Abstract
From my own standpoint as a scientist, I, in this paper attempt to explore the scientific judgement-making process from an ethical perspective. In the process of developing truthful scientific knowledge, there are a myriad of judgements to make for the scientist. However, our contemporary world, dominated by technology, rules and regulations, presents us with less unconditioned opportunities for exercising our judgmental abilities. Any deliberation about a choice of action within our practice is, in a manner, made for us, and not by us. The challenges that we meet is largely assumed solved either by rules of conduct or by formulas where the right thing to do is based on mechanical computations (deontology), or as within utilitarianism where one focuses on the consequences of an action. My thesis is, however, that virtue ethics and the concept of Phronesis, as a framework, is better suited to grasp the peculiarity of the scientific practice compared to the contemporary mind-set. Hence, I will try to display my perspective and show how virtue ethics can lead to enhanced understanding of both the epistemological and the ethical parts of the scientific practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aristotle. (1999). The Nikomachean Ethics (Norwegian version) [Den Nikomakiske Etikk]. Oslo: Bokklubben Dagens Bøker.
Bertinetto, A., & Bertram, G. (2020). We Make Up the Rules as We Go Along: Improvisation as an Essential Aspect of Human Practices? Open Philosophy, 3(1).
Bretag, T., & Green, M. (2014). The role of virtue ethics principles in academic integrity breach decision-making. Journal of Academic Ethics, 12(3), 165–177.
Chen, JY. (2015). Virtue and the Scientist: Using Virtue Ethics to Examine Science’s Ethical and Moral Challenges. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21, 75–94.
Dash, DP. (2009). Science as Reflective Practice: A Review of Frederick Grinnell’s Book, Everyday Practice of Science. Journal of Research Practice, 5.
Dillern, T. (2020). The Act of Knowing: Michael Polanyi Meets Contemporary Natural Science. Foundations of Science, 25, 573–585).
Dumler-Winckler, E. (2018). “Distinguishing Intellectual and Moral Virtues in the Practices of Modern Science.” Philosophy, Theology and the Sciences (PTSc) 5 (1): 80–103. https://doi.org/10.1628/ptsc-2018-0006.
Emmerich, N. (2015). A sociological analysis of ethical expertise: The case of medical ethics. SAGE Open, 5(2).
Eraut, M. (2004). Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in continuing education, 26(2), 247–273.
Eriksson, S., Helgesson, G., & Höglund, A. T. (2007). Being, doing, and knowing: Developing ethical competence in health care. Journal of Academic Ethics, 5, 207–216.
Felix, CO., Ahmad, AHB., & Arshad, RB. (2016). Examining ethical reasoning and transformational leadership style in Nigeria public sector. SAGE Open, 6(2).
Fossestøl, B. (2013). Evidence and practical knowldge [Evidens og praktisk kunnskap]. Fontene forskning, 2, 55–66.
Gadamer, H. (2003). Collected Works (Norwegian version) [Gesammelte Werke]. Oslo: Cappelen akademisk.
Grobstein, P. (2005). Revisiting Science in Culture: Science as Story Telling and Story Revising. Journal of Research Practice, 1.
Halverson, R. (2004). Accessing, Documenting, and Communicating Practical Wisdom: The Phronesis of School Leadership Practice (a pre-published version of the text). American Journal of Education, 111, 68–89.
Hicks, D. J., & Stapleford, T. A. (2016). The Virtues of Scientific Practice: MacIntyre, Virtue Ethics, and the Historiography of Science. Isis, 107(3).
Jørgensen, D. (2008). Aglaias dance. Towards an aesthetic thinking [Aglaias dans. På vej mod en æstetisk tænkning], Århus, Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Kidd, I. J. (2016). Inevitability, Contingency, and Epistemic Humility. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Special Section - Historiography and the Philosophy of the SciencesSpecial Section - Scientific Knowledge of the Deep Past, 55, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.08.006.
Lindseth, A. (2015). Response-ability and critical reflection - How to develop practical knowledge? In: MCGUIRCK, J. & METHI, J. (eds.) Practical knowledge as professional research [Svarevne og kritisk refleksjon - Hvordan utvikle praktisk kunnskap? In: MCGUIRCK, J. & METHI, J. (red.) Praktisk kunnskap som profesjonsforskning]. Bergen, Fagbokforlaget.
Lissack, M. (2015). Second Order Science: Putting the Metaphysics Back Into the Practice of Science, (retrieved may 2015) (http://lissack.com/SecondOrder.pdf)
Macintyre, AC. (2007). After virtue: a study in moral theory (3rd ed.). Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2007). Strategic management as distributed practical wisdom (phronesis). Industrial and Corporate Change, 16, 371–394.
Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge - Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. London: Routledge.
Polanyi, M. (1961). Faith and Reason. The Journal of Religion, 41, 237–247.
Polanyi, M. (1965). On the Modern Mind. Encounter, 12–20.
Resnik, D. B. (1998). The ethics of science: An introduction. London and New York: Routledge.
Schwartz, B., & Sharpe, K. E. (2006). Practical wisdom: Aristotle meets positive psychology. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 377–395.
Scott, B. (2004). Second-order cybernetics: an historical introduction. Kybernetes (33/9). pp. 1365–1378
Shulman, L. S. (2007). Practical Wisdom in the Service of Professional Practice (Response to Comments). Educational Researcher, 36, 560–563.
Smith, R. (1999). Paths of Judgement: the revival of practical wisdom. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 31, 327–340.
Stapleford, T. A. (2018). Making and the Virtues: The Ethics of Scientific Research. Philosophy, Theology, and the Sciences, 5(1), 28–50. https://doi.org/10.1628/ptsc-2018-0004.
Turriago-Hoyos, A., Thoene, U., & Arjoon, S. (2016). Knowledge workers and virtues in Peter Drucker’s management theory. SAGE Open, 6(1).
Umpleby, S. A. (2016). Second-Order Cybernetics as a Fundamental Revolution in Science. Constructivist Foundations, 11(3), 455–465.
van Valey, T., Hartmann, D., Fuqua, W., Evans, A., Ing, A. D., Meyer, A. ... & Walmsley, C. (2015). The process of ethical decision-making: Experts vs novices. Journal of Academic Ethics, 13(1), 45–60.
Wackerhausen, S. (1992). Technology, competence and knowledge forms [Teknologi, kompetence og vidensformer]. Philosophias temanr: Teknologi og Filosofi, 20, 81–117.
Wolf, J. (2002). What is phenomenology? In: Wolf, J. & Gjerris, M. (eds.) Tracks in the sand [Hvad er fænomenologi? In: Wolf, J. & Gjerris, M. (red.) Spor i sandet]. København: Anis.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank professor Johan Arnt Myrstad for his valuable comments on this work. I would also like to thank the anonymous referees for their insightful observations and remarks, which obviously has contributed in improving the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dillern, T. The Scientific Judgment-Making Process from a Virtue Ethics Perspective. J Acad Ethics 19, 501–516 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09399-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09399-0