Skip to main content
Log in

Geometry of Ancient Mazes: A Synthesis Part II: ‘Roman’ Mazes

  • Research
  • Published:
Nexus Network Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present survey was an investigation of the processes implemented for conceiving and setting up three types of ancient mazes which have come down to us on various media (stone, mosaic, painting, ceramic, coins…) from Prehistory to  Middle Ages (and, for some, even later). The first part of this study was devoted to the so-called ‘Cretan’ mazes, and this second part focusses on a corpus of 43 ‘Roman’ mazes ranging from Portugal and England to Cyprus and from 100 BC to AD 330. Like the other one, this type is well individualized and homogeneous; it is characterized by several similar sectors run through, clockwise or anticlockwise. An introductory study of a maze exemplifies the fundamental duality between path and walls and the various types of meanders which are to be met with. Then a general processes for setting up a Roman maze, beginning with making a regular grid, going on with filling a sector and duplicating it and ending with managing an entrance/exit device, is proposed. Variants of the general prototype are also reviewed. In particular, in the course of this work a comparative study enabled to investigate the complex and intriguing maze of Pula (Croatia), the structure of which can now be better understood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33
Fig. 34
Fig. 35
Fig. 36
Fig. 37
Fig. 38
Fig. 39
Fig. 40
Fig. 41

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The main references used for establishing the corpus are (Daszewski 1977), (Saint-Hilaire 1992), (Lonegren 1993) and (Balmelle et al. 2002).

  2. Among the 42 mazes for which the running direction is identifiable, 12 are clockwise and 30 anticlockwise.

  3. See Virgil’s Aeneid for the trick by which Queen Dido was able to obtain enough land to build the city of Carthage.

  4. In this particular case, the filling of the sector is centrifugal: it includes the successive setting up of three return meanders.

  5. As said above, the reason of this ‘Italian improvement’ is to avoid inserting an exit path.

  6. This is a possible reason for the researchers’ confusion.

References

  • Balmelle, Catherine et al. 2002. Labyrinthes. In : Le décor géométrique de la mosaïque romaine. Vol. II : Répertoire graphique et descriptif des décors centrés, 126–134. Paris: Picard:

  • Bar-Shay, Avraham. 2011. Méthode d’analyse des labyrinthes en mosaïque romaine. O mosaico romano no centro e nas periferias: originalidades, influências e identidades. Actas do X Colloquio international da AIEMA, 353–366. Conímbriga: Instituto dos Museos e das Conservaçãos.

  • Darmon, Jean-Pierre and Henri Lavagne. 1977. Recueil général des mosaïques de la Gaule II. Province de Lyonnaise 3. Paris : CNRS.

  • Daszewski, Wiktor Andrzej. 1977. La mosaïque de Thésée. Étude sur les mosaïques avec représentations du Labyrinthe, de Thésée et du Minotaure. Trans. Zsolt Kiss. Warsaw: Éditions scientifiques de Pologne.

  • Joannès, F. 2019. Salomon et la Reine de Saba. Histoire et Civilisation 55: 72-85.

  • Lonegren, Sig. 1993. Les labyrinthes. Mythes traditionnels et applications modernes.. Escalquens: Dangles. Fr. trans. of Labyrinths: Ancient Myths and Modern Uses.

  • Mosca, Fabio. 2018. Come evitare di perdersi nel labirinto: lo schema grafico usato in due mosaici con Teseo e il Minotauro. Atti del XXIII Colloquio dell’AISCOM,C. Angelelli, C. Cecalupo, M.e. Erba, D. Massara, F. Rinaldi, eds. Roma: Quasar.

  • Munier, Claudine, ed. 2017. Le quartier antique du Palatium et des domus. Archéologie au collège Lumière de Besançon. Besançon: Presses Universitaires de Franche-Comté.

  • Parzysz, Bernard. 2020. Geometry of Ancient Mazes, Part I: ‘Cretan’ Mazes. Nexus Network Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-020-00528-7.

  • Phillips, Anthony. 1992. The Topology of Roman Mosaic Mazes. Leonardo Journal of Sciences 25(3-4): 321-329.

  • Saint-Hilaire, Paul de. 1992. L’univers secret du labyrinthe. Paris: Robert Laffont.

  • Saward, Jeff and Kimberly. 2020. Labyrinthos. Labyrinth and Maze Resource. labyrinthos.net, accessed 14 July 2020.

  • Vassal, Véronique. 2016. Influences et adoptions de schémas grecs et romains dans la mosaïque hérodienne. Atti del XIII Congreso Internacional de la AIEMA, Estudios sobre mosaicos antiguos y medievales, ed. Luz Neira Jiménez, 31–42. Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernard Parzysz.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Corpus of Roman Mazes

Appendix: Corpus of Roman Mazes

Site

Country

Date

Shape

Sect

Dir

Section 1

Section 2

Section 3

Section 4

Annaba

Algeria

AD 150–200

Rectangle

4

C

Z

Z

Z

Z

Avenches

Switzerl

ca AD 250

cCrcle

4

A

R 1

R 1

R 1

R 1

Besançon 1

France

AD 150–175

Square

4

C

R 2

R 2

R 2

R 2

Besançon 2

France

AD 150–175

Octagon

4

Pseudo maze

Brindisi

Italy

AD 200–250

Square

4

A

R 4

R 4

R 4

R 4

Caerleon

UK

AD 200–220

Square

4

C ?

R 3

R 3

R 3

R 3

Calvatone

Italy

AD 25–50

Square

4

C

R 2

R 2

R 2

BF

Cherchel

Algeria

AD 180–220

Square

4

A

R 2

R 2

R 2

R 2

Chusclan

France

AD 150–200

Square

4

A

R 1

R 1

R 1

R 1

Cirencester

UK

AD 300–350

Square

4

A

R 2

R 2

R 2

R 2

Conimbriga 1

Portugal

AD 200–250

Square

4

C

R 3

R 3

R 3

R 3

Conimbriga 2

Portugal

AD 150–200

Square

4

C

R 2

R 2

R 2

R 2

Cormerod

Switzerl

AD 175–225

Circle

8

C

Z

Z

Z

Z

Cremona

Italy

AD 80–120

Square

4

A

R 2

R 2

R 2

BF

Cyrene

Libya

AD 180–220

Square

4

C

R 2

R 2

R 2

R 2

Dellys

Algeria

AD 180–220

Square

4

A

E

E

E

E

Dougga

Tunisia

AD 150–200

Square

4

A

R 5

R 5

R 5

R 5

El Asnam

Algeria

AD 328

Square

4

A

E

E

E

E

Gamzigrad

Serbia

AD 280–320

Hexagon

3

A

R 2

R 2

R 2

 

Giannutri

Italy

AD 150–200

Rectangle

4

A

E 2

E 2

E 2

E 2

Harpham

UK

AD 300–320

Square

4

A

R 3

R 3

R 3

R 3

Henchir-el-Faouar

Tunisia

AD 300–320

Square

4

A

Z

Z

Z

Z

Itálica

Spain

AD 140–160

Square

4

A

R 2

R 2

R 2

R 2

Mactar

Tunisia

AD 199

½ circle

2

C

R 5

R 5

  

Merida

Spain

AD 200–300

Circle

4

A

R 2

R 2

R 2

R 2

Oldcoates

UK

?

Square

4

C

R 3

R 3

R 3

R 3

Orbe

Switzerl

AD 175–200

Square

4

A

R 3

R 3

R 3

R 3

Ostia

Italy

ca AD 150

Square

4

C

R 2

R 2

R 2

R 2

Paphos 1

Cyprus

AD 280–300

Circle

4

A

R 1

R 1

R 1

R 1

Paphos 2

Cyprus

AD 100–200

Circle

4

A

Z

Z

Z

Z

Pompeii 1

Italy

80–60 BC

Square

4

A

R 3

R 3

R 3

BF

Pompeii 2

Italy

80–60 BC

Rectangle

4

A

R 4

R 4

R 4

R 4

Pompeii 3

Italy

60–40 BC

Square

4

A

R 2

R 2

R 2

BF

Pompeii 4

Italy

60–40 BC

Square

4

A

R 2

R 2

R 2

BF

Pont-Chevron

France

AD 150–175

Square

4

A

R 2

R 2

R 2

R 2

Pula

Croatia

AD 100–200

Square

4

Pseudo maze

Sabratha

Libya

AD 1–100

Circle

4

C

Z

Z

Z

Z

Loigsfelder

Austria

AD 275–300

Square

4

C

R 3

R 3

R 3

R 3

Sousse

Tunisia

AD 200–250

Square

4

A

2 × R 2

2 × R 2

2 × R 2

2 × R 2

St Cyr / Mer

France

?

Circle

4

A

Z

Z

Z

Z

Stolac

Bosnia

ca AD 300

Square

4

A

R 3

R 3

R 3

R 3

Taormina

Italy

AD 100–200

Square

4

?

R 2 ?

R 2 ?

R 2 ?

R 2 ?

Thuburbo

Tunisia

AD 250–300

Square

4

A

R 4

R 4

R 4

R 4

Thysdrus

Tunisia

AD 175–225

Circle

4

A

R 3

R 3

R 3

R 3

Verdes

France

AD 200–250

Circle

4

A

R 2

R 2

R 2

R 2

Vienne

France

AD 200–250

Circle

4

A

R 2

R 2

R 2

R 2

Direction: C clockwise, A anticlockwise; Meander: R n returning in n registers, BF back-and-forth, C coiling (C 2 = coiling in two registers), Z zigzag.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parzysz, B. Geometry of Ancient Mazes: A Synthesis Part II: ‘Roman’ Mazes. Nexus Netw J 23, 267–298 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-021-00549-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-021-00549-w

Keywords

Navigation