On a Waring's problem for Hermitian lattices

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulsci.2021.102970Get rights and content

Abstract

Assume E is an imaginary quadratic field and O is its ring of integers. For each positive integer m, let Im be the free Hermitian lattice of rank m over O having an orthonormal basis. For each positive integer n, let SO(n) be the set of all Hermitian lattices of rank n over O that can be represented by some Im. Denote by gO(n) the smallest positive integer g such that each Hermitian lattice in SO(n) can be represented by Ig. In this paper, we shall provide an explicit upper bound for gO(n) for all imaginary quadratic fields E and all positive integers n.

Introduction

A positive integer a is said to be represented by a quadratic form f, written as af, if there are some integers x1,,xm such that f(x1,,xm)=a. A typical question is to determine those positive integers that can be represented by the quadratic form Im:=x12++xm2 for a positive integer m. In light of the celebrated work of Fermat, Euler, Legendre and Lagrange on sums of squares, it is well-known that every positive integer can be written as a sum of at most four squares, and the number four is optimal.

This result has been extended in several different directions. For example, Waring's Problem seeks the smallest positive integer r(k) such that every positive integer is a sum of r powers of order k. There is also a higher dimensional generalization in terms of representations of positive definite integral quadratic forms, where a quadratic form f(x1,,xm) is said to be represented by another quadratic form f˜(y1,,yn) with nm if one finds an m×n integral matrix A such that f(x)=f˜(xA); f is said to be equivalent to f˜ if A is a unimodular matrix.

In general, a quadratic form can be represented by the quadratic form Im if and only if it is a sum of m squares of integral linear forms. The renowned Lagrange's Four-Square Theorem implies that all unary positive definite integral quadratic forms can be represented by I4. In the 1930s, Mordell [16] and Ko [14] successively extended this result to quadratic forms in more variables, and they showed that all positive definite integral quadratic forms in n variables can be represented by In+3 if 2n5. All the preceding results can be derived directly from the observations that every positive definite integral quadratic form in n variables is represented by In+3 locally everywhere, and that there is exactly one equivalence class in the genus of In+3 when 1n5. Here, the genus of f, written as gen(f), is the set of all quadratic forms that are equivalent to f over the ring Zp of p-adic integers at each prime number p and over the field R of real numbers.

This approach does not work when n6, since in this case there are more than one equivalence classes in the genus of In+3; even worse, Mordell [17] found that the quadratic forml=16xl2+(l=16xl)22x1x22x2x6 corresponding to the root system E6 cannot be represented by any sum of squares. This subtlety leads to the consideration of the set SZ(n) consisting of all quadratic forms in n variables that can be represented by some sums of squares.

Define the g-invariant gZ(n) to be the smallest positive integer g such that Ig represents every quadratic form in SZ(n). Icaza [8] first found the existence of gZ(n) and also derived an explicit upper bound for it by computing the constant c in the Hisa-Kitaoka-Kneser Theorem [7, Theorem 1] with respect to In+3. Kim and Oh [11] later improved the upper bound for gZ(n) to an exponential of n through the theory of neighbors of quadratic forms. Recently, in [1], with my coauthors, we further improved the upper bound for gZ(n) to an exponential of n and also observed that our method can be used to study a similar problem of Hermitian forms over an imaginary quadratic field with class number 1. Unfortunately, we cannot apply our method to general imaginary quadratic fields due to some emerged complications if the class numbers of those fields are bigger than 1; for instance, when the ring of integers is not a principle ideal domain, then a positive definite integral Hermitian form may not attain its minimum at a primitive vector.

In this paper, we shall consider the Hermitian analog of this representation problem in general situations. Let E:=Q() be an imaginary quadratic field with a square-free positive integer, and let O be its ring of integers. Because O is not necessarily a principle ideal domain in general, a Hermitian form corresponds to a Hermitian lattice but not vice visa; so, instead of considering only Hermitian forms, the more general notion of Hermitian lattices will be utilized. For each integer m1, denote by Im the free Hermitian lattice of rank m having an orthonormal basis. From the standard correspondence between Hermitian forms and free Hermitian lattices, Im corresponds to the Hermitian form x1x1++xmxm. For each integer n1, let SO(n) be the set consisting of all Hermitian lattices of rank n that can be represented by some Im, and writegO(n):=min{gZ:LIgfor allLSO(n)}. The finiteness of gO(n) was observed in [1, Appendix A].

In this paper, we derive an explicit upper bound for gO(n) that only depends on the imaginary quadratic field E and the rank n, and our main result reads as follows.

Theorem 1.1

Let E=Q() be an imaginary quadratic field for a square-free positive integer ℓ, and let n1 be an integer. Then, for gO(n) defined in (1.1), we havegO(n)23nδ(n+1)+3(p01)(p0+5)n2n1(j=3n+17logp0(Cj)+G())+n+6. Here, δ(n):={n3ifn3and2is ramified0otherwise, p0 is the smallest inert prime number in the extension E/Q, G():={B3,χ/36+643if2is ramifiedB3,χ/144+3otherwise, χ is the Dirichlet character associated with E, B3,χ is the third Bernoulli number twisted by χ, and C>0 is an absolute constant.

In Section 2, we introduce the geometric language of Hermitian spaces and Hermitian lattices. In Section 3, we consider the local density of a positive integer represented by a quadratic lattice Kˆ (which is associated with a Hermitian lattice K in the genus of Im) at each prime number p. In Section 4, we find a positive integer c(m) such that an integer t is represented by every Hermitian lattice Kgen(Im) when tc(m). In Section 5, we briefly review the theory of neighbors of Hermitian lattices over E following Schiemann [20]. In Section 6, we prove our main Theorem 1.1. Notice that the main scheme of Kim and Oh [11] is utilized in proving Theorem 1.1, but there are a number of difficulties that need to be overcome in the current setting based on [1], [15].

Section snippets

Preliminaries

Throughout this paper, we adopt the notations and terminologies for lattices from the classic monograph O'Meara [18]. For background information and terminologies specific to the Hermitian case, the reader may consult the work of Shimura [21], Gerstein [5] and Johnson [10].

Let E=Q() be an imaginary quadratic field for a square-free positive integer , and let O be the ring of integers of E. Then, one has O=Z[ω] with ω=ω:= if 1,2(mod4) and ω=ω:=(1+)/2 if 3(mod4). For each αE, denote

Local density

For a Hermitian lattice L on V, denote by (Lˆ) the dual lattice of Lˆ as a quadratic lattice over Z, and by Lˆ the associated quadratic lattice of the dual lattice of L. In general, (Lˆ) and Lˆ are different. The next result describes the relation between these two quadratic lattices.

Lemma 3.1

Assume L is a Hermitian lattice, and write D1:={αE:Tr(αO)Z} to be the inverse of the different D of E over Q. Then, one has(Lˆ)={2D1Lˆwhen1,2(mod4)D1Lˆwhen3(mod4).

Proof

We only consider the case where 3(

The smallest universal number

For a Hermitian lattice Kgen(Im), let c(K) be the smallest positive integer l such that jK for all integers jl. Define c(m):=max{c(K):Kgen(Im)} to be the smallest universal number. Let c˜(Kˆ) be the smallest positive integer l such that jKˆ for all (even, when Kˆ is even) integers jl. Define c˜(m):=max{c˜(Kˆ):Kgen(Im)} accordingly. Then, we shall have c(m)=c˜(m) if 1,2(mod4) and c(m)=12c˜(m) if 3(mod4).

Given a positive definite integral quadratic lattice J of rank n with the

Neighborhood of Hermitian lattices

In this section, for completeness, we briefly review the theory of neighbors of Hermitian lattices over O following Schiemann [20], which is considered as the Hermitian analogue of that of quadratic lattices developed by Kneser [13], and which is needed in Section 6. This theory enables us to identify a condition under which a Hermitian lattice L of rank n is represented by In+2. Other helpful resources include Gerstein [5] and Johnson [10].

In the subsequent discussions, let L be an integral

Proof of Theorem 1.1

Let p be a prime number, and let P be a prime ideal in O lying above p. By abuse of notations, we regard in this section individual lattices in N(L,P) as representatives of their isometry classes, and simply say that all Hermitian lattices in the isometry class of N are P-neighbors of M if N is a P-neighbor of M. Given two Hermitian lattices M,NN(L,P), define the distance d(M,N) between M and N as the minimal number of edges between M and N.

If p remains inert in E, then P=pO is the unique

Declaration of Competing Interest

There exists no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgement

The author warmly thanks the anonymous referees and Professor David Harari for several valuable suggestions, sincerely appreciates her advisor Professor Wai Kiu Chan for the introduction of this topic, and acknowledges the partial financial support of the 2019–2020 Faculty Research Fellowships from College of Arts & Sciences at Texas A&M University-San Antonio.

References (24)

  • A. Schiemann

    Classification of Hermitian forms with the neighbour method

    J. Symb. Comput.

    (1998)
  • T. Yang

    An explicit formula for local densities of quadratic forms

    J. Number Theory

    (1998)
  • C.N. Beli et al.

    On a Waring's problem for integral quadratic and Hermitian forms

    Trans. Am. Math. Soc.

    (2019)
  • J.W.S. Cassels

    Rational Quadratic Forms

    (1978)
  • J.H. Conway et al.

    Low-dimensional lattices. IV. The mass formula

    Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A

    (1988)
  • J.H. Conway et al.

    Sphere Packings, Lattices and Groups

    (1999)
  • L.J. Gerstein

    Classes of definite Hermitian forms

    Am. J. Math.

    (1978)
  • K. Hashimoto et al.

    Class numbers of positive definite binary and ternary unimodular Hermitian forms

    Tohoku Math. J.

    (1989)
  • J.S. Hisa et al.

    Representations of positive definite quadratic forms

    J. Reine Angew. Math.

    (1978)
  • M.I. Icaza

    Sums of squares of integral linear forms

    Acta Arith.

    (1996)
  • H. Iwaniec

    Topics in Classical Automorphic Forms

    (1997)
  • A.A. Johnson

    Integral representation of Hermitian forms over local fields

    J. Reine Angew. Math.

    (1968)
  • Cited by (4)

    View full text