Skip to main content
Log in

On Some Subspaces of the Exterior Algebra of a Simple Lie Algebra

  • Published:
Algebras and Representation Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, we are interested in some subspaces of the exterior algebra of a simple Lie algebra \(\mathfrak {g}\). In particular, we prove that some graded subspaces of degree d generate the \({\mathfrak {g}}\)-module \(\bigwedge ^{d}{\mathfrak {g}}\) for some integers d.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bourbaki, N.: Lie groups and Lie algebras. Chapters 4–6. Translated from the 1968 French original by Andrew Pressley. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Charbonnel, J.-Y.: Projective dimension and the Commuting variety of a reductive Lie algebra. arXiv:2006.12942 (2020)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Yves Charbonnel.

Additional information

Presented by: Michela Varagnolo

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A: Some Remarks on Root Systems

Appendix A: Some Remarks on Root Systems

Let β be in Π and X := Π ∖{β}. Set \({\mathfrak p}_{\mathrm {u}} := {\mathfrak p}_{\mathrm {u},X}\) and \(d := \dim \hskip .125em {\mathfrak p}_{\mathrm {u},X}\). The goal of the section is the following proposition:

Proposition A.1

  1. (i)

    Suppose Π of type A and X not connected. Then β = βs+ 1 for some s in {1,…, − 2},

$$ \mathrm{m} =2, \quad n_{1} = \frac{s(s+1)}{2}, \quad n_{2} = \frac{(\ell-s-1)(\ell-s)}{2} . $$

Moreover, if 2d + n1n then

$$ \ell \geq 6, \quad s \leq \frac{1}{6}\left( 2\ell -3 - \sqrt{ 4\ell^{2} + 12 \ell + 9}\right), \quad 2d+n_{2} > n . $$
  1. (ii)

    Suppose Π of type B or C and X not connected. Then β = βs+ 1 for some s in {1,…, − 2},

$$ \mathrm{m} =2, \quad n_{1} = \frac{s(s+1)}{2}, \quad n_{2} = (\ell-s-1)^{2} . $$

Moreover, if 2d + n1n then

$$ \ell \geq 7, \quad s \leq \frac{1}{10}\left( 8\ell -9 - \sqrt{ 24\ell^{2} + 16 \ell + 1}\right), \quad 2d+n_{2} > n . $$
  1. (iii)

    Suppose Π of type D. If β = β− 2 then 2d > n. If β is different from β− 2 and X is not connected, then

$$ \mathrm{m} =2, \quad n_{1} = \frac{s(s+1)}{2}, \quad n_{2} = (\ell-s-1)^{2} . $$

Moreover, if 2d + n1n then

$$ \ell \geq 8, \quad s \leq \frac{1}{10}\left( 8\ell -13 - \sqrt{ 24\ell^{2} - 8\ell + 9}\right), \quad 2d+n_{2} > n . $$
  1. (iv)

    Suppose that Π is exceptional. If 2dn then X is connected.

We prove the proposition case by case. So, in the classical case, we suppose ≥ 3 and X not connected.

1.1 A.1 Type A

As X is not connected, m = 2 and β = βs+ 1 for some s in {1,…, − 2}. Then

$$ \begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} n_{1} = \frac{s(s+1)}{2}, \quad n_{2}& =& \frac{(\ell-s-1)(\ell-s)}{2}, \quad d = n -n_{1}-n_{2},\\ n - 2d - n_{1} &=& \frac{1}{2}\left( 3s^{2} + (-4\ell + 3)s + \ell^{2}- 3\ell\right). \end{array} $$

If n − 2dn1 ≥ 0 then

$$ s \leq \frac{1}{6}\left( 4\ell -3 - \sqrt{4\ell^{2} + 12\ell + 9}\right) \quad \text{or} \quad s \geq \frac{1}{6}\left( 4\ell -3 + \sqrt{4\ell^{2} + 12\ell + 9}\right) . $$

As s ≥ 1, the first inequality is possible only if ≥ 6. The second inequality is impossible since its right hand side is bigger than − 2 and s is at most − 2.

By the above equalities,

$$ n -2d - n_{2} = 3s^{2} + (-2\ell + 3)s - 2\ell. $$

If the left hand side is nonnegative then

$$ s \leq \frac{1}{6}\left( 2\ell -3 - \sqrt{4\ell^{2} + 12\ell + 9}\right) \quad \text{or} \quad s \geq \frac{1}{6}\left( 2\ell -3 + \sqrt{4\ell^{2} + 12\ell + 9}\right) . $$

The first inequality is impossible since its right hand side is negative. The second inequality is possible only if ≥ 7 since s − 2. Moreover, it is not possible to have n ≥ 2d + n1 and n ≥ 2d + n2 since

$$ \frac{1}{6}\left( 2\ell -3 + \sqrt{4\ell^{2} + 12\ell + 9}\right) > \frac{1}{6}\left( 4\ell -3 - \sqrt{4\ell^{2} + 12\ell + 9}\right), $$

whence Assertion (i) of Proposition A.1.

1.2 A.2 Type B or C

As X is not connected, m = 2 and β = βs+ 1 for some s in {1,…, − 2}. Then

$$ \begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} n_{1} = \frac{s(s+1)}{2}, \quad n_{2} &=& (\ell-s-1)^{2}, \quad d = n -n_{1}-n_{2},\\ n - 2d - n_{1} &=& \frac{1}{2}\left( 5s^{2} + (-8\ell + 9)s + 2\ell^{2}- 8\ell + 4\right). \end{array} $$

If n − 2dn1 ≥ 0 then

$$ s \leq \frac{1}{10}\left( 8\ell -9 - \sqrt{24\ell^{2} + 16\ell + 1}\right) \quad \text{or} \quad s \geq \frac{1}{10}\left( 8\ell -9 + \sqrt{24\ell^{2} + 16\ell + 1}\right) . $$

As s ≥ 1, the first inequality is possible only if ≥ 7. The second inequality is impossible since its right hand side is bigger than − 2 and s is at most − 2.

By the above equalities,

$$ n -2d - n_{2} = 2s^{2} + (-2\ell + 5)s - 4\ell+4. $$

If the left hand side is nonnegative then

$$ s \leq \frac{1}{4}\left( 2\ell -5 - \sqrt{4\ell^{2} + 12\ell - 7}\right) \quad \text{or} \quad s \geq \frac{1}{4}\left( 2\ell -5 + \sqrt{4\ell^{2} + 12\ell - 9}\right) . $$

The first inequality is impossible since its right hand side is negative. The second inequality is impossible since

$$s\leq \ell -2 \quad \text{and} \quad \frac{1}{4}\left( 2\ell -5 + \sqrt{4\ell^{2} + 12\ell - 9}\right) > \ell -2, $$

whence Assertion (ii) of Proposition A.1.

1.3 A.3 Type D

As X is not connected, β is different from β1, β− 1, β. If β = β− 2 then X has three connected components and

$$ d = \ell(\ell -1) - 2 - \frac{1}{2}(\ell-3)(\ell -2) . $$

In this case n < 2d. Suppose ≥ 5 and β = βs+ 1 for some s in {1,…, − 4}. Then

$$ \begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} n_{1} = \frac{s(s+1)}{2}, \quad n_{2}& =& (\ell-s-1)(\ell -s-2), \quad d = n-n_{1}-n_{2},\\ n-2d - n_{1} &=& 5 s^{2} - s(4\ell -7) + \ell^{2}-5\ell+4 . \end{array} $$

If n − 2dn1 ≥ 0 then

$$ s \leq \frac{1}{10}\left( 8\ell -13 - \sqrt{24\ell^{2}- 8\ell+9}\right) \quad \text{or} \quad s \geq \frac{1}{10}\left( 8\ell -13 + \sqrt{24\ell^{2}-8\ell+9}\right) . $$

As s ≥ 1, the first inequality is possible only if ≥ 8. The second inequality is impossible since its right hand side is bigger than − 4 and s is at most − 4.

By the above equalities,

$$ n -2d - n_{2} = 2s^{2} + (-2\ell + 4)s - 2\ell+2. $$

If the left hand side is nonnegative then

$$ s \leq -1 \quad \text{or} \quad s\geq \ell-1 . $$

These inequalities are impossible since s is positive and smaller than − 3, whence Assertion (iii) of Proposition A.1.

1.4 A.4 The Exceptional Cases

Set \({\mathfrak {l}}:={\mathfrak {l}}_{X}\), \({\mathfrak {d}} := {\mathfrak {d}}_{X}\). Then \(2d = \dim \hskip .125em \mathfrak {g}-\dim \hskip .125em {\mathfrak {l}}\). For each case, we give all the possible dimensions of \({\mathfrak {l}}\) when |X| = − 1.

  1. (a)

    The algebra \(\mathfrak {g}\) has type G2. Then X is connected, whence Assertion (iv) of Proposition A.1 for this case.

  2. (b)

    The algebra \(\mathfrak {g}\) has type F4. In this case n = 24 and

    $$ \dim\hskip .125em {\mathfrak{l}} \in \{12,22\} \quad \text{whence} \quad 2d \in \{40,30\}$$

    and Assertion (iv) of Proposition A.1 for this case.

  3. (c)

    The algebra \(\mathfrak {g}\) has type E6. In this case n = 36 and

    $$ \dim\hskip .125em {\mathfrak{l}} \in \{20,28,36,46\} \quad \text{whence} \quad 2d \in \{58,50,42,32 \}$$

    and Assertion (iv) of Proposition A.1 for this case since \({\mathfrak {d}}\) is simple of type D5 when 2d = 32.

  4. (d)

    The algebra \(\mathfrak {g}\) has type E7. In this case n = 63 and

    $$ \dim\hskip .125em {\mathfrak{l}} \in \{27,33,39,49,67,79\} \quad \text{whence} \quad 2d \in \{106,100,94,84,66,54\}$$

    and Assertion (iv) of Proposition A.1 for this case since \({\mathfrak {d}}\) is simple of type E6 when 2d = 54.

  5. (e)

    The algebra \(\mathfrak {g}\) has type E8. In this case n = 120 and

    $$\dim {\mathfrak{l}} \in \{36,40,52,54,64,82,92,134\} \text{ whence } 2d \in \{212,208,196,194,184,166,156,114\}$$

    and Assertion (iv) of Proposition A.1 for this case since \(\mathfrak {d}\) is simple of type E7 when 2d = 114.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Charbonnel, JY. On Some Subspaces of the Exterior Algebra of a Simple Lie Algebra. Algebr Represent Theor 25, 725–746 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10468-021-10042-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10468-021-10042-0

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

Navigation