To read this content please select one of the options below:

False binaries in management history, and the scope for a postcolonial project

Nidhi Srinivas (The New School, New York City, USA)

Journal of Management History

ISSN: 1751-1348

Article publication date: 2 December 2020

Issue publication date: 29 January 2021

294

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to offer a postcolonial approach that goes past current management history controversies.

Design/methodology/approach

Discussion of current management history controversies with examples.

Findings

Post-colonial approaches to management history enable engagement with questions of power and knowledge in the management discipline.

Research limitations/implications

Further historical research is needed that considers the interplay of disciplinary knowledge and the historical events under question, especially in post-colonial settings.

Practical implications

It is essential to engage with historical texts and interpretations to better understand the contextual limitations to management as a discipline: a better understanding of disciplinary pasts enables us to better understand the present.

Social implications

By considering management’s pasts, this paper can acknowledge more closely how the discipline continues to retain colonialist assumptions that need to be challenged and changed.

Originality/value

Examples of management history from formerly colonized regions.

Keywords

Citation

Srinivas, N. (2021), "False binaries in management history, and the scope for a postcolonial project", Journal of Management History, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 121-140. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-08-2020-0050

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles