Elsevier

Fungal Ecology

Volume 51, June 2021, 101046
Fungal Ecology

Interactions between pinewood nematodes and the fungal community of pine trees

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2021.101046Get rights and content

Abstract

The pinewood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, is the pathogenic agent of pine wilt disease and a globally notable pine pest. Despite being a plant pathogen, B. xylophilus has a mycophagous phase during its life cycle. We assessed the capacity for polyphagy of mycetophagous pinewood nematodes, testing which of the common species of fungi in pine trees provide better food and higher population growth rates. B. xylophilus performed particularly well on airborne fungi, namely the endophytes Botrytis cinerea and Cladosporium herbarum, and the pathogens Sirococcus conigenus and Sphaeropsis sapinea. Surprisingly, growth performance was not as good on the blue stain species (Ophiostoma spp. and Leptographium spp.) which are considered natural associates of B. xylophilus in the wild. Most of the fungi nonetheless permitted positive population growth of B. xylophilus, which is polyphagous and capable of feeding on numerous fungal species with diverse ecological niches.

Introduction

There is an astonishing diversity of fungi colonizing all tissues of forest trees (Baldrian, 2017), with equally complex and diverse fungal-tree interactions, ranging from mutualistic to antagonistic (Carrol, 1988). Adding to the complexity, it is difficult to categorize all tree-dwelling fungi into discrete categories such as pathogens or endophytes, since many fungal species can easily switch their lifestyle from one to the other (Sieber, 2007). In fact, a healthy forest tree supports a diverse fungal community that includes latent pathogens, dormant saprotrophs and mutualists (Carrol, 1988; Saikkonen et al., 1998; Sieber, 2007; Zamora et al., 2008). When the tree weakens and dies, some of these fungi switch life styles (Flowers et al., 2001; Smith et al., 1996; Smith and Stanosz, 2008), while the tree is invaded by a wide range of other airborne and insect-vectored pathogens and saprotrophs (Eckhardt et al., 2004).

Tree inhabiting fungal species can also form complex interactions, not only with the trees, but also with other tree dwelling organisms, such as insects, mites and nematodes. For example, some fungal species change the quality of food for insect herbivorous (Eberl et al., 2019), while others support a rich community of mites and nematodes (Massey, 1974; Hofstetter and Moser, 2014). These interactions arise naturally because the organic matter within living trees is mostly unavailable to potential animal consumers due to indigestible and toxic phytochemicals such as lignin, cellulose, hemicellulose and secondary metabolites. Fungi tend to transform living and dead plant matter into more digestible fungal tissues (Ayres et al., 2000; Schigel, 2016). In the other direction, several groups of fungi have evolved phoretic associations with insects and mites that facilitate the colonization of new tree hosts (Hofstetter and Moser, 2014). Tripartite or multipartite associations that include fungi have resulted in some of the most damaging disease systems and biological disturbances affecting forests worldwide. Some notorious examples are symbiotic associations between Ophiostomatoid fungi and bark beetles (Ayres et al., 2000; Hofstetter et al., 2006; Moser et al., 2010; Zhao et al., 2019).

Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, the pinewood nematode, is the pathogenic agent of pine wilt disease (PWD), and presently is the major invasive pest threat to Eurasian pine forests. It is native to North America (Togashi and Jikumaru, 2007; Vicente et al., 2012). It is vector-borne in that it is transmitted among trees by pine sawyer beetles (genus Monochamus). Nematodes travel on the adult sawyer beetles to move from depleted pine tree hosts to infect new ones (Giblin-Davis et al., 2003). The pinewood nematode is one of the few plant pathogenic species within the genus Bursaphelenchus, which are mostly fungal feeders in dead and dying pine trees, and usually phoretic on bark beetles or wood borers (Giblin-Davis et al., 2003; Ryss et al., 2005). B. xylophilus has evolved an additional phytophagous phase during its life cycle, while retaining the mycetophagous phase. This is unusual within the plant-parasitic nematodes, which are generally obligatory parasites (Espada et al., 2016). In fact, B. xylophilus can be maintained in laboratory cultures either on fungi or pine tissue (Espada et al., 2016; Pimentel et al., 2017).

Thus, development of PWD is dependent of a multipartite system where fungi are a nutritional substrate for potential pathogenic nematodes. The currently accepted view of the B. xylophilus life cycle is that its phytophagous phase starts when the nematodes enter a living pine through maturation feeding of insect vectors in the canopy. Then nematodes migrate within the tree while feeding on the contents of parenchyma cells. Later when the tree is weakened or freshly dead, it is colonized by a succession of fungi species, and the nematode populations switch to the mycetophagous phase before boarding a pupa of its insect vector (Mamiya, 2012; Espada et al., 2016). B. xylophilus can, however, skip the phytophagous phase when inoculated in an already dead or dying pine tree through oviposition of female pine sawyer beetles. It has been proposed that this is most frequent in areas where healthy pines are resistant to infection by the pathogen, mainly in its native range in North America, which precludes the phytophagous phase (Wingfield et al., 1984).

The importance of fungi in the population dynamics of B. xylophilus has been recognized for some time (Wingfield et al., 1984). Surveys of the suitability of different fungi species for the pinewood nematode have focused on fungi identified from the stems of recently dead pine trees infested with the nematode (Fukushige, 1991; Maehara and Futai, 2000; Futai et al., 2007). Special attention has been paid to fungi within the Ophiostomataceae (frequently known as blue stain fungi) that are carried by bark and wood boring insects into the same phloem tissues as pinewood nematodes (Niu et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2018). It has been suggested that B. xylophilus may have specific or even mutualistic relations with some of these fungal species (Zhao et al., 2013, 2018). However, fungal feeding nematodes are commonly regarded as generalists, and surveys of nematode growth on different species of fungi always shows them as polyphagous, although some fungal resources may support higher nematode reproduction rates and population levels (Ruess et al., 2000; Okada et al., 2005; Hasna et al., 2007). B. xylophilus has also been reported to be polyphagous in its mycetophagous phase (Futai et al., 2007).

The complexity of the pinewood nematode life cycle makes likely that it will encounter a diverse array of fungi species during its time within a host pine tree. When entering healthy trees through the canopy, B. xylophilus can encounter dormant saprotrophs and pathogens, and endophytic fungi living asymptomatically within leaves and stems. As the tree weakens and dies, its fungal community changes dramatically as it is invaded by a wide range of other airborne and insect-vectored pathogens and saprotrophs, entering through the canopy and stem. Thus, being polyphagous in its mycetophagous phase may be advantageous for the pinewood nematode. However, the ecological significance of interactions between pinewood nematode populations and the fungal community of pine trees has not been explored.

In the present work, we assessed how polyphagous the pinewood nematode is during its mycetophagous phase and tested whether ophiostomatoid fungi are better substrates for B. xylophilus development than other groups of fungi growing on pine hosts. We used replicated standardized bioassays to compare nematode growth when feeding on insect-vectored fungi of the Ophiostomataceae versus other airborne, endophytic, pathogenic and/or saprotrophs fungi that they may encounter in pine trees. We tested B. xylophilus populations from both Portugal and North America because they have been hypothesized to be ecologically different in their resource use (Wingfield et al., 1984). Our objective was to study the interaction between B. xylophilus and the fungal community of their host trees, and to clarify the importance of these interactions to our understanding of pine wilt disease in general.

Section snippets

Fungi species

Ten species of Ascomycota fungi were selected for this experiment; each can be encountered within pine tree hosts by B. xylophilus in the wild. An objective was to compare the nutritional suitability of fungi in the various niches that can be occupied by B. xylophilus within pine trees. Thus, our selection included species that are airborne and dispersed by rain splash, entering the tree through the canopy, as well as species of ophiostomatoids adapted to be phoretic on bark and wood boring

Results

Averaged across fungal species, the abundance of nematodes in cultures peaked at 14.7 ± 2.3 d (mean ± SD), without significant differences between populations from Louisiana and Portugal (t = 0.66 df = 18, P = 0.52). In most fungal species, numbers of nematodes started to decline before the end of the experiment (20th d) - namely B. cinerea, A. pullulans, C. herbarum, S. conigenus, O. minus and O. ips. However, on L. procerum, numbers were still increasing at the end of the experiment, and on

Discussion

Our results demonstrate that B. xylophilus has high capacity for polyphagy in its mycophagous life stage, being able to feed, grow, and reproduce on numerous species of Ascomycota fungi that occupy very different niches within pine trees. Despite this capacity for polyphagy, there were substantial differences in the population growth rates of nematodes depending upon the fungi that they were consuming. It seems likely that these differences are of ecological significance. B. xylophilus

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Janel diBiccari and Alexandra Ricardo for help on laboratory work. This work was funded by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) through the project PTDC/AGR-CFL/098869/2008 and funding of C. S. Pimentel through the grants SFRH/BPD/46995/2008 and SFRH/BPD/101667/2014, and the contract DL57/2016/CP1382/CT0009. This research was supported by the Forest Research Centre (CEF), a research unit funded by FCT (UIDB/00239/2020). Additional support to the work in

References (59)

  • S. Alizon et al.

    Virulence evolution and the trade-off hypothesis: history, current state of affairs and the future

    J. Evol. Biol.

    (2009)
  • G. Álvarez et al.

    Ophiostomatoid fungi associated with declined Pinus pinaster stands in Spain

    Forest systems

    (2015)
  • M.P. Ayres et al.

    Nitrogen budgets of phloem-feeding bark beetles with and without symbiotic fungi

    Ecology

    (2000)
  • P. Baldrian

    Forest microbiome: diversity, complexity and dynamics

    FEMS (Fed. Eur. Microbiol. Soc.) Microbiol. Rev.

    (2017)
  • A.M. Calvo et al.

    Relationship between secondary metabolism and fungal development

    Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.

    (2002)
  • G. Carroll

    Fungal endophytes in stems and leaves: from latent pathogen to mutualistic symbiont

    Ecology

    (1988)
  • X. Ding et al.

    Deciphering the molecular variations of pine wood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus with different virulence

    PloS One

    (2016)
  • L.G. Eckhardt et al.

    Pathogenicity of Leptographium species associated with loblolly pine decline

    Plant Dis.

    (2004)
  • H.C. Eisenman et al.

    The role of melanins in melanotic fungi for pathogenesis and environmental survival

    Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.

    (2020)
  • M.J. Endara et al.

    The resource availability hypothesis revisited: a meta-analysis

    Funct. Ecol.

    (2011)
  • M. Espada et al.

    Identification and characterization of parasitism genes from the pinewood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus reveals a multilayered detoxification strategy

    Mol. Plant Pathol.

    (2016)
  • J. Flowers et al.

    Latent infection of Austrian and Scots pine tissues by Sphaeropsis sapinea

    Plant Dis.

    (2001)
  • H. Fukushige

    Propagation of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Nematoda: aphelenchoididae) on fungi growing in pine-shoot segments

    Appl. Entomol. Zool

    (1991)
  • K. Futai

    Developmental rate and population growth of Bursaphelenchus lignicolus (Nematoda, Aphelenchoididae) and Bursaphelenchus mucronatus

    Appl. Entomol. Zool

    (1980)
  • K. Futai et al.

    Cohabitation of the pine wood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, and fungal species in pine trees inoculated with B. xylophilus

    Nematology

    (2007)
  • R.M. Giblin-Davis et al.

    Evolution of parasitism in insect-transmitted plant nematodes

    J. Nematol.

    (2003)
  • S. Halik et al.

    Long-term survival of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus in living Pinus sylvestris in an established plantation

    Eur. J. For. Pathol.

    (1994)
  • M.K. Hasna et al.

    Food attraction and population growth of fungivorous nematodes with different fungi

    Ann. Appl. Biol.

    (2007)
  • R.W. Hofstetter et al.

    The role of mites in insect-fungus associations

    Annu. Rev. Entomol.

    (2014)
  • Cited by (7)

    • Nematode problems in forests and their sustainable management

      2023, Nematode Diseases of Crops and Their Sustainable Management
    • Harnessing microbial multitrophic interactions for rhizosphere microbiome engineering

      2022, Microbiological Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The exciting fact about fungivorous nematodes is that they feed on different soil fungi like phytopathogenic and plant-beneficial (such as mycorrhizal) fungi, which could be manipulated and exploited for plant health and protection against soil-borne pathogens. These nematodes are called polyphagous nematodes (Pimentel et al., 2021). On the other hand, protists also perform numerous tasks such as decomposing organic matter, influencing nutrient cycling, and producing certain antibiotics, which confer resistance against plant pathogens (Nguyen et al., 2020; Paungfoo-Lonhienne et al., 2015; Gao et al., 2019).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text