Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental Examination of the Behavior of Shotcrete-Reinforced Masonry Walls and Xgboost Neural Network Prediction Model

  • Research Article-Civil Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 25 May 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

In this study, the effects of reinforcement using polypropylene fiber dry-mix shotcrete on the behaviors of U-shaped masonry walls were experimentally studied, and predicting modeling was performed with XGBoost. Firstly, five full-scale masonry specimens were constructed. A specimen was left unstrengthened. The other four specimens were coated with dry-mix shotcrete with layer thicknesses of 50 and 100 mm, reinforced with additional amounts of polypropylene fiber. All specimens were tested under reversible and cyclic out-of-plane loads. The results showed that the strengthened specimens had a considerably higher ultimate load-carrying and energy absorption capacities than the bare one. In the second stage of the study, an XGBoost neural network model was developed, predicting the ultimate load capacity and energy absorption capacity with data affecting the result of the model. The ultimate load capacity and energy absorption capacity values obtained as a result of the tests were compared with the results derived from the experiments, and then it was observed that the results of XGBoost modeling were quite close to the results obtained from experimental data. Thus, the thickness of shotcrete required for the desired data can be painlessly predicted using XGBoost model without the need for were experimentally studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Shermi, C.; Dubey, R.N.: In-plane behaviour of unreinforced masonry panel strengthened with welded wire mesh and mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 178, 195–203 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Khan, H.A.; Nanda, R.P.; Das, D.: In-plane strength of masonry panel strengthened with geosynthetic. Constr. Build. Mater. 156, 351–361 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Buchan, P.A.; Chen, J.F.: Blast resistance of FRP composites and polymer strengthened concrete and masonry structures: a state-of-the-art review. Compos. Part B 38, 509–522 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gilstrap, J.M.; Dolan, C.W.: Out-of-plane bending of FRP-reinforced masonry walls. Compos. Sci. Technol. 58, 1277–1284 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Papanicolaou, C.; Triantafillou, T.; Lekka, M.: Externally bonded grids as strengthening and seismic retrofitting materials of masonry panels. Constr. Build. Mater. 25, 504–514 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sevil, T.; Baran, M.; Bilir, T.; Canbay, E.: Use of steel fiber reinforced mortar for seismic strengthening. Constr. Build. Mater. 25, 892–899 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang, K.-H.; Joo, D.-B.; Sim, J.-I.; Kang, J.-H.: In-plane seismic performance of unreinforced masonry walls strengthened with unbonded prestressed wire rope units. Eng. Struct. 45, 449–459 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kadam, B.S.; Singh, Y.; Li, B.: Strengthening of unreinforced masonry using welded wire mesh and micro-concrete: behaviour under in-plane action. Constr. Build. Mater. 54, 247–257 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shermi, C.; Dubey, R.N.: Study on out-of-plane behaviour of unreinforced masonry strengthened with welded wire mesh and mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 143, 104–120 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Farooq, S.H.; Shahid, I.; Ilyas, M.: Seismic performance of masonry strengthened with steel strips. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 18(7), 2170–2180 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0540-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Farooq, S.H.; Ilyas, M.; Amir, S.: Response of masonry walls strengthened with CFRP and steel strips. Arab J. Sci Eng 37, 545–559 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-012-0190-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Farooq, S.H.; ElGawady Mohamed, A.; Ilyas, M.: Seismic in-plane performance of retrofitted masonry walls. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 18(1), 226–237 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Baloević, G.; Radnić, J.; Grgić, N.; Mateśan, D.: The application of a reinforced plaster mortar for seismic strengthening of masonry structures. Compos. B 93, 190–202 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kariou, F.A.; Triantafyllou, S.P.; Bournas, D.A.; Koutas, L.N.: Out-of-plane response of masonry walls strengthened using textile-mortar system. Constr. Build. Mater. 165, 769–781 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lin, Y.; Lawley, D.; Wotherspoon, L.; Ingham, M.J.: Out-of-plane testing of unreinforced masonry walls strengthened using ECC shotcrete. Structures 7, 33–42 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin, Y.-W.; Wotherspoon, L.; Scott, A.; Ingham, M.J.: In-plane strengthening of clay brick unreinforced masonry wallettes using ECC shotcrete. Eng. Struct. 66, 57–65 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Çakıroğlu, A.M.; İnce, G.; Tekeli, H.; Demir, F.; Çakıroğlu, M.G.; Yedek, Y.Ç.: Strengthening with steel wire mesh of masonry structures. J. Selçuk Univ. Nat. Appl. Sci. 4(2), 11–20 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. American Concrete Institute (ACI) 506R-85.

  19. Baricevic, A.; Pezer, M.; Rukavina, M.J.; Serdar, M.; Stirmer, N.: Effect of polymer fibers recycled from waste tires on properties of wet-sprayed concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 176, 135–144 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Galan, I.; Baldermann, A.; Kusterle, W.; Dietzel, M.; Mittermayr, F.: Durability of shotcrete for underground support review and update. Constr. Build. Mater. 202, 465–493 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Manca, M.; Karrech, A.; Dight, P.; Ciancio, D.: Image processing and machine learning to investigate fibre distribution on fibre-reinforced shotcrete round determinate panels. Constr. Build. Mater. 190, 870–880 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pendharkar, U.; Chaudhary, S.; Nagpal, A.K.: Neural network for bending moment in continuous composite beams considering cracking and time effects in concrete. Eng. Struct. 29, 2069–2079 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bejarano-Urrego, L.; Verstrynge, E.; Giardina, G.; Van Balen, K.: Crack growth in masonry: numerical analysis and sensitivity study for discrete and smeared crack modelling. Eng. Struct. 165, 471–485 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Moradabadi E, Laefer Debra, F. Numerical modelling options for cracked masonry buildings. In: 9th International Masonry Conference 2014, Guimarães, Portugal, 7–9 July (2014)

  25. Wang, N.; Zhao, X.; Zhao, P.; Zhang, Y.; Zou, Z.; Ou, J.: Automatic damage detection of historic masonry buildings based on mobile deep learning. Autom. Constr. 103, 53–66 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Valero, E.; Forster, A.; Bosché, F.; Hyslop, E.; Wilson, L.; Turmel, A.: Automated defect detection and classification in ashlar masonry walls using machine learning. Autom. Constr. 106, 102846 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Muhammad, K.; Mohammad, N.; Rehman, F.: Modeling shotcrete mix design using artificial neural network. Comput. Concr. 15(2), 167–181 (2015). https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2015.15.2.167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yıldızel, S.A.; Yiğit, M.E.; Öztürk, A.U.; Kaplan, G. Examination with ABAQUS CAE Program of Rebound Optimization of Sprayed Concrete Mixtures Having Different Viscosity Values. In: 9. National Concrete Congress, Union of Chambers of Turkish Engineers and Architects Chamber of Civil Engineers, April, Antalya (2015)

  29. Süzen, A.A.; Çakıroğlu, M.A.: Prediction of rebound in shotcrete using deep bi-directional LSTM. Comput. Concr. 24(6), 555–560 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Huang, H.; Burton, H.W.: Classification of in-plane failure modes for reinforced concrete frames with infills using machine learning. J. Build. Eng. 25, 1–11 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Alwanas, A.A.H.; Al-Musawi, A.A.; Salih, S.Q.; Tao, H.; Ali, M.; Yaseen, Z.M.: Load-carrying capacity and mode failure simulation of beam-column joint connection: application of self-tuning machine learning model. Eng. Struct. 194, 220–229 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.05.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Deng, M.; Li, T.: Masonry columns strengthened with bar mesh highly ductile fiber reinforced concrete (BMHDC) jacket under concentric and eccentric loads. Constr. Build. Mater. 237, 117606 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lan, G.; Wang, Y.; Zeng, G.; Zhang, J.: Compressive strength of earth block masonry: prediction based on neural networks and adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system. Compos. Struct. 235, 111731 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cengiz, O.; Turanlı, L.: Comparative evaluation of steel mesh, steel fibre, and high-performance polypropylene fiber reinforced shotcrete in panel test. Cement Concrete Res 34, 1357–1364 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gattesco, N.; Boem, I.: Out-of-plane behavior of reinforced masonry walls: experimental and numerical study. Compos. B 128, 39–52 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Arıoğlu, E.; Yüksel, A.; Yılmaz, A.O.: Shotcrete informations sheets-solved problems. Chamb Min Eng Turk Istanb Branch General Assem 142, 296 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Güngör E, The experimental investigation of the hybrid fiber concrete’s properties, M.SC. Thesis, Balıkesir University, Institute of Science Technology Department of Civil Engineering (2013)

  38. Banthia, N.: Advances in sprayed concrete (shotcrete). Developments in the Formulation and Reinforcement of Concrete (Second Edition), Woodhead Publishing Series in Civil and Structural Engineering, 289–306 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102616-8.00012-5

  39. TS EN 771–1+A1. Specification for Masonry Units-Part 1: Clay Masonry Units. Turkish Standards Institution, Ankara (2015) (in Turkish)

  40. TS EN 998–2. Specification for mortar for masonry — Part 2: Masonry mortar. Turkish Standards Institution, Ankara (2017) (in Turkish)

  41. TS EN 14487–1, Sprayed concrete—Part 1: Definitions, Specifications and Conformity. Turkish Standards Institution, Ankara (2015) (in Turkish)

  42. TS EN 14487–2. Sprayed concrete—Part 2: Execution. Turkish Standards Institution, Ankara (2015) (in Turkish)

  43. ACI 506.4R-94. Guide for the evaluation of shotcrete, reported by ACI Committee 506.

  44. ACI 506.2–95. Specification for Shotcrete, Reported by ACI Committee 506

  45. ASTM C 1140–98. Standard Practice for Preparing and Testing Samples from Shotcrete Test Panels

  46. Shaheen, H.; Agarwal, S.; Ranjan, P.: MinMaxScaler Binary PSO for Feature Selection. In: First International Conference on Sustainable Technologies for Computational Intelligence (pp. 705–716). Springer, Singapore (2020)

  47. De Oliveira, J.V.; Pedrycz, W.: Advances in Fuzzy Clustering and Its Applications. Wiley, West Sussex (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  48. Chen, X.; Huang, L.; Xie, D.; Zhao, Q.: EGBMMDA: extreme gradient boosting machine for MiRNA-disease association prediction. Cell Death Dis. 9(1), 1–16 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Georganos, S.; Grippa, T.; Vanhuysse, S.; Lennert, M.; Shimoni, M.; Wolff, E.: Very high resolution object-based land use–land cover urban classification using extreme gradient boosting. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 15(4), 607–611 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. De Myttenaere, A.; Golden, B.; Le Grand, B.; Rossi, F.: Mean absolute percentage error for regression models. Neurocomputing 192, 38–48 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Idiou, N.; Benatia, F.; Brahimi, B. Bias and RMSE of Archimedean copula using moment and L-moments methods. In: 2020 2nd International Conference on Mathematics and Information Technology (ICMIT) (pp. 55–58). IEEE (2020)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBİTAK) with the Project Number of 111M335.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmet Ali Süzen.

Additional information

The original publication of the article was revised: The order of authors have been corrected.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 97 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Çakıroğlu, M.A., İnce, G., Kabas, H.T. et al. Experimental Examination of the Behavior of Shotcrete-Reinforced Masonry Walls and Xgboost Neural Network Prediction Model. Arab J Sci Eng 46, 10613–10630 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-05466-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-05466-1

Keywords

Navigation