Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Power flow solution using a novel generalized linear Hopfield network based on Moore–Penrose pseudoinverse

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel generalized linear Hopfield neural network-based power flow analysis technique using Moore–Penrose Inverse (MPI) to solve the nonlinear power flow equations (PFEs). The Hopfield neural network (HNN) with linear activation function augmented by a feed forward layer is used to compute the MPI. In this work, the inverse of Jacobian matrix in solving the PFEs is determined by including feed forward network along with feedback network. The developed power flow technique is coded in MATLAB, and its effectiveness is tested on well-conditioned IEEE bus systems (9-bus, 14-bus, 30-bus, and 118-bus), naturally ill-conditioned systems (11-bus and 13-bus), and real-time Malaysian 87-bus system. The results of voltage magnitude and phase angle obtained are compared with standard Newton–Raphson method in case of well-conditioned system. Further, the sensitivity analysis of this approach is carried out against change in initial conditions, line outage, and increase in power generation to validate its robustness. The computational cost of convergence time is compared with well-known power flow techniques of Modified HNN, fourth-order Runge–Kutta (RK4), Iwamoto, and Euler method. The convergence of solution obtained from proposed technique is ensured by Lyapunov notion of stability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig.15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Saadat H (1998) Power System Analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wang XF, Song Y (2010) Modern Power System Analysis. Springer, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  3. Veerasamy V, Abdul Wahab NI, Ramachandran R, Madasamy B, Mansoor M, Othman ML, Hizam H (2020) A novel RK4-hopfield neural network for power flow analysis of power system. Appl Soft Comput J 93:106346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Guo Y, Zhang B, Wu W, Guo Q, Sun H (2013) Solvability and solutions for bus-type extended load flow. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 51:89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.02.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tostado M, Kamel S, Jurado F (2019) Developed Newton-Raphson based Predictor-Corrector load flow approach with high convergence rate. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 105:785–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.09.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Song Y, Hill DJ, Liu T (2019) State-in-mode analysis of the power flow Jacobian for static voltage stability. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 105:671–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.09.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kamel S, Abdel-Akher M, Jurado F (2013) Improved NR current injection load flow using power mismatch representation of PV bus. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 53:64–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.03.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tripathy SC, Prasad GD, Malik OP, Hope GS (1982) Load-flow solutions for Ill-conditioned power systems by a Newton-like method. IEEE Power Eng Rev PER-2:25–26. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPER.1982.5519878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Milano F (2019) Implicit continuous newton method for power flow analysis. IEEE Trans Power Syst 34:3309–3311. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2912485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Durga Prasad G, Jana AK, Tripathy SC (1990) Modifications to Newton-Raphson load flow for ill-conditioned power systems. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 12:192–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-0615(90)90032-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tostado-Véliz M, Kamel S, Jurado F (2018) Development of combined Runge-Kutta Broyden’s load flow approach for well- and ill conditioned power systems. IET Gener Transm Distrib 12:5723–5729. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.5633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Iwamoto S, Tamura Y (1981) A load flow calculation method for ill-conditioned power systems. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst PAS PAS-100:1736–1743. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAS.1981.316511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tostado-Véliz M, Kamel S, Jurado F (2020) A powerful power-flow method based on composite newton-cotes formula for ill-conditioned power systems. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 116:105558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.105558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pourbagher R, Derakhshandeh SY (2018) A powerful method for solving the power flow problem in the ill-conditioned systems. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 94:88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2017.06.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang Y, Ge SS (2005) Design and analysis of a general recurrent neural network model for time-varying matrix inversion. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 16:1477–1490. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2005.857946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang Y, Li Z, Chen K, Cai B (2008) Common nature of learning exemplified by BP and Hopfield neural networks for solving online a system of linear equations. In: Proc 2008 IEEE Int Conf Networking, Sens Control ICNSC 832–836. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNSC.2008.4525331

  17. Yin S, Rodriguez-Andina JJ, Jiang Y (2019) Real-time monitoring and control of industrial cyberphysical systems: with integrated plant-wide monitoring and control framework. IEEE Ind Electron Mag 13:38–47. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIE.2019.2938025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Heleno M, Sumaili J, Meirinhos J, Da Rosa MA (2014) A linearized approach to the symmetric fuzzy power flow for the application to real systems. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 54:610–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wong KP, Li A, Law MY (1997) Development of constrained-genetic-algorithm load-flow method. IEE Proc Gener Transm Distrib 144:91–99. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-gtd:19970847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Acharjee P, Goswami SK (2010) Chaotic particle swarm optimization based robust load flow. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 32:141–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2009.06.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kumar N, Wangneo R, Kalra PK, Srivastava SC (2005) Application of artificial neural networks to load flow solutions. TENCON’91 Reg 10 Int Conf EC3-energy. Comput Commun Control Syst 1:199–203. https://doi.org/10.1109/tencon.1991.712546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Paucar VL, Rider MJ (2002) Artificial neural networks for solving the power flow problem in electric power systems. Electr Power Syst Res 62:139–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7796(02)00030-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nguyen TT (1995) Neural network load-flow. IEE Proc Gener Transm Distrib 142:51–58. https://doi.org/10.11475/sabo1973.47.6_8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Veerasamy V, Ramachandran R, Thirumeni M, Madasamy B (2017) Load flow analysis using generalised Hopfield neural network. IET Gener Transm Distrib 12:1765–1773. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.1211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cai B, Jiang X (2014) A novel artificial neural network method for biomedical prediction based on matrix pseudo-inversion. J Biomed Inform 48:114–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2013.12.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Balasubramonian M, Rajamani V (2014) Design and real-time implementation of SHEPWM in single-phase inverter using generalized hopfield neural network. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 61:6327–6336. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2014.2304919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dieu VN, Ongsakul W, Polprasert J (2013) The augmented Lagrange Hopfield network for economic dispatch with multiple fuel options. Math Comput Model 57:30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2011.03.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ramachandran R, Madasamy B, Veerasamy V, Saravanan L (2018) Load frequency control of a dynamic interconnected power system using generalised Hopfield neural network based self-adaptive PID controller. IET Gener Transm Distrib 12:5713–5722. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.5622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Takahashi Y (1997) Mathematical improvement of the Hopfield model for TSP feasible solutions by synapse dynamical systems. Neurocomputing 15:15–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-2312(96)00044-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nguyen QM, Nguyen TTH, La PH, Lewis HG, Atkinson PM (2019) Downscaling gridded DEMs using the hopfield neural network. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 12:4426–4437. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2019.2953515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang H, Wang B, Yao Q, Yu A, Zhang J (2019) Efficient hybrid multi-faults location based on hopfield neural network in 5G coexisting radio and optical wireless networks. IEEE Trans Cogn Commun Netw 5:1218–1228. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCCN.2019.2946312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kong D, Hu S, Wang J, Liu Z, Chen T, Yu Q, Liu Y (2019) Study of recall time of associative memory in a memristive hopfield neural network. IEEE Access 7:58876–58882. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2915271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Guo D, Zhang Y (2014) Li-function activated ZNN with finite-time convergence applied to redundant-manipulator kinematic control via time-varying Jacobian matrix pseudoinversion. Appl Soft Comput J 24:158–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.06.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lv X, Tan Z, Chen K, Yang Z (2020) Improved recurrent neural networks for online solution of Moore-Penrose inverse applied to redundant manipulator kinematic control. Asian J Control 22:1188–1196. https://doi.org/10.1002/asjc.1988

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang Y, Guo D, Li Z (2013) Common nature of learning between back-propagation and hopfield-type neural networks for generalized matrix inversion with simplified models. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 24:579–592. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2013.2238555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cichocki A, Unbehauen R (1994) Simplified neural networks for solving linear least squares and total least squares problems in real time. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 5:910–923. https://doi.org/10.1109/72.329687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lv X, Xiao L, Tan Z et al (2019) Improved gradient neural networks for solving moore-penrose inverse of full-rank matrix. Neural Process Lett 50:1993–2005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-019-09983-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hopfield JJ, Tank DW (1985) Neural computation of decisions in optimization problems. Biol Cybern 52:141–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00339943

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Wen UP, Lan KM, Shih HS (2009) A review of Hopfield neural networks for solving mathematical programming problems. Eur J Oper Res 198:675–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.11.002

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Shukla R, Khoram S, Jorgensen E, Li J, Lipasti M, Wright S (2018) Computing generalized matrix inverse on spiking neural substrate. Front Neurosci 12:1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lendaris GG, Mathia K, Saeks R (1999) Linear Hopfield networks and constrained optimization. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B Cybern 29:114–118. https://doi.org/10.1109/3477.740171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wahab NIA, Mohamed A, Hussain A (2011) Fast transient stability assessment of large power system using probabilistic neural network with feature reduction techniques. Expert Syst Appl 38:11112–11119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Christie R (1999) Power System Test Archieve. University of Washington. http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/pstca

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Advanced Lightning and Power Energy System, Universiti Putra Malaysia, for providing research fund under UPM Grant No. 9630000 and Grant No. 9671700, and facilities to carry out the research. Also, they thank TEQIP-III-COE-Alternate Energy Research (AER) funded by NPIU, Government of Technology, Tamil Nadu, India, for supporting this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Advanced Lightning, Power and Energy Research (ALPER), Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

    Veerapandiyan Veerasamy, Noor Izzri Abdul Wahab, Mohammad Lutfi Othman, Hashim Hizam & Rizwan Farade

  2. Department of Electrical Engineering, Government College of Technology, Coimbatore, 641013, India

    Rajeswari Ramachandran

  3. Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Aswan University, Aswan, Egypt

    Salah Kamel

Authors
  1. Veerapandiyan Veerasamy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Noor Izzri Abdul Wahab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rajeswari Ramachandran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Salah Kamel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mohammad Lutfi Othman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hashim Hizam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Rizwan Farade
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veerapandiyan Veerasamy.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Veerasamy, V., Abdul Wahab, N.I., Ramachandran, R. et al. Power flow solution using a novel generalized linear Hopfield network based on Moore–Penrose pseudoinverse. Neural Comput & Applic 33, 11673–11689 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-05843-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-05843-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation