Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Contextualisation of Human (In)security at the Sarawak-West Kalimantan Borderland

  • Published:
East Asia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Borderland areas separating the state of Sarawak (Malaysia) and West Kalimantan (Indonesia) have long been a security concern for the Sarawak State Government. In general, such areas emerge as cross-border crime scenes, where many cases are constantly reported to the relevant security authorities. Despite the perseverance of Malaysia in enhancing border security, particularly that of the Sarawak state government, a discourse centred on state-centric security on people’s security issues in the affected area remains lacking. Border communities are rarely asked about matters of personal safety which can shed some light on the depiction of borderlands as insecure regions threatening human security. Although calls to secure national borders are evident, the perspectives of border communities are often discounted. This paper aims to highlight the importance of an empirical study in understanding human security from a spatial context of a borderland. By analysing the perceptions of people residing close to the border, this study contextualises human (in)security focusing on border community narratives and experiences and reflects on how borders impact people’s daily life. The analysis thematically underlined the value of including people’s collective experiences gathered through focus group discussions (FGDs) among the border communities of Danau Melikin, Serian, Sarawak. The findings offered insights into the population’s mental state and contributed to the current understanding of human (in)security from a bottom-up perspective. Accordingly, the study reported that people’s perception of threats and fear resulted from cross-border threats, where the profound effects related to human security threats were mostly influenced by border vulnerabilities. In this vein, the border as a ‘space’ was essential in influencing insecurity among the border communities of Danau Melikin, Serian.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The term kampung or kampong (in the English language) refers to village, specifically in Malay-speaking countries such as Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, and Brunei.

  2. Tuai Rumah is an Iban headman or one that acts as the village leader.

References

  1. McIntosh, M. & Hunter, A. (2010). New Perspectives on Human Security. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lunden T. (2004). On the Boundary: About Humans at the End of Territory. In Meinhof U. (ed.), Living (with) Borders. Identity Discourses on East-West Borders in Europe. Stockholm: Sodertorns Hogskola.

  3. Vollmer, B. (2019). The paradox of border security – an example from the UK. Political Geography, 71, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.01.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Oomen, T.K (1995). Contested boundaries and emerging pluralism. International Sociology, 10, 251-68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Newman, D. (2003) On borders and power: A theoretical framework. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 18 (1), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2003.9695598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eilenberg, M. (2011). Straddling the Border: A Marginal History of Guerrilla Warfare and ‘Counter-Insurgency’ in the Indonesian Borderlands, 1960s-1970s. Modern Asian Studies, 45(6), 1423-1463. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X11000230.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Baud, M. & Michiel Willem van Schendel (1997). Toward a Comparative History of Borderlands. Journal of World History, 8, 211 - 242. https://doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2005.0061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Newman, D., & Paasi, A. (1998). Fences and neighbours in the postmodern world: boundary narratives in political geography. Progress in Human Geography, 22(2), 186–207. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913298666039113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cimadomo, Guido. (2017). “Spatial Practices in Borderlands: Bottom-Up Experiences and Their Influence on Border Communities”. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 16 (3), 362-82. https://acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/1066.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haselsberger, B. (2014). Decoding borders. Appreciating border impacts on space and people. Planning Theory & Practice, 15 (4), 505-526. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2014.963652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ullah, A. K. M. A., & Kumpoh, A. A.-Z. A. (2018). Are Borders the Reflection of International Relations? Southeast Asian Borders in Perspective. Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, 5(3), 295–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347797018798253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gavrilis, G. (2006). Policing the periphery: A theory of border control from the Central Asian Context, 1991–2006. Austin, TX: University of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Harun, Ruhanas. (2009). In pursuit of National Interest: Change and continuity in Malaysia’s foreign policy towards the Middle East. Jurnal Antarabangsa Kajian Asia Barat, 1, 23-38 [Online] http://journalarticle.ukm.my/176/. (7 September 2019).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Balakrishnan, C. (2019). Non-traditional Threats that Obstruct the Peace and Security in Eastern Sabah and Calebes Sea. The journal of defence and security 10 (1), 22-27. ISSN 2180-284X

    Google Scholar 

  15. Martin Doevenspeck (2011). Constructing the border from below: Narratives from the Congolese–Rwandan state boundary. Political Geography, 30 (3), 129-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.03.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bilgin, P. (2003). Individual and Societal Dimensions of Security. International Studies Review,5, 203–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Newman, D. (2010). Critical Human Security Studies. Review of International Studies 36(1): 77-94. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210509990519.

  18. Owen, T. (2008). The Uncertain Future of Human Security in the UN. International Social Science Journal 59 (1), 113-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2451.2008.00629.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Martin, M. & Owen, T. (2014). Routledge Handbook of Human Security. New York, USA: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ogata, Sadako & Johan Cels (2003). Human Security: Protecting and Empowering the People. Global Governance 9(3), 273-82 [Online] http://www.jstor.org/stable/27800482 (3 October 2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gasper, D. (2011). The Human and the Social: a comparison of the discourses of Human Development, Human Security and Social Quality. International Journal of Social Quality, 1(1), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.3167/IJSQ.2011010108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Laurén, K. 2012. Fear in Border Narratives: Perspectives of the Finnish-Russian Border. Folklore, 39–62 [Online]. http://www.folklore.ee/folklore/vol52/lauren.pdf (9 March 2020).

  23. United Nations Development Program (UNDP) (1994). New Dimensions of Human Security: Human Development Report. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Atienza, M.E.L. (2015). People’s views about human security in five Philippine municipalities. Disaster Prevention and Management, 24(4), 448-467. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-12-2014-0277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. King, V.T. & Carnegie, Paul J. (2018). Towards a Social Science Understanding of Human Security. Journal of Human Security Studies 7 (1), 1-17. [Online] https://www.jahss-web.org/single-post/2018/04/17/Journal-of-Human-Security-Studies-Vol7-No1-Spring-2018. (13 March 2020).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hoogensen, G. (2005). Gender, identity, and human security: Can we learn anything from the case of women terrorists? Canadian Foreign Policy Journal 12(1), 119-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/11926422.2005.9673392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Aas, K.F, Gundhus, H.O.I (2015). Policing Humanitarian Borderlands: Frontex, Human Rights and the Precariousness of Life. The British Journal of Criminology, 55(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azu086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lord, M and Chang, S. (2019). Pre-feasibility study of Sarawak-West Kalimantan Cross-border value chains. MPRA Paper No.94732. [Online]. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/94732/ (13 November 2019).

  29. Karim, Moch Faisal (2015). “Local-Central Dynamics and Limitations of Micro-Regionalism: Understanding West Kalimantan and Sarawak Cross-Border Cooperation”, in Mely Caballero-Anthony and Richard Barichello (eds) Balanced Growth for an Inclusive and Equitable asean Community. Singapore: Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University. [Online] www.rsis.edu.sg (2 February 2020)

  30. Fariastuti (2002). The Mobility of People and Goods across the Border of West Kalimantan and Sarawak, Antropologi Indonesia, 67, 94-104.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pasukan Gerakan Am Briged Sarawak (GOF). 2019, September. In-depth interview.

  32. Nuurrianti Jalli & Ismail Sualman (2020). Exploring Contemporary Security Issues Near Sarawak-Kalimantan Border. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 36(1), 401-418. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2020-3601-23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Serian District Office (2019). Populasi Penduduk Danau Melikin. [Online] https://serian.sarawak.gov.my/. (20 November 2019)

  34. Gordon, L. E. (2016). Real research : Research Methods Sociology Students Can Use. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tracy, S.J (2013). Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact. Johny Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Publication.

  36. Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Clarke, V. & Braun, V. (2013). Thematic analysis. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of quality of life research. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Stuvoy, K. (2011). Human Security, Oil and People. Journal of Human Security, 7 (2): 5-19. https://doi.org/10.3316/JHS0702005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Tadjbakhsh, S. (2014). Human security twenty years on. Expert Analysis. Norwegian Peacebuilding Resource Centre [Online] https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/181368/540cb240aa84ac7133bce008adcde01f.pdf,(15 July 2019)

  40. Osimen, G.U, Anegbode, E. J., Akande, C.A & Oyewole, O. (2017). "The Borderless-Border and Internal Security Challenges in Nigeria", International Journal of Political Science 3 (3), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.20431/2454-9452.0303003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Soo Siang, Yang. (2019). Transnational Crimes: Issues and Challenges from the Perspective of Malaysia’s National Security Construct. The Journal of Defence and Security, 10(1), 14-21. ISSN 2180-284X [Online]. http:/midas.mod.gov.my (5 November 2019)

  42. JS Abd Hair Awang, NRA Bakar, MY Abdullah & OP Liu (2013). Informal cross-border trade Sarawak (Malaysia)-Kalimantan (Indonesia): A catalyst for border community’s development. Asian Social Science, 9(4), 167-173. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n4p167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Newman, D. (2006). The lines that continue to separate us: borders in our `borderless’ world. Progress in Human Geography, 30(2), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132506ph599xx

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kudo, Sasagu (2013). Securitization of undocumented migrants and the politics of insecurity in Malaysia. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 17, 947 – 956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2013.02.113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Rosenblum, M.R., Bjelopera, J.P., & Finklea, K.M. (2013). Border security: Understanding threats at U.S. borders. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service [Online]. https://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/key_workplace/1036/ (12 October 2019).

  46. Gusni, Saat & Gek Hsia, J.T. (2020). Faktor Kelangsungan Penyeludupan Barangan di Sempadan Malaysia, Sarawak (Lubuk Antu) dan Indonesia Kalimantan Barat (Badau). Akademika 90(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.17576/akad-2020-9001-05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Bauman, Zygmunt (2006). Liquid fear. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Pathak, S.K.(2013). “India’s Diverse Borders and Diverse Threats.” International Studies 50 (1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020881716654384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Donnan, H., Thomas W. (1994). Border Approaches: Anthropological Perspectives on Frontiers. Lanham: University Press of America

    Google Scholar 

  50. Horstmann, A. & Wadley, R. (2006). Centering the Margin: Agency and Narrative in Southeast Asian Borderlands. Oxford and New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Hai Luong, T. (2020). Transnational Crime and its trends in Southeast Asia: A detailed Narrative in Vietnam. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 9 (2), 88-101. https://doi.org/10.5240/ijcjsd.v9i2.1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Borneo Post (2016). Porous border areas blamed for rise in crimes involving firearms and drugs, discloses Deputy Home Minister. [Online] https://borneopost.com (2 September 2019)

  53. Gerstein, Daniel M., Anthony Atler, Aaron C. Davenport, Beth Grill, Amanda Kadlec, and William Young, Managing International Borders: Balancing Security with the Licit Flow of People and Goods. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2018. [Online] https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PE290.html. (12 September 2019)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  54. Eilenberg, M. (2012). At the Edges of States: Dynamics of State Formation in the Indonesian Borderlands. Brill: Boston.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  55. Benedek, W. (2010). The Human Security Approach to Terrorism and Organized Crime in Post-Conflict Situations. In: Benedek W., Daase, C., Dimitrijević V., & van Duyne P. (eds) Transnational Terrorism, Organized Crime and Peace-Building. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230281479_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  56. Eilenberg, M. & Wadley, R.L. (2009). Borderland livelihood strategies: The socio-economic significance of ethnicity in cross-border labour migration, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 50, 58-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8373.2009.01381.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Wadley, R.L. (1998). The road to change in the Kapuas Hulu borderlands: Jalan Lintas Utara. Borneo Research Bulletin, 29, 71–94.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article is part of a PhD research, funded under Bumiputera Academic Training Scheme (SLAB) scholarship provided by the Ministry of Education Malaysia and Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS).

Funding

The authors wish to express sincere gratitude to the Malaysian Ministry of Higher Education Ministry (MOHE), Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS), and Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) for supporting the conduct of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research and Education for Peace (REPUSM), School of Social Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia

    Shafina Tantiana Bt Zulkipli & Kamarulzaman Askandar

Authors
  1. Shafina Tantiana Bt Zulkipli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kamarulzaman Askandar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shafina Tantiana Bt Zulkipli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zulkipli, S.T.B., Askandar, K. Contextualisation of Human (In)security at the Sarawak-West Kalimantan Borderland. East Asia 38, 291–311 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-020-09353-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-020-09353-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation