Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Academics’ Societal Engagement in Cross-country Perspective: Large-n in Small-n Comparative Case Studies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Higher Education Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This editorial article presents the conceptual approach to researching academics’ societal engagement (ASE) in the cross-country study “Academic Profession in Knowledge Societies (APIKS).” Methodologically, the APIKS survey (large-n) aims for the cross-country comparative study of academics’ work (research, teaching, ASE and (self-governance) of selected country cases (small-n). We define ASE broadly as social co-construction of knowledge (and technology) by academics and partners from outside academia. Conceptually, we amended the analytical framework by Perkmann et al. (Res Policy 42:423–442, 2013), for example, by adding a contextual factors box (e.g., network indicators). For the study of ASE, in a collaborative effort, we evaluated ASE-activities or types of ASE-activities and selected 17 ASE-activities, which are applicable in varying national higher education and sciences contexts. We find that concrete ASE-practices are strongly connected to the national higher education and science traditions of the respective countries and disciplinary cultures. The technical and commercial dimension of ASE is dominantly performed in STEM-fields, and knowledge dissemination activities and participation in external science organizations are more common in HSS-fields. We consider the APIKS study of ASE to be a further step toward establishing international knowledge about ASE-activities for cross-country comparison.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abreu, M., Grinevich, V., Hughes, A. and Kitson, M. (2009) Knowledge exchange between academics and the business, public and third sectors. Cambridge: Centre for Business Research and UK-IRC, University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A.K. (2001) ‘University-to-industry knowledge transfer: literature review and unanswered questions', International Journal of Management Reviews 3(4): 285–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P.G. (ed.) (1996) The international academic profession: portraits of fourteen countries, Princeton: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argote, L. and Ingram, P. (2000) ‘Knowledge transfer: a basis for competitive advantage in firms', Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82(1): 150–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspers, P. (2009) ‘Knowledge and valuation in markets', Theory and Society 38: 111–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • APEC—Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (2000). Towards knowledge-based economies in APEC. Seoul: APEC Economic Committee. Available online at: https://www.apec.org/Publications/2000/11/Towards-KnowledgeBased-Economies-in-APEC-2000 (last accessed: 15.06.2019).

  • Baker, E.A., Homan, S., Schonhoff, R. and Kreuter, M. (1999) ‘Principles of practice for academic/practice/community research partnerships', American Journal of Preventive Medicine 16(3S): 86–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekkers, R. and Freitas, I.M.B. (2008) ‘Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: to what degree do sectors also matter?', Research Policy 37: 1837–1853.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benner, M. and Sandström, U. (2000) ‘Institutionalizing the triple helix: research funding and norms in the academic system', Research Policy 29(2): 291–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benneworth, P. and Jongbloed, B.W. (2010) ‘Who matters to universities? A stakeholder perspective on humanities, arts and social sciences valorisation', Higher Education 59(5): 567–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonaccorsi, A. (2008) ‘Search regimes and the industrial dynamics of science', Minerva 46(3): 285–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B., Rimes, H. and Youtie, J. (2015) ‘The evolving state-of-the-art in technology transfer research: revisiting the contingent effectiveness model', Research Policy 44(1): 34–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (1999) ‘The role of lay people in the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge', Science Technology Society 4: 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camic, C., Gross, N. and Lamont, M. (2011) `The study of social knowledge making', in C. Camic, N. Gross and M. Lamont (eds.) Social knowledge in the makingChicago: Chicago University Press, pp. 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W., Nelson, R. and Walsh, J. (2002) ‘Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D', Management Science 48(1): 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, D., LaPorte, J. and Seawright, J. (2012) ‘Putting typologies to work: concept formation, measurement, and analytic rigor', Political Research Quarterly 65(1): 217–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colyvas, J.A. and Powell, W.W. (2006) ‘Roads to institutionalization: the remaking of boundaries between public and private science', Research in Organizational Behavior 27: 305–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Este, P. and Patel, P. (2007) ‘University–industry linkages in the UK. What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry?', Research Policy 36(9): 1295–1313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinghaus, B. (2005) ‘When less is more: selection problems in large-N and small-N cross-national comparison', International Sociology 20: 133–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC—European Commission (2005). Mobilising the brainpower of Europe: enabling universities to make their full contribution to the Lisbon strategy. Brussels: COM(2005) 152 final.

  • Fear, F.A. and Sandmann, L. (1995) ‘Unpacking the service category: reconceptualizing university outreach for the 21st century', Continuing Higher Education Review 59(3): 110–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973) The interpretation of cultures, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerring, J. (2004) ‘What is a case study and what is it good for?’, American Political Science Review 98(2): 341–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Götze, N., Carvalho, T., Aarrevaara, T. (2021). ‘Academics’ societal engagement in diverse European binary higher education systems—a cross-country comparative analysis.’ Higher Education Policy. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-020-00222-w.

  • Gläser, J. (2019) `How can governance change research content? Linking science policy studies to the sociology of science', in D. Simon, S. Kuhlmann, J. Stamm and W. Canzler (eds.) Handbook on science and public policyCheltenham: Elgar, pp. 419–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen, A.C. and Tsang, E.W.K. (2005) ‘Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer’, The Academy of Management Review 30(1): 146–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, M. and Hellström, T. (2018) ‘Epistemic governance and the conditions for knowledge production in HER institutions’, Studies in Higher Education 43(10): 1711–1717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobi, A.P. (2007) ‘The knowledge society and global dynamics in education politics’, European Educational Research Journal 6(1): 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, M.-L. (2012) Research universities. Networking the knowledge economy. Summary report: policy implications, Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruss, G. (2012) ‘Reconceptualising engagement: a conceptual framework for analysing university interaction with external social partners’, South African Review of Sociology 43(2): 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maassen, P. and Stensaker, B. (2011) ‘The knowledge triangle, European higher education policy logics and policy implications’, Higher Education 61(6): 757–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinelli, A., Meyer, M. and von Tunzelmann, N. (2008) ‘Becoming an entrepreneurial university? A case study of knowledge exchange relationships and faculty attitudes in a medium-sized, research-oriented university’, The Journal of Technology Transfer 33: 259–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascarenhas, C., Ferreira, J.J. and Marques, C. (2018) ‘University-industry cooperation: a systematic literature review and research agenda’, Science and Public Policy 45(5): 708–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Krahmer, F. and Schmoch, U. (1998) ‘Science-based technologies: university–industry interactions in four fields’, Research Policy 27(8): 835–851.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD—Organization for Economic Development. (1996) The knowledge-based economy, Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD—Organization for Economic Development. (1997) National Innovation Systems, Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD—Organization for Economic Development. (2015) Making Open Science a Reality, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 25. Paris: OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrs2f963zs1-en.

  • Olmos-Peñuela, J., Benneworth, P. and Castro-Martínez, E. (2015) ‘What stimulates researchers to make their research usable? Towards an ‘openness approach.’ Minerva 53(4): 381–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olmos-Penuela, J., Molas-Gallart, J. and Castro-Martinez, E. (2013) ‘Informal collaborations between social sciences and humanities researchers and non-academic partners’, Science and Public Policy 41(4): 493–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekşen, S., Queirós, A., Flander, A., Leišytė, L. and Tenhunen, V. (2021) ‘The Determinants of External Engagement of Hard Scientists: A Study of Generational and Country Differences in Europe.’ Higher Education Policy. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-020-00214-w.

  • Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., et al. (2013) ‘Academic engagement and commercialisation. A review of the literature on university–industry relations’, Research Policy 42(2): 423–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkmann, M., Salandra, R., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M. and Hughes, A. (2021) ‘Academic engagement: a review of the literature 2011–2019’, Research Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (2004) Politics in time: history, institutions, and social analysis, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneijderberg, C. and Teichler, U. (2012) ‘Wissens- und Technologietransfer oder Goldfisch im Kugelglas? (Knowledge and Technology Transfer as Goldfish in a Glasbubble?)’, in B.M. Kehm, H. Schomburg and U. Teichler (eds.), Differenzierung, Internationalisierung, Relevanzsteigerung—Hochschulen im Funktionswandel. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus, pp. 263–279.

  • Schneijderberg, C., Broström, A., Carvalho, T. Geschwind, L., Marquina, M., Müller, L. and Reznik, N. (2021a) ‘Academics’ Societal Engagement in the Humanities and Social Sciences: A Generational Perspective from Argentina, Germany, Portugal and Sweden.’ Higher Education Policy. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-020-00218-6.

  • Schneijderberg, C., Götze, N., Jones, G.A., Bilyalov, D., Panova, A., Stephenson, G.K. and Yudkevich, M. (2021b). ‘Does vertical University Stratification foster or hinder Academics’ Societal Engagement? Findings from Canada, Germany, Kazakhstan, and Russia.’ Higher Education Policy. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-020-00219-5.

  • Seawright, J. and Gerring, J. (2008) ‘Case selection techniques in case study research: a menu of qualitative and quantitative options’, Political Research Quarterly 61(2): 294–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smelser, N.J. (2003) ‘On comparative analysis, interdisciplinarity and internationalization in sociology’, International Sociology 18(4): 643–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, D.E. (1997) Pasteur’s quadrant: basic science and technological innovation, Washington: Brookings Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suri, H. (2011) ‘Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis’, Qualitative Research Journal 11(2): 63–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, U. (2014) ‘Opportunities and problems of comparative higher education research: the daily life of research’, Higher Education 67(4): 393–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, U., Arimoto, A. and Cummings, W.K. (eds.) (2013) The changing academic profession. Major findings of a comparative survey, Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thune, T., Reymert, I., Gulbrandsen, M., Aamodt, P. and O. (2016) ‘Universities and external engagement activities: particular profiles for particular universities?’, Science and Public Policy 43(6): 774–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thursby, J.G., Jensen, R. and Thursby, M.C. (2001) ‘Objectives, characteristics and out-comes of university licensing: a survey of major U.S. universities’. The Journal of Technology Transfer 26(1–2): 59–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trowler, P. (2014) ‘Academic tribes and territories: the theoretical trajectory’, Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften 25(3): 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trowler, P. (2014) ‘Depicting and researching disciplines: strong and moderate essentialist approaches’, Studies in Higher Education 39(10): 1720–1731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, K. (2003) Faculty service roles and the scholarship of engagement, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2002) Constructing knowledge societies. New challenges for tertiary education, Washington DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziman, J. (2003) ‘Non-instrumental roles of science’, Science and Engineering Ethics 9(1): 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Centre for Higher Education Research, University of Kassel, Moenchebergstr. 17, 34109, Kassel, Germany

    Christian Schneijderberg & Nicolai Götze

Authors
  1. Christian Schneijderberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nicolai Götze
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Schneijderberg.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schneijderberg, C., Götze, N. Academics’ Societal Engagement in Cross-country Perspective: Large-n in Small-n Comparative Case Studies. High Educ Policy 34, 1–17 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-021-00227-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-021-00227-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation