Skip to main content
Log in

Indifference pricing of reinsurance with reinstatements using coherent monetary criteria

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
European Actuarial Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider the problem of indifference pricing of reinsurance contracts that contain a reinstatement clause. We define the indifference price relative to both a monetary utility function and a risk measure, to take into account both the risk reduction and the relief of capital immobilization provided by reinsurance. We characterize the indifference price as the unique solution to a fixed point equation and we bound the price by two easily computable values, if one has access to losses simulations. We illustrate our results on a European catastrophe insurance portfolio, and we conduct a simulation study for comparison and reproducibility purposes, where we include the case of dependence between claim arrivals, using Hawkes processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albrecher H, Beirlant J, Teugels JL (2017) Reinsurance: actuarial and statistical aspects. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Albrecher H, Haas S (2011) Ruin theory with excess of loss reinsurance and reinstatements. Appl Math Comput 217(20):8031–8043

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson RR, Dong W (1998) Pricing catastrophe reinsurance with reinstatement provisions using a catastrophe model. Casualty Actuarial Society Forum, pp 303–322

  4. Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber J-M, Heath D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math Finance 9(3):203–228

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Barrieu P, El Karoui N (2009) Pricing, hedging and optimally designing derivatives via minimization of risk measures. In: Carmona R (ed) Volume on indifference pricing. Princeton University Press

  6. Biagini S, Frittelli M (2009) On the extension of the Namioka-Klee theorem and on the Fatou property for risk measures. Optimality and risk-modern trends in mathematical finance. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–28

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Damodaran A (2020) Cost of capital by sector. http://people.stern.nyu.edu/adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/wacc.htm. Accessed 5 June 2020

  8. Deelstra G, Plantin G (2014) Risk theory and reinsurance. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Delbaen F (2012) Monetary utility functions. Osaka University Press, Osaka

    Google Scholar 

  10. El Karoui N, Ravanelli C (2009) Cash subadditive risk measures and interest rate ambiguity. Math Finance 19(4):561–590

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Föllmer H, Schied A (2011) Stochastic finance: an introduction in discrete time. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Frittelli M, Gianin ER (2002) Putting order in risk measures. J Bank Finance 26(7):1473–1486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Goovaerts M, De Vylder E, Haezendonck J (1984) Insurance premiums: theory and applications. North-Holland, Amsterdam, p 406

  14. Hawkes AG (1971) Spectra of some self-exciting and mutually exciting point processes. Biometrika 58(1):83–90

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Hess KT, Schmidt KD (2004) Optimal premium plans for reinsurance with reinstatements. ASTIN Bull J IAA 34(2):299–313

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Hürlimann W (1998) On stop-loss order and the distortion pricing principle. ASTIN Bull J IAA 28(1):119–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hürlimann W (2005) Excess of loss reinsurance with reinstatements revisited. ASTIN Bull J IAA 35(1):211–238

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Jouini E, Schachermayer W, Touzi N (2006) Law invariant risk measures have the Fatou property. Advances in mathematical economics. Springer, Berlin, pp 49–71

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Jouini E, Schachermayer W, Touzi N (2008) Optimal risk sharing for law invariant monetary utility functions. Math Finance 18(2):269–292

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. KPMG (2020) Cost of capital study 2019. https://home.kpmg/de/en/home/insights/2019/10/cost-of-capital-study-2019.html. Accessed 5 June 2020

  21. Laeven R, Goovaerts M (2014) Premium calculation and insurance pricing. In: Balakrishnan N, Colton T, Everitt B, Piegorsch W, Ruggeri F, Teugels JL (eds) Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.stat03578

  22. Mata AJ (2000) Pricing excess of loss reinsurance with reinstatements. ASTIN Bull J IAA 30(2):349–368

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Rytgaard M (1996) On calculating the risk premium for an excess of loss cover with an annual aggregate deductible and a limited number of reinstatements. Astin Colloquium, Copenhagen, Denmark 1, vol 27, pp 82–94

  24. Sundt B (1993) On excess of loss reinsurance with reinstatements. Insur Math Econ 12(1):73

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Walhin J-F, Paris J (2000) The effect of excess of loss reinsurance with reinstatements on the cedent’s portfolio. Blätter der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Versicherungsmathematik 24:616–627

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Walhin J-F, Paris J (2001) Excess of loss reinsurance with reinstatements: premium calculation and ruin probability of the cedent. Blätter der DGVFM 25(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang S (1996) Premium calculation by transforming the layer premium density. ASTIN Bull J IAA 26(1):71–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nabil Kazi-Tani.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The author gratefully acknowledges the support of the insurer Axa who made its data available, and thanks Thierry Cohignac, Guillaume Gorge and Jean-Sébastien Lagacé for fruitful discussions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kazi-Tani, N. Indifference pricing of reinsurance with reinstatements using coherent monetary criteria. Eur. Actuar. J. 11, 161–183 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-020-00257-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-020-00257-8

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation