Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Exclusive talent management and its consequences: a review of literature

  • Published:
Asian Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is twofold, i.e. first to explore the ethical ambiguity arising out of exclusive approach to talent management practices and second to take into consideration the employees’ reaction of such practices. Workforce discrimination or segmentation may be feasible from the point of view of cost-benefit, but it imposes serious implications on the fairness perceived by employees. The paper involves extensive use of existing literature which comprises of journals, books, published reports, articles, etc. from various sources that are critical to the subject of study. The literature is selected based on the availability, language (English), accessibility and relevancy to the topic. The extensive review of literature postulates the violation of the stakeholder theory, equity theory and organisational justice theory in practising exclusive approach of talent management. Ethics and fairness play a major role in influencing the affective, behavioural and cognitive responses of an individual. As a result, talented employees may feel overburdened by the responsibility given to them, and non-talented employees may disassociate themselves from the additional work. Therefore, overall consequence may result to net negative reactions of exclusive talent management practice. Moreover, the role of perceived organisational justice and support cannot be undermined in studying the relationship between exclusive talent management and attitude of employees. This paper is based on certain literature from a limited database. Exhaustive literature review would lead to more concrete perspectives about ethical consideration and subsequently employees’ reaction. Analysing the consequences of employee’s reaction arising from the exclusive talent management practices will highlight the need for change in the direction towards inclusive approach and implement better practices for the good of all employees. This indeed will outline the efficient mechanism to manage talent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, P. (2016). Fitting talent management strategy into national culture. Indian Institute of Management, 2(4), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anlesinya, A., & Amponsah-Tawiah, K. (2020). Towards a responsible talent management model. European Journal of Training and Development, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/ejtd-07-2019-0114.

  • Anlesinya, A., Dartey-Baah, K., & Amponsah-Tawiah, K. (2019). Strategic talent management scholarship: A review of current foci and future directions. Industrial and Commercial Training, 51(5), 299–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, C., & Morton, L. (2005). Managing talent for competitive advantage: Taking a systemic approach to talent management. Strategic HR Review, 4(5), 28–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2002). Smart people or mart context? Cognition, ability and talent development in an age of situated approached to knowing and learning. Educational Psychologist, 37(3), 165–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkhuizen, N., Mogwere, P., & Schutte, N. (2014). Talent management, work engagement and service quality orientation of support staff in a higher education institution. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5, 69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bethke-Langenegger, P., Mahler, P., & Staffelbach, B. (2011). Effectiveness of talent management strategies. European Journal of International Management, 5, 524–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breckler, S. T. (1984). Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1191–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chami-Malaeb, R., & Garavan, T. (2013). Talent and leadership development practices as drivers of intention to stay in Lebanese organisations: The mediating role of affective commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 4046–4062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuai, X., Preece, D., & Iles, P. (2008). Is talent management just “old wine in new bottles”? Management Research News, 31(12), 901–911. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170810920611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collings, D., & Mellahi, K. (2009). Strategic talent management: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 19(4), 304–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.04.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Boeck, G., Meyers, M. C., & Dries, N. (2018). Employee reactions to talent management: Assumptions versus evidence. Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 39, 199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dissanayake, D. M. S. B., Niroshane, W. W. A. E., Nisansala, M. H., Rangani, M. L. D., Samarathunga, S. E. I., Wickramaarachchi, D. N., Nirasha, K., Wickramasinghe, D. N., & Wickramasinghe, W. W. M. E. G. P. M. B. (2015). Cultural comparison in Asian countries: An application of greet Hofstede’s cultural dimensions. In Proceedings of the 2nd undergraduate symposium on contemporary management and theory (pp. 211–224). Department of Commerce and Financial Management: Faculty of Commerce and Management, University of Kelaniya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dries, N. (2013). The psychology of talent management: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 272–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dries, N., & De Gieter, S. (2014). Information asymmetry in high potential programs. Personnel Review, 43, 7–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dries, N., Van Acker, F., & Verbruggen, M. (2012). How ‘boundaryless’ are the careers of high potentials, key experts and average performers? Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 81, 271–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis, L., Barkhuizen, N., Stanz, K., & Schutte, N. (2015). The management side of talent: Causal implications for the retention of generation Y employees. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 31(5), 1767–1780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I., & Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 565–573. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.3.565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallardo-Gallardo, E., & Thunnissen, M. (2019). Talent management: Disentangling key ideas. In a. Wilkinson, N. bacon, S. Snell & D. Lepak, the SAGE handbook of human resource management (2nd ed.). SAGE.

  • Gallardo-Gallardo, E., Dries, N., & González-Cruz, T. (2013). What is the meaning of ‘talent’ in the world of work? Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.05.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelens, J., Dries, N., Hofmans, J., & Pepermans, R. (2013). The role of perceived organizational justice in shaping the outcomes of talent management: A research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 23, 341–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelens, J., Hofmans, J., Dries, N., & Pepermans, R. (2014). Talent management and organisational justice: Employee reactions to high potential identification. Human Resource Management Journal, 24(2), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16, 606–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guest, D. E. (2017). Human resource management and employee well-being: Towards a new analytic framework. Human Resource Management Journal, 27(1), 22–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings In Psychology And Culture, 2(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind, revised and expanded (3rd ed). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huselid, M. A., Beatty, R. W., & Becker, B. E. (2005). ““A Players” Or “A Positions”?: The Strategic Logic Of Workforce Management”. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2005/12/a-players-or-a-positions-the-strategic-logic-of-workforce-management.

  • Huseman, R. C., Hatfield, J. D., & Miles, E. W. (1987). A new perspective on equity theory: The equity sensitivity construct. Academy of Management Review, 12, 222–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iles, P., Chuai, X., & Preece, D. (2010). Talent management and HRM in multinational companies in Beijing: Definitions, differences and drivers. Journal of World Business, 45(2), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2009.09.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuvaas, B., & Dysvik, A. (2010). Exploring alternative relationships between perceived investment in employee development, perceived supervisor support and employee outcomes. Human Resource Management Journal, 20(2), 138–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, M. Y., & Groves, K. (2014). Talent management collides with corporate social responsibility: Creation of inadvertent hypocrisy. Journal of Management Development, 33(4), 399–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledford, G., & Kochanski, J. (2004). Allocating training and development resources based on contribution. In L. Berger & D. Berger (Eds.), The talent management handbook: Creating organizational excellence by identifying (pp. 218–229). McGraw-Hill, New York, NY: Developing and Promoting Your Best People.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R., & Heckman, R. (2006). Talent management: A critical review. Human Resource Management Review, 16(2), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2006.03.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, W. Z. (2006). The new key word ‘talent management’ in retaining the top employees. Human Capital Magazine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luna-Arocas, R., & Morley, M. J. (2015). Talent management, talent mindset competency and job performance: The mediating role of job satisfaction. European Journal of International Management, 9, 28–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. (2006). Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society – A relational perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 99–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malik, A. R., & Singh, P. (2014). ‘High potential’ programs: Let's hear it for ‘B’ players. Human Resource Management Review, 24, 330–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, A. (2011). Still fighting the “war for talent”? Bridging the science versus practice gap. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(2), 169–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mensah, J. K. (2019). Talent management and employee outcomes: A psychological contract Fulfilment perspective. Public Organization Review, 19, 325–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-018-0407-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, M., & Van Woerkom, M. (2014). The influence of underlying philosophies on talent management: Theory, implications for practice, and research agenda. Journal of World Business, 49(2), 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2013.11.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, E., Handfield-Jones, H., & Axelrod, B. (2001). The war for talent. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mousa, M., & Ayoubi, R. (2019). Talent management practices: Perceptions of academics in Egyptian public business schools. Journal of management development, ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/jmd-01-2019-0030.

  • Narayanan, A., Rajithakumar, S., & Menon, M. (2019). Talent management and employee retention: An integrative research framework. Human Resource Development Review, 18(2), 228–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naulleau, M. (2015). Conditions for developing a successful talent management strategy. 4th Workshop on Talent Management, Valencia, Spain. <hal-01221228>.

  • Nishii, L. H., Lepak, D. P., & Schneider, B. (2008). Employee attributions of the “why” of HR practices: Their effects on employee attitudes and behaviours, and customer satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 61, 503–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, E., & Crowley-Henry, M. (2017). Exploring the relationship between exclusive talent management, perceived organizational justice and employee engagement: Bridging the literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(4), 903–917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3543-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, T. M. (1969). The relationship between the affective, behavioral and cognitive components of attitude. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 12–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Painter-Morland, M., Kirk, S., Deslandes, G., & Tansley, C. (2019). Talent management: The good, the bad, and the possible. European Management Review, 16(1), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12171.

  • Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. J., & Hovland, C. I. (1960). Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of attitude. In M. J. Rosenberg, C. I. Hovland, W. J. McGuire, R. P. Abelson, & J. W. Brehm (Eds.), Attitude organizafion and change: An analysis of consisrency among attifude components (pp. 1–14). CTi Yale University Press: New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Six, F. E. (2007). Building interpersonal trust within organizations: A relational signalling perspective. Journal of Management and Governance, 11(3), 285–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenberg, M., van Zijderveld, V., & Brinks, M. (2013). The role of talent– Perception incongruence in effective talent management. Journal of World Business, 49, 272–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumelius, J., Smale, A., & Yamao, S. (2019). Mixed signals: Employee reactions to talent status communication amidst strategic ambiguity The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1500388.

  • Swailes, S., Downs, Y., & Orr, K. (2014). Conceptualising inclusive talent management: Potential, possibilities and practicalities. Human Resource Development International, 1–16.

  • Tansley, C., & Tietze, S. (2013). Rites of passage through talent management progression stages: An identity work perspective. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(9), 1799–1815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarique, I., & Schuler, R. (2010). Global talent management: Literature review, integrative framework, and suggestions for further research. Journal of World Business, 45(2), 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2009.09.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thunnissen, M., Boselie, P., & Fruytier, B. (2013). Talent management and the relevance of context: Towards a pluralistic approach. Human Resource Management Review, 23, 326–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaiman, V., Haslberger, A., & Vance, C. (2015). Recognizing the important role of self-initiated expatriates in effective global talent management. Human Resource Management Review, 25(3), 280–286.

  • Williams, G., & Zinkin, J. (2008). The effect of culture on consumers' willingness to punish irresponsible corporate behaviour: Applying Hofstede's typology to the punishment aspect of corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(2), 210–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S., & Bright, D. (2012). Talent definition and talent management recognition in Chinese private-owned enterprises. Journal of Chinese Entrepreneurship, 4(2), 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1108/17561391211242753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, C. (2009). Keeping talents for advancing service firms in Asia. Journal of Service Management, 20(5), 482–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business Administration, Tezpur University, Tezpur, Assam, India

    Rajneet Bhatia & Papori Baruah

Authors
  1. Rajneet Bhatia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Papori Baruah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajneet Bhatia.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhatia, R., Baruah, P. Exclusive talent management and its consequences: a review of literature. Asian J Bus Ethics 9, 193–209 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-020-00105-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-020-00105-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation