Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

University Strategic Plans: What they Say about Innovation

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We analyze innovation in university strategic plans to assess whether innovation is a stated priority, to what end innovation is sought, and whether innovation is a comprehensive strategy or more carefully bounded, excluding innovation opportunities. Our analysis utilized Atlas.ti software to quantify word usage and to extract and classify sentences that state innovation intentions. Innovation, entrepreneurship and transformation are mentioned often in university strategic plans, conveying aspirations to change, both inside the university (to improve the institution) and outside (for the benefit of society at large). In recent years (especially since 2015), these terms have become unifying themes of many plans aiming to modernize, improve and become more responsive to societal needs, spanning multiple mission areas. Moreover, the terminology has been adopted by a broad range of American universities, though less often by those that have the highest rankings for their undergraduate education and research programs. Though innovation strategies nudge universities toward change by promoting adoption of technology, service to diverse students, and creation of buildings and spaces for collaboration, strategic plans do not express aspirations for disruptive forms of innovation that alter the direction of higher education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data can be provided upon request.

References

  • Aleong, C. (2007). An empirical and qualitative study of the strategic planning process of a higher education institution. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 4(4), 33-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aleong, C. & Aleong, J. (2011). A qualitative study of the strategic plans of three higher education instituions. Journal of Business and Economics Research, 9(2), 17-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, B. (2020). Academia next, the futures of higher education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Aoun, J. (2017). Robot-proof, higher education in the age of artificial intelligence. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • APLU (2020). Innovation and Economic Prosperity Universities. webpage https://www.aplu.org/projects-and-initiatives/economic-development-and-community-engagement/innovation-and-economic-prosperity-universities-designation-and-awards-program/. Accessed 5 October 2020.

  • Barringer, S.N., Leahey, E. & Salazar, K. (2020). What catalyzes research universities to commit to interdisciplinary research?. Research in Higher Education, 61, 679-705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, W.G., (2013). Higher education in the digital age. New York, NY: Ithaka.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brint, S. (2005). Creating the future: ‘New directions’ in American research universities. Minerva, 43(1), 23-50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brint, S. (2018). Two cheers for higher education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chance, S. & Williams, B.T. (2009). Assessing university strategic plans: A tool for consideration. Educational planning: the journal of the international society for educational planning, 18(1), 38-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C.M. and Eyring, H.J. (2011). The innovative university: Changing the DNA of higher education from the inside out. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2011.

  • Clark, B. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities, organizational pathways of transformation. Bingley: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortés-Sánchez, J.D. (2017). What do universities want to be? a content analysis of mission and vision statements worldwide, LSE Blog, https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2017/12/20/what-do-universities-want-to-be-a-content-analysis-of-mission-and-vision-statements-worldwide/. Accessed 23 June 2020.

  • Crow, M.M., & Dabars, W.B. (2015). Designing the new American university. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davey, T., Meerman, A., Orazbayeva, B., Riedel, M., Galan-Muros, V., Plewa, C. & Eckert, N. (Eds.) (2019). The future of universities thoughtbook. Amsterdam: University Industry Innovation Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, C.N. (2017). The new education: How to revolutionize the university to prepare students for a world in flux. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckel, P.D. & Kezar, A. (2003). Taking the reins, institutional transformation in higher education. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckel, P. & Trower, C. (2019). Stop planning!, Inside Higher Education, February 14, https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2019/02/14/colleges-need-rethink-strategic-planning-opinion. Accessed 23 June 2020.

  • Evans, N. & Henrichsen, L. (2008). Long-term strategic incrementalism: An approach and a model for bringing about change in higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 33(2), 111-124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, R.L. & Sa, C.M. (2008). Tapping the riches of science, universities and the promise of economic growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gittleman, S. (2004). An entrepreneurial university, the transformation of Tufts, 1976-2002. Medford, MA: Tufts University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigg, T. (1994). Adopting an entrepreneurial approach in universities. Journal of Engineering Technology Management, 11(3-4), 273-298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R.W. (2021). Creating the innovative university, Technology and Innovation (forthcoming).

  • Harris, M. (2010). Interdisciplinary strategy and collaboration: A case study of American research universities. Journal of Research Administration, 41(1), 22-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou, A.Y.C., Morse, R. & Chiang, C.L. (2012). An analysis of mobility in global rankings: Making institutional strategic plans and positioning for building world-class universities. Higher Education Research and Development, 31(6), 841-857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrabowski, F.A. With Rous, P.J. & Henderson, P.H. (2019). The Empowered University. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, H.-F. & Shannon, S.E. 2005, Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A. & Eckel, P. (2002). Examining the institutional transformation process: The importance of sensemaking, interrelated strategies, and balance. Research in Higher Education, 43(3) 295-328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leih, S. & Teece, D. (2016). Campus leadership and the entrepreneurial university: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(2), 183-210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, H.C. Jr. (2016). Technology and the disruption of higher education. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Markowska, M., (2014). ‘The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree’: The entrepreneurial university as nurturer of entrepreneurial values. In Fayolle, A. and Redford, D.T. (Eds.) Handbook on the entrepreneurial university (pp. 209-224). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meerman, A., Orazbayeva, B., Davey, T., McCoy, C., Plewa, C., Muros, V.G., Alstock, M. & Brown, C. (Eds.) (2019). The future of universities thoughtbook, North American edition. Amsterdam: University Industry Innovation Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morphew, C. & Hartley, M. (2006). Mission statements: A thematic analysis of rhetoric across international type. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(3), 456-471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morphew, C.C., Fumasoli, T. & Stensaker, B. (2018). Changing missions? how the strategic plans of research-intensive universities in Northern Europe and North America balance competing identities. Studies in Higher Education, 43(6), 1074-1088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NCES (2020). Postsecondary institution expenditures. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cue.asp Accessed 29 June, 2020.

  • NSF (2020). I-Corps, NSF Innovation Corps. https://www.nsf.gov/news/special_reports/i-corps/. Accessed 5 October 2020.

  • Orazbayeva, B., Plewa, C., Meerman, A., Brennan, I., Szabo, J., Forde, N., Atkinson, M., Shaw, J. & Anderson, K. (Eds.) (2019). The future of universities thoughtbook, Australian edition. Amsterdam: University Industry Innovation Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozdem, G. (2011). An analysis of the mission and vision statements on the strategic plans of higher education institutions. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 11(4), 1887-1894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plattner, H. (2019). Stanford 2025, uncharted territory, a guide to reimagining higher education. Stanford, CA: Institute of Design at Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romos-Monge, E.L., Lliñas-Audet, X. & Barrena-Martinez, J. (2019). Drivers and barriers of university social responsibility: Integration into strategic plans. World review of entrepreneurship, management and sustainable development, 15(1/2), 174-201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sample, S. (2002). The contrarian’s guide to leadership. San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S. & Leslie, L.L. (1999). Academic capitalism. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staley, D.J. (2019). Alternative universities, speculative design for innovation in higher education, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stanford (2020). Stanford Innovation and Entrepreneurship Certificate. https://online.stanford.edu/programs/stanford-innovation-and-entrepreneurship-certificate. Accessed 5 October 2020.

  • Stankiewicz, R. (1986). Academics and entrepreneurs. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, P., Baker, N., DeMillo, R., Soares, L. & Yaeger, L. (2019). The transformation-ready higher education institution. Huron.

  • Sutphen, M., Solbrekke, T.D. & Sugrue, C. (2019). Toward articulating an academic praxis by interrogating university strategic plans. Studies in Higher Education, 44(8), 1400-1412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A.L. & Karr, S. (1999). Strategic planning approaches used to respond to issues confronting research universities. Innovative Higher Education, 23(3), 221-234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorp, H. & Goldstein, B. (2010). Engines of innovation, the entrepreneurial university in the twenty-first century. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, B., Kelly, A.P. & Carey, K. (Eds.) (2011). Reinventing higher education: The promise of innovation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G. (2014). The future of college?, The Atlantic, https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/09/the-future-of-college/375071/, Accessed 23 June 2020.

Download references

Funding

Research was supported by the University of Southern California and its Viterbi School of Engineering.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Epstein Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Southern California, 240 GER, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA

    Randolph Hall & Jack Lulich

Authors
  1. Randolph Hall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jack Lulich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Jack Lulich obtained strategic plans and financial statements and analyzed content through use of Atlas.ti. Randolph Hall was the primary author, and developed the methodology used for analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Randolph Hall.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests

The first author served as V.P. of Research at the University of Southern California from 2005 to 2019, and continues at USC as a professor. The first author graduated from the University of California at Berkeley. Both institutions are in the pool of universities assessed in this paper.

Code Availability

No custom code was utilized.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hall, R., Lulich, J. University Strategic Plans: What they Say about Innovation. Innov High Educ 46, 261–284 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-020-09535-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-020-09535-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation