Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Determinants of External Engagement of Hard Scientists: A Study of Generational and Country Differences in Europe

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Higher Education Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

In the context of transformation of the higher education landscape by Knowledge Society imperatives, there is an increase in academics’ external engagement, especially in the fields of hard sciences. This trend is noticeable in various European countries with different higher education models, but rather limited knowledge in understanding the generational influence on external engagement of academics exists, taking into account the broad range of external engagement activities. The aim of this paper is to examine generational differences by conducting cross-country analyses (N = 976) across different European countries and higher education models. The findings show that there is a trend towards academics’ engagement in spin-off/start-up creation in Finland, volunteer-based activities in Slovenia, teaching-related activities in Portugal and consultancy activities in Lithuania and in additional also is evidence for generational differences in academics’ external engagement. The logistic regression shows positive relationship between consolidate generation academics and patenting/licensing activities, younger generation and spin-off/start-up creation as well as intermediate generation and giving public lectures/speeches and producing publications for broader society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abreu, M. and Grinevich, V. (2013) ‘The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities’, Research Policy 42(2): 408–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biglan, A. (1973) ‘The characteristics of subject matter’, Journal of Applied Psychology 57(3): 195–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broström, A., Feldmann, A. and Kaulio, M. (2019) ‘Structured relations between higher education institutions and external organisations: opportunity or bureaucratisation?’, Higher Education 78(4): 575–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caradec, V. (1998) ‘Les transitions biographies, étapes du vieillissement’, Prévenir 35(2): 131–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E.G., and Campbell, D. F. J. (2018) Smart Quintuple Helix Innovation Systems: How social ecology and environmental protection are driving innovation, sustainable development and economic growth, Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, T. and Santiago, R. (2010) ‘Still Academics After All…’, Higher Education Policy 23: 397–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E. and Geppert, M. (2002) ‘Management learning and knowledge transfer in transforming societies: approaches, issues and future directions’, Human Resource Development International 5(3): 263–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey, T., Rossano, S. and Sijde, P. (2016) ‘Does context matter in academic entrepreneurship? The role of barriers and drivers in the regional and national context’, The Journal of Technology Transfer 41(6): 1457–1482.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Este, P. and Patel, P. (2007) ‘University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry?’, Research Policy 36(9): 1295–1313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ejermo, O. and Toivanen, H. (2018) ‘University invention and the abolishment of the professor’s privilege in Finland’, Research Policy 47(4): 814–825.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders, J. and Musselin, C. (2008) ‘Back to the future? The Academic Professions in the 21st Century’ in OECD (eds). Higher Education to 2030, Volume 1, Demography, Paris: OECD, pp. 125–150.

  • Erdős, K. and Varga, A. (2012) ‘The academic entrepreneur: myth or reality for increased regional growth in Europe’, in M. van Geenhuizen and P. Nijkamp (eds). Creative Knowledge Cities, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 157–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C. and Terra, B.R.C. (2000) ‘The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm’, Research Policy 29(2): 313–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, M.J., Seal, R.K. and Schuster, J.H. (1998) The New Academic Generation. A Profession in Transformation, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Furco, A. (2010) ‘The engaged campus: toward a comprehensive approach to public engagement’, British Journal of Educational Studies 58(4): 375–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gál, Z., and Ptaček, P. (2011) ‘The role of mid-range universities in knowledge transfer in non-metropolitan regions in Central Eastern Europe’. European Planning Studies 19(9): 1669–1690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, A. (2007) ‘Understanding generational differences for competitive success’, Industrial and Commercial Training 39(2): 98–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, N. and Strauss, W. (2000) Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation, New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, J. (1998) ‘Differentiation and diversity in higher education systems’, in J.C. Smart (eds.). Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. XIII, Bronx: Springer, pp. 77–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsson, S., Vico E.P. and Hellsmark, H. (2014) ‘The many ways of academic researchers: How is science made useful?’, Science and Public Policy 41(5): 641–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehm, B.M. and Teichler, U. (2013) The Academic Profession in Europe: New Tasks and New Challenges, Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komljenovic, J. (2012) ‘The complexity of policy mirroring: the connection between international and Slovenian higher education policy discourse’, CEPS journal 2(4): 9–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroll, H., Dornbusch, F. and Schnabl, E. (2016) ‘Universities’ Regional Involvement in Germany: How Academics’ Objectives and Opportunity Shape Choices of Activity’ Regional Studies 50(9): 1595–1610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwiek, M. (2017) ‘A Generational Divide in the Polish Academic Profession. A Mixed Quantitative and Qualitative Approach’ European Educational Research Journal 16(5): 645–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, A. (2011) ‘What motivates academic scientists to engage in research commercialization: “gold”, “ribbon” or “puzzle”’, Research Policy 40(10): 1354–1368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leišytė, L. (2007) ‘University governance and academic research: case studies of research units in Dutch and English universities’, Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente.

  • Leišytė, L. and Dee, J. (2012) ‘Understanding academic work in a changing institutional environment: Faculty autonomy, productivity and identity in Europe and the United States’, in J. C. Smart and M. Paulsen (eds). Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research 27, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 123-206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leišytė, L. and Fochler, M. (2018) ‘Topical collection of the Triple Helix Journal: Agents of change in university-industry-government-society relationships [Editorial]’. Triple Helix 5: 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques, J.P.C, Caraca¸ J.M.G and Diz, H. (2006) ‘How can university industry–government interactions change the innovation scenario in Portugal?—the case of the University of Coimbra’, Technovation 26: 534–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquina, M. and Jones, G.A. (2015) ‘Generational change and academic work: An introduction’, Studies in Higher Education 40(8): 1349–1353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquina, M., Yuni, J. and Ferreiro, M. (2015) ‘Generational change in the Argentine academic profession through the analysis of ‘life courses’’, Studies in Higher Education 40(8): 1392–1405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, I., Mejlgaard, N., Lindner, R., Woolley, R., Rafols, I., Griesler, E., … and Peter, V. (2015) Monitoring the Evolution and Benefits of Responsible Research and Innovation (MoRRI)—a preliminary framework for RRI dimensions & indicators. Paper presented at OECD Blue Sky Forum 2016; 19 September, Ghent, Belgium.

  • Paliokaitė, A., Krūminas, P. and Stamenov, B. (2016) RIO country report: Lithuania, European Union. EUR 27882 EN; https://doi.org/10.2791/049440.

  • Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., … and Sobrero, M. (2013) ‘Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations’, Research Policy 42(2): 423-442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Protogerou, A., Caloghirou, Y. and Siokas, E. (2013) ‘Twenty-five years of science-industry collaboration: The emergence and evolution of policy-driven research networks across Europe’, Journal of Technology Transfer 38(6): 873–895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robyn, A. and Du Preez, R. (2013) ‘Intention to quit amongst Generation Y academics in higher education’, SA Journal of Industrial Psychology 39(1): 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, F. and Rosli A. (2015) ‘Indicators of university–industry knowledge transfer performance and their implications for universities: Evidence from the United Kingdom’, Studies in Higher Education 40(10): 1970–1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santiago, R., Carvalho, T. and Cardoso, S. (2015a) ‘Portuguese academics’ perceptions of higher education institutions’ governance and management: a generational perspective’, Studies in Higher Education 40(8): 1471-1484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santiago, R., Carvalho, T. and Ferreira, A. (2015b) ‘Changing knowledge and the academic profession in Portugal’, Higher Education Quarterly 69(1): 79–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneijderberg, C. and Götze, N. (2020) ‘Academics Societal Engagement in Cross-country Comparative Perspective’ Higher Education Policy.

  • Seawright, J. and Gerring, J. (2008) ‘Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options’, Political Research Quarterly 61(2): 294–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, J.C., Kim, Y., Lim, H., Shim, B. and Choi, Y. (2015) ‘The “Sandwich Generation” in Korean Academe: Between Traditional Academic Authority and Meritocratic Culture’, Studies in Higher Education 40(8): 1406–1422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigl, L. and Leišytė, L. (2018) ‘Imaginaries of invention management: Comparing path dependencies in East and West Germany’, Minerva 56(3): 357–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smola, K.W. and Sutton, C.D. (2002) ‘Generational differences: Revisiting generational work values for the new millennium’, Journal of Organizational Behavior 23: 363–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, P.E. and Levin, S.G. (1992) Striking the Mother Lode in Science: The Importance of Age, Place, and Time, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, W. and Howe, N. (1991) Generations: The History of American’s Future, New York: William Morrow Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suurna, M. and Kattel, R. (2010) ‘Europeanization of innovation policy in Central and Eastern Europe’, Science and Public Policy 37(9): 646–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tartari, V., Perkmann, M. and Salter, A. (2014) ‘In good company: The influence of peers on industry engagement by academic scientists’, Research Policy 43(7): 1189–1203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, U. and Höhle, E.A. (2013) The work situation of the academic profession in Europe: Findings of a survey in twelve countries, Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J.M., Campbell, S.M., Hoffman, B.J. and Lance, C.E. (2010) ‘Generational differences in work values: Leisure and extrinsic values increasing, social and intrinsic values decreasing’, Journal of Management 36(5): 1117–1142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J.M., Campbell, W.K. and Freeman, E.C. (2012) ‘Generational differences in young adults’ life goals, concern for others, and civic orientation, 1966–2009’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 102(5): 1045-1062.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance Lee, R. (2019) ‘Influences on external stakeholder engagement and its measurement in Irish HEIs’, Ph.D. dissertation, School of Business, Waterford Institute of Technology.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The APIKS country study Portugal was financially supported by the Project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-029427—funded by FEDER, through COMPETE2020 - Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização (POCI), and by national funds (OE), through FCT/MCTES.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany

    Sude Pekşen & Liudvika Leišytė

  2. University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal

    Anabela Queirós

  3. Centre of the Republic of Slovenia for Mobility and Educational and Training Programmes, CMEPIUS, Ljubljana, Slovenia

    Alenka Flander

  4. University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

    Ville Tenhunen

Authors
  1. Sude Pekşen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anabela Queirós
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alenka Flander
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Liudvika Leišytė
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ville Tenhunen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sude Pekşen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pekşen, S., Queirós, A., Flander, A. et al. The Determinants of External Engagement of Hard Scientists: A Study of Generational and Country Differences in Europe. High Educ Policy 34, 18–41 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-020-00214-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-020-00214-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation