Abstract
The present research examined the associations that narcissistic personality features had with motives to pursue status through the use of dominance-based strategies, prestige-based strategies, and leadership-based strategies as well as whether these associations were mediated by either dangerous or competitive social worldviews. Across three studies (N = 2082), the assertive/extraverted and antagonistic/disagreeable aspects of narcissism had indirect associations with the motive to use dominance-based strategies through the competitive social worldview. However, the results for the antagonistic/disagreeable aspect of narcissism were more robust than those for the assertive/extraverted aspect of narcissism which were weakened when other aspects of narcissism were included in the same analysis. In contrast, the assertive/extraverted, vulnerable/neurotic, and communal aspects of narcissism were positively associated with the motive to pursue status through the use of prestige-based strategies but social worldviews did not consistently mediate these associations. These results suggest that these aspects of narcissism have divergent associations with motives to pursue status through the use of particular strategies and that the competitive social worldview may play a role in some—but not all—of these associations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data files for these studies are available on the Open Science Framework (OSF) at https://osf.io/cw5rp.
Code Availability
The code for these studies is available on the Open Science Framework (OSF) at https://osf.io/cw5rp.
Notes
We decided to adopt a mediational framework for our analyses even though they could have been framed as concerning confounding (see MacKinnon, Krull, & Lockwood, 2000, for a review). The most important conceptual difference between mediational and confounding analyses is that mediational analyses imply causal relationships among the variables, whereas confounding analyses do not imply these sorts of causal relationships. We relied exclusively on cross-sectional data for each of the present studies which prevented us from determining whether causal relationships existed among these variables. However, we decided to adopt a mediational framework for our analyses because our hypotheses were mediational in nature. That is, we thought that narcissistic personality features would contribute to the adoption of the competitive social worldview which, in turn, would play a role in activating the motivation to pursue status through the use of particular strategies. It is important to note that the actual computations involved in mediational analyses and confounding analyses are identical so the particular framing of these analyses would not have influenced the results that emerged from the present studies.
Preliminary analyses for each study found that gender did not moderate the indirect associations that narcissistic personality features had with the motivation to use particular strategies to pursue status. Further, the inclusion of gender in these analyses did not significantly alter the results. As a consequence, we decided not to include gender in the final analyses nor do we discuss gender differences in the interest of parsimony.
We had initially planned to report the results of each sample as separate studies rather than combining them into a single study. However, preliminary analyses revealed highly consistent results across the three samples (e.g., the antagonistic/disagreeable aspect of narcissism had a positive indirect association with the dominance-based motive through the competitive social worldview in each sample). As a result, we decided to present the results for the combined samples in the interest of parsimony.
References
Abraham, J., & Pane, M. M. (2016). The role of narcissism and competitive worldview in predicting environmental apathy. Asian Journal of Quality of Life, 1(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.21834/ajqol.v1i1.33
Anderson, C., & Cowan, J. (2014). Personality and status attainment: A micropolitics perspective. In J. T. Cheng, J. L. Tracy, & C. Anderson (Eds.), The psychology of social status (pp. 99–117). Springer.
Anderson, C., Hildreth, J. A. D., & Howland, L. (2015). Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), 574–601. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038781.
Back, M. D., Küfner, A. C. P., Dufner, M., Gerlach, T. M., Rauthmann, J. F., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2013). Narcissistic admiration and rivalry: Disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(6), 1013–1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034431.
Barkow, J. H. (1989). Darwin, sex, and status: Biological approaches to mind and culture. University of Toronto Press.
Blader, S. L., Shirako, A., & Chen, Y. R. (2016). Looking out from the top: Differential effects of status and power on perspective taking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(6), 723–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216636628.
Bradlee, P. M., & Emmons, R. A. (1992). Locating narcissism within the interpersonal circumplex and the five-factor model. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(7), 821–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90056-U.
Brunell, A. B., Gentry, W. A., Campbell, W. K., Hoffman, B. J., Kuhnert, K. W., & DeMarree, K. G. (2008). Leader emergence: The case of the narcissistic leader. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(12), 1663–1676. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616720832410.
Cheng, J. T., & Tracy, J. L. (2014). Toward a unified science of hierarchy: Dominance and prestige are two fundamental pathways to human social rank. In J. T. Cheng, J. L. Tracy, & C. Anderson (Eds.), The psychology of social status (pp. 3–28). Springer.
Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030398.
Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., & Henrich, J. (2010). Pride, personality, and the evolutionary foundations of human social status. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(5), 334–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.004.
Clifton, J. D., Baker, J. D., Park, C. L., Yaden, D. B., Clifton, A. B., Terni, P., & Seligman, M. E. (2019). Primal world beliefs. Psychological Assessment, 31(1), 82–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000639.
Crowe, M. L., Edershile, E. A., Wright, A. G., Campbell, W. K., Lynam, D. R., & Miller, J. D. (2018). Development and validation of the Narcissistic Vulnerability Scale: An adjective rating scale. Psychological Assessment, 30(7), 978–983. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000578.
Crowe, M. L., Lynam, D. R., Campbell, W. K., & Miller, J. D. (2019). Exploring the structure of narcissism: Toward an integrated solution. Journal of Personality, 87(6), 1151–1169. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12464.
Curran, P. G. (2016). Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.006.
de Waal-Andrews, W., Gregg, A. P., & Lammers, J. (2015). When status is grabbed and when status is granted: Getting ahead in dominance and prestige hierarchies. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(3), 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12093.
Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41–113). Academic Press.
Duckitt, J., & Fisher, K. (2003). The impact of social threat on world view and ideological attitudes. Political Psychology, 24(1), 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895x.00322.
Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., du Plessis, I., & Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.75.
Gebauer, J. E., Sedikides, C., Verplanken, B., & Maio, G. R. (2012). Communal narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(5), 854–878. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029629.
Gilbert, P., Price, J., & Allan, S. (1995). Social comparison, social attractiveness and evolution: How might they be related? New Ideas in Psychology, 13(2), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-118x(95)00002-x.
Glover, N., Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Crego, C., & Widiger, T. A. (2012). The Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory: A five-factor measure of narcissistic personality traits. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(5), 500–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.670680.
Grapsas, S., Brummelman, E., Back, M., & Denissen, J. (2020). The “why” and “how” of narcissism: A process model of narcissistic status pursuit. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(1), 150–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619873350.
Grijalva, E., Harms, P. D., Newman, D. A., Gaddis, B. H., & Fraley, R. C. (2015). Narcissism and leadership: A meta-analytic review of linear and nonlinear relationships. Personnel Psychology, 68(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12072.
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Henrich, J., Chudek, M., & Boyd, R. (2015). The Big Man Mechanism: How prestige fosters cooperation and creates prosocial leaders. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370(1683), 20150013. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0013.
Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(3), 165–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1090-5138(00)00071-4.
Jonason, P. K. (2015). How “dark” personality traits and perceptions come together to predict racism in Australia. Personality and Individual Differences, 72, 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.08.030.
Jonason, P. K., Okan, C., & Özsoy, E. (2019). The Dark Triad traits in Australia and Turkey. Personality and Individual Differences, 149, 123–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.058.
Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765–780. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.4.765.
Judge, T. A., LePine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2006). Loving yourself abundantly: Relationship of the narcissistic personality to self-and other perceptions of workplace deviance, leadership, and task and contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 762–776. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.762.
Krizan, Z., & Herlache, A. D. (2018). The narcissism spectrum model: A synthetic view of narcissistic personality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868316685018.
Lange, J., Redford, L., & Crusius, J. (2019). A status-seeking account of psychological entitlement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(7), 1113–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218808501.
Laustsen, L., & Petersen, M. B. (2015). Does a competent leader make a good friend? Conflict, ideology and the psychologies of friendship and followership. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(4), 286–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.01.001.
Lynam, D. R., Hoyle, R. H., & Newman, J. P. (2006). The perils of partialling: Cautionary tales from aggression and psychopathy. Assessment, 13(3), 328–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191106290562.
MacKinnon, D., Krull, J., & Lockwood, C. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1(4), 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026595011371.
Maner, J. K. (2017). Dominance and prestige: A tale of two hierarchies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 526–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417714323.
Maynard-Smith, J. (1982). Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.2277/0521288843.
Maxwell, S. E., & Cole, D. A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.23.
Maxwell, S. E., Cole, D. A., & Mitchell, M. A. (2011). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation: Partial and complete mediation under an autoregressive model. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(5), 816–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.606716.
Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., McCain, J. L., Few, L. R., Crego, C., Widiger, T. A., & Campbell, W. K. (2016). Thinking structurally about narcissism: An examination of the Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory and its components. Journal of Personality Disorders, 30(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2015_29_177.
Mitchell, M. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2013). A comparison of the cross-sectional and sequential designs when assessing longitudinal mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 48(3), 301–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2013.784696.
Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12(4), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1204_1.
O’Laughlin, K. D., Martin, M. J., & Ferrer, E. (2018). Cross-sectional analysis of longitudinal mediation processes. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53(3), 375–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2018.1454822.
Perry, R., Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2013). Dangerous and competitive worldviews: A meta-analysis of their associations with Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.10.004.
Re, D. E., DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., & Perrett, D. I. (2013). Facial cues to perceived height influence leadership choices in simulated war and peace contexts. Evolutionary Psychology, 11(1), 147470491301100100. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491301100109.
Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F., & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7(4), 331–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331.
Ross, M. (1993). The culture of conflict. Yale University Press.
Sauls, D., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2020). Basic emotional systems and narcissistic personality features: What is the emotional core of narcissism? Personality and Individual Differences, 162, 110032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110032.
Schönbrodt, F. D., & Perugini, M. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize? Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 609–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009.
Semenyna, S. W., & Honey, P. L. (2015). Dominance styles mediate sex differences in Dark Triad traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.046.
Sherman, E. D., Miller, J. D., Few, L. R., Campbell, W. K., Widiger, T. A., Crego, C., & Lynam, D. R. (2015). Development of a short form of the Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory: The FFNI-SF. Psychological Assessment, 27(3), 1110–1116. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000100.
Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2009). Big-five personality, social worldviews, and ideological attitudes: Further tests of a dual process cognitive-motivational model. Journal of Social Psychology, 149, 545–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540903232308.
Spisak, B. R., Dekker, P. H., Krüger, M., & van Vugt, M. (2012). Warriors and peacekeepers: Testing a biosocial implicit leadership hypothesis of intergroup relations using masculine and feminine faces. PLoS ONE, 7(1), e30399. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030399.
Suessenbach, F., Loughnan, S., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Moore, A. B. (2019). The dominance, prestige, and leadership account of social power motives. European Journal of Personality, 33(1), 7–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2184.
Van Hiel, A., Cornelis, I., & Roets, A. (2007). The intervening role of social worldviews in the relationship between the five-factor model of personality and social attitudes. European Journal of Personality, 21(2), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.618.
Van Vugt, M. (2006). Evolutionary origins of leadership and followership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(4), 354–371. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_5.
Van Vugt, M., & Grabo, A. E. (2015). The many faces of leadership. An evolutionary-psychology approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(6), 484–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415601971
Zeigler-Hill, V. (2019). Fundamental social motives mediate the associations that dangerous and competitive social worldviews have with ideological attitudes. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-018-0164-6.
Zeigler-Hill, V., Martinez, J. L., Vrabel, J. K., Ezenwa, M. O., Oraetue, H., Nweze, T., et al. (2020). The darker angels of our nature: Do social worldviews mediate the associations that dark personality features have with ideological attitudes? Personality and Individual Differences, 160, 109920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109920.
Zeigler-Hill, V., McCabe, G. A., Vrabel, J. K., Raby, C. M., & Cronin, S. (2018). The narcissistic pursuit of status. In A. D. Hermann, A. B. Brunell, & J. D. Foster (Eds.), The handbook of trait narcissism: Key advances, research methods, and controversies (pp. 299–306). Springer.
Zeigler-Hill, V., Sauls, D., & Malay, P. (in press). Through the eyes of Narcissus: Competitive social worldviews mediate the associations that narcissism has with ideological attitudes. Self and Identity. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2020.1779118
Zeigler-Hill, V., Vrabel, J. K., McCabe, G. A., Cosby, C. A., Traeder, C. K., Hobbs, K. A., & Southard, A. C. (2019). Narcissism and the pursuit of status. Journal of Personality, 87(2), 310–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12392.
Funding
There was no external funding for the present research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Virgil Zeigler-Hill conceptualized and designed the project, collected data for the project, analyzed and interpreted the data for the project, and wrote the manuscript. Destaney Sauls, Victoriano Ochoa, and Jessica Kopitz assisted with drafting the manuscript and adding specific content. Avi Besser assisted with conceptualizing and designing the project, collected data for the project, and provided feedback on the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
Ethical approval was provided by the Institutional Review Board at Oakland University for Study 1, Study 2 (samples A and B), and Study 3. Ethical approval for sample C in Study 2 was provided by the Institutional Review Board at Hadassah Academic College.
Consent to Participate
All participants were adults and provided their consent to participate.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zeigler-Hill, V., Sauls, D., Ochoa, V. et al. Narcissism and Motives to Pursue Status Through the Use of Dominance-Based Strategies, Prestige-Based Strategies, and Leadership-Based Strategies. Evolutionary Psychological Science 7, 254–272 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-021-00278-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-021-00278-w