Abstract
In thin shell buckling, geometric imperfections are important contributors to observed scatter in experimentally determined postbuckling behavior. Buckling experiments with large shells are difficult and expensive to conduct, and hence the sample sizes of buckling tests reported in the literature are generally small. To study statistical variability of buckling loads for a large number of notionally identical thin shells, we have carried out 100 buckling experiments each for two thin shell geometries. One shell geometry is a dome-like shell with a flat base (a bowl), and the other is a truncated cone with a flat base (a tumbler). The test shells are industrially produced, inexpensive, made of stainless steel, and easily available in India as utensils for domestic use. We provide detailed geometric and material characterization of these thin shell specimens. These shells were compressed axially between rigid plates. Buckling for both shell geometries was elastoplastic in nature. The experimental buckling load–displacement curves of 100 specimens for the bowl show variability in buckling loads by a factor of two, and stable postbuckling response. The corresponding curves for 100 specimens of the tumbler show variations of as much as a factor 5, with many snap-throughs, and unstable postbuckling response for larger compressions. We present two sets of axisymmetric elastoplastic finite element simulations of the tumbler, with both (a) tractions directly applied on a predetermined region and (b) through contact with a rigid plate. The latter set of simulations show approximately twice as much sensitivity to geometrical imperfections. Our results may guide new assessments of factors of safety in buckling, as laid down in design codes, when there is a chance of such interactions between contact loading and geometry.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
At Microlab in Chennai; see http://www.microlabchennai.com/
Abbreviations
- CDF:
-
cumulative distribution function
- EDM:
-
electrical discharge machine
- FCC:
-
face centered cubic
- UTM:
-
universal testing machine
- \(\mu \) :
-
mean
- \(\sigma \) :
-
standard deviation
References
Pengfei W, Tang C and Yang Y 2020 Structural reliability and reliability sensitivity analysis of extremely rare failure events by combining sampling and surrogate model methods. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part O J. Risk Reliab. 233(6): 943–957
Cheng H, Tao J, Chen X and Jiang Y 2014 Fatigue reliability evaluation of structural components under random loadings. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part O J. Risk Reliab. 228(5): 469–477
Ontiveros V L, Modarres M and Amiri M 2015 Estimation of reliability of structures subject to fatigue loading using plastic strain energy and thermodynamic entropy generation. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part O J. Risk Reliab. 229(3): 220–236
von Karman T and H S Tsien 1941 The buckling of thin cylindrical shells under axial compression. J. Aeronaut. Sci. 8(8): 303–312
Babcock C D 1962 The buckling of cylindrical shells with an initial imperfection under axial compression loading. PhD Thesis, California Institute of Technology
Simitses G J 1986 Buckling and post buckling of imperfect cylindrical shells: a review. Appl. Mech. Rev. 39(10): 1517–1524
Hutchinson J W and Koiter W T 1970 Postbuckling theory. Appl. Mech. Rev. 23(12): 1353–1366
Teng J G 1996 Buckling of thin shells: recent advances and trends. Appl. Mech. Rev. 49(4): 263–274
Singer J, Arbocz J and Weller T 2002 Buckling Experiments: Experimental Methods in Buckling of Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 2. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
Chryssanthopoulos M K 1998 Probabilistic buckling analysis of plates and shells. Thin Walled Struct. 30(1): 135-157
Sabarethinam K and Padgett J E 2016 Stochastic modeling of geometric imperfections in aboveground storage tanks for probabilistic buckling capacity estimation. ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertain. Eng. Syst. Part A Civil Eng. 2(2): C4015005
Gotsulyak E A, Lukyanchenko O A and Shakh V V 2009 On stability of cylindrical shells of variable thickness with initial imperfections. Int. Appl. Mech. 45(4): 433
Papadopoulos V, Stefanou G and Papadrakakis M 2009 Buckling analysis of imperfect shells with stochastic non-Gaussian material and thickness properties. Int. J. Solids Struct. 46(14): 2800–2808
Roudsari T M, Gordini M, Fazeli H and Kavehei B 2017 Probability analysis of double layer barrel vaults considering the effect of initial curvature and length imperfections simultaneously. Int. J. Steel Struct. 17(3): 939–948
Arbocz J and Hilburger M W 2005 Toward a probabilistic preliminary design criterion for buckling critical composite shells. AIAA J. 43(8): 1823–1827
Trayana T, da Silva L S, Liliana M, Rebelo C and Taras A 2014 Towards a standardized procedure for the safety assessment of stability design rules. J. Construct. Steel Res. 103: 290–302
Arbocz J and Babcock C D 1969 The effect of general imperfections on the buckling of cylindrical shells. J. Appl. Mech. 36(1): 28–38
Lee A, Jiménez F L, Marthelot J, Hutchinson J W and Reis P M 2016 The geometric role of precisely engineered imperfections on the critical buckling load of spherical elastic shells. J. Appl. Mech. 83(11): 111005–111011
Ifayefunmi O 2016 Buckling behavior of axially compressed cylindrical shells: comparison of theoretical and experimental data. Thin Walled Struct. 98: 558–564
Wohlever J C and Healey T J 1995 A group theoretic approach to the global bifurcation analysis of an axially compressed cylindrical shell. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 122(3–4): 315–349
RCC-MRx 2012 Design and construction rules for mechanical components of FBR nuclear islands. Section III Tome 1 Subsection Z Technical Appendix A7, AFCEN, Paris, France
Acknowledgements
We thank S D Sajish, S Jalaldeen, and S Raghupathy at IGCAR for support and encouragement, Ramesh Babu of the Central Workshop for specimen cutting and preparation, and P Manmath for XRD analyses. AC thanks P Venkitanarayanan for help with a clarifying experiment, and Sovan Das for background discussion.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Data accessibility.
Available for download at https://archive.org/details/buckling-data
Competing interests.
The authors have none.
Funding.
IGCAR provided funds for procurement of test shells, and main experimental facilities.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, A., Nandagopal, M., Laha, K. et al. Variability in large-sample postbuckling behavior of two small thin walled structures. Sādhanā 46, 51 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01577-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01577-5