Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanical performance of glulam beam-to-column connections with coach screws as fasteners

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mechanical performance of beam-to-column connections plays an essential role in the design of post-and-beam glulam structures. This paper presents an investigation into the mechanical performance of glulam beam-to-column connections with coach screws as fasteners. A series of monotonic and reversed cyclic loading tests were conducted on the beam-to-column connections with coach screws, and the failure modes, moment-resisting capacity, stiffness, ductility and energy dissipation of the connections were analyzed. Results showed that the use of coach screws was an effective way to increase the initial stiffness, ductility and energy dissipation of the glulam beam-to-column connections. The strength of coach screws and glulam members was fully developed, and the moment-resisting capacity of the beam-to-column connections was improved due to the adoption of the coach screws. It was noted that the rotational deformation and energy dissipation of the beam-to-column connections was mainly governed by the mechanical performance of the screwed connections. Moreover, a separating analytical method and a finite element model were established for the tested glulam beam-to-column connections, and results indicated that the stress distribution, deformation and moment–rotation relationships of the connections can be predicted efficaciously versus the test results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shu Z, Li Z, Yu X, Zhang J, He M. Rotational performance of glulam bolted joints: experimental investigation and analytical approach. Constr Build Mater. 2019;213:675–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang M, Song X, Gu X. Numerical simulation of rotational behavior of bolted glulam beam-to-column connections with slotted-in steel plates. Appl Mech Mater. 2016;858:22–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. He M, Zhang J, Li Z. Influence of cracks on the mechanical performance of dowel type glulam bolted joints. Constr Build Mater. 2017;153:445–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ghabussi A, Marnani J, Rohanimanesh M. Improving seismic performance of portal frame structures with steel curved dampers. Structures. 2020;24:27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li Z, He M, Wang K. Hysteretic performance of self-centering glulam beam-to-column connections. J Struct Eng. 2018;144(5):04018031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. He M, Zhao Y, Ma R. Experimental investigation on lateral performance of pre-stressed tube bolted connection with high initial stiffness. Adv Struct Eng. 2016;19(5):762–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ma Y, Song X, Xu T, Luo L. Rotational behavior of bolted glulam beam-to-column connections reinforced with section steel. Appl Mech Mater. 2016;858:15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shu Z, Li Z, He M, Zheng X, Wu T. Seismic design and performance evaluation of self-centering timber moment resisting frames. Soil Dyn Earthqu Eng. 2019;119:346–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Araki Y, Endo T, Iwata M. Feasibility of improved slotted bolted connection for timber moment frames. J Wood Sci. 2011;57(3):247–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sun X, He M, Li Z. Novel engineered wood and bamboo composites for structural applications: state-of-art of manufacturing technology and mechanical performance evaluation. Constr Build Mater. 2020;249:118751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gao J, Koopialipoor M, Armaghani D, Ghabussi A, Baharom S, Morasaei A, Shariati A, Khorami M, Zhou J. Evaluating the bond strength of FRP in concrete samples using machine learning methods. Smart Struct Syst. 2020;26:403–18.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shariati A, Ghabussi A, Habibi M, Safarpour H, Safarpour M, Tounsi A, Safa M. Extremely large oscillation and nonlinear frequency of a multi-scale hybrid disk resting on nonlinear elastic foundation. Thin-Walled Struct. 2020;154:106840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Safarpour M, Ghabussi A, Ebrahimi F, Habibi M, Safarpour H. Frequency characteristics of FG-GPLRC viscoelastic thick annular plate with the aid of GDQM. Thin-Walled Struct. 2020;150:106683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Song X, Ma Y, Gu X, Wang M. Carbon fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement for rotational behavior of bolted glulam beam-to-column connections. J Compos Constr. 2017;21(3):04016096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang M, Song X, Gu X, Zhang Y, Luo L. Rotational behavior of bolted beam-to-column connections with locally cross-laminated Glulam. J Struct Eng. 2015;141(4):04014121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ogrizovic J, Wanninger F, Frangi A. Experimental and analytical analysis of moment-resisting connections with glued-in rods. Eng Struct. 2017;145:322–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xiong H, Liu Y, Yao Y, Li B. Experimental study on the lateral resistance of reinforced glued-laminated timber post and beam structures. J Asian Archit Build. 2017;16(2):379–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. He M, Liu H. Comparison of glulam post-to-beam connections reinforced by two different dowel-type fasteners. Constr Build Mater. 2015;99:99–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith T, Ponzo F, Di Cesare A, Pampanin S, Carradine D, Buchanan A, Nigro D. Post-tensioned glulam beam-column joints with advanced damping systems: testing and numerical analysis. J Earthq Eng. 2014;18(1):147–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Karagiannis V, Malaga-Chuquitaype C, Elghazouli A. Behaviour of hybrid timber beam-to-tubular steel column moment connections. Eng Struct. 2017;131:243–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li Z, Wang X, He M. Experimental and analytical investigations into lateral performance of cross laminated timber (CLT) shear walls with different construction methods. J Earthq Eng. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2020.1815609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bedon C, Fragiacomo M. Three-dimensional modelling of notched connections for timber-concrete composite beams. Struct Eng Int. 2017;27(2):184–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Symons D, Persaud R, Stanislaus H. Slip modulus of inclined screws in timber-concrete floors. Struct Build. 2010;163:245–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sebastian W, Piazza M, Harvey T, Webster T. Forward and Reverse shear transfer in beech LVL-concrete composites with singly inclined coach screw connectors. Eng Struct. 2018;175:231–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hassanieh A, Valipour H, Bradford M. Experimental and analytical behaviour of steel-timber composite connections. Constr Build Mater. 2016;118:63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bradford M, Hassanieh A, Valipour H, Foster S. Sustainable steel-timber joints for framed structures. In: 12th International Conference on Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques. 2017; Vilnius, Lithuania.

  27. Hassanieh A, Valipour H, Bradford M. Load-slip behaviour of steel-cross laminated timber (CLT) composite connections. J Constr Steel Res. 2016;122:110–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jiang Y, Hong W, Hu X, Crocetti R, Wang L, Sun W. Early-age performance of lag screw shear connections for glulam-lightweight concrete composite beams. Constr Build Mater. 2017;151:36–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Du H, Hu X, Jiang Y, Wei C, Hong W. Loading carrying capacity of self tapping lag screws for glulam-lightweight concrete composite beams. BioResources. 2019;14(1):166–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Standards Press of China. Technical code of glued laminated timber structures, GB/T 50708-2012. Beijing: Standards Press of China; 2012. p. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Standards Press of China. Mechanical properties of fasteners bolts, screws and studs, GB3098-2000. Beijing: Standards Press of China; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  32. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). Standard test methods for small clear specimens of timber, ASTM D143-09, PA, USA, 2000.

  33. Hong J, Barrett D. Three-dimensional finite-element modeling of nailed connections in wood. J Struct Eng. 2010;136(6):715–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hong J, Barrett D. Three-dimensional finite solid element model for Japanese post and beam connection. In: Proceeding of 10th world conference on timber engineering (WCTE). 2008; Miyazaki, Japan.

  35. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). Standard test methods for evaluating dowel-bearing strength of wood and wood-based products, ASTM D5764-97a, PA, USA, 2018.

  36. Standards Press of China. Standard for design of timber structure, GB/T 50005-2017. Beijing: Standards Press of China; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Standards Press of China. Standard for design of steel structure, GB 50017-2017. Beijing: Standards Press of China; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  38. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). Standard test methods for cyclic (reversed) load test for shear resistance of vertical elements of the lateral for resisting systems for building, ASTM E2126-11, PA, USA, 2012.

  39. Porteous J, Kermani A. Structural timber design to eurocode 5. Wiley; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  40. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). Standard Test Methods for Mechanical Fasteners in Wood, ASTM D1761-12, PA, USA, 2012.

  41. Yasumura M, Kawai N. Estimating seismic performance of wood-framed structures. In: Proceedings of the 5th world conference on timber engineering. 1998; Lausanne.

  42. Muñoz W, Mohammad M, Salenikovich A. Determination of yield point and ductility of timber assemblies: in search for a harmonised approach. In: Proceedings of the 10th world conference in timber engineering. 2008; Miyazaki, Japan.

  43. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Eurocode 5: design of timber structure prat 1–1. General Common Rules and Rules for Buildings, EN1995-1-1, Brussels, Belgium, 2004.

  44. Smith I, Asiz A, Snow M, Chui I. Possible Canadian/ISO approach to deriving design values from test data. In: Proceedings of the 39th meeting, international council for research and innovation in building and construction working commission W18-timber structures. 2006; KIT, Karlsruhe, Germany.

  45. Closen M, Lam L. Performance of moment resisting self-tapping screw assembly under reverse cyclic load. In: 2012 world conference on timber engineering. 2012; Auckland, New Zealand.

  46. Yeh M, Lin Y, Huang G. Investigation of the structural performance of glulam beam connections using self-tapping screws. J Wood Sci. 2014;60(1):39–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Moayedi H, Darabi R, Ghabussi A, et al. Weld orientation effects on the formability of tailor welded thin steel sheets. Thin-Walled Struct. 2020;149:106669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFC0703507) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51878476) for supporting this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zheng Li.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, M., Li, M., Li, Z. et al. Mechanical performance of glulam beam-to-column connections with coach screws as fasteners. Archiv.Civ.Mech.Eng 21, 51 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-021-00207-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-021-00207-5

Keywords

Navigation