Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tidal level affects the prevalence and impacts of pests and parasites on oysters (Crassostrea virginica) on intertidal reefs in Georgia, USA

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Oysters (Crassostrea virginica) provide multiple ecosystem services to coastal habitats. Due to their declines, numerous restoration efforts target oysters, making it critical to explore factors that might limit recovery. Biotic stressors, such as pea crabs and boring sponges, can negatively affect oysters, and may interact with abiotic stressors like tidal exposure. In this study, boring sponge and pea crab distribution patterns were explored across an intertidal gradient on oyster reefs in Georgia (32.002° N, − 080.920° W) in the summer of 2016, while considering the effects of both stressors on oyster condition. Boring sponges and pea crabs were both most abundant on the lower intertidal of reefs (15% and 6% prevalence, respectively) and decreased with increasing tidal exposure (~ 1% prevalence of both pests in the upper intertidal). Pea crabs had a more negative effect on oyster condition in the upper intertidal zone (27% difference), whereas boring sponges caused the greatest condition reduction in the lower intertidal zone (30% difference). Pea crabs were more abundant in sponge-infected oysters than uninfected oysters. An observed negative relationship between oyster density and sponges suggests that higher sponge prevalence may drive low oyster density in the lower intertidal zone. Since biotic stressors on oyster reefs can affect oyster population structure and reef function, understanding their distribution and interactions is important for management and restoration. While sponges and pea crabs are not likely to be eliminated by restoration efforts, careful attention to location within the tidal prism can minimize their impacts on restoration efforts, particularly in the southeastern USA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Abbe GR, Albright BW (2003) An improvement to the determination of meat condition index for the eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin 1791). J Shellfish Res 22:747–752

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams MP, Walker RL, Heffernan PB (1994) The effects of stocking density, bag mesh size, and bottom sediment on the growth and survival of the eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica, with emphasis on controlling oyster spat and fouling. J Appl Aquacult 4:25–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahr LM, Lanier WP (1981) The ecology of intertidal oyster reefs of the south Atlantic coast: A community profile. US Fish and Wildlife Service

  • Bartol I, Mann R, Luckenbach MW (1999) Growth and mortality of oysters (Crassostrea virginica) on constructed intertidal reefs: effects of tidal height and substrate level. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 237:157–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck MW, Brumbaugh RD, Airoldi L, Carranza A, Coen LD, Crawford C, Defeo O, Edgar GJ, Hancock B, Kay MC, Lenihan HS, Luckenbach MW, Toropova CL, Zhang G, Guo X (2011) Oyster reefs at risk and recommendations for conservation, restoration and management. Bioscience 61:107–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell JJ, McGrath E, Biggerstaff A, Bates T, Bennett H, Marlow J, Shaffer M (2015) Sediment impacts on sponges. Mar Poll Bull 94:5–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bierbaum RM, Ferson S (1986) Do symbiotic pea crabs decrease growth rate in mussels? Biol Bull 170:51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop MJ, Peterson CH (2006) Direct effects of physical stress can be counteracted by indirect benefits: oyster growth on a tidal elevation gradient. Oecologia 147:426–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown KM, George GJ, Peterson GW, Thompson BA, Cowan JH Jr (2008) Oyster predation by black drum varies spatially and seasonally. Estuar Coast 31:597–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2003) Model selection and multimodel interference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers JE, Rogers TL, Grabowski JH, Hughes AR, Piehler MF, Kimbro DL (2014) Host and parasite recruitment correlated at a regional scale. Oecologia 174:731–738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll J, O’Shaughnessy K, Diedrich G, Finelli C (2015a) Are oysters being bored to death? Influence of Cliona celata on Crassostrea virginica condition, growth and survival. Dis Aquat Org 117:31–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll JM, Marion JP, Finelli CF (2015b) A field test of the effects of mesopredators and landscape setting on juvenile oyster, Crassostrea virginica, consumption on intertidal reefs. Mar Biol 162:993–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver C, Theriault I, Mallet A (2010) Infection of cultured eastern oysters Crassostrea virginica by the boring sponge Cliona celata, with emphasis on sponge life history and mitigation strategies. J Shellfish Res 29:905–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen AM, McDermott J (1958) Life-history and biology of the oyster crab, Pinnotheres ostreum Say. Biol Bull 115:146–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements JC, Comeau LA (2019) Use of high-frequency, non-invasive electromagnetic biosensors to detect ocean acidification effects on shellfish behaviour. J Shellfish Res 38:811–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coen LD, Brumbaugh RD, Bushek D, Grizzle R, Luckenbach MW, Posey MH, Powers SP, Tolley SG (2007) Ecosystem services related to oyster restoration. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 341:303–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culbertson J, Gelwick F, Ray S (2011) Dermo (Perkensus marinus) infection and freshwater inflows interaction with Texas oyster population dynamics. J Shellfish Res 30:498–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Dame RF, Zingmark RG, Haskins E (1984) Oyster reefs as processors of estuarine materials. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 83:239–247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Falco G, Magni P, Terasvuori LMH, Matteucci G (2004) Sediment grain size and organic carbon distribution in the Carbas Lagoon (Sardinia, Western Mediterranean). Chem Ecol 4:S367–S377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Derby CD, Atema J (1980) Induced host odor attraction in the pea crab Pinnotheres maculatus. Biol Bull 158:26–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn R, Eggleston D, Lindquist NL (2014) Oyster-sponge interations and bioerosion of reef-building substrate materials: implications for oyster restoration. J Shellfish Res 33:727–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodrie F, Rodriguez A, Baillie C, Brodeur M, Coleman S, Gittman R, Keller D, Kenworthy M, Poray A, Ridge J, Theierkauf E, Lindquist N (2014) Classic paradigms in a novel environment: inserting food web and productivity lessons from rocky shores and saltmarshes into biogenic reef restoration. J App Ecol 51:1314–1325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski JH, Brumbaugh RD, Conrad RF, Keeler AG, Opaluch JJ, Peterson CH, Piehler MF, Powers SP, Smyth AR (2012) Economic valuation of ecosystem services provided by oyster reefs. Bioscience 62:900–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski JH, Hughes AR, Kimbro DL, Dolan MA (2005) How habitat setting influences restored oyster reef communities. Ecol 86:1926–1935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grove MW, Woodin SA (1996) Conspecific recognition and host choice in a pea crab Pinnixa chaetopterana (Brachyura: Pinnotheridae). Biol Bull 190:359–366

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanke MH, Hargrove JM, Alphin TD, Posey MH (2015) Oyster utilization and host variation of the oyster pea crab (Zaops ostreum). J Shellfish Res 34:281–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley TC, White JW, Stallings CD, Kimbro DL (2019) Environmental gradients shape the combined effects of multiple parasites on oyster hosts in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 612:111–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harding J, Mann R (2001) Oyster reefs as fish habitat: Opportunistic use of restored reefs by transient fishes. J Shellfish Res 20:951–959

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson KD, Smee DL (2014) Predators influence the tidal distribution of oysters (Crassostrea virginica). Mar Biol 161:1557–1564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knights AM (2012) Spatial variation in body size and reproductive condition of subtidal mussels: considerations for suitable management. Fish Res 113:45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercado-Silva N (2005) Condition index of the eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin, 1791) in Sapelo Island Georgia - Effects of site, position on bed and pea crabs. J Shellfish Res 24:121–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meroz-Fine E, Shefer S, Ilan M (2005) Changes in morphology and physiology of an East Mediterranean sponge in different habitats. Mar Biol 147:243–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer DL, Townsend EC, Thayer GW (2008) Stabilization and erosion control value of oyster cultch for intertidal marsh. Restor Ecol. 5:93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Beirn FX, Walker RL (1999) Pea crab, Pinnotheres ostreum Say, 1817, in the eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin, 1791): prevalence and apparent adverse effects on oyster gonadal development. Veliger 42:17–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons TR, Maita Y, Lalli CM (1984) A manual of chemical and biological methods for seawater analysis. Pergamon Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pusack TJ, White JW, Tillotson HG, Kimbro DL, Stallings CD (2018) Size-dependent predation and intraspecific inhibition of an estuarine snail feeding on oysters. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 501:74–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranier JS, Mann R (1992) A comparison of methods for calculating condition index in eastern oysters, Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin, 1791). J Shellfish Res 11:55–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheault RB, Rice MA (1996) Food-limited growth and condition index in the eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin 1791), and the bay scallop Argopecten irradians irradians (Lamarck 1819). J Shellfish Res 15:271–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosell D, Uriz MJ, Martin D (1999) Infestation by excavating sponges on the oyster (Ostrea edulis) populations of the Blanes littoral zone (north-western Mediterranean Sea). J Mar Biol Assoc UK 79:409–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutzler K (1995) Low-tide exposure of sponges in a Caribbean mangrove community. Mar Ecol 16:165–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer AE, Smee DL (2017) Eastern oysters Crassostrea virginica produce plastic morphological defenses in response to crab predators despite resource limitation. Biol Bull 233:144–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Speights CJ, McCoy MW (2017) Range expansion of a fouling species indirectly impacts local species interactions. PeerJ 5:e3911

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stauber LA (1945) Pinnotheres ostreum, parasitic on the American Oyster, Ostrea (Gryphaea) virginica. Biol Bull 88:269–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefaniak LM, McAtee J, Shulman MJ (2005) The costs of being bored: effects of a clionid sponge on the gastropod Littorina littorea (L). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 327:103–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubler AD, Robertson H, Styron HJ, Carroll JM, Finelli CF (2017) Reproductive and recruitment dynamics of clionaid sponges on oyster reefs in North Carolina. Invertebr Biol 136:365–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolley S, Volety A (2005) The role of oysters in habitat use of oyster reefs by resident fishes and decapod crustaceans. J Shellfish Res 24:1007–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volety AK, Savarese M, Tolley SG, Arnold WS, Sime P, HGoodman P, Chamberlain RH, Doering PH, (2009) Eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) as an indicator for restoration of Everglades Ecosystems. Ecol Indic 9:S120–S136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warburton FE (1958) The effects of boring sponges on oysters. Fish Res Bd Can Progr Rep Atl Coast Stns 68:3–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward JE, Langdon CJ (1986) Effects of the ectoparasite Boonea (=Odostomia) impressa (Say) (Gastropoda: Pyramidellidae) on the growth rate, filtration rate, and valve movements of the host Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 99:163–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts JC, Carroll JM, Munroe DM, Finelli CM (2018) Examination of the potential relationship between boring sponges and pea crabs and their effects on eastern oyster condition. Dis Aquat Org 130:25–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wells HW (1959) Boring sponges (Clionidae) of Newport River, North Carolina. J Elisha Mitchell Sci Soc 75:168–173

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Georgia Southern University Biology Department for boat time to access sites for this project. In addition, we would like to acknowledge A. McKenna and N. Kleinas for help conducting field surveys, and M. Whitesell and B. Berringer for help processing samples. Finally, we acknowledge two anonymous reviewers for useful comments which improved the quality of this manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially supported by an internal Faculty Development Grant from Georgia Southern University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, USA

    John M. Carroll, Ryan Dashiell, Jessica C. Watts & Elizabeth A. Hunter

Authors
  1. John M. Carroll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ryan Dashiell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jessica C. Watts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Elizabeth A. Hunter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JC, RD and JW designed the study and collected the data. JC and EH conducted analysis and writing the manuscript. All authors were involved in editing final versions.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John M. Carroll.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical approval

No approval of research ethics committee was required to accomplish the goals of this study because experimental work was conducted with an unregulated invertebrate species.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: J. Grassle.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Reviewers: undisclosed experts.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 312 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carroll, J.M., Dashiell, R., Watts, J.C. et al. Tidal level affects the prevalence and impacts of pests and parasites on oysters (Crassostrea virginica) on intertidal reefs in Georgia, USA. Mar Biol 168, 45 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-021-03848-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-021-03848-5

Search

Navigation