Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Toys: a Man Has His Reasons. Winnicottian Perspectives on the Playing of Men

  • Published:
Pastoral Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The essay draws on the psychodynamic theory of D.W. Winnicott to argue for eight interrelated reasons informing the playing of men. Through playing, men seek to reestablish a holding environment; (re) discover their bodies; dabble with non-pathological insanity or madness; support their true self; experience transformation and enter transitional spaces; toy with destruction; seek healing from physical, emotional, relational, and spiritual wounds; they play to experience ego orgasms; and, men play for play’s own sake. The author’s own playing, in the form of long-distance motorcycling provides a backdrop of lived experience for the essay. The article mirrors Winnicott’s methodology, which resisted grand theory making as it focuses on specific psychodynamic insights and themes. Winnicott’s thought is used to extend William Blake’s wisdom around toys and reasons, wisdom Erik Erikson explored previously.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. I wrote about this experience in: Hamman (2011). A play-full life: Slowing down and seeking peace. Cleveland: Pilgrim Press, p. 1.

  2. Winnicott’s “ego orgasm” is similar to Jacques Lacan’s “jouissance” and it may be that Winnicott got his construct from Lacan, who wrote about jouissance as early as 1953. See: Lacan and Miller (2008). The ethics of psychoanalysis, 1959-1960: The seminar of Jacques Lacan Book VII. London: W.W Norton, p. 191.

References

  • Abram, J., & Hjulmand, K. (2018). The language of Winnicott: A dictionary of Winnicott’s use of words. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barlett, C., Harris, R., Smith, S., & Bonds-Raacke, J. (2005). Action figures and men. Sex Roles, 53(11), 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, J. (1998). Shadow of the other: Intersubjectivity and gender in psychoanalysis. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, W., & Yeats, W. B. (1893). The poems of William Blake. London: Lawrence & Bullen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollas, C. (1987). The shadow of the object: Psychoanalysis of the unthought known. London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollas, C. (2007). A theory for the true self. In L. Caldwell (Ed.), Winnicott and the psychoanalytic tradition: Interpretation and other psychoanalytic issues (pp. 8–23). London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britzman, D. P. (2010). On the madness of lecturing on gender: A psychoanalytic discussion. Gender and Education, 22(6), 13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., & Vaughan, C. (2009). Play: How it shapes the brain, opens the imagination, and invigorates the soul. New York: Avery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, N. (1994). Femininities, masculinities, sexualities: Freud and beyond. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, A. (1996). Masculinity and its vicissitudes: Reflections on some gaps in the psychoanalytic theory of male identity formation. Psychoanalytic Review, 83(1), 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craib, I. (1987a). Masculinity and male dominance. The Sociological Review, 356(4), 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craib, I. (1987b). Masculinity and male dominance. The Sociological Review, 35(4), 22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dethiville, L. (2019). The clinic of Donald W. Winnicott. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, M. J. (2006). Masculinity unraveled: The roots of male gender identity and the shifting of male ego ideals throughout life. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 54(4), 31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1977). Toys and reasons: Stages in the ritualization of experience (1st ed.). New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1993). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogel, G. I. (2006). Riddles of masculinity: Gender, bisexuality, and thirdness. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 54(4), 24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamman, J. J. (2000). Developing a capacity for concern: The million man march as transitional object. Koinonia, 12(1), 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamman, J. J. (2011). A play-full life: Slowing down and seeking peace (pp. 3–4). Cleveland: Pilgrim Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, R. (Ed.). (2001). Boys and their toys? Masculinity, technology, and class in America. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacks, L. P. (1932). Education through recreation. London: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, M. (1995). D.W. Winnicott. London: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, M. (1974). Ego-orgasm in bisexual love. International Review of Psycho-Analysis, 1, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J., & Miller, J.-A. (2008). The ethics of psychoanalysis, 1959-1960: The seminar of Jacques Lacan Book VII. London: W. W Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laporic, Z. (2012). From Freud to Winnicott: Aspects of a paradigm change. In J. Abram (Ed.), Donald Winnicott today. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, R. (1996). Psychoanalysis and gender: An introductory reader. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, T. H. (1989). The primitive edge of experience. Northvale: J. Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, T. H. (2007). On holding and containing, being and dreaming. In L. Caldwell (Ed.), Winnicott and the psychoanalytic tradition: Interpretation and other psychoanalytic issues (pp. 76–96). London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A. (2005). Going sane: Maps of happiness. New York: Fourth Estate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Register, W. (2001). Everyday Peter Pans: Work, manhood, and consumption in Urban America, 1900-1930. In Boys and their toys? Masculinity, technology, and class in America (pp. 199-228). New York: Routledge.

  • Ronson, S. (2008). Making use of Winnicott. Psychoanalytic Perspectives, 5(2), 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, S., & Frank, A. (2019). Psychoanalysis and contemporary American men: Gender identity in a time of uncertainty. London; New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (Ed.). (1986). Home is where we start from: Essays by a psychoanalyst (1st American ed.). New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1989). Psycho-somatic illness in its positive and negative aspects. In C. Winnicott, R. Shepherd, & M. Davis (Eds.), Psycho-analytic explorations (pp. 103–114). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1992a). Anxiety associated with insecurity. In Through paediatrics to psycho-analysis: Collected papers (1st ed., pp. 97–100). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1992b). Appetite and emotional disorder. In Through paediatrics to psycho-analysis: Collected papers (1st ed., pp. 33–51). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1992c). The depressive position in normal emotional development (1954–5). In Through paediatrics to psycho-analysis: Collected papers (1st ed., pp. 262–277). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1992d). Primitive emotional development. In Through paediatrics to psycho-analysis: Collected papers (1st ed., pp. 145–156). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1992e). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena. In Through paediatrics to psycho-analysis: Collected papers (1st ed., pp. 229–242). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1993a). Creativity and its origins. In Playing and reality (pp. 65-85). London: Tavistock.

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1993b). Mirror-role of mother and family in child development. In Playing and reality (pp. 111-118). London: Tavistock.

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1993c). Playing: A theoretical statement. In D. W. Winnicott (Ed.), Playing and reality (pp. 38–52). London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, C. (1994). D.W.W.: A reflection. In C. Winnicott, R. Shepherd, & M. Davis (Eds.), Psycho-analytic explorations (pp. 1–20). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1994a). The capacity to be alone. In The maturational processes and the facilitating environment: Studies in the theory of emotional development (pp. 29-36). Madison: International Universities Press.

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1994b). Communicating and not communicating leading to a study of certain opposites. In The maturational processes and the facilitating environment: Studies in the theory of emotional development (pp. 179-192). Madison: International Universities Press.

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1994c). The development of the capacity for concern. In The maturational processes and the facilitating environment: Studies in the theory of emotional development (pp. 73-82). Madison: International Universities Press.

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1994d). Ego distortion in terms of true self and false self. In The maturational processes and the facilitating environment: Studies in the theory of emotional development (pp. 140-152). Madison: International Universities Press.

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1994e). Ego integration in child development. In The maturational processes and the facilitating environment: Studies in the theory of emotional development (pp. 56-63). Madison: International Universities Press.

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1994f). The fate of the transitional object (1959). In C. Winnicott, R. Shepherd, & M. Davis (Eds.), Psycho-analytic explorations (pp. 53–58). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1994g). The fear of breakdown. In C. Winnicott, R. Shepherd, & M. Davis (Eds.), Psycho-analytic explorations (pp. 87–95). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1994h). From dependence towards independence in the development of the individual (1963). In The maturational processes and the facilitating environment: Studies in the theory of emotional development (pp. 83-92). Madison: International Universities Press.

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1994i). Mind in relation to psyche-soma. In C. Winnicott, R. Shepherd, & M. Davis (Eds.), Psycho-analytic explorations (pp. 243–254). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1994j). Notes on play. In C. Winnicott, R. Shepherd, & M. Davis (Eds.), Psycho-analytic explorations (pp. 59–63). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1994k). On the basis for self in body. In C. Winnicott, R. Shepherd, & M. Davis (Eds.), Psycho-analytic explorations (pp. 261–283). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1994l). Playing and culture. In C. Winnicott, R. Shepherd, & M. Davis (Eds.), Psycho-analytic explorations (pp. 203–206). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1994m). The theory of parent-infant relationship. In The maturational processes and the facilitating environment: Studies in the theory of emotional development (pp. 37-55). Madison: International Universities Press.

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1994n). The use of an object and relating through identifications. In C. Winnicott, R. Shepherd, & M. Davis (Eds.), Psycho-analytic explorations (pp. 218–227). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1995a). The effect of psychosis on family life. In The family and individual development (pp. 61-68). London: Tavistock Publications.

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1995b). Group influences and the maladjusted child. In The family and individual development (pp. 146-154). London: Tavistock Publications.

  • Winnicott, D. W. (2017a). Paediatrics and childhood neurosis. In L. Caldwell & H. T. Robinson (Eds.), The collected works of D.W. Winnicott (Vol. 5, pp. 165–170). Oxford: The Winnicott Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (2017b). What do we mean by a normal child? In L. Caldwell (Ed.), The collected works of D.W. Winnicott (Vol. 2, pp. 281–286). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (2017c). Why children play. In L. Caldwell & H. T. Robinson (Eds.), The collected works of D.W. Winnicott (Vol. 2, pp. 167–170). Oxford: The Winnicott Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, K. (2007). The suppressed madness of sane analysts. In L. Caldwell (Ed.), Winnicott and the psychoanalytic tradition: Interpretation and other psychoanalytic issues (pp. 165–174). London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamalin, A. (2017). D.W. Winnicott, ethics, and race: Psychoanalytic thought and racial equality in the United States. In M. H. Bowker & A. Buzby (Eds.), D.W. Winnicott and political theory: Recentering the subject (pp. 271–290). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaco J. Hamman.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamman, J.J. Toys: a Man Has His Reasons. Winnicottian Perspectives on the Playing of Men. Pastoral Psychol 70, 87–106 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-021-00937-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-021-00937-6

Keywords

Navigation