Skip to main content
Log in

An innovative model for predicting the displacement and rotation of column-tree moment connection under fire

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we carried out nonlinear finite element simulations to predict the performance of a column-tree moment connection (CTMC) under fire and static loads. We also conducted a detailed parameter study based on five input variables, including the applied temperature, number of flange bolts, number of web bolts, length of the beam, and applied static loads. The first variable is changed among seven levels, whereas the other variables are changed among three levels. Employing the Taguchi method for variables 2–5 and their levels, 9 samples were designed for the parameter study, where each sample was exposed to 7 different temperatures yielding 63 outputs. The related variables for each output are imported for the training and testing of different surrogate models. These surrogate models include a multiple linear regression (MLR), multiple Ln equation regression (MLnER), an adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), and gene expression programming (GEP). 44 samples were used for training randomly while the remaining samples were employed for testing. We show that GEP outperforms MLR, MLnER, and ANFIS. The results indicate that the rotation and deflection of the CTMC depend on the temperature. In addition, the fire resistance increases with a decrease in the beam length; thus, a shorter beam can increase the fire resistance of the building. The numbers of flanges and web bolts slightly affect the rotation and displacement of the CTMCs at temperatures of above 400°C.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. NIST. Final Report on the Collapse of the World Trade Center Towers. Report NIST NCSTAR 1. Gaithersburg Maryland: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  2. FEMA. World Trade Center Building Performance Study: Data Collection, Preliminary Observations, and Recommendations, FEMA-403. Washington, D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chung H Y, Lee C H, Su W J, Lin R Z. Application of fire-resistant steel to beam-to-column moment connections at elevated temperatures. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2010, 66(2): 289–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Al-Jabri K S, Lennon T, Burgess I W, Plank R J. Behaviour of steel and composite beam-column connections in fire. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 1998, 46(1–3): 308–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Al-Jabri K S, Burgess I W, Lennon T, Plank R J. Moment-rotation-temperature curves for semi-rigid joints. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2005, 61(3): 281–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shishegaran A, Rahimi S, Darabi H. Introducing box-plate beam-to-column moment connections. Vibroengineering Procedia, 2017, 11: 200–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Spyrou S, Davison J B, Burgess I W, Plank R J. Experimental and analytical investigation of the ‘compression zone’ components within a steel joint at elevated temperatures. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2004, 60(6): 841–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Al-Jabri K S. Component-based model of the behaviour of flexible end-plate connections at elevated temperatures. Composite Structures, 2004, 66(1–4): 215–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Jabri K S, Burgess I W, Plank R J. Spring-stiffness model for flexible end-plate bare-steel joints in fire. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2005, 61(12): 1672–1691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Al-Jabri K S, Seibi A, Karrech A. Modelling of un-stiffened flush endplate bolted connections in fire. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2006, 62(1–2): 151–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sarraj M, Burgess I W, Davison J B, Plank R J. Finite element modelling of steel fin plate connections in fire. Fire Safety Journal, 2007, 42(6–7): 408–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Qian Z H, Tan K H, Burgess I W. Behavior of steel beam-to-column joints at elevated temperature: Experimental investigation. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2008, 134(5): 713–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yu H, Burgess I W, Davison J B, Plank R J. Experimental investigation of the behaviour of fin plate connections in fire. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2009, 65(3): 723–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yu H, Burgess I W, Davison J B, Plank R J. Numerical simulation of bolted steel connections in fire using explicit dynamic analysis. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2008, 64(5): 515–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sun R R, Burgess I W, Huang Z H, Dong G. Progressive failure modelling and ductility demand of steel beam-to-column connection in fire. Engineering Structures, 2015, 89: 66–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Burgess I, Davison J B, Dong G, Huang S S. The role of connections in the response of steel frames to fire. Structural Engineering International, 2012, 22(4): 449–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yu H X, Burgess I W, Davison J B, Plank R J. Experimental and numerical investigations of the behaviour of flush endplate connections at elevated temperatures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2011, 137(1): 80–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dwaikat M, Kodur V. Engineering approach for predicting fire response of restrained steel beams. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2011, 137(7): 447–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dwaikat M, Kodur V. A performance based methodology for fire design of restrained steel beams. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2011, 67(3): 510–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Desombre J, Rodgers G W, MacRae G A, Rabczuk T, Dhakal R P, Chase J G. Experimentally validated FEA models of HF2V damage free steel connections for use in full structural analyses. Journal of Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 2011, 37(4): 385–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Samanta S, Nanthakumar S S, Annabattula R K, Zhuang X. Detection of void and metallic inclusion in 2D piezoelectric cantilever beam using impedance measurements. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2019, 13(3): 542–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rabczuk T, Eibl J. Numerical analysis of prestressed concrete beams using a coupled element free Galerkin/finite element approach. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2004, 41(3–4): 1061–1080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rabczuk T, Zi G. Numerical fracture analysis of prestressed concrete beams. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 2008, 2(2): 153–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Areias P, Pires M, Bac N V, Rabczuk T. An objective and path-independent 3D finite-strain beam with least-squares assumed-strain formulation. Computational Mechanics, 2019, 64(4): 1115–1131

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Vu-Bac N, Silani M, Lahmer T, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. A unified framework for stochastic predictions of mechanical properties of polymeric nanocomposites. Computational Materials Science, 2015, 96: 520–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sun R R, Huang Z H, Burgess I W. Progressive collapse analysis of steel structures under fire conditions. Engineering Structures, 2012, 34: 400–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sun R R, Huang Z H, Burgess I W. The collapse behaviour of braced steel frames exposed to fire. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2012, 72: 130–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sun R R, Huang Z H, Burgess I W. A static/dynamic procedure for collapse analysis of structure in fire. In: Proceeding of Fire Safety Engineering in the UK: the State of the Art. Edinburgh: Fireseat, 2010, 37–42

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shishegaran A, Khalili M R, Karami B, Rabczuk T, Shishegaran A. Computational predictions for estimating the maximum deflection of reinforced concrete panels subjected to the blast load. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2020, 139: 103527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shishegaran A, Amiri A, Jafari M A. Seismic performance of boxplate, box-plate with UNP, box-plate with L-plate and ordinary rigid beam-to-column moment connections. Journal of Vibroengineering, 2018, 20(3): 1470–1487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gholizadeh S, Pirmoz A, Attarnejad R. Assessment of load carrying capacity of castellated steel beams by neural networks. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2011, 67(5): 770–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. ASTM F3125/F3125M–18. Standard Specification for High Strength Structural Bolts and Assemblies, Steel and Alloy Steel, Heat Treated, Inch Dimensions 120 ksi and 150 ksi Minimum Tensile Strength, and Metric Dimensions 830 MPa and 1040 MPa Minimum Tensile Strength. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2018

  33. ISO I. 834: Fire Resistance Tests-Elements of Building Construction. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  34. CEN. Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures, Part 1.2: General Rules-Structural Fire Design. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  35. Shishegaran A, Ghasemi M R, Varaee H. Performance of a novel bent-up bars system not interacting with concrete. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2019, 13(6): 1301–1315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Takagi T, Sugeno M. Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1985, SMC-15(1): 116–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jang J S. ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1993, 23(3): 665–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ferreira C. Gene expression programming in problem solving. In: Soft Computing and Industry. London: Springer, 2002, 635–653

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Bates J M, Granger C W. The combination of forecasts. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1969, 20(4): 451–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timon Rabczuk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naghsh, M.A., Shishegaran, A., Karami, B. et al. An innovative model for predicting the displacement and rotation of column-tree moment connection under fire. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 15, 194–212 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0688-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0688-2

Keywords

Navigation