Abstract
This paper examines the relationship between product market competition and intermediate-term relative strength strategies in the U.S. over the past two decades, i.e., from 1997 to 2016. As industries become increasingly concentrated, I find that return reversal patterns are observable only in competitive industries. As the industry concentration level (ICL) increases, these patterns gradually disappear and reverse in the highly concentrated industry quintile. The performance of intermediate-term relative strength strategies is affected by not only the product market competition level but also recent recessions. In the sample, I find no reliable and robust momentum effect. These results shed new light on the relationship between the product market competition levels and the performance of intermediate-term relative strength strategies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Li (2016) used ICBIN industries, which generate 10 industry sectors for U.S. firms. The most competitive industries are the bottom two industries with the lowest HHI.
LH (12,3) means portfolios that are formed based on the past 12-month (with montht-1 excluded) accumulative momentum returns and then held for 3 months before rebalancing.
The SIC code is a four-digit code available from both the CRSP and the Compustat database. However, there are discrepancies between the two sources, as documented by Kahle and Walking (1996).
All variables are winsorized at the 1% level (0.5% on each side).
In the HHI equation, i is an individual firm, j is the industry to which firm i belongs, and t is the year.
Montht-1 is excluded to avoid the bid-ask bound.
The years 2001, 2008, and 2009 are officially recognized as economic recession periods by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER). Source: https://www.nber.org/cycles.html
SMB is the size premium (small minus big). HML is the book-to-market premium (high minus low). UMD is the premium from a zero-cost portfolio that is long on winners and short on losers based on the past 12-month accumulative returns.
RMW is the profitability premium (robust minus weak). CMA is the investment premium (conservative minus aggressive). The FF factors are downloaded from Kenneth French’s website: https://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html
References
Avramov, D., Chordia, T., Jostova, G., Philipov, A.: Momentum and credit rating. J. Finance 62, 2503–2520 (2007)
Carhart, M.M.: On persistence in mutual fund performance. J. Finance 52, 57–82 (1997)
Daniel, K., Titman, S.: Market efficiency in an irrational world. Financ. Anal. J. 55, 28–40 (1999)
Fama, E.F., French, K.R.: Common risk factors in the returns of bonds and stocks. J. Financ. Econ. 33, 3–56 (1993)
Fama, E.F., French, K.R.: A five-factor asset pricing model. J. Financ. Econ. 116, 1–22 (2015)
Grullon, G., Larkin, Y., Michaely, R.: Are US industries becoming more concentrated? Rev. Finance. 24, 1–47 (2019)
Grundy, B., Martin, J.: Understanding the nature of risks and the source of the rewards to momentum investing. Rev. Financ. Stud. 14, 29–78 (2001)
Hong, H., Lim, T., Stein, J.C.: Bad news travels slowly: size, analyst coverage, and the profitability of momentum strategies. J. Finance 55, 265–295 (2000)
Hou, K., Robinson, D.: Industry concentration and average stock returns. J. Finance 10, 1927–1956 (2006)
Jegadeesh, N., Titman, S.: Returns to buying winners and selling losers: implication for stock market efficiency. J Finance 48, 65–91 (1993)
Jegadeesh, N., Titman, S.: Profitability of momentum strategies: an evaluation of alternative explanations. J. Finance 60, 1983–2011 (2001)
Kahle, K.M., Walking, R.A.: The impact of industry classifications and financial research. J. Financ Quant. Anal. 31, 309–335 (1996)
Lee, C., Swaminathan, B.: Price momentum and trading volume. J. Finance 55, 1217–1269 (2000)
Li, T.: Intra-industry momentum and product market competition around the world. Rev. Dev Finance 6, 16–26 (2016)
Moskowitz, T., Grinblatt, M.: Do industries explain momentum. J. Finance 54, 1249–1290 (1999)
Newey, W., West, K.: A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55, 703–708 (1987)
Schumpeter, J.: The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (1912)
Acknowledgement
I want to thank Dr. Qianqiu Liu (Professor of Finance, Shidler College of Business, University of Hawaii at Manoa) for his advice and continuous support in my researches related to product market competition and stock returns. I am very grateful to Editor Dr. Markus Schmid and an anonymous referee for their detailed and valuable comments on earlier versions of the paper. All remaining errors are my own.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
This study is fully self-funded. I declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, S. Product market competition and intermediate-term momentum. Financ Mark Portf Manag 35, 255–267 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-020-00371-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-020-00371-3