Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Three-dimensional Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis for Load-Carrying Capacity Prediction of a Railway Arch Bridge

  • Research paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Calculation of load-carrying capacity of old railway masonry arch bridges as crucial infrastructures is one of the vital issues in the railway industry. The field test of the 2PL20 bridge reveals important properties such as the initial stiffness and cracking pattern, but the ultimate capacity of the bridge under static loading was not achieved due to the field limitations. Therefore, the present study aims to predict the total nonlinear response of the 2PL20 bridge up to the failure status. All the geometrical characteristics of the 2PL20 bridge are modeled precisely and the failure state is predicted using the three-dimensional nonlinear finite element analysis. Moreover, to determine the load-carrying capacity of the 2PL20 bridge, the behavior of materials is regarded nonlinearly in which the Williams and Warnke and the Drucker-Prager failure criteria are taken into account for concrete and soil materials, respectively. To obtain precise results of ultimate capacity of the 2PL20 bridge under field test, the vertical and horizontal displacements of the crown on the northern span are chosen as the calibration criterion and, consequently, the vertical and horizontal load-deformation curves are verified based on the field test results. The obtained results indicate that the load-carrying capacity of the 2PL20 bridge equals 8880 kN under the static field test. Finally, the calculated safety factor is equal to 3.2 and increasing axial load up to 35-ton is admissible based on UIC 776-1 for a 25-ton axial load.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Agency, Design manual for roads and bridges, HM Stationery Office1994.

  2. Wang J, Melbourne C (2010) Mechanics of MEXE method for masonry arch bridge assessment. Proc Institution Civ Eng—Eng Comput Mech 163(3):187–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gilbert M, Melbourne C (1994) Rigid-block analysis of masonry structures. Struct Eng 72(21):359–361

  4. Sarhosis V, De Santis S, de Felice G (2016) A review of experimental investigations and assessment methods for masonry arch bridges. Struct Infrastruct Eng 12(11):1439–1464

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marefat MS, Yazdani M, Jafari M (2019) Seismic assessment of small to medium spans plain concrete arch bridges. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 23(7):894–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tubaldi E, Macorini L, Izzuddin BA (2018) Three-dimensional mesoscale modelling of multi-span masonry arch bridges subjected to scour. Eng Struct 165:486–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pulatsu B, Erdogmus E, Lourenço PB (2019) Comparison of in-plane and out-of-plane failure modes of masonry arch bridges using discontinuum analysis. Eng Struct 178:24–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. De Santis S, de Felice G (2014) A fibre beam-based approach for the evaluation of the seismic capacity of masonry arches. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 43(11):1661–1681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Galvín P, Romero A, Moliner E, Martínez-Rodrigo MD (2018) Two FE models to analyse the dynamic response of short span simply-supported oblique high-speed railway bridges: comparison and experimental validation. Eng Struct 167:48–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mahmoudi Moazam A, Hasani N, Yazdani M (2018) Three-dimensional modelling for seismic assessment of plain concrete arch bridges. Proc Inst Civ Eng Civ Eng 171(3):135–143

    Google Scholar 

  11. Choo BS, Coutie MG, Gong NG (1991) finite element analysis of masonry arch bridges using tapered elements, Proceedings—Institution of Civil Engineers. Part 2. Res Theory 91:755–770

    Google Scholar 

  12. Franck SA, Bretschneider N, Slowik V (2020) Safety analysis of existing masonry arch bridges by nonlinear finite element simulations. Int J Damage Mech 29(1):126–143

  13. Aydin AC, Özkaya SG (2018) The finite element analysis of collapse loads of single-spanned historic masonry arch bridges (Ordu, Sarpdere Bridge). Eng Fail Anal 84:131–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fanning PJ, Boothby TE (2001) Three-dimensional modelling and full-scale testing of stone arch bridges. Comput Struct 79(29–30):2645–2662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Milani G, Lourenço PB (2012) 3D non-linear behavior of masonry arch bridges. Comput Struct 110–111:133–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pulatsu B, Erdogmus E, Bretas EM (2018) Parametric study on masonry arches using 2D discrete element modeling. J Architect Eng 24(2):04018005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sarhosis V, Forgács T, Lemos JV (2019) A discrete approach for modelling backfill material in masonry arch bridges. Comput Struct 224:106108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Forgács T, Sarhosis V, Bagi K (2018) Influence of construction method on the load bearing capacity of skew masonry arches. Eng Struct 168:612–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Marefat MS, Ghahremani-Gargary E, Ataei S (2004) Load test of a plain concrete arch railway bridge of 20-m span. Constr Build Mater 18(9):661–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Brencich A, Sabia D (2007) Tanaro bridge: dynamic tests on a couple of spans. J Bridge Eng 12(5):662–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Page J (1993) Masonry arch bridges, HM Stationery Office.

  22. Casapulla C, Mousavian E, Zarghani M (2019) A digital tool to design structurally feasible semi-circular masonry arches composed of interlocking blocks. Comput Struct 221:111–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Accornero F, Lacidogna G, Carpinteri A (2016) Evolutionary fracture analysis of masonry arches: Effects of shallowness ratio and size scale. Comptes Rendus Mécanique 344(9):623–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yazdani M, Azimi P (2020) Assessment of railway plain concrete arch bridges subjected to high-speed trains. Structures 27:174–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Severini L, Cavalagli N, DeJong M, Gusella V (2018) Dynamic response of masonry arch with geometrical irregularities subjected to a pulse-type ground motion. Nonlinear Dyn 91(1):609–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Forgács T, Sarhosis V, Ádány S (2021) Shakedown and dynamic behaviour of masonry arch railway bridges. Eng Struct 228:111474

  27. Mahmoudi Moazam A, Hasani N, Yazdani M (2018) Incremental dynamic analysis of small to medium spans plain concrete arch bridges. Eng Fail Anal 91:12–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Homaei F, Yazdani M (2020) The probabilistic seismic assessment of aged concrete arch bridges: The role of soil-structure interaction. Structures 28:894–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jahangiri V, Yazdani M (2021) Seismic reliability and limit state risk evaluation of plain concrete arch bridges. Struct Infrastruct Eng 17(2):170–190

  30. Conde B, Eguía P, Stavroulakis GE, Granada E (2018) Parameter identification for damaged condition investigation on masonry arch bridges using a Bayesian approach. Eng Struct 172:275–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Moazam AM, Hasani N, Yazdani M (2017) 3D simulation of railway bridges for estimating fundamental frequency using geometrical and mechanical properties. Adv Comput Design 2(4):257–271

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yazdani M, Khaji N, Khodakarami MI (2016) Development of a new semi-analytical method in fracture mechanics problems based on the energy release rate. Acta Mech 227(12):3529–3547

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Yazdani M, Khaji N (2018) Development of a new semianalytical approach for 2D analysis of crack propagation problems. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 41(6):1344–1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Khoei A, Yasbolaghi R, Biabanaki S (2015) A polygonal finite element method for modeling crack propagation with minimum remeshing. Int J Fract 194(2):123–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang G, Wang Y, Lu W, Zhou C, Chen M, Yan P (2015) XFEM based seismic potential failure mode analysis of concrete gravity dam–water–foundation systems through incremental dynamic analysis. Eng Struct 98:81–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Willam KJ (1975) Constitutive model for the triaxial behaviour of concrete. Proc Intl Assoc Bridge Structl Engrs 19:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  37. A. Committee, I.O.f. Standardization, Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318–08) and commentary, American Concrete Institute, 2008.

  38. Fanning P, Kelly O (2000) Smeared crack models of RC beams with externally bonded CFRP plates. Comput Mech 26(4):325–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. De Santis S, de Felice G (2014) Overview of railway masonry bridges with a safety factor estimate. Int J Architect Heritage 8(3):452–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Melbourne C, Tomor AK, Wang J (2004) Cyclic load capacity and endurance limit of multi-ring masonry arches, In: Arch bridges IV conference proceedings, pp 375–384.

  41. Sotoudeh S, Jahangiri M, Ranjbarnia M, Zakeri J-A (2020) Three-dimensional modeling of an old masonry bridge and assessing its current capacity. Periodica Polytechnica Civ Eng 64(2):460–473

    Google Scholar 

  42. U. Code, 776-1, Loads to be considered in railway bridge design, International Union of Railway, 2006

  43. U. Code, 778-3, 2011, Recommendations for the inspection, assessment and maintenance of masonry arch bridges.

  44. Panian R, Yazdani M (2020) Estimation of the service load capacity of plain concrete arch bridges using a novel approach: stress intensity factor, Structures, Elsevier pp 1521–1534

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge and express their special gratitude to anonymous reviewers, for their constructive comments that improved the quality of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Arak University, P.O. Box 38158–879, Arak, Iran

    Mahdi Yazdani

Authors
  1. Mahdi Yazdani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahdi Yazdani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yazdani, M. Three-dimensional Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis for Load-Carrying Capacity Prediction of a Railway Arch Bridge. Int J Civ Eng 19, 823–836 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-021-00608-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-021-00608-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation