning 4 (1): 1–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vulcano, G., G. Van Ryzin, and R. Ratliff. 2012. Estimating primary demand for substitutable products from sales transaction data. Operations Research 60 (2): 313–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warburg, V., C. Bhat, and T. Adler. 2006. Modeling demographic and unobserved heterogeneity in air passengers’ sensitivity to service attributes in itinerary choice. Transportation Research Record 1951 (1): 7–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiering, M., and M. Van Otterlo. 2012. Reinforcement learning. Adaptation, Learning, and Optimization 12: 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, K.E., and N. Ashford. 1996. Carrier choices of air passengers in pacific rim: Using comparative analysis and complementary interpretation of revealed preference and stated preference data. Transportation Research Record 1562 (1): 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeni, R. H. (2001). Improved forecast accuracy in airline revenue management by unconstraining demand estimates from censored data. Universal-Publishers.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed Abdelghany.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdelghany, A., Abdelghany, K. & Huang, CW. An integrated reinforced learning and network competition analysis for calibrating airline itinerary choice models with constrained demand. J Revenue Pricing Manag 20, 227–247 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41272-021-00309-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41272-021-00309-y

Keywords

Navigation