Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Education and time investment in domestic and parental activities in urban areas of Iran

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Population Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Education is considered one of the most important determinants of population change; operating through cultural change, enhancing negotiating powers or increasing opportunity costs of some behaviors. However, the role of education in gender division of household activities has not been investigated in Iran. This paper uses data from the 2014–2015 Time Use Survey, representing urban areas of Iran, to examine the association between spouses’ education and their participation in domestic and parental activities. The findings show that wives are five times more likely to participate in either domestic or parental activities than their husbands, suggesting the persistence of gender division of roles in family sphere in urban areas of Iran. There are considerable gender differences in the association between education and the amount of time allocated to these activities. However, the experience of both wives and husbands is consistent with cultural explanations. Although different levels of education determine wives’ and husbands’ participation in domestic and parental activities, the positive direction of these associations suggest that economic explanations are irrelevant. It seems that higher education does not increase the opportunity costs of household activities nor used as a negotiating power to reduce one’s share in household activities. Education appears to operate by enhancing egalitarian gender attitudes and the importance of quality parenting. Similar analyses in rural areas can deepen our understanding about gender relations in Iran and help evidence-based policy making in a context where family dynamics have raised serious concerns at the highest political levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J., McDonald, P., & Hosseini-Chavoshi, M. (2009). The fertility transition in Iran: Revolution and reproduction. Dordecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Aghajanian, A. (1988). Husband-wife conflict among two-worker families in Shiraz. International Journal of Sociology of Family, 18(1), 15–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1988). Family economics and macro behavior. American Economic Review, 78, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blossfeld, H.-P. (1995). The new role of women: Family formation in modern societies. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blood, R. O., & Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and wives: The dynamics of family living. Oxford: Free Press Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brines, J. (1993). The exchange value of housework. Rationality and Society, 5(3), 302–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, J. C. (1982). Theory of fertility decline. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, J., & Rodriguez, G. (1988). The effect of parental education on marital fertility in developing countries. Population Studies, 42, 419–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, J., & Wilson, C. (1987). Demand theories of the fertility transition: An iconoclastic view. Population Studies, 41, 5–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coverman, S. (1985). Explaining husbands’ participation in domestic labor. The Sociological Quarterly, 26(1), 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, I., Newby, M., & Varle, S. (1998). Female education and fertility: Examining the links. In C. H. Bledsoe, J. B. Casterline, J. A. Johnson-Kuhn, & J. G. Haaga (Eds.), Critical perspective in schooling and fertility in developing countries (pp. 23–48). Washington: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, X.-Y., & An, X. (2012). Gender patterns and value of unpaid work findings from China’s first larg-scale time use survey, Research paper 2012-16, Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD).

  • England, P., & Farkas, G. (1986). Households, employment and gender: A Social, economic and demographic view. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • England, P., & Srivastava, A. (2013). Educational differences in US parents’ time spent in child care: The role of culture and cross-spouse influence. Social Science Research, 42, 971–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiller, D. V. (1984). Power dependence and division of family work. Sex Roles, 10(11/12), 1003–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmeister, H., & Moen, P. (1999). Late midlife employment, gender roles and marital quality: His and her perspectives. Sociological Focus, 32(3), 317–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsin, A. (2007). Children’s time use: Labor divisions and schooling in Indonesia. National Council on Family Relations, 69(5), 1297–1306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jejeebhoy, S. J. (1995). Women’s education, autonomy, and reproductive behavior: Experience from developing countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato, T., Kumamaru, H., & Fukuda, S. (2018). Men’s participation in childcare and housework and parity progression: A Japanese population-based study. Asian Population Studies, 14(3), 290–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemipour, S. (2004). Changes in women’s age at marriage in Iran [Persian]. Pazhuhish-i Zanan, 2(3), 103–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubricht, B. C., Miller, R. B., Yang, K.-L., Harper, J. M., & Sandberg, J. G. (2017). Division of household labor and marital satisfaction in China: Urban and rural comparisons. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 48(2), 261–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladusingh, L. (2018). Rural-urban differences in time spent in unpaid household work in India. In M. Hyde, H. S. Chungkham, & L. Ladusingh (Eds.), Work and health in India (pp. 87–105). Bristol: Bristol University Press, Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoudian, H. (2005). The increasing age at marriage: Examining the protective factors [Persian]. Journal of Social Sciences, 24, 27–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility. Journal of Population Research, 17(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, D. K., Lichter, D. T., & Johnston, G. M. (1993). Some women marry young: Transitions to first marriage in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55(4), 827–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moghadam, V. M. (2004). Patriarchy in transition: Women and the changing family in the Middle East. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 35(2), 137–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oshio, T., Nozaki, K., & Kobayashi, M. (2013). Division of household labor and marital satisfaction in China, Japan and Korea. Journal of Family and Economic, 34(2), 211–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. W. (1974). Economics of the family: marriage, children, and human capital, NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

  • Shelton, B. A., & John, D. (1996). The division of household labor. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 299–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistical Center of Iran. (2015). Results of time use in urban areas (2014–2015). Tehran: Statistical Center of Iran.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistical Centre of Iran. (2016). Detailed results of general census of individuals and housing [electronic resource]. Tehran. http://amar.sci.org.ir.

  • Suitor, J. J. (1991). Marital quality and satisfaction with the division of household labor across the family life cycle. Journal of Marriage and Family, 53(1), 221–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, A., Fricke, T., Yang, L. S., & Chang, J. S. (1994). Theoretical mechanisms of social change. In A. Thornton & H.-S. Lin (Eds.), Social change and the family in Taiwan (pp. 88–115). Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, J. (1958). Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica, 26(1), 24–36.

  • Torabi, F. (2011). The role of unobserved heterogeneity in event history analyses: An application to the fertility behaviour of women in Iran [Persian]. Journal of Population Association of Iran, 5(10), 6–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torabi, F., & Abbasi-Shavaiz, M. J. (2016). Women’s education, time use, and marriage in Iran. Asian Population Studies, 12(3), 229–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torabi, F., & Askari-Nodoushan, A. (2012). Dynamics of the population age structure and changes in marriage in Iran [Persian]. Journal of Population Association of Iran, 7(13), 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torabi, F., Baschieri, A., Clarke, L., & Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J. (2013). Marriage postponement in Iran: Accounting for socio-economic and cultural change in time and space. Population, Space and Place, 19(3), 258–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, R. A. (1993). Marital happiness and household equity in later life. Journal of Marriage and Family, 55(2), 427–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatemeh Torabi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Providing access to the Time Use Data by the Statistical Centre of Iran and invaluable comments from the reviewers are appreciated.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Torabi, F. Education and time investment in domestic and parental activities in urban areas of Iran. J Pop Research 38, 25–51 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-020-09251-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-020-09251-z

Keywords

Navigation