Skip to main content
Log in

Dispersion and modeling discussion of aerosol air pollution caused during mining and processing of open-cast mines

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given the importance of mining as a source of Total Suspended Particles (TSP) and fine Particulate Matters (PM10), it is important to develop appropriate methods for estimating emissions for use in modeling forecasts and to be aware of regulatory decisions. Development of site-specific emission estimation and also dispersion radius in copper mines would be a practical guide for environmental regulatory bodies in developing countries with incomplete local data. To address these needs, this research is presented, at an open-cast copper mine in mountainous area, using both one-year measurement observational and AERMOD emission modeling software based on documented Environment Protection Agency emission factors. Results demonstrate TSP dispersion predictions were in better agreement with the measured concentrations than those for PM10. This research finds that PM10 and TSP concentration are lowest in autumn and winter, respectively, while both have the highest concentration in summer. The maximum observed concentration of both pollutants is about 300 μg/m3 which is beyond the standard level. The study further shows that generally, concentration of TSP is three times of PM10. The dispersion radius of aerosols was 14 km with wide dispersion for TSP compared with PM10; so, could potentially pose serious environmental and health threats to the surrounding environment and community. The TSP and PM10 emission are about 3.242 and 0.969 kg per any ton of copper produced. This research was applied to a mountainous copper mine in NW Iran, one of the biggest surface mines all across the world (~ 300Mt/y).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amoatey P, Omidvarborna H, Affum HA, Baawain M (2019) Performance of AERMOD and CALPUFF models on SO2 and NO2 emissions for future health risk assessment in Tema Metropolis. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 25(3):772–786

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aneja VP, Isherwood A, Morgan P (2012) Characterization of particulate matter (PM10) related to surface coal mining operations in Appalachia. Atmos 54:496–501

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baawain M, Al-Mamun A, Omidvarborna H, Al-Jabri A (2017) Assessment of hydrogen sulfide emission from a sewage treatment plant using AERMOD. Environ Monit Assess 189(6):263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bidhendi GN, Karbassi AR, Nasrabadi T, Hoveidi H (2007) Influence of copper mine on surface water quality. Int J Environ Sci Technol 4(1):85–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borrego S, Lavin P, Perdomo I, Saravia SG, Guiamet P (2012) Determination of indoor air quality in archives and biodeterioration of the documentary heritage ISRN microbiology. Int Sch Res Notices 2012:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbonell LMT, Gacita MS, OlivaJ JR, Garea LC, Rivero ND, Ruiz EM (2010) Methodological guide for implementation of the AERMOD system with incomplete local data. Atmos Pollut Res 1(2):102–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers DJ, Stocker JR, Ellis A, Seaton MD, Smith SM (2017) Evaluation of an explicit NOx chemistry method in AERMOD. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 67(6):702–712

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cerqueira JS, Albuerque HN, Sousa FAS (2019) Atmospheric pollutants: modeling with Aermod software. Air Qual Atmos Health 12(1):21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang JC, HannaS R (2004) Air quality model performance evaluation. Meteorol Atmospheric Phys 87(1–3):167–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaulya SK (2004) Assessment and management of air quality for an opencast coal mining area. J Environ Manag 70(1):1–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chaulya SK, Chakraborty MK, Ahmad M, Singh RS, Bondyopadhay C, Mondal GC, Pal D (2002) Development of empirical formulae to determine emission rate from various opencast coal mining operations. Water Air Soil Pollut 140(1–4):21–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Hand Carter KE (2017) Modeling potential occupational inhalation exposures and associated risks of toxic organics from chemical storage tanks used in hydraulic fracturing using AERMOD. Environ Pollut 224:300–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPA (1998) Emission factor documentation for AP-42—section revision of emission factors for AP-42 section 11.9 western surface coal mining. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA (2000) Fugitive dust from mining and quarrying. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA (2016) List of designated reference and equivalent methods. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey H (2007) Quantification of uncertainty in emission factors and inventories. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gautam S, Prasad N, Patra AK, Prusty BK, Singh P, Pipal AS, Saini R (2016) Characterization of PM2.5 generated from opencast coal mining operations: a case study of Sonepur Bazari OpencastProject of India. Environ Technol Innov 6:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghose MK, Majee SR (2001) Air pollution caused by opencast mining and its abatement measures in India. J Environ Manag 63(2):193–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hang NT, Oanh NTK (2014) Chemical characterization and sources apportionment of fine particulate pollution in a mining town of Vietnam. Atmos Res 145:214–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HannaSR EBA, Purdum J, Wagler J (2001) Evaluation of the ADMS, AERMOD, and ISC 3 dispersion models with the OPTEX, Duke Forest, Kincaid, Indianapolis and Lovett field datasets. Int J Environ Pollut 16(1):301–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes NS, Morawska L (2006) A review of dispersion modelling and its application to the dispersion of particles: an overview of different dispersion models available. Atmos 40(30):5902–5928

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huertas JI, Huertas ME, Izquierdo S, Gonzalez ED (2012a) Air quality impact assessment of multiple open pit coal mines in northern Colombia. J Environ Manag 93(1):121–129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huertas JI, Camacho DA, Huertas ME (2012b) Standardized emissions inventory methodology for open-pit mining areas. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19:2784–2794

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaiprakash P, Singh G, Pal AKG (2010) Air pollution dispersion modeling performance for mining complex. We Int J Sci Tech 5:205–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakosimos KE, Assael MJ, Lioumbas JS, Spirdis AS (2011) Atmospheric dispersion modelling of the fugitive particulate matter from overburden dumps with numerical and integral models. Atmos Pollut Res 2(1):24–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Brandt J, Ketzel M, Patil RS, Dikshit AK, Hertel O (2019) Evaluation of the urban background model (UBM) and AERMOD for Mumbai City. Environ Model Assess 24(1):75–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leili M, Naddafi K, Nabizadeh R, Yunesian M, Mesdaghinia A (2008) The study of TSP and PM10 concentration and their heavy metal content in central area of Tehran. Iran Air Qual Atmos Health 1(3):159–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • León-Mejía G, Espitia-Pérez L, Hoyos-Giraldo LS, Silva JD, Hartmann A, Henriques JAP, Quintana M (2011) Assessment of DNA damage in coal open-cast mining workers using the cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus test and the comet assay. Sci Total Environ 409(4):686–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • León-Mejía G, Quintana M, Debastiani R, Dias J, Espitia-Pérez L, Hartmann A, Henriques JAP, Silva JD (2014) Genetic damage in coal miners evaluated by buccal micronucleus cytome assay. Ecotox Environ Safe 107:133–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Ma Z, Kuijp TJK, Yuan Z, Huang L (2014) A review of soil heavy metal pollution from mines in China: pollution and health risk assessment. Sci Total Environ 468:843–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilic N, Cvjetic A, Knezevic D, Milisavljevic V, Pantelic U (2018) Dust and noise environmental impact assessment and control in Serbian mining practice. Minerals 8(34):2–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Matacchiera F, Manes C, Beaven RP, Rees-White TC, Boano F, Mønster J, Scheutz Ch (2019) AERMOD as a Gaussian dispersion model for planning tracer gas dispersion tests for landfill methane emission quantification. Waste Manag 87:924–936

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michanowicz DR, ShmoolJLC TBJ, Tripathy Sh, Gillooly S, Kinnee E, Clougherty JE (2016) A hybrid land use regression/AERMOD model for predicting intra-urban variation in PM2.5. Atmos 131:307–315

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Monjezi M, Shahriar K, Dehghani H, Namin FS (2009) Environmental impact assessment of open pit mining in Iran. Environ geol 58(1):205–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morawska L, Moore M, Ristovski Z (2004) Impacts of ultrafine Particles: desktop literature review and analysis. Department of the environment and Heritage, Commonwealth of Australia Government

  • Mpanza M, Adam E, Moolla R (2020) Dust deposition impacts at a liquidated gold mine village: Gauteng Province in South Africa. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(14):2–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahand AA (2016) Investigation of deadliest minerals and their environmental risks With a particular perspective to the mines of East Azarbaijan state

  • Nasrabadi T, Bidhendi NGR, Karbassi AR, Hoveidi H, Nasrabadi I, Pezeshk H, Rashidinejad F (2009) Influence of Sungun copper mine on groundwater quality. NW Iran Environ Geol 58(4):693–700

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neshuku MN (2012) Comparison of the performance of two atmospheric dispersion models (AERMOD and ADMS) for open pit mining sources of air pollution. University of Pretoria

  • NPI (2012) National pollution inventory of Austrailia. Deapartment of Agriculture, Water and the Environment. Australia

  • OMNITM FT (2020) Ambient air sampler manual. https://bgi.mesalabs.com/omni-ft-ambient-air-sampler/. Accessed 10 December 2020

  • Patra AK, Gautam S, Kumar P (2016) Emissions and human health impact of particulate matter from surface mining operation—a review. Environ Technol Innov 5:233–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng X, Shi G, Zheng J, Liu J, Shi X, Xu J, Feng Y (2016) Influence of quarry mining dust on PM2.5 in a city adjacent to a limestonequarry: seasonal characteristics and source contributions. Sci Total Environ 550:940–949

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rashidinejad F, Osanloo M, Rezai B (2008) Cutoff grades optimization with environmental management; a case study: Sungun copper project. Int J Eng Sci 19:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson C, Rutherford SH, Agranovski I (2018) Characterization of particulate emissions from Australian open-cut coal mines: Toward improved emission estimates. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 68(6):598–607

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sastry VR, Chandar KR, Nagesha KV, Muralidhar E, Mohiuddin MS (2015) Prediction and analysis of dust dispersion from drilling operation in opencast coal mines. Procedia Earth Planet Sci 11:303–311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seangkiatiyuth K, Surapipith V, Tantrakarnapa K, Lothongkum AW (2011) Application of the AERMOD modeling system for environmental impact assessment of NO2 emissions from a cement complex. J Environ Sci 23(6):931–940

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silvester S, Lowndes I, Hargreaves D (2009) A computational study of particulate emissions from an open pit quarry under neutral atmospheric conditions. Atmos 43(40):6415–6424

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh G, Sharma PK (1992) A study of spatial distribution of air pollutants in some coal mining areas of Raniganj coalfield, India. Environ Int 18(2):191–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha S, Banerjee S (1997) Characterization of haul road dust in an Indian opencast iron ore mine. Atmos 31(17):2809–2814

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tasić V, Kovačević R, Maluckov B, Apostolovski T, Matić B, Cocić M, Steharnic M (2017) The content of As and heavy metals in TSP and PM10 near copper smelter in Bor, Serbia. Water Air Soil Pollut 228(6):230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teggi S, Costanzini S, Ghermandi G, Malagoli C, Vinceti M (2018) A GIS-based atmospheric dispersion model for pollutants emitted by complex source areas. Sci Total Environ 610–611:175–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2020) https://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/5217/. Accessed 06 Dec 2020

  • WHO (1997) City air quality trends. World Health Organization

  • WHO (2000) Guidelies for air quality. World Health Organization

  • WHO (2005) Air quality guidelinesfor particulate matter,ozone, nitrogendioxide and sulfur dioxide. World Health Organization

Download references

Acknowledgement

Authors would like to thank Sungun copper mine, especially department of HSE for their valuable participation in the study.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, ornot-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Khazini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no competing interest to declare.

Additional information

Editorial Responsibility: Mohamed F. Yassin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khazini, L., Dehkharghanian, M.E. & Vaezihir, A. Dispersion and modeling discussion of aerosol air pollution caused during mining and processing of open-cast mines. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 19, 913–924 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03225-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03225-1

Keywords

Navigation