Abstract—
The problem of the interaction of a shock wave with an increased-density gas bubble in the neighborhood of the wall is investigated on the basis of numerical simulation of Euler’s equations in the two-dimensional plane formulation. The process of shock wave refraction and focusing, namely, reflection of transverse shocks from the plane of symmetry of flow and the wall, is described. It is found that qualitatively different flow regimes, in which the wave is focused in the plane of symmetry before or after the beginning of wave reflection from the wall, can be implemented depending on the constitutive parameters of the problem. It is shown that the presence of a heavy bubble in the neighborhood of the wall strengthens multiply the pulse shock-wave loading on the wall. The maximum pressure reached on the wall is found as a function of the impinging wave Mach number, the bubble gas density, and the initial distance between the bubble and the wall. In some cases such a dependence is essentially nonmonotonic with respect to the bubble gas density and the distance between bubble and wall.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Ranjan, D., Oakley, J., and Bonazza, R., Shock-bubble interactions, Ann. Review of Fluid Mech., 2011, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 117–140.
Li, Y., Wang, Z., Yu, B., Zhang, B., and Liu, H., Gaussian models for late-time evolution of two-dimensional shock–light cylindrical bubble interaction, Shock Waves, 2020, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 169–184.
Hejazialhosseini, B., Rossinelli, D., and Koumoutsakos, P., Vortex dynamics in 3D shock-bubble interaction, Phys. Fluids, 2013, vol. 25, no. 11, p. 110816
Haehn, N., Ranjan, D., Weber, C., Oakley, J., Rothamer, D., and Bonazza R., Reacting shock bubble interaction, Combustion and Flame, 2012, vol. 159, pp. 1339–1350.
Diegelmann, F., Hickel, S., and Adams, N.A., Three-dimensional reacting shock–bubble interaction, Combustion and Flame, 2017, vol. 181, p. 300–314.
Georgievskiy, P.Yu., Levin V.A., and Sutyrin, O.G., Interaction of a shock with elliptical gas bubbles, Shock Waves, 2015, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 357–369.
Georgievskiy, P.Yu., Levin V.A., and Sutyrin, O.G., Shock focusing in the interaction with a local area of increased gas density, Fluid Dynamics, 2018, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 835–842. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0015462818060174
Haehn, N., Weber, C., Oakley, J., Anderson, M., Ranjan, D., and Bonazza, R., Experimental study of the shock–bubble interaction with reshock, Shock Waves, 2012, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 47–56.
Si, T., Zhai, Z., Yang, J., and Luo, X., Experimental investigation of reshocked spherical gas interfaces, Phys. Fluids, 2012, vol. 24, no. 5, p. 054101.
Zhu, Y., Yu, L., Pan, J., Pan, Z., and Zhang, P., Jet formation of SF6 bubble induced by incident and reflected shock waves, Phys. Fluids, 2017, vol. 29, no. 12, p. 126105.
Zhai, Z., Zhang, F., Si, T., and Luo, X., Evolution of heavy gas cylinder under reshock conditions, J. Visualization, 2014, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 123–129.
Tunik, Yu.V., Thermal shielding of a sphere from the action of a strong shock wave, Fluid Dynamics, 2007, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 287–293. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0015462807020135
Liu, X.D., Osher, S., and Chan, T., Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes, J. Comput. Phys., 1994, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 200–212.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The work was carried out in the Institute of Mechanics of Lomonosov Moscow State University using the equipment of the shared research facilities of HPC computing resources at Lomonosov Moscow State University with partial financial support from the Russian Federation President’s Council on grants (MK-3012.2019.1) and the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 18-01-00793).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated by E.A. Pushkar
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sutyrin, O.G., Khabibullin, R.R. Interaction of a Shock Wave with an Increased-Density Gas Bubble in the Neighborhood of the Wall. Fluid Dyn 56, 228–235 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0015462821020129
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0015462821020129