Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tribological Characterization of Gradient-density Polyacrylamide Hydrogel Surfaces

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The contact and frictional response of a hydrogel is dependent on the polymer structure at the gel surface. Recent work has shown that different mold materials in contact with the gel during polymerization will affect the resulting polymer density.

Objective

The tribological response of a gel with a ‘brushy’ less-dense polymer surface has not been thoroughly studied. Our goal was to perform a suite of tribological experiments to better understand the response of the less-dense layer.

Methods

In this work, we conducted indentation, creep, and sliding experiments with various loads, speeds, and probe materials to determine the impact of the less-dense layer on the contact and frictional behavior of polyacrylamide hydrogels. We additionally used micro-fluorescent particle exclusion to measure the contact areas throughout each experiment.

Results

Indentation revealed a non-Hertzian regime for the first 13–29 µm after first contact that has a weaker force response for a given indentation depth. Creep experiments showed that the surface layer relaxes poroelastically, with water exudation occurring within the gradient layer despite the low contact pressures. Friction was highly speed-dependent, with faster sliding speeds decreasing friction to values as low as 0.01; transient behavior was not seen for most of the experiments, suggesting that the surface layer is capable of quick water re-uptake when out of contact.

Conclusions

We have provided a deeper understanding of the contact and frictional response of this gradient-density surface layer, which will prove useful for hydrogel designs requiring ultra-low friction in a dynamic application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DeRossi D, Kajiwara K, Osada Y, Yamauchi A (1991) Polymer Gels: Fundamentals and Biomedical Applications, vol. 53

  2. Drury JL, Mooney DJ (2003) Hydrogels for tissue engineering: Scaffold design variables and applications. Biomaterials 24(24):4337–4351. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00340-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Calvert P (2009) Hydrogels for soft machines. Adv Mater 21(7):743–756. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200800534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Haque MA, Kurokawa T, Gong JP (2012) Super tough double network hydrogels and their application as biomaterials. Polymer (Guildf) 53(9):1805–1822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2012.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gong JP, Katsuyama Y, Kurokawa T, Osada Y (2003) Double-network hydrogels with extremely high mechanical strength. Adv Mater 15(14):1155–1158. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200304907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sun JY et al (2012) Highly stretchable and tough hydrogels. Nature 489(7414):133–136. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lin P, Ma S, Wang X, Zhou F (2015) Molecularly engineered dual-crosslinked hydrogel with ultrahigh mechanical strength, toughness, and good self-recovery. Adv Mater 27(12):2054–2059. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201405022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shoaib T, Espinosa-Marzal RM (2018) Insight into the Viscous and Adhesive Contributions to Hydrogel Friction. Tribol Lett 66(3):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-018-1045-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li H, Choi YS, Rutland MW, Atkin R (2020) Nanotribology of hydrogels with similar stiffness but different polymer and crosslinker concentrations. J Colloid Interface Sci 563:347–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2019.12.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Arjmandi M, Ramezani M, Nand A, Neitzert T (2018) Experimental study on friction and wear properties of interpenetrating polymer network alginate-polyacrylamide hydrogels for use in minimally-invasive joint implants. Wear 406–407(April):194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2018.04.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shi Y, Xiong D (2013) Microstructure and friction properties of PVA/PVP hydrogels for articular cartilage repair as function of polymerization degree and polymer concentration. Wear 305(1–2):280–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2012.12.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Meier YA, Zhang K, Spencer ND, Simic R (2019) Linking Friction and Surface Properties of Hydrogels Molded against Materials of Different Surface Energies. Langmuir 35(48):15805–15812. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b01636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gombert Y, Simič R, Roncoroni F, Dübner, Geue T, Spencer ND (2019) “Structuring Hydrogel Surfaces for Tribology,” Adv. Mater. Interfaces, vol. 6, no. 22, https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.201901320

  14. Dunn AC, Urueña JM, Huo Y, Perry SS, Angelini TE, Sawyer WG (2013) Lubricity of surface hydrogel layers. Tribol Lett 49(2):371–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-012-0076-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Garcia M, Schulze KD, O’Bryan CS, Bhattacharjee T, Sawyer WG, Angelini TE (2017) Eliminating the surface location from soft matter contact mechanics measurements. Tribol - Mater Surfaces Interfaces 11(4):187–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/17515831.2017.1397908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chan EP, Hu Y, Johnson PM, Suo Z, Stafford CM (2012) Spherical indentation testing of poroelastic relaxations in thin hydrogel layers. Soft Matter 8(5):1492–1498. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1sm06514a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin DC, Shreiber DI, Dimitriadis EK, Horkay F (2009) Spherical indentation of soft matter beyond the Hertzian regime: Numerical and experimental validation of hyperelastic models. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 8(5):345–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-008-0139-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Simic R, Yetkin M, Zhang K, Spencer ND “Importance of Hydration and Surface Structure for Soft-Hydrogel Friction.”

  19. Williams DRM (1993) Moduli of Polymer Brushes, Contact Mechanics, and Atomic Force Microscope Experiments. Macromolecules 26(19):5096–5098. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma00071a018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rubinstein M, Colby RH (2003) Polymer Physics. Oxford University Press Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Galli M, Comley KSC, Shean TAV, Oyen ML (2009) Viscoelastic and poroelastic mechanical characterization of hydrated gels. J Mater Res 24(3):973–979. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2009.0129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lin Y-Y, Hu B-W (2006) Load relaxation of a flat rigid circular indenter on a gel half space. J Non Cryst Solids 352(38):4034–4040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cuccia NL, Pothineni S, Wu B, Harper JM, Burton JC (2020) Pore-size dependence and slow relaxation of hydrogel friction on smooth surfaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117(21):11247–11256. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1922364117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schulze KD et al (2017) Biotribology Polymer Osmotic Pressure in Hydrogel Contact Mechanics. Biotribology 11(May):3–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotri.2017.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kii A, Xu J, Gong JP, Osada Y, Zhang X (2001) Heterogeneous polymerization of hydrogels on hydrophobic substrate. J Phys Chem B 105(20):4565–4571. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp003242u

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. McGhee  EO et al (2018) “In Situ Measurements of Contact Dynamics in Speed-dependent Hydrogel Friction,” Biotribology, vol. 13, no. October 2017, pp. 23–29,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotri.2017.12.002

  27. Kim J, Dunn AC (2016) Soft hydrated sliding interfaces as complex fluids. Soft Matter 12(31):6536–6546. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6sm00623j

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Reale ER, Dunn AC (2017) Poroelasticity-driven lubrication in hydrogel interfaces. Soft Matter 13(2):428–435. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6SM02111E

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lai Y, He D, Hu Y (2019) Indentation adhesion of hydrogels over a wide range of length and time scales. Extrem Mech Lett 31:100540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2019.100540

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation through NSF Award 1751945. Thank you to Jiho Kim, Shabnam Bonyadi, Md Mahmudul Hasan, and Yaswanth Sai Jetti for helpful reviews and support.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (Award 1751945).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Science & Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA

    C. L. Johnson & A. C. Dunn

Authors
  1. C. L. Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. C. Dunn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. C. Dunn.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Johnson, C.L., Dunn, A.C. Tribological Characterization of Gradient-density Polyacrylamide Hydrogel Surfaces. Exp Mech 61, 829–842 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-021-00704-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-021-00704-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation