Microbiota-root-shoot-environment axis and stress tolerance in plants

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2021.102028Get rights and content

Reminiscent to the microbiota-gut-brain axis described in animals, recent advances indicate that plants can take advantage of belowground microbial commensals to orchestrate aboveground stress responses. Integration of plant responses to microbial cues belowground and environmental cues aboveground emerges as a mechanism that promotes stress tolerance in plants. Using recent examples obtained from reductionist and community-level approaches, we discuss the extent to which perception of aboveground biotic and abiotic stresses can cascade along the shoot–root axis to sculpt root microbiota assembly and modulate the growth of root commensals that bolster aboveground stress tolerance. We propose that host modulation of microbiota-root-shoot circuits contributes to phenotypic plasticity and decision-making in plants, thereby promoting adaptation to rapidly changing environmental conditions.

Introduction

Belowground and aboveground plant organs are constantly exposed to a number of biotic and abiotic stresses that can change or rapidly fluctuate over time. Because roots and leaves are exposed to different environmental cues, each compartment has evolved organ-specific mechanisms that ensure efficient responses to cognate belowground and aboveground environmental constraints. However, several examples also illustrate that root and shoot organs can ectopically control response to stresses in distant leaves and root compartments, respectively, via long distance communication along the root–shoot axis [1]. For instance, it has been shown that the shoot-derived mobile signal CEPD-like 2 regulates root nitrate uptake according to shoot nitrate status in Arabidopsis thaliana [2] or that shoot-to-root translocation of the mobile transcription factor HY5 mediates light-activated promotion of lateral root growth and nitrogen uptake in A. thaliana [3]. Remarkably, legumes can control nodulation via shoot-to-root translocation of miR2111, a systemic symbiosis activator constitutively repressing nodulation in uninfected roots and ensuring susceptibility to rhizobia in infected roots [4••]. Finally, root-to-shoot upward migration of cytokinin was shown to act as a signal molecule orchestrating photosynthetic activity in tomato leaves [5]. These selected examples suggest that long distance communication between root and shoot organs are likely key in coordinating growth and development of these two distinct yet interdependent organs, thereby promoting stress tolerance and ensuring plant survival in nature.

Complex multi-kingdom microbial communities have interacted with roots of healthy plants since 450 MyA (i.e., hereafter named the root microbiota [6,7]). Root microbiota members confer numerous beneficial functions to the host linked to nutrient acquisition, pathogen protection or immune system modulation [8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15,16••,17, 18, 19]). Given the well-known interplay between the host, the associated microbiota and the environment, it is conceivable that direct integration of responses to microbial commensals belowground and responses to environments aboveground contribute to shoot phenotypic plasticity and aboveground stress resistance in plants. In animals, such long-distance bidirectional communication mechanisms have been extensively described in the context of the microbiota–gut–brain axis [20]. Gut microbiota members were found to modulate mood, cerebral metabolism and behaviour in model gnotobiotic mice systems by 1) modulating the host immune system and immune homeostasis, 2) by impacting the host metabolism (hormones, neuropeptides, neurotransmitters) and 3) by directly interfering with neuronal signalling [20]. In turn, these modifications in brain processes have consequences on gut microbiota assembly, thereby shaping microbiota–gut–brain circuits [20]. Given that plant roots and animal guts share similar physiological functions [21], that the growth of root and shoot organs is tightly coordinated, and that root microbiota members modulate growth and immunity processes in plants, such bidirectional microbiota–root–shoot mechanisms likely play crucial functions for plant health as well [16••,22••,23].

In this article, we discuss the extent to which aboveground stresses can modulate root microbiota assembly and conversely how root commensals can mitigate aboveground stress responses (Figure 1). We especially discuss the concept of the microbiota-root-shoot-environment axis in the context of herbivores, microbial leaf pathogens and light stresses because these biotic and abiotic stimuli are specifically perceived by leaves and the consequences on root metabolism and root microbiota assemblages can only be explained by long-distance shoot–root signalling. Using numerous examples obtained from manipulation or microbiota reconstitution experiments, we provide several lines of evidence suggesting that 1) bi-directional communication mechanisms along the microbiota–root–shoot axis promote aboveground stress tolerance 2) selective, host-driven recruitment of particular root commensals acts as a feedback loop that bolsters stress tolerance 3) signals from belowground microbial commensals and aboveground environment are integrated along the microbiota-root-shoot axis to prioritize growth or defence according to the stresses encountered.

Section snippets

Biotic and abiotic cues perceived by leaves modulate root microbiota assembly

Aboveground plant organs can sense changes in environmental conditions and initiate local but also systemic responses that are likely critical for plant survival in nature. Although local responses are most often studied, stress-induced changes in leaves were shown to also modulate host metabolism in distant root organs, with cascading consequences on root microbiota composition (Figure 1).

Microbial root commensals modulate leaf responses to aboveground stresses

Emerging evidence indicates that root microbiota members can influence the plant’s response to aboveground stressors, and not only being passively affected by them. Microbiota manipulation and/or reconstitution experiments have been critical to test the relevance of the root microbiota for promoting aboveground stress tolerance in plants (Figure 1).

Bidirectional microbiota–root–shoot circuits enhance plant tolerance to stresses

Although some examples indicate that aboveground biotic and abiotic stresses can modulate root microbiota assembly and conversely that root commensals can promote host tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses, it remains difficult to experimentally test whether these two responses are actually part of a microbiota-root-shoot circuit that promotes stress resistance in plants (Figure 1).

Conclusions

Similar to animals, it becomes clear that plant responses to stresses or diseases are affected by the immune and metabolic state of the host. Given that microbial root and gut commensals have been shown to directly intersect with these responses, we start to appreciate the extent to which microbiota-induced change in host metabolism can ultimately influence health and disease states in plants and animals. Therefore, it is plausible that these circuits have evolved over evolutionary time in

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by funds to Stéphane Hacquard from a European Research Council starting grant (MICRORULES) and by funds from the Max-Planck-Society. Shiji Hou salary was primarily covered by a scholarship provided by the China Scholarship Council (CSC Student ID 201604910525).

References (61)

  • D. Tsikou et al.

    Systemic control of legume susceptibility to rhizobial infection by a mobile microRNA

    Science (80-)

    (2018)
  • N. Glanz-Idan et al.

    Root–shoot communication in tomato plants: cytokinin as a signal molecule modulating leaf photosynthetic activity

    J Exp Bot

    (2020)
  • M.A. Hassani et al.

    Microbial interactions within the plant holobiont

    Microbiome

    (2018)
  • F.M. Martin et al.

    Ancestral alliances: plant mutualistic symbioses with fungi and bacteria

    Science (80-)

    (2017)
  • N. Vannier et al.

    Microbiota-mediated disease resistance in plants

    PLoS Pathog

    (2019)
  • K. Hiruma et al.

    Root endophyte Colletotrichum tofieldiae confers plant fitness benefits that are phosphate status dependent

    Cell

    (2016)
  • J. Almario et al.

    Root-associated fungal microbiota of nonmycorrhizal Arabis alpina and its contribution to plant phosphorus nutrition

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2017)
  • J. Zhang et al.

    NRT1.1B is associated with root microbiota composition and nitrogen use in field-grown rice

    Nat Biotechnol

    (2019)
  • C.J. Harbort et al.

    Root-secreted coumarins and the microbiota interact to improve iron nutrition in Arabidopsis

    Cell Host Microbe

    (2020)
  • M.-J. Kwak et al.

    Rhizosphere microbiome structure alters to enable wilt resistance in tomato

    Nat Biotechnol

    (2018)
  • F. Getzke et al.

    Contribution of bacterial-fungal balance to plant and animal health

    Curr Opin Microbiol

    (2019)
  • P. Durán et al.

    Microbial interkingdom interactions in roots promote Arabidopsis survival

    Cell

    (2018)
  • V.J. Carrión et al.

    Pathogen-induced activation of disease-suppressive functions in the endophytic root microbiome

    Science (80-)

    (2019)
  • L.H. Morais et al.

    The gut microbiota–brain axis in behaviour and brain disorders

    Nat Rev Microbiol

    (2020)
  • S. Hacquard et al.

    Microbiota and host nutrition across plant and animal kingdoms

    Cell Host Microbe

    (2015)
  • S. Hou et al.

    Microbiota-root-shoot axis modulation by MYC2 favours Arabidopsis growth over defence under suboptimal light

    bioRxiv

    (2020)
  • C.-Y. Huang et al.

    Small RNAs – big players in plant-microbe interactions

    Cell Host Microbe

    (2019)
  • J.W. Yang et al.

    Whitefly infestation of pepper plants elicits defence responses against bacterial pathogens in leaves and roots and changes the below-ground microflora

    J Ecol

    (2011)
  • J. Yuan et al.

    Root exudates drive the soil-borne legacy of aboveground pathogen infection

    Microbiome

    (2018)
  • I.A. Stringlis et al.

    MYB72-dependent coumarin exudation shapes root microbiome assembly to promote plant health

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2018)
  • Cited by (40)

    • Microbial fortification of pharmacological metabolites in medicinal plants

      2023, Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    3

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

    View full text