Skip to main content
Log in

The Impact of the Marrakesh Treaty on South African Publishers

  • Published:
Publishing Research Quarterly Aims and scope

Abstract

The significant technological advances in reading and content provision technologies since the 1978 Copyright Act in South Africa have not been considered in the expanding exemptions to Copyright nationally. The 2017 version of the amended Copyright Act was sent back to Parliament in South Africa in June of 2020, leaving the provisions for print-disabled readers proposed by the Marrakesh Treaty unimplemented, furthering marginalisation of print disabled readers in SA. A born digital workflow is proposed to facilitate the ‘mainstreaming’ of accessible format materials, and facilitate the implementation of the treaty with minimal disruption to the local publishing industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson P. With booksellers' pressure: DRM is now soft in Germany. The Bookseller. 2015. https://www.thebookseller.com/futurebook/certain-digital-undoing-drm-germany-309359 Accessed 18 Aug 2015.

  2. Armstrong C, de Beer J, Kawooya D. Access to knowledge in Africa: the role of copyright. Canada: IDRC; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Atwell A. Electric book works. How to start publishing digitally. 2020. https://electricbookworks.com/thinking/how-to-start-publishing-digital-first/ Retrieved from 18 Aug 2020.

  4. Cassells L, Weber C. A report on the current access to academic information at the University of Pretoria for visually impaired students: challenges and opportunities. Perspect Policy Pract High Educ. 2018;22(3):82–91.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Department of Business, Enterprise and Innovation. Regulatory impact analysis: copyright and other intellectual property law provisions bill 2018. Dublin: Intellectual Property Unit; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Department of Trade and Industry. Accession to world intellectual property organization treaties. Pretoria: Department of Trade and Industry; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Electric Book Works. Visualising the modern book-production process. Modern Book Production. 2020. https://electricbookworks.com/thinking/modern-book-production-process/ Accessed from 5 Sep 2020.

  8. Electronic Information for Libraries. Implementation of the marrakesh treaty for persons with print disabilities. A practical guide for librarians. https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/hq/topics/exceptionslimitations/etting_started_faq_marrakesh_treaty_a_practical_guide_for_librarians_2018_en.pdf Accessed from 18 Nov 2020.

  9. European Parliament and Council. Eur-lex. Regulation (EU) 2017/1563 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 September 2017 on the cross-border exchange between….2017. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32017R1563 Accessed from 13 sep 2017.

  10. Fitzpatrick S. Setting its sights on the marrakesh treaty: the U.S. Role in alleviating the book famine for persons with print disabilities. Boston Coll Int Comp Law Rev. 2014;37:139–72.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Greaney V. Promoting reading in developing countries. United states: Minesota, USA: International Reading Association; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. Implementing the Marrakesh Treaty for persons with print disabilities. Natherland: IFLA; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jewel C. Accessible books consortium: breaking down barriers to accessibility. WIPO Magazine. Volume 4, 2014.

  14. Karjiker S. Daily Maverick. To rely on the Marrakesh Treaty and its provisions for blind, visually impaired and persons with other disabilities to force the president to give effect to the Copyright Amendment Bill in its entirety would amount to the worst kind of political expedienc. 2020. https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/opinionista/2020-06-08-supporters-of-the-copyright-bill-should-avoid-resorting-to-political-expediency-to-achieve-their-aims/#gsc.tab=0 Accessed from 8 Jun 2020.

  15. Kouletakis JK. A critical examination of copyright limitations and exceptions for the visually impaired pertaining to literary works in South Africa in the local and global context. UCT: Cape Town; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Louw M. GroundUp. Blind sidelined by department of trade and industry. 2013. https://www.groundup.org.za/article/blind-sidelined-department-trade-and-industry/. Accessed from 2 Oct 2013.

  17. National Planning Commission. National development. Plan 2030 South Africa, office of the presidency. Pretoria: South African National Government; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nicholson, D. R. (2012, October 29). Accommodating Persons With Sensory Disabilities In South African Copyright Law. Master of Laws (LLM) (Dissertation). Faculty of Commerce, Law and Management at the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.

  19. Okediji RL. The international copyright system: limitations, exceptions and public interest considerations for developing countries. Switzerland: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD); 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Ouma M. How can African countries benefit from the Marrakesh Treaty. Switzerland: Kenya Copyright Board WIPO; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Palmedo M. South Africa’S copyright amendment bill returned to parliament for further consideration. InfoJustice. 2020. https://infojustice.org/archives/42426 Accessed from 22 Jun 2020.

  22. PASA. Making works accessible for the visually impaired: is there a need for global minimum copyright exceptions? Wynberg: PASA; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  23. PASA. Copyright amendment bill, No 13 Of 2017: Supplementary submission. Cape Town: PASA; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Publishers’ Association of South Africa. Position on an international copyright treaty to improve access for persons with print disabilities. Cape Town: PASA; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rasool F. IT Web. Copyright Laws stifle education. 2010. https://www.itweb.co.za/content/LPp6VMr1nra7DKQz Accessed from 23 Jul 2020.

  26. Armstrong C, de Beer J, Kawooya D, Prabhala A, Schonwetter T. Access to Knowledge in Africa: The Role of Copyright. Cape Town: UCT Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Section27. Section27 submission on the department of trade and industry’s copyright. Johannesburg: Section27; 2015.

  28. Spoor and Fisher. The copyright ammendment bill (B13–2017). Cape Town: Spoor and Fisher; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stagoor U. LIASA Statement On The Marrakesh Treaty. 2013. https://www.liasa.org.za/page/marrakesh: https://www.liasa.org.za/page/marrakesh Accessed from 28 Jun 2013.

  30. Strba SI. The Marrakesh treaty, public-private partnerships, and access to copyrighted works by visually impaired persons. In: Chon PR-LM, editor. The Cambridge handbook of public-private partnerships, intellectual property governance, and sustainable development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2018. p. 176–98.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. UCT Ip Unit. Briefing paper: Marrakesh Treaty implementation guide South Africa. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Intellectual Property Unit; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Verboom M. Accessible Book Publishing, a dutch model. Equitable library services for everybody including persons with print disabilities. Alexandria: IFLA WLIC; 2019. p. 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wiele BV. The ratification and implementation of the Marrakesh treaty: a look at the future of South African copyright law. Cape Town: UCT; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  34. WIPO. Contracting Parties > Marrakesh VIP Treaty. Administered Treaties.2020. https://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ShowResults.jsp?treaty_id=843 Accessed from 28 Sep 2020.

  35. World Health Organisation. Visual Impairment and Blindness. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laetitia Cassells.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cassells, L. The Impact of the Marrakesh Treaty on South African Publishers. Pub Res Q 37, 41–52 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-020-09775-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-020-09775-5

Keywords

Navigation