Elsevier

Environmental Development

Volume 39, September 2021, 100616
Environmental Development

Spatio-temporal evolution of the social-ecological landscape resilience and management zoning in the loess hill and gully region of China

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2021.100616Get rights and content

Abstract

Discussions on the evolutionary process and mechanism of social-ecological landscape resilience play an important role in maintaining the sustainable provision of landscape services. However, studies on the evolutionary process and mechanism of social-ecological landscapes at the micro-scale have received relatively little attention. The purpose of this research is to analyze the spatio-temporal evolution of social-ecological landscape resilience at the micro-level in Gaoqu Township in Mizhi County, China. A three-dimensional (ecosystem, social system, and production system) indicator was constructed to quantitatively evaluate the social-ecological landscape resilience. The results showed that (1) the spatio-temporal variation in the three subsystems’ resilience was extensive from 2012 to 2018. The ecosystem resilience was distributed in the northeast-southwest direction, which was consistent with the distribution of gullies. The social system resilience was spatially high in the northwest and low in the southeast. The production system resilience was low in the middle and high in the peripheral regions. The resilience values of the ecosystem, social system and production system increased by 0.127, 0.122 and 0.101, respectively. (2) The spatio-temporal differentiation of the social-ecological landscape resilience was also significant, and its resilience value increased by 11.44%, which showed a spatial pattern with a low center and high surroundings. (3) Finally, based on the status and trend of the social-ecological landscape resilience, 20 villages in the region can be divided into predominantly advancing areas, predominantly stable areas, predominantly attenuation areas, emerging advancing areas, and sensitive-vulnerable areas. This study can provide the spatial guidance for differentiated sustainable development in the Loess hill and gully region based on the local conditions of the social-ecological landscapes.

Introduction

Social-ecological landscapes (SELs) are complicated accommodative systems that contain social-ecological components and their mutual effects, with spatial properties (Petrosillo et al., 2010; Biggs et al., 2012; Cumming et al., 2013; Wu et al., 2013). Thus far, scholars have formed some valuable consensuses on the study of SELs. And they characterize an SEL as a social-ecological system with a certain time evolution and development history (Ciftcioglu, 2017). With the development of landscape ecology and GIS, academia has gradually begun to study social-ecological systems from the spatial level. These studies emphasize more the spatial scale and pay more attention to the spatial pattern and interaction of the various elements of the system (Folke, 2006; Petrosillo et al., 2010). Furthermore, some scholars have focused on the socio-cultural aspects of SELs and argued that the improvement of SELs, in turn, enhances human well-being and protects the ecological environment (Andrew et al., 2011). Currently, against the background of land use changes, the evolution of social-ecological landscape resilience (SELR) is mainly influenced by multiple factors such as global environmental change, urbanization development and local specific social ecological environment. In the loess hilly and gully regions of China, the significance of land use changes has seriously affected the welfare of local communities, biodiversity conservation and regional production trends and patterns (Li et al., 2016; Jia et al., 2018). With the conditions of an ever-changing environment, maintaining and enhancing SELR is the foundation of regional sustainable development (Ciftcioglu, 2017). Therefore, the scientific evaluation and effective improvement of SELR have attracted the attention of many interdisciplinary research fields, such as geography, ecology, and sociology (Ciftcioglu, 2017; Zhang et al., 2019). An analysis of the evolution of SELR and its management zoning is conducive to revealing the human activities in the ecological environment and sustaining necessary landscape services, which are significant for regional sustainable development.

Resilience thinking provides a sustainable analytical framework for the operation of social-ecological systems at different spatio-temporal scales (Walker et al., 2004; Carpenter et al., 2005). SELR refers to the ability to withstand perturbations on the condition that the SEL does not transform states (Rescia et al., 2010; Min et al., 2017). Compared with a traditional resilience evaluation, the outstanding characteristics of an SELR evaluation are represented by the quantitative representation of resilience heterogeneity (Rescia et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2019). The previous research on SELR evaluation mainly focuses on two aspects. (1) On the one hand, the previous research evaluates the spatial heterogeneity of SELR at the macro-scale (Li et al., 2014; Rescia et al., 2017). Luo et al. (2018) described the spatio-temporal characteristics of urban landscape resilience based on the trend analysis of a vegetation index and night lighting data. Rescia et al. (2018) explored the agricultural landscape resilience at different scales through landscape level indicators. Furthermore, network analysis based on connectivity effectively characterizes geographical location characteristics and becomes a powerful quantitative approach for SELR (Kärrholm et al., 2014). In the research, great breakthroughs have been made in quantitatively characterizing the spatial heterogeneity of SELR based on landscape indicators, a natural index, and a space index, but some limitations still exist in terms of the elemental characteristics and the relationships of subsystems in social-ecological systems. (2) On the other hand, previous research examines the temporal evolution of SELR at the micro-scale (Bgamini et al., 2010; Pliening et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2015). Rescia et al. (2010) observed the 50-year evolution of two nature reserves in Spain and found that rural employment opportunities and landscape homogeneity affect landscape resilience. Wang et al. (2015) analyzed the evolutionary process of SELR in Qiandao Lake, China and found that the resilience of the subsystems at different stages is significantly different. The research in this area focuses on the characteristics (relationships) of micro-scale system elements and the mechanism of system evolution in the evaluation of SELR, but there is little analysis of system spatial patterns. Accordingly, based on systematic thought patterns, considering the spatio-temporal differentiation and evolution of micro-scale SELs and their elements has become important in the research of SELR.

In addition, although the research on SELR has made breakthroughs in its evaluation methods, resilience level, spatial-temporal evolution and spatial mapping, it is necessary to further study the management division of SELR (Li et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2015; Peng et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2019). Peng et al. (2019) adopted a self-organizing feature map (SOFM) method to manage mountainous landscape with the balance and synergy of landscape functions. Li et al. (2014) constructed a zoning unit of Taihu Lake Basin in China based on the two standards of the protection and restoration of the SEL. For the research scale, the research on SELR is mostly investigated from the macro scale (i.e., the geomorphic unit, the watershed unit, and the ecological function zoning unit), as this scale conveniently sustains the integrity of the regional natural environment. There is relatively little research on the classification of SELR based on the micro-level. At a relatively short time scale, the economy, culture and institutions often have greater impacts than natural factors have on the evolution of rural landscapes (Long et al., 2009; Li et al., 2010; Qasim et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2017). Long et al. (2012) pointed out that the reconstruction of rural landscapes is centered on the transformation of local socio-economic forms and is characterized by the adjustment of the rural regional spatial pattern. Yang et al. (2015) showed that the resilience of rural communities is mainly affected by social factors such as collective memory, livelihood diversity and adaptability. Therefore, by fully considering the homogeneity of the natural foundation of the SELs at the micro-scale, the frequency of human activities and the convenience of management, this paper conducts village scale management zoning, which is conducive to more reasonable management measures.

The Loess hill and gully region is a typical fragile ecological region, and it is also one of the most poverty-stricken areas in China (Zhou et al., 2012). In this region, the unreasonable long-term exploitation and utilization of resources has caused regional vegetation degradation, serious soil erosion and drastic land productivity declines (Fu et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2017). Since 1999, when the China Grain for Green Project Program1 was implemented, the regional natural ecological environment has been improved significantly (Chen et al., 2016; Cao et al., 2018). Therefore, by taking Gaoqu Township as a case study, we aim to 1) construct a micro-scale SELR evaluation index system, 2) analyze the spatio-temporal evolution characteristics of SELR on a micro-scale, and 3) propose a management zoning plan for this rural SELs.

Section snippets

Study area

Mizhi County (109°49′E−110°29′E, 37°39′N—38°05′N) is located in the northern part of Shaanxi Province, China, with an area of 1212 km2 and a long history (Fig. 1-a; Fig. 1-b). The county is known as a Millennium Ancient County and Terrace County. It belongs to the typical Loess hill and gully region with broken topography (Fig. 1-c), severe soil erosion and a dry climate (Liu et al., 2018). In addition, Mizhi County has mountainous areas, with economic forests, dams and valleys. Most of the

Spatio-temporal evolution of social-ecological landscape resilience

In 2012, 2015 and 2018, the ER values of the study area were 0.513, 0.551 and 0.640, respectively. The spatial differentiation of ER was significant and showed a strip-to-phase distribution in the northeast-southwest direction (Fig. 2a); During 2012–2018, the SR values of the study area were 0.386, 0.487, and 0.507, respectively. The general spatial pattern of SR can be reflected by the advantage that the northwest district had over the southeast district (Fig. 2b); In 2012, 2015 and 2018, the

Construction of the social-ecological landscape resilience evaluation indicators

As a tool to effectively support landscape system management, resilience evaluation has become a hot research topic in the fields of landscape ecology, geography, and environmental science (Schouten et al., 2013; Ciftcioglu, 2017; Zhang et al., 2019). The multi-level indicator framework of constructing SELR has been recognized by many scholars, but the paradigm of the evaluation index system has not yet been formed (Wang et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2015). Compared with traditional

Conclusion

This research constructed a three-dimensional assessment framework to analyze the spatio-temporal evolution of SELR. The results showed that the spatio-temporal variation of the overall SELR was significantly different, and the spatial pattern was low in the middle and high in the surrounding areas. Based on the status and trend of SELR, management zoning can divide into five categories. From the perspective of the spatial layout, the spatial distributions of the five zonings had a certain

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 41971271 & 41871185). We would like to thank Di Liu, Hui Jia, Ming Zhang, Sheng Ma and Yan Zhao for collecting the data. We also sincerely thank the local farmers in Gaoqu Township.

References (58)

  • F. Berkes et al.

    Community resilience: toward an inte-grated approach

    Soc. Nat. Resour.

    (2013)
  • R. Biggs et al.

    Toward principles for enhancing the resilience of ecosystem services

    Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour.

    (2012)
  • F. Brand

    Critical natural capital revisited: ecological resilience and sustainable development

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2009)
  • Z. Cao et al.

    When and where did the loess plateau turn ‘green’? analysis of the tendency and breakpoints of normalized difference vegetation index

    Land Degrad. Dev.

    (2017)
  • S.R. Carpenter et al.

    Surrogates for resilience of social-ecological systems

    Ecosystems

    (2005)
  • W. Chao et al.

    Assessment of the impact of China's sloping land conservation program on regional development in a typical hilly region of the loess plateau—a case study in guyuan

    Environ. Dev

    (2017)
  • H. Chen et al.

    China's grain for green policy and farm dynamics: simulating household land-use responses

    Reg. Environ. Change

    (2016)
  • G.C. Ciftcioglu

    Assessment of the resilience of socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes: a case study from Lefke Region of North Cyprus

    Ecol. Indicat.

    (2017)
  • G.S. Cumming

    Spatial resilience: integrating landscape ecology, resilience, and sustainability

    Landsc. Ecol.

    (2011)
  • G.S. Cumming et al.

    Resilience, experimentation, and scale mismatches in social-ecological landscapes

    Landsc. Ecol.

    (2013)
  • Y.D. Fan et al.

    A method of data girding from administration cell to girding cell

    Sci. Geogr. Sin.

    (2004)
  • C. Folke

    Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses

    Global Environ. Change

    (2006)
  • T. Frazier et al.

    Stakeholder perspectives on land-use strategies for adapting to climate-change-enhanced coastal hazards: sarasota, Florida

    Appl. Geogr.

    (2010)
  • B. Fu et al.

    Landscape Pattern Change and Soil Erosion in the Loess Plateau

    (2014)
  • A.S. Garmestani et al.

    A framework for resilience-based governance of social-ecological systems

    Ecol. Soc.

    (2013)
  • [EB/OL]

  • K.F. Gotham et al.

    Coupled vulnerability and resilience: the dynamics of cross- scale interactions in post-Katrina New Orleans

    Ecol. Soc.

    (2011)
  • C.W. Hoy

    Agroecosystem health, agroecosystem resilience, and food security

    J. Environ. Soc. Sci.

    (2015)
  • H. Jia et al.

    Landscape sustainable development in highly sensitive ecological fragile areas

    Resour. Sci.

    (2018)
  • M. Kärrholm et al.

    Spatial resilience and urban planning: addressing the interdependence of urban retail areas

    Cities

    (2014)
  • C. Kelly et al.

    Community resilience and land degradationin forest and shrubland socio-ecological: evidence from Gorgoglione, Basilicata, Italy

    Land Use Pol.

    (2015)
  • X. Li et al.

    An overview of the resilience of agro-ecosystems

    Resour. Sci.

    (2015)
  • Y. Li et al.

    Spatio-temporal analysis of population and residential land change in rural China

    J. Nat. Resour.

    (2010)
  • Y. Li et al.

    Applying the concept of spatial resilience to socio-ecological systems in the urban wetland interface

    Ecol. Indicat.

    (2014)
  • Q. Li et al.

    Role of capitals and capabilities in ensuring economic resilience of land conservation efforts: a case study of the grain for green project in China's Loess Hills

    Ecol. Indicat.

    (2016)
  • Y. Liu et al.

    Revitalize the world’ s countryside

    Nature

    (2017)
  • D. Liu et al.

    A quantitative assessment of comprehensive ecological risk for a loess erosion gully: a case study of Dujiashi Gully, northern Shaanxi Province, China

    Sustainability

    (2018)
  • H. Long et al.

    Evolution characteristics and dynamic mechanism of hollow villages in China

    Acta Geograph. Sin.

    (2009)
  • F. Luo et al.

    Assessing urban landscape ecological risk through an adaptive cycle framework

    Landsc. Urban Plann.

    (2018)
  • Cited by (13)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text