Skip to main content
Log in

Variability in large-sample postbuckling behavior of two small thin walled structures

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In thin shell buckling, geometric imperfections are important contributors to observed scatter in experimentally determined postbuckling behavior. Buckling experiments with large shells are difficult and expensive to conduct, and hence the sample sizes of buckling tests reported in the literature are generally small. To study statistical variability of buckling loads for a large number of notionally identical thin shells, we have carried out 100 buckling experiments each for two thin shell geometries. One shell geometry is a dome-like shell with a flat base (a bowl), and the other is a truncated cone with a flat base (a tumbler). The test shells are industrially produced, inexpensive, made of stainless steel, and easily available in India as utensils for domestic use. We provide detailed geometric and material characterization of these thin shell specimens. These shells were compressed axially between rigid plates. Buckling for both shell geometries was elastoplastic in nature. The experimental buckling load–displacement curves of 100 specimens for the bowl show variability in buckling loads by a factor of two, and stable postbuckling response. The corresponding curves for 100 specimens of the tumbler show variations of as much as a factor 5, with many snap-throughs, and unstable postbuckling response for larger compressions. We present two sets of axisymmetric elastoplastic finite element simulations of the tumbler, with both (a) tractions directly applied on a predetermined region and (b) through contact with a rigid plate. The latter set of simulations show approximately twice as much sensitivity to geometrical imperfections. Our results may guide new assessments of factors of safety in buckling, as laid down in design codes, when there is a chance of such interactions between contact loading and geometry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. At Microlab in Chennai; see http://www.microlabchennai.com/

Abbreviations

CDF:

cumulative distribution function

EDM:

electrical discharge machine

FCC:

face centered cubic

UTM:

universal testing machine

\(\mu \) :

mean

\(\sigma \) :

standard deviation

References

  1. Pengfei W, Tang C and Yang Y 2020 Structural reliability and reliability sensitivity analysis of extremely rare failure events by combining sampling and surrogate model methods. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part O J. Risk Reliab. 233(6): 943–957

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng H, Tao J, Chen X and Jiang Y 2014 Fatigue reliability evaluation of structural components under random loadings. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part O J. Risk Reliab. 228(5): 469–477

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ontiveros V L, Modarres M and Amiri M 2015 Estimation of reliability of structures subject to fatigue loading using plastic strain energy and thermodynamic entropy generation. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part O J. Risk Reliab. 229(3): 220–236

    Google Scholar 

  4. von Karman T and H S Tsien 1941 The buckling of thin cylindrical shells under axial compression. J. Aeronaut. Sci. 8(8): 303–312

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Babcock C D 1962 The buckling of cylindrical shells with an initial imperfection under axial compression loading. PhD Thesis, California Institute of Technology

  6. Simitses G J 1986 Buckling and post buckling of imperfect cylindrical shells: a review. Appl. Mech. Rev. 39(10): 1517–1524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hutchinson J W and Koiter W T 1970 Postbuckling theory. Appl. Mech. Rev. 23(12): 1353–1366

    Google Scholar 

  8. Teng J G 1996 Buckling of thin shells: recent advances and trends. Appl. Mech. Rev. 49(4): 263–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Singer J, Arbocz J and Weller T 2002 Buckling Experiments: Experimental Methods in Buckling of Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 2. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Chryssanthopoulos M K 1998 Probabilistic buckling analysis of plates and shells. Thin Walled Struct. 30(1): 135-157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sabarethinam K and Padgett J E 2016 Stochastic modeling of geometric imperfections in aboveground storage tanks for probabilistic buckling capacity estimation. ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertain. Eng. Syst. Part A Civil Eng. 2(2): C4015005

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gotsulyak E A, Lukyanchenko O A and Shakh V V 2009 On stability of cylindrical shells of variable thickness with initial imperfections. Int. Appl. Mech. 45(4): 433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Papadopoulos V, Stefanou G and Papadrakakis M 2009 Buckling analysis of imperfect shells with stochastic non-Gaussian material and thickness properties. Int. J. Solids Struct. 46(14): 2800–2808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Roudsari T M, Gordini M, Fazeli H and Kavehei B 2017 Probability analysis of double layer barrel vaults considering the effect of initial curvature and length imperfections simultaneously. Int. J. Steel Struct. 17(3): 939–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Arbocz J and Hilburger M W 2005 Toward a probabilistic preliminary design criterion for buckling critical composite shells. AIAA J. 43(8): 1823–1827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Trayana T, da Silva L S, Liliana M, Rebelo C and Taras A 2014 Towards a standardized procedure for the safety assessment of stability design rules. J. Construct. Steel Res. 103: 290–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Arbocz J and Babcock C D 1969 The effect of general imperfections on the buckling of cylindrical shells. J. Appl. Mech. 36(1): 28–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee A, Jiménez F L, Marthelot J, Hutchinson J W and Reis P M 2016 The geometric role of precisely engineered imperfections on the critical buckling load of spherical elastic shells. J. Appl. Mech. 83(11): 111005–111011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ifayefunmi O 2016 Buckling behavior of axially compressed cylindrical shells: comparison of theoretical and experimental data. Thin Walled Struct. 98: 558–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wohlever J C and Healey T J 1995 A group theoretic approach to the global bifurcation analysis of an axially compressed cylindrical shell. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 122(3–4): 315–349

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. RCC-MRx 2012 Design and construction rules for mechanical components of FBR nuclear islands. Section III Tome 1 Subsection Z Technical Appendix A7, AFCEN, Paris, France

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank S D Sajish, S Jalaldeen, and S Raghupathy at IGCAR for support and encouragement, Ramesh Babu of the Central Workshop for specimen cutting and preparation, and P Manmath for XRD analyses. AC thanks P Venkitanarayanan for help with a clarifying experiment, and Sovan Das for background discussion.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashok Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Data accessibility.

Available for download at https://archive.org/details/buckling-data

Competing interests.

The authors have none.

Funding.

IGCAR provided funds for procurement of test shells, and main experimental facilities.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, A., Nandagopal, M., Laha, K. et al. Variability in large-sample postbuckling behavior of two small thin walled structures. Sādhanā 46, 51 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01577-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01577-5

Keywords

Navigation