Abstract
The current study evaluated the use of precision teaching to address the verbal behavior deficits of children with autism and other language disorders. From 2013 to 2018, a high-research-activity doctoral university in the south-central United States operated a free clinic that provided applied behavior anlaysis services to early learners in the local community. Participants received referent-based verbal behavior instruction to strengthen their functional language skills by systematically transferring stimulus control across 4 primary verbal operants: mands, echoics, tacts, and sequelics. Referent-based instruction is premised on the notion that proportionate levels of strength among these 4 operants provide the relational flexibility of naturalistic speaking observed in typical language development. This article details the language gains made by 49 participants who received 13 weeks of intervention for 90 min a day, 4 days a week. Relative strengths and weaknesses were identified in the verbal repertoire of each participant, and individualized fluency aims were subsequently developed. Results of pretest and posttest comparisons show that there was a large effect size within the verbal behavior gains of participants who received precision teaching. Implications for implementing referent-based instruction, as well as future areas of research, are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Teachers were instructed to vary their SDs to the extent possible. For example, across 10-min intervals, these fill-in-the-blank frames might change to “T-Rex is a ____,” “All aboard the ____,” and “When I get to the bottom, I go back to the top of the ____,” respectively.
Teachers may have also included the most recent target(s) from the previous NET interval to ensure a sufficient number of stimuli in the probe, with the aim of having more stimuli than the student could respond to within a 1-min timing.
References
Arntzen, E., & Almås, I. K. (2002). Effects of mand-tact versus tact-only training on the acquisition of tacts. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35(4), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2002.35-419
Baum, W. M. (2017). Understanding behaviorism: Behavior, culture, and evolution (3rd ed.). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
Behavior Analyst Certification Board. (2013). Registered behavior technician (RBT) task list. Littleton, CO: Author. Retrieved November 4, 2019, from https://www.bacb.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/161019-RBT-task-list-english.pdf
Binder, C. (1996). Behavioral fluency: Evolution of a new paradigm. The Behavior Analyst, 19(2), 163–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03393163
Bondy, A., Tincani, M., & Frost, L. (2004). Multiply controlled verbal operants: An analysis and extension to the picture exchange communication system. The Behavior Analyst, 27(2), 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03393184
Brown, S. M., & Bebko, J. M. (2012). Generalization, overselectivity, and discrimination in the autism phenotype: A review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6(2), 733–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2011.10.012
Carroll, R. J., & Hesse, B. E. (1987). The effects of alternating mand and tact training on the acquisition of tacts. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 5(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03392820
Cihon, T. M. (2007). A review of training intraverbal repertoires: Can precision teaching help? The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 23(1), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03393052
Cihon, T. M., White, R., Zimmerman, V. L., Gesick, J., Stordahl, S., & Eshleman, J. (2017). The effects of precision teaching with textual or tact relations on intraverbal relations. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 22(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1037/bdb0000056.
Cochran, W. G. (1950). The comparison of percentages in matched samples. Biometrika, 37, 256–266. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/37.3-4.256.
Doughty, S. S., Chase, P. N., & O’Shields, E. M. (2004). Effects of rate building on fluent performance: A review and commentary. The Behavior Analyst, 27(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03392086
Downs, J., & Morin, S. (1990). Improving reading fluency with precision teaching. Teaching Exceptional Children, 22(3), 38–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005999002200308
Edwards, T. L., Lotfizadeh, A. D., & Poling, A. (2019). Motivating operations and stimulus control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 112(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.516
Egan, C. E., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2009). Emergence of tacts following mand training in young children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42(3), 691–696. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2009.42-691
Egan, C. E., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2010). Establishing mand emergence: The effects of three training procedures and modified antecedent conditions. The Psychological Record, 60(3), 473–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03395722
Egan, C. E., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2011). Examining antecedent control over emergent mands and tacts in young children. The Psychological Record, 61(1), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03395750
Emmick, J., Cihon, T. M., & Eshleman, J. (2010). The effects of textual prompting and reading fluency on the acquisition of intraverbals. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 26, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03393080
Engelmann, S. (2005). Low performers' manual. Eugene, OR: Author.
Fabrizio, M. A., & Moors, A. L. (2003). Evaluating mastery: Measuring instructional outcomes for children with autism. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 4(1–2), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2003.11434213
Ferguson, C. J. (2009). An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40(5), 532–538. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015808
Ferris, K., & Fabrizio, M. A. (2009). Teaching analytical thinking skills to a learner with autism. Journal of Precision Teaching and Celeration, 25, 29–34.
Finn, H. E., Miguel, C. F., & Ahearn, W. H. (2012). The emergence of untrained mands and tacts in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45(2), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2012.45-265
Foley, K., & Fabrizio, M. A. (2005). Teaching sound frequency imitation to a child with autism. Journal of Precision Teaching and Celeration, 21, 22–24.
Fryling, M. J. (2017). The functional independence of Skinner’s verbal operants: Conceptual and applied implications. Behavioral Interventions, 32(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1462
Hall, G., & Sundberg, M. L. (1987). Teaching mands by manipulating conditioned establishing operations. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 5(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03392819
Haughton, E. C. (1972). Aims: Growing and sharing. In J. B. Jordan & L. S. Robbins (Eds.), Let’s try doing something else kind of thing (pp. 20–39). Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
Haughton, E. C. (1980). Practicing practices: Learning by activity. Journal of Precision Teaching, 1(3), 3–20.
Heinicke, M. R., Carr, J. E., LeBlanc, L. A., & Severtson, J. M. (2010). On the use of fluency training in the behavioral treatment of autism: A commentary. The Behavior Analyst, 33(2), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03392221
Hughes, J. C., Beverley, M., & Whitehead, J. (2007). Using precision teaching to increase the fluency of word reading with problem readers. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 8(2), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2007.11434284
Kodak, T., & Clements, A. (2009). Acquisition of mands and tacts with concurrent echoic training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42(4), 839–843. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2009.42-839
Kubina, R. M., Morrison, R., & Lee, D. L. (2002). Benefits of adding precision teaching to behavioral interventions for students with autism. Behavioral Interventions, 17(4), 233–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.122
Kubina, R. M., & Starlin, C. M. (2003). Reading with precision. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 4(1–2), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2003.11434212
Kubina, R. M., & Wolfe, P. (2005). Potential applications of behavioral fluency for students with autism. Exceptionality, 13(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327035ex1301_5
Lamarre, J., & Holland, J. G. (1985). The functional independence of mands and tacts. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1985.43-5
Lerman, D. C., Parten, M., Addison, L. R., Vorndran, C. M., Volkert, V. M., & Kodak, T. (2005). A methodology for assessing the functions of emerging speech in children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38(3), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2005.106-04
Lindsley, O. R. (1992). Precision teaching: Discoveries and effects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1992.25-51
Lindsley, O. L. (2000, August 16). Re: Plotting celeration lines-zero line [Electronic mailing list message]. Retrieved from http://lists.psu.edu/archives/sclistserv.html
Luccherino, L., & Scali, V. (2013). The alternating only-tact training and mand-tact training in the acquisition of tacts in a child with mental retardation. European Psychiatry, 28, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0924-9338(13)77286-9
Mason, L. L., & Andrews, A. (2014). Referent-based verbal behavior instruction for children with autism. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 7(2), 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-014-0018-z
Mason, L. L., & Andrews, A. (2019). The verbal behavior stimulus control ratio equation (SCoRE): A quantification of language. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 42, 323–343 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-018-0141-1
Mason, L. L., Andrews, A., Rivera, C. J., & Davis, D. (2016). Free-operant field experiences: Differentially reinforcing successive approximations to behavior analysis through a ShaperSpace. Global Education Review, 3(4), 70–83.
Mason, L. L., Davis, D., & Andrews, A. (2015). Token reinforcement of verbal responses controlled by temporally removed verbal stimuli. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 31(1), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-015-0032-4
Mason, L. L., Sawchak, A., Scott Curtis, S., Andrews, A., Arriaga, A., & Pena, H. (2018). A comparison of outcomes from curriculum-based and experimental analyses of verbal behavior. Behavioral Development, 23(2), 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/bdb0000080.
McDade, C. E., & Olander, C. P. (1990). SAFMEDS design: A comparison of three protocols. Journal of Precision Teaching, 6(2), 69–73.
Meindl, J. N., Miller, N. D., & Ivy, J. W. (2018). Explaining language: A behavioral critique of Skinner’s analysis of verbal behavior. Archives of Scientific Psychology, 6, 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1037/arc0000045
Michael, J., Palmer, D. C., & Sundberg, M. L. (2011). The multiple control of verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393089
Miguel, C. F., Petursdottir, A. I., & Carr, J. E. (2005). The effects of multiple-tact and receptive-discrimination training on the acquisition of intraverbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 21(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03393008
Neely, M. (1982). Seven ways of describing reading - McGuffy's and six more: Parts III and IV. Journal of Precision Teaching, 3(1), 1–9.
Nuzzolo-Gomez, R., & Greer, R. D. (2004). Emergence of untaught mands or tacts of novel adjective-object pairs as a function of instructional history. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 20(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03392995
O’Toole, C., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2009). Three chronometric indices of relational responding as predictors of performance on a brief intelligence test: The importance of relational flexibility. The Psychological Record, 59(1), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395652
O'Toole, C., Barnes-Holmes, D., Murphy, C., O'Connor, J., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2009). Relational flexibility and human intelligence: extending the remit of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 9(1), 1–17.
Palmer, D. C. (2009). Response strength and the concept of the repertoire. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 10(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2009.11434308
Petursdottir, A. I., Carr, J. E., & Michael, J. (2005). Emergence of mands and tacts of novel objects among preschool children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 21(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03393010
Pino, O., Leone, D., Forconi, S., & Casarini, F. (2010). Functional independence and preference effects on the acquisition of multiply controlled mands and tacts. Journal of Applied Radical Behavior Analysis, 1, 82–98.
Reed, S. R., Stahmer, A. C., Suhrheinrich, J., & Schreibman, L. (2013). Stimulus overselectivity in typical development: Implications for teaching children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(6), 1249–1257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1658-x
Ribeiro, D. M., Elias, N. C., Goyos, C., & Miguel, C. F. (2010). The effects of listener training on the emergence of tact and mand signs by individuals with intellectual disabilities. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 26(1), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03393084
Ross, D. E., & Greer, R. D. (2003). Generalized imitation and the mand: Inducing first instances of speech in young children with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 24(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0891-4222(02)00167-1
Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson University Library.
Sautter, R. A., LeBlanc, L. A., & Gillett, J. N. (2008). Using free operant preference assessments to select toys for free play between children with autism and siblings. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2007.02.001
Sigafoos, J., Reichle, J., Doss, S., Hall, K., & Pettitt, L. (1990). “Spontaneous” transfer of stimulus control from tact to mand contingencies. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 11(2), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-4222(90)90033-5
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Solis, T., Derby, K. M., & McLaughlin, T. F. (2003). The effects of precision teaching techniques and functional communication training on problem behavior for a 12-year-old male with autism. International Journal of Special Education, 18(1), 49–54.
Starlin, C. (1971). Evaluating progress toward reading proficiency. In B. Bateman (Ed.), Learning disorders: Vol. 4. Reading (pp. 389–465). Seattle, WA: Special Child Publications.
Sundberg, M. L. (2008). Verbal behavior milestones assessment and placement program. Concord, CA: AVB Press.
Sundberg, M. L., San Juan, B., Dawdy, M., & Argüelles, M. (1990). The acquisition of tacts, mands, and intraverbals by individuals with traumatic brain injury. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03392850
Twyman, J. S. (1996). The functional independence of impure mands and tacts of abstract stimulus properties. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 13(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf033929033
Vargas, J. S. (1977). Behavioral psychology for teachers. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Vargas, E. A. (1982). Intraverbal behavior: The codic, duplic and sequelic subtypes. VB News, 1, 5–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392792
Wallace, M. D., Iwata, B. A., & Hanley, G. P. (2006). Establishment of mands following tact training as a function of reinforcer strength. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2006.119-04
Wan, C. Y., Bazen, L., Baars, R., Libenson, A., Zipse, L., Zuk, J., et al. (2011). Auditory-motor mapping training as an intervention to facilitate speech output in non-verbal children with autism: A proof of concept study. PLOS One, 6(9), e25505. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025505.
Wodka, E. L., Mathy, P., & Kalb, L. (2013). Predictors of phrase and fluent speech in children with autism and severe language delay. Pediatrics, 131(4), e1128–e1134. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-2221
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethical Approval
The procedures performed involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University of Texas at San Antonio’s Institutional Review Board (#2017-181) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Research Highlights
• Precision teaching is beneficial for measuring relative rates of verbal behavior.
• Selecting aims across learning channels promotes relational flexibility.
• Referent-based instruction facilitates the transfer of stimulus control.
• Speaking fluency is defined in terms of proportionate stimulus control over verbal behavior.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mason, L.L., Andrews, A. Referent-Based Instruction to Strengthen the Verbal Behavior of Early Learners with Autism and Related Language Disorders. Behav Analysis Practice 14, 660–672 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-020-00491-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-020-00491-2