Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Modelling Bourdieusian Social Reproduction Theory

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social reproduction theory claims that the social structure of inequality is the product of unequal distribution of resources. This inequality perpetuates across generations due to the strategies that agents use to maintain and enhance their relative positions in the social space of positions. This study built the triptych model of reproduction of social class to evaluate the social reproduction theory of Bourdieu. The model is consisted of three stages. The first stage explored that the cultural and economic capital are inversely related in the social structure of South Punjab. The second stage analyzed the reproduction of social class. The data supported the intergeneration perpetuation of the dominant class in south Punjab. The study excluded the third stage of mediation models. The study concluded that the structure of unequal distribution of resources perpetuated from one generation to the next. The study suggested that the triptych model of reproduction of social class may be used in the future studies to assess the social reproduction theory of Bourdieu.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarts, K. (2007). Parsimonious Methodology. Methodological Innovations. Online, 2(1), 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agresti, A. (2007). An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis. John Wiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Amato, P. R. (2010). Research on divorce: continuing trends and new developments. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 650–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anheier, H. K., Gerhards, J., & Romo, F. P. (1995). Forms of Capital and Social Structure in Cultural Fields: Examining Bourdieu’s Social Topography. American Journal of Sociology, 100(4), 859–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astone, N. M., & McLanahan, S. S. (1991). Family structure, parental practices and high school completion. American sociological review, 56(3), 309–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baran, S. J., & Davis, D. K. (1995). Mass communication theory: Foundations, ferment and future. Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartee, R. D., & Brown, M., II. (2007). C. Why African American students need multiple forms of capital. Peter Lang: School matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital theory. Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardi, F., & Boertien, D. (2017). Non-intact families and diverging educational destinies: A decomposition analysis for Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom and the United States. Social science research, 63, 181–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biblarz, T. J., & Gottainer, G. (2000). Family structure and children’s success: A comparison of widowed and divorced single-mother families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(2), 533–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biblarz, T. J., & Raftery, A. E. (1999). Family Structure, Educational Attainment and Socioeconomic Success: Rethinking the ’Pathology of Matriarchy. The American Journal of Sociology, 105(2), 321–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bihagen, E., & Katz-Gerro, T. (2000). Culture consumption in Sweden: the stability of gender differences. Poetics, 27, 327–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björklund, A., Ginther, D. K., & Sundström, M. (2007). Family structure and child outcomes in the USA and Sweden. Journal of Population Economics, 20(1), 183–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977a). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977b). Cultural Reproduction and Social Reproduction. In J. Karabel & A. H. Halsey (Eds.), Power and Ideology in Education (pp. 487–511). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P (1984) Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.

  • Bourdieu, P. (1985). The social space and the genesis of groups. Information (International Social Science Council), 24(2), 195–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). Forms of Capital. In S. Ball (Ed.), The RoutledgeFalmerReader in sociology of education (Vol. 2, pp. 15–29). Hoboken: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990a). The logic of practice. Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). In other words: Essays towards a reflexive sociology. Oxford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., et al. (1991). Social Space and Symbolic Space. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Contemporary Sociological Theory (pp. 267–275). Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature. Columbia: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1996). The state nobility: Elite schools in the field of power. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action. California: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheadle, J. E. (2008). Educational investment, family context and children’s math and reading growth from kindergarten through the third grade. Sociology of education, 81(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherbo, J. M., & Peters, M. (1995). American Participation in Opera and Musical Theater, 1992. Research Division Report# 32. Seven Locks Press, 1400 E. Watson Center Rd., Carson, CA 90745–4319.

  • Christin, A. (2012). Gender and highbrow cultural participation in the United States. Poetics, 40, 423–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, W. G. (1953). Sampling Techniques. Asian Publishing House.

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology, 94, S95–S120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulangeon, P., & Lemel, Y. (2009). The homology thesis: Distinction revisited. In K. Robson & C. Sanders (Eds.), Quantifying Theory: Pierre Bourdieu (pp. 47–60). Hoboken: Springer Publication.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crook, C. J. (1997). Cultural practices and socioeconomic attainment: The Australian experience: Greenwood Publishing Group.

  • De Graaf, N. D., De Graaf, P. M., & Kraaykamp, G. (2000). Parental cultural capital and educational attainment in the Netherlands: A refinement of the cultural capital perspective. Sociology of education, 73(2), 92–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. (2004). Gender, networks and cultural capital. Poetics, 32, 99–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., & Mohr, J. (1985). Cultural capital, educational attainment and marital selection. American journal of sociology, 90(6), 1231–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumais, S. A. (2002). Cultural capital, gender and school success: The role of habitus. Sociology of education, 75(1), 44–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumais, S. A. (2006). Early childhood cultural capital, parental habitus and teachers’ perceptions. Poetics, 34(2), 83–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durr-e-Nayab. (2011). Estimating the middle class in Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 50, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., & Barber, B. L. (1999). Student council, volunteering, basketball, or marching band? What kind of extra curricular involvement matters? Journal of Adolescent Research., 14(1), 10–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, G., Grobe, R. P., Sheehan, D., & Shuan, Y. (1990). Cultural resources and school success: Gender, ethnicity and poverty groups within an urban school district. American Sociological Review, 55, 127–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flemmen, M. (2012). The Structure of the Upper Class: A Social Space Approach. Sociology, 46(6), 1039–1058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fordellone, M., & Vichi, M. (2017). Multiple Correspondence K-Means: Simultaneous Versus Sequential Approach for Dimension Reduction and Clustering. In N. C. Lauro E. et al. (Eds.), Data Science and Social Research: Epistemology, Methods, Technology and Applications (pp. 81–95). Springer: Cham.

  • Foxcroft, D. R., & Lowe, G. (1991). Adolescent drinking behaviour and family socialization factors: a meta-analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 14(3), 255–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francesconi, M., Jenkins, S. P., & Siedler, T. (2010). Childhood family structure and schooling outcomes: Evidence for Germany. Journal of Population Economics, 23(3), 1073–1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaddis, S. M. (2013). The influence of habitus in the relationship between cultural capital and academic achievement. Social science research, 42(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, H. S. (2003). The history and philosophy of social science. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gracia, P. (2015). Parent–child leisure activities and cultural capital in the United Kingdom: The gendered effects of education and social class. Social Science Research, 52, 290–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, E. R. B. (2013). An Examination of Putnam’s, Coleman’s and Bourdieu’s Conceptualizations of Social Capital and The Structural Differences Across Class, Race and Gender Groups (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Akron.

  • Hatlevik, O. E., Guðmundsdóttir, G. B., & Loi, M. (2015). Digital diversity among upper secondary students: A multilevel analysis of the relationship between cultural capital, self-efficacy, strategic use of information and digital competence. Computers & Education, 81, 345–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjellbrekke, J., & Korsnes, O. (2009). Quantifying the field of power in Norway. In K. Robson & C. Sanders (Eds.), Quantifying Theory: Pierre Bourdieu (pp. 31–45). Hoboken: Springer Publication.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, S. C. (2003). Home School Collaboration and Creation of Social Capital. Hong Kong Journal of Sociology, 4(1), 57–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeynes, W. (2007). The relationship between parental involvement and urban secondary school student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Urban Education, 42(1), 82–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson, J. O. (1993). Education, social mobility and social reproduction in Sweden: patterns and changes. International journal of sociology, 23(1), 2–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn, M. (1994). Assortative mating by cultural and economic occupational status. American journal of Sociology, 100(2), 422–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn, M., & Kraaykamp, G. (1996). Race, cultural capital and schooling: An analysis of trends in the United States. Sociology of education, 69(1), 22–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsillis, J., & Rubinson, R. (1990). Cultural capital, student achievement and educational reproduction: The case of Greece. American Sociological Review. 270–279.

  • Kaufman, J., & Gabler, J. (2004). Cultural capital and the role of extracurricular activities of boys and girls in the college attainment process. Poetics, 32, 145–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. S. (2011). Consequences of parental divorce for child development. American Sociological Review, 76(3), 487–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., Chung, J. E., & Park, N. (2016). Linking cultural capital with subjective well-being and social support: The role of communication networks. Social Science Computer Review, 34(2), 172–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. (2009). Early motherhood and harsh parenting: The role of human, social and cultural capital. Child Abuse & Neglect, 33(9), 625–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicka, M. (2005). Ways to make people active: The role of place attachment, cultural capital and neighborhood ties. Journal of environmental psychology, 25(4), 381–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicka, M. (2013). Localism and Activity as two dimensions of people–place bonding: The role of cultural capital. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lillard, D., & Gerner, J. (1999). Getting to the Ivy League: How Family Composition Affects College Choice. Journal of Higher Education, 70(6), 706–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lizardo, O. (2016). Why “cultural matters” matter: Culture talk as the mobilization of cultural capital in interaction. Poetics, 58, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, N. D. (2009). Quantifying social class: A latent clustering approach. In K. Robson & C. Sanders (Eds.), Quantifying theory: Pierre Bourdieu (pp. 161–173). Hoboken: Springer Publication.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan, S., & Percheski, C. (2008). Family structure and the reproduction of inequalities. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 257–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møllegaard, S., & Jæger, M. M. (2015). The effect of grandparents’ economic, cultural and social capital on grandchildren’s educational success. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 42, 11–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakhaie, M. R. (1996). The reproduction of class relations by gender in Canada. Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, 21(4), 523–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (2015). Pakistan Standard Classification of Occupation 2015. Retrieved from http://www.pbs.gov.pk/sites/default/files//PSCO_2015.pdf

  • Parkin, F. (1971). Class Inequality and the Political Order. Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prieur, A., Rosenlund, L., & Skjott-Larsen, J. (2008). Cultural capital today: A case study from Denmark. Poetics, 36(1), 45–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ra, E. (2011). Understanding the role of economic, cultural and social capital and habitus in student college Choice: An investigation of student, family and school contexts (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Michigan).

  • Raftery, A. E. (1986). Choosing Models for Cross-Classifications. American Sociological Review, 51, 146–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riaz, F. (2009). Cultural Capital and Its effect on Students Academic Performance (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R. V. (1984). Reproducing class relations in industrial capitalism. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 182–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R. V., & Garnier, M. A. (1985). Class Reproduction Among Men and Women in France: Reproduction Theory on Its Home Ground. American Journal of Sociology, 91(2), 250–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogošić, S., & Baranović, B. (2016). Social Capital and Educational Achievements: Coleman vs. Bourdieu. C-E-P-S Journal, 6(2), 81–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roscigno, V. J., & Ainsworth-Darnell, J. W. (1999). Race, cultural capital and educational resources: Persistent inequalities and achievement returns. Sociology of education, 72(3), 158–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rössel, J., & Beckert-Zieglschmid, C. (2002). Die ReproduktionkulturellenKapitals/The Reproduction of Cultural Capital. ZeitschriftfürSoziologie, 31(6), 497–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandefur, G. D., & Wells, T. (1999). Does Family Structure Really Influence Educational Attainment? Social Science Research, 28, 331–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streib, J. (2011). Class reproduction by four year olds. Qualitative Sociology, 34(2), 337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, A. (2001). Cultural capital and educational attainment. Sociology, 35(04), 893–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y., & Li, Y. (2009). Parental divorce, sibship size, family resources and children’s academic performance. Social Science Research, 38(3), 622–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swartz, D. (1997). Culture and power: The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tepper, S. (2000). Fiction reading in America: explaining the gender gap? Poetics, 27, 255–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toren, Z. (2004). Art curriculum, learning materials and cultural capital in the Israeli kindergarten. Studies in Art Education, 45(3), 206–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Werfhorst, H. G., & Hofstede, S. (2007). Cultural capital or relative risk aversion? Two mechanisms for educational inequality compared. The British journal of sociology, 58(3), 391–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenstra, G. (2009). Transmutations of capitals in Canada: A ‘social space’ approach. In K. Robson & C. Sanders (Eds.), Quantifying theory: Pierre Bourdieu (pp. 61–73). Hoboken: Springer Publication.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Von Eye, A., & Munn, E. (2013). Log-Linear Modeling: Concepts. John Wiley & Sons Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willekens, M., & Lievens, J. (2014). Family (and) culture: The effect of cultural capital within the family on the cultural participation of adolescents. Poetics, 42, 98–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, E. O., & Perrone, L. (1977). Marxist class categories and income inequality. American Sociological Review, 42(1), 32–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, W. J., Sandberg, J. F., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Hofferth, S. L. (2001). Children’s time with fathers in intact families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(1), 136–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, M., & Logan, J. R. (1989). Returns on human capital in ethic enclaves: New York City’s Chinatown. American sociological review, 54(4), 809–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study is a part of PhD thesis of the principal author of this paper.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, University of Okara, Okara, Pakistan

    Shahzad Farid

  2. International Islamic University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan

    Saif Ur Rehman Saif Abbasi & Qaisar Khalid Mahmood

Authors
  1. Shahzad Farid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Saif Ur Rehman Saif Abbasi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qaisar Khalid Mahmood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qaisar Khalid Mahmood.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

figure a
figure b
figure c
figure d
figure e
figure f

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farid, S., Abbasi, S.U.R.S. & Mahmood, Q.K. Modelling Bourdieusian Social Reproduction Theory. Soc Indic Res 157, 297–333 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02649-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02649-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation