Christian Meurisch
Max Mühlhäuser
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have shaped today’s user services, enabling enhanced personalization and better support. As such AI-based services inevitably require user data, the resulting privacy implications are de facto the unacceptable face of this technology. In this article, we categorize and survey the cutting-edge research on privacy and data protection in the context of personalized AI services. We further review the different protection approaches at three different levels, namely, the management, system, and AI levels—showing that (i) not all of them meet our identified requirements of evolving AI services and that (ii) many challenges are addressed separately or fragmentarily by different research communities. Finally, we highlight open research challenges and future directions in data protection research, especially that comprehensive protection requires more interdisciplinary research and a combination of approaches at different levels.
- Martin Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan, Ilya Mironov, Kunal Talwar, and Li Zhang. 2016. Deep learning with differential privacy. In CCS’16. ACM, 308--318. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2976749.2978318Google Scholar
- Saeed Abdullah, Nicholas D. Lane, and Tanzeem Choudhury. 2012. Towards population scale activity recognition: A framework for handling data diversity. In AAAI’12. AAAI Press, 851--857.Google Scholar
- Tigist Abera, N. Asokan, Lucas Davi, Farinaz Koushanfar, Andrew Paverd, Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi, and Gene Tsudik. 2016. Things, trouble, trust: On building trust in IoT systems. In DAC’16. ACM, 121--126. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2897937.2905020Google Scholar
- Charu C. Aggarwal and Philip S. Yu. 2008. A general survey of privacy-preserving data mining models and algorithms. In Privacy-preserving Data Mining. Springer, 11--52. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70992-5_2Google Scholar
- Rakesh Agrawal and Ramakrishnan Srikant. 2000. Privacy-preserving data mining. In SIGMOD’00. ACM, 439--450. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/342009.335438Google Scholar
- Google AI. 2019. Federated Learning. Retrieved from https://federated.withgoogle.com.Google Scholar
- JongGwan An, Wenbin Li, Franck Le Gall, Ernoe Kovac, Jaeho Kim, Tarik Taleb, and JaeSeung Song. 2019. EiF: Toward an elastic IoT fog framework for AI services. IEEE Commun. Mag. 57, 5 (2019), 28--33. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2019.1800215Google ScholarCross Ref
- Annie I. Antón, Julia B. Earp, and Jessica D. Young. 2010. How internet users’ privacy concerns have evolved since 2002. IEEE Secur. Priv. 8, 1 (2010), 21--27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2010.38Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sergei Arnautov, Bohdan Trach, Franz Gregor, Thomas Knauth, Andre Martin, Christian Priebe, Joshua Lind, Divya Muthukumaran et al. 2016. SCONE: Secure Linux containers with Intel SGX. In USENIX OSDI’16. 689--703.Google Scholar
- Sasikanth Avancha, Amit Baxi, and David Kotz. 2012. Privacy in mobile technology for personal healthcare. Comput. Surv. 45, 1 (2012), 3:1--3:54. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2379776.2379779Google Scholar
- Louise Barkhuus and Anind K. Dey. 2003. Location-based services for mobile telephony: A study of users’ privacy concerns. In INTERACT’03, Vol. 3. Citeseer, 702--712.Google Scholar
- Mauro Barni, Pierluigi Failla, Riccardo Lazzeretti, Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi, and Thomas Schneider. 2011. Privacy-preserving ECG classification with branching programs and neural networks. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forens. Secur. 6, 2 (2011), 452--468. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2011.2108650Google ScholarDigital Library
- Solon Barocas, Moritz Hardt, and Arvind Narayanan. 2017. Fairness in machine learning. NIPS Tutor. 1 (2017).Google Scholar
- Avron Barr and Edward A. Feigenbaum. 1981. The Handbook of Artificial Intelligence. Butterworth-Heinemann. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-07690-6Google Scholar
- Susanne Barth and Menno D. T. De Jong. 2017. The privacy paradox--Investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior—A systematic literature review. Elsevier Telemat. Inf. 34, 7 (2017), 1038--1058. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.04.013Google ScholarDigital Library
- Andrew Baumann, Marcus Peinado, and Galen Hunt. 2014. Shielding applications from an untrusted cloud with Haven. In USENIX OSDI’14. 267--283.Google Scholar
- Sebastian P. Bayerl, Tommaso Frassetto, Patrick Jauernig, Korbinian Riedhammer, Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi, Thomas Schneider, et al. 2020. Offline model guard: Secure and private ML on mobile devices. In DATE’20. IEEE, 460--465. DOI:https://doi.org/10.23919/DATE48585.2020.9116560Google Scholar
- Elisa Bertino, Gabriel Ghinita, and Ashish Kamra. 2011. Access control for databases: Concepts and systems. Found. Trends® Datab. 3, 1--2 (2011), 1--148. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1561/1900000014Google ScholarDigital Library
- Laurent Beslay and Hannu Hakala. 2007. Digital territory: Bubbles. In European Visions for the Knowledge Age: A Quest for New Horizons in the Information Society. Cheshire Henbury, 69--78.Google Scholar
- Igor Bilogrevic and Martin Ortlieb. 2016. “If you put all the pieces together...”: Attitudes towards data combination and sharing across services and companies. In CHI’16. ACM, 5215--5227. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858432Google Scholar
- Enrico Blanzieri and Anton Bryl. 2008. A survey of learning-based techniques of email spam filtering. Artif. Intell. Rev. 29, 1 (2008), 63--92. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-009-9109-6Google ScholarDigital Library
- Avrim Blum, Cynthia Dwork, Frank McSherry, and Kobbi Nissim. 2005. Practical privacy: The SuLQ framework. In PODS’05. ACM, 128--138. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1065167.1065184Google Scholar
- Keith Bonawitz, Vladimir Ivanov, Ben Kreuter, Antonio Marcedone, H. Brendan McMahan, Sarvar Patel, et al. 2017. Practical secure aggregation for privacy-preserving machine learning. In CCS’17. ACM, 1175--1191. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3133956.3133982Google Scholar
- Ferdinand Brasser, Srdjan Capkun, Alexandra Dmitrienko, Tommaso Frassetto, Kari Kostiainen, and Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi. 2019. DR.SGX: Automated and adjustable side-channel protection for SGX using data location randomization. In ACSAC’19. ACM, 788--800. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3359789.3359809Google Scholar
- Ferdinand Brasser, Tommaso Frassetto, Korbinian Riedhammer, Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi, Thomas Schneider, and Christian Weinert. 2018. VoiceGuard: Secure and private speech processing. In Interspeech’18. ISCA, 1303--1307.Google Scholar
- Luca Canzian and Mirco Musolesi. 2015. Trajectories of depression: Unobtrusive monitoring of depressive states by means of smartphone mobility traces analysis. In UbiComp’15. ACM, 1293--1304. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2805845Google Scholar
- Swarup Chandra, Vishal Karande, Zhiqiang Lin, Latifur Khan, Murat Kantarcioglu, and Bhavani Thuraisingham. 2017. Securing data analytics on SGX with randomization. In ESORICS’17. Springer, 352--369. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66402-6_21Google Scholar
- Amir Chaudhry, Jon Crowcroft, Heidi Howard, Anil Madhavapeddy, Richard Mortier, Hamed Haddadi, and Derek McAuley. 2015. Personal data: Thinking inside the box. In AA’15. ACM, 29--32. DOI:https://doi.org/10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21312Google Scholar
- Ramnath K. Chellappa and Raymond G. Sin. 2005. Personalization versus privacy: An empirical examination of the online consumer’s Dilemma. Inf. Technol. Manag. 6, 2-3 (2005), 181--202. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-005-5879-yGoogle ScholarDigital Library
- Siyun Chen, Ting Liu, Feng Gao, Jianting Ji, Zhanbo Xu, Buyue Qian, Hongyu Wu, et al. 2017. Butler, not servant: A human-centric smart home energy management system. IEEE Commun. Mag. 55, 2 (2017), 27--33. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2017.1600699CMGoogle ScholarDigital Library
- Raymond Cheng, Fan Zhang, Jernej Kos, Warren He, Nicholas Hynes, Noah Johnson, Ari Juels, Andrew Miller, and Dawn Song. 2019. Ekiden: A platform for confidentiality-preserving, trustworthy, and performant smart contract execution. In EuroS&P. IEEE, 185--200. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/EuroSP.2019.00023Google Scholar
- Terry Chia. 2012. Confidentiality, integrity, availability: The three components of the CIA triad. IT Security Community Blog (2012). https://security.blogoverflow.com/2012/08/confidentiality-integrity-availability-the-three-components-of-the-cia-triad/.Google Scholar
- Minho Choi and Sang Woo Kim. 2017. Online SVM-based personalizing method for the drowsiness detection of drivers. In EMBC’17. IEEE, 4195--4198. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037781Google Scholar
- Victor Costan and Srinivas Devadas. 2016. Intel SGX explained. IACR Cryptol. Arch. 2016, 086 (2016), 1--118.Google Scholar
- Andy Crabtree, Tom Lodge, James Colley, Chris Greenhalgh, et al. 2016. Enabling the new economic actor: Data protection, the digital economy, and the databox. Person. Ubiq. Comput. 20, 6 (2016), 947--957. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-016-0939-3Google ScholarDigital Library
- John Criswell, Nathan Dautenhahn, and Vikram Adve. 2014. Virtual ghost: Protecting applications from hostile operating systems. In ASPLOS’14. ACM, 81--96. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2541940.2541986Google Scholar
- Nigel Davies, Nina Taft, Mahadev Satyanarayanan, Sarah Clinch, and Brandon Amos. 2016. Privacy mediators: Helping IoT cross the chasm. In HotMobile’16. 39--44. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2873587.2873600Google Scholar
- Allan de Barcelos Silva, Marcio Miguel Gomes, Cristiano André da Costa, Rodrigo da Rosa Righi, Jorge Luis Victoria Barbosa, Gustavo Pessin, Geert De Doncker, and Gustavo Federizzi. 2020. Intelligent personal assistants: A systematic literature review. Exp. Syst. Applic. 147 (2020), 113193. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113193Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jaybie A. De Guzman, Kanchana Thilakarathna, and Aruna Seneviratne. 2019. Security and privacy approaches in mixed reality: A literature survey. Comput. Surv. 52, 6 (2019). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3359626Google Scholar
- Yves-Alexandre De Montjoye, Erez Shmueli, Samuel S. Wang, and Alex Sandy Pentland. 2014. openPDS: Protecting the privacy of metadata through SafeAnswers. PLoS ONE 9, 7 (2014), e98790. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098790Google ScholarCross Ref
- George Demiris and Brian K. Hensel. 2008. Technologies for an aging society: A systematic review of smart home applications. Yearb. Med. Inf. 17, 01 (2008), 33--40. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1638580Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sarah M. Diesburg and An-I Andy Wang. 2010. A survey of confidential data storage and deletion methods. Comput. Surveys 43, 1 (2010). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1824795.1824797Google Scholar
- Nathan Dowlin, Ran Gilad-Bachrach, Kim Laine, Kristin Lauter, Michael Naehrig, and John Wernsing. 2016. CryptoNets: Applying neural networks to encrypted data with high throughput and accuracy. In ICML’16. JMLR.org, 201--210.Google Scholar
- Cynthia Dwork, Frank McSherry, Kobbi Nissim, and Adam Smith. 2006. Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis. In TCC’06. Springer, 265--284. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/11681878_1Google Scholar
- Milan Erdelj, Enrico Natalizio, Kaushik R. Chowdhury, and Ian F. Akyildiz. 2017. Help from the sky: Leveraging UAVs for disaster management. IEEE Pervas. Comput. 16, 1 (2017), 24--32. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2017.11Google ScholarDigital Library
- Úlfar Erlingsson, Vasyl Pihur, and Aleksandra Korolova. 2014. RAPPOR: Randomized aggregatable privacy-preserving ordinal response. In CCS’14. ACM, 1054--1067. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2660267.2660348Google Scholar
- Liyue Fan et al. 2015. A practical framework for privacy-preserving data analytics. In WWW’15. ACM, 311--321. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2736277.2741122Google Scholar
- Earlence Fernandes, Justin Paupore, Amir Rahmati, Daniel Simionato, Mauro Conti, and Atul Prakash. 2016. FlowFence: Practical data protection for emerging IoT application frameworks. In USENIX Security’16. 531--548.Google Scholar
- Brian J. Fogg. 1999. Persuasive technologies. Commun. ACM 42, 5 (1999), 26--29. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/301353.301396Google ScholarDigital Library
- Benjamin C. M. Fung, Ke Wang, Rui Chen, and Philip S. Yu. 2010. Privacy-preserving data publishing: A survey of recent developments. Comput. Surv. 42, 4 (2010). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1749603.1749605Google Scholar
- John Gantz and David Reinsel. 2012. The digital universe in 2020: Big data, bigger digital shadows, and biggest growth in the far east. IDC iView: IDC Anal. Fut. 2007, 2012 (2012), 1--16.Google Scholar
- Simson Garfinkel. 1995. PGP: Pretty Good Privacy. O’Reilly Media, Inc.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bugra Gedik and Ling Liu. 2007. Protecting location privacy with personalized k-anonymity: Architecture and algorithms. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 7, 1 (2007), 1--18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2007.1062Google ScholarDigital Library
- Craig Gentry. 2009. Fully homomorphic encryption using ideal lattices. In STOC’09. ACM, 169--178. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1536414.1536440Google Scholar
- Nina Gerber, Paul Gerber, and Melanie Volkamer. 2018. Explaining the privacy paradox: A systematic review of literature investigating privacy attitude and behavior. Comput. Secur. 77 (2018), 226--261. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2018.04.002Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nina Gerber, Benjamin Reinheimer, and Melanie Volkamer. 2019. Investigating people’s privacy risk perception. In PETS’19. Sciendo, 267--288. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2478/popets-2019-0047Google Scholar
- Vipul Goyal, Omkant Pandey, Amit Sahai, and Brent Waters. 2006. Attribute-based encryption for fine-grained access control of encrypted data. In CCS’06. ACM, 89--98. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1180405.1180418Google Scholar
- Thore Graepel, Kristin Lauter, and Michael Naehrig. 2012. ML confidential: Machine learning on encrypted data. In ICISC’12. Springer, 1--21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37682-5_1Google Scholar
- Mike Graves, Adam Constabaris, and Dan Brickley. 2007. FOAF: Connecting people on the semantic web. Catalog. Classif. Quart. 43, 3--4 (2007), 191--202. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v43n03_10Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jonathan Grudin and Richard Jacques. 2019. Chatbots, humbots, and the quest for artificial general intelligence. In CHI’19. ACM, 209:1--209:11. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300439Google Scholar
- Andrew Hard, Kanishka Rao, Rajiv Mathews, Swaroop Ramaswamy, Françoise Beaufays, Sean Augenstein, Hubert Eichner, Chloé Kiddon, and Daniel Ramage. 2018. Federated Learning for Mobile Keyboard Prediction. arxiv:1811.03604.Google Scholar
- Thomas Hardjono, Patrick Deegan, and John Henry Clippinger. 2014. Social use cases for the ID3 open mustard seed platform. IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag. 33, 3 (2014), 48--54. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2014.2345197Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thomas Hardjono and Alex Pentland. 2019. Data cooperatives: Towards a foundation for decentralized personal data management. arxiv:1905.08819.Google Scholar
- Thomas Hardjono, David L. Shrier, and Alex Pentland. 2019. Trusted Data: A New Framework for Identity and Data Sharing. MIT Connection Science & Engineering.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael Henson and Stephen Taylor. 2014. Memory encryption: A survey of existing techniques. Comput. Surv. 46, 4 (2014). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2566673Google ScholarDigital Library
- Owen S. Hofmann, Sangman Kim, Alan M. Dunn, Michael Z. Lee, and Emmett Witchel. 2013. InkTag: Secure applications on an untrusted operating system. In ASPLOS’13, Vol. 48. ACM, 265--278. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2451116.2451146Google ScholarDigital Library
- White House. 2012. Consumer data privacy in a networked world: A framework for protecting privacy and promoting innovation in the global digital economy. White House, Washington, DC (2012), 1--62. Retrieved from https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=700959.Google Scholar
- Yun Chao Hu, Milan Patel, Dario Sabella, Nurit Sprecher, and Valerie Young. 2015. Mobile edge computing—A key technology towards 5G. ETSI White Paper 11, 11 (2015), 1--16.Google Scholar
- Mathias Humbert, Benjamin Trubert, and Kévin Huguenin. 2019. A survey on interdependent privacy. Comput. Surv. 52, 6 (2019). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3360498Google Scholar
- Tyler Hunt, Congzheng Song, Reza Shokri, Vitaly Shmatikov, and Emmett Witchel. 2018. Chiron: Privacy-preserving machine learning as a service. arxiv:1803.05961.Google Scholar
- Tyler Hunt, Zhiting Zhu, Yuanzhong Xu, Simon Peter, and Emmett Witchel. 2016. Ryoan: A distributed sandbox for untrusted computation on secret data. In USENIX OSDI’16. 533--549.Google Scholar
- Iulia Ion, Niharika Sachdeva, Ponnurangam Kumaraguru, and Srdjan Čapkun. 2011. Home is safer than the cloud! Privacy concerns for consumer cloud storage. In SOUPS’11. ACM, 13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2078827.2078845Google Scholar
- Corey Brian Jackson and Yang Wang. 2018. Addressing the privacy paradox through personalized privacy notifications. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wear. Ubiq. Technol. 2, 2 (2018), 68. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3214271Google Scholar
- Alejandro Jaimes and Nicu Sebe. 2007. Multimodal human--computer interaction: A survey. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 108, 1--2 (2007), 116--134. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2006.10.019Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zhanglong Ji, Zachary C. Lipton, and Charles Elkan. 2014. Differential Privacy and Machine Learning: A Survey and Review. arxiv:1412.7584.Google Scholar
- Michael I. Jordan. 2019. Artificial intelligence--The revolution hasn’t happened yet. Harvard Data Sci. Rev. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.f06c6e61Google Scholar
- Thivya Kandappu, Archan Misra, Shih-Fen Cheng, Randy Tandriansyah, et al. 2018. Obfuscation at-source: Privacy in context-aware mobile crowd-sourcing. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wear. Ubiq. Technol. 2, 1 (2018), 16. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3191748Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yiping Kang, Johann Hauswald, Cao Gao, Austin Rovinski, Trevor Mudge, et al. 2017. Neurosurgeon: Collaborative intelligence between the cloud and mobile edge. ACM SIGARCH Comput. Archit. News 45, 1 (2017), 615--629. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3093337.3037698Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fabian Kaup, Stefan Hacker, Eike Mentzendorff, Christian Meurisch, and David Hausheer. 2018. The Progress of the Energy-efficiency of Single-board Computers. Technical Report. NetSys-TR-2018-01.Google Scholar
- Sebastian Kauschke and Johannes Fürnkranz. 2018. Batchwise patching of classifiers. In AAAI’18. 3374--3381.Google Scholar
- Predrag Klasnja, Sunny Consolvo, Tanzeem Choudhury, Richard Beckwith, and Jeffrey Hightower. 2009. Exploring privacy concerns about personal sensing. In Pervasive’09. Springer, 176--183. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01516-8_13Google Scholar
- Klaudia Krawiecka, Arseny Kurnikov, Andrew Paverd, Mohammad Mannan, and N. Asokan. 2018. SafeKeeper: Protecting web passwords using trusted execution environments. In WWW’18. ACM, 349--358. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3178876.3186101Google Scholar
- Andrew L. Kun, Susanne Boll, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2016. Shifting gears: User interfaces in the age of autonomous driving. IEEE Pervas. Comput. 15, 1 (2016), 32--38. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2016.14Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carl Landwehr. 2019. 2018: A big year for privacy. Commun. ACM 62, 2 (2019), 20--22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3300224Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nicholas D. Lane, Mu Lin, Mashfiqui Mohammod, Xiaochao Yang, Hong Lu, Giuseppe Cardone, Shahid Ali, Afsaneh Doryab, Ethan Berke, Andrew T. Campbell, et al. 2014. BeWell: Sensing sleep, physical activities and social interactions to promote wellbeing. Mob. Netw. Applic. 19, 3 (2014), 345--359. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-013-0484-5Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nicholas D. Lane, Emiliano Miluzzo, Hong Lu, Daniel Peebles, Tanzeem Choudhury, and Andrew T. Campbell. 2010. A survey of mobile phone sensing. IEEE Commun. Mag. 48, 9 (2010), 140--150. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2010.5560598Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nicholas D. Lane, Ye Xu, Hong Lu, Shaohan Hu, Tanzeem Choudhury, Andrew T. Campbell, and Feng Zhao. 2011. Enabling large-scale human activity inference on smartphones using community similarity networks (CSN). In UbiComp’11. ACM, 355--364. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2030112.2030160Google Scholar
- Marc Langheinrich. 2002. A privacy awareness system for ubiquitous computing environments. In UbiComp’02. Springer, 237--245. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45809-3_19Google Scholar
- Neal Lathia, Veljko Pejovic, Kiran K. Rachuri, Cecilia Mascolo, Mirco Musolesi, and Peter J. Rentfrow. 2013. Smartphones for large-scale behavior change interventions. IEEE Pervas. Comput. 12, 3 (2013), 66--73. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2013.56Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yann LeCun, Yoshua Bengio, and Geoffrey Hinton. 2015. Deep learning. Nature 521, 7553 (2015), 436--444. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539Google Scholar
- Sangmin Lee, Edmund L. Wong, Deepak Goel, Mike Dahlin, et al. 2013. πBox: A platform for privacy-preserving apps. In USENIX NSDI’13. 501--514.Google Scholar
- Yaniv Leviathan and Yossi Matias. 2018. Google duplex: An AI system for accomplishing real-world tasks over the phone. Google AI Blog 8 (2018). Retrieved from https://ai.googleblog.com/2018/05/duplex-ai-system-for-natural-conversation.html.Google Scholar
- Ninghui Li, Tiancheng Li, and S. Venkatasubramanian. 2007. t-closeness: Privacy beyond k-anonymity and l-diversity. In ICDE’07. IEEE, 106--115. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.2007.367856Google Scholar
- Yanlin Li, Jonathan McCune, James Newsome, Adrian Perrig, Brandon Baker, and Will Drewry. 2014. MiniBox: A two-way sandbox for x86 native code. In USENIX ATC’14. 409--420.Google Scholar
- Blerina Lika, Kostas Kolomvatsos, and Stathes Hadjiefthymiades. 2014. Facing the cold start problem in recommender systems. Exp. Syst. Applic. 41, 4 (2014), 2065--2073. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.09.005Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bin Liu, Yurong Jiang, Fei Sha, and Ramesh Govindan. 2012. Cloud-enabled privacy-preserving collaborative learning for mobile sensing. In SenSys’12. ACM, 57--70. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2426656.2426663Google Scholar
- Hong Lu, Denise Frauendorfer, Mashfiqui Rabbi, Marianne Schmid Mast, Gokul T. Chittaranjan, Andrew T. Campbell, Daniel Gatica-Perez, and Tanzeem Choudhury. 2012. StressSense: Detecting stress in unconstrained acoustic environments using smartphones. In UbiComp’12. ACM, 351--360. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2370216.2370270Google Scholar
- Yang Lu. 2019. Artificial intelligence: A survey on evolution, models, applications and future trends. J. Manag. Anal. 6, 1 (2019), 1--29. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/23270012.2019.1570365Google Scholar
- Ewa Luger and Abigail Sellen. 2016. Like having a really bad PA: The gulf between user expectation and experience of conversational agents. In CHI’16. ACM, 5286--5297. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858288Google Scholar
- George F. Luger and William A. Stubblefield. 1993. Artificial Intelligence: Structures and Strategies for Complex Problem Solving. Benjamin/Cummings Pub. Co.Google Scholar
- Ashwin Machanavajjhala, Daniel Kifer, Johannes Gehrke, and Muthuramakrishnan Venkitasubramaniam. 2007. L-diversity: Privacy beyond k-anonymity. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data 1, 1 (2007), 3. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1217299.1217302Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kirsten Martin and Katie Shilton. 2016. Putting mobile application privacy in context: An empirical study of user privacy expectations for mobile devices. Inf. Soc. 32, 3 (2016), 200--216. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2016.1153012Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rahat Masood, Dinusha Vatsalan, Muhammad Ikram, et al. 2018. Incognito: A method for obfuscating web data. In WWW’18. ACM, 267--276. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3178876.3186093Google Scholar
- Markus Maurer, J. Christian Gerdes, Barbara Lenz, and Hermann Winner. 2016. Autonomous Driving. Springer Berlin. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48847-8Google Scholar
- H. Brendan McMahan, Eider Moore, Daniel Ramage, Seth Hampson, and Blaise Aguera y Arcas. 2017. Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In AISTATS’17. JMLR: W&CP, 1273--1282.Google Scholar
- Abhinav Mehrotra and Mirco Musolesi. 2017. Intelligent Notification Systems: A Survey of the State of the Art and Research Challenges. arxiv:1711.10171Google Scholar
- Christian Meurisch, Bekir Bayrak, Florian Giger, and Max Mühlhäuser. 2020. PDSProxy: Trusted IoT proxies for confidential ad-hoc personalization of AI services. In ICCCN’20. IEEE, 1--2. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCN49398.2020.9209655Google Scholar
- Christian Meurisch, Bekir Bayrak, and Max Mühlhäuser. 2019. AssistantGraph: An approach for reusable and composable data-driven assistant components. In COMPSAC’19. IEEE, 513--522. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC.2019.00079Google Scholar
- Christian Meurisch, Bekir Bayrak, and Max Mühlhäuser. 2019. EdgeBox: Confidential ad-hoc personalization of nearby IoT applications. In GLOBECOM’19. IEEE, 1--6. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOBECOM38437.2019.9013520Google Scholar
- Christian Meurisch, Bekir Bayrak, and Max Mühlhäuser. 2020. Privacy-preserving AI services through data decentralization. In WWW’20. ACM, 190--200. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3366423.3380106Google Scholar
- Christian Meurisch, Maria-Dorina Ionescu, Benedikt Schmidt, and Max Mühlhäuser. 2017. Reference model of next-generation digital personal assistant: Integrating proactive behavior. In Proceedings of the ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. ACM, 149--152. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3123024.3123145Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christian Meurisch, Bennet Jeutter, Wladimir Schmidt, Nickolas Gündling, Benedikt Schmidt, Fabian Herrlich, and Max Mühlhäuser. 2017. An extensible pervasive platform for large-scale anticipatory mobile computing. In COMPSAC’17. IEEE, 459--464. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC.2017.54Google Scholar
- Christian Meurisch, Sebastian Kauschke, Tim Grube, Bekir Bayrak, and Max Mühlhäuser. 2019. {P}Net: Privacy-preserving personalization of AI-based models by anonymous inter-person similarity networks. In MobiQuitous’19. ACM, 60--69. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3360774.3360819Google Scholar
- Christian Meurisch, Cristina Mihale-Wilson, Adrian Hawlitschek, Florian Giger, Florian Müller, Oliver Hinz, and Max Mühlhäuser. 2020. Exploring user expectations of proactive AI systems. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 4, 4 (12 2020), 1--22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3432193Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christian Meurisch, Benedikt Schmidt, Michael Scholz, Immanuel Schweizer, and Max Mühlhäuser. 2015. Labels: Quantified self app for human activity sensing. In UbiComp/ISWC’15. ACM, 1413--1422. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2800835.2801612Google Scholar
- Christian Meurisch, Dennis Werner, Bekir Bayrak, Florian Giger, and Max Mühlhäuser. 2020. PDSProxy++: Proactive proxy deployment for confidential personalization of AI services. In ICCCN’20. IEEE, 1--9. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCN49398.2020.9209747Google Scholar
- Cristina Mihale-Wilson, Jan Zibuschka, and Oliver Hinz. 2017. About user preferences and willingness to pay for a secure and privacy protective ubiquitous personal assistant. In ECIS’17. AIS Electronic Library, 32--47.Google Scholar
- Cristina Mihale-Wilson, Jan Zibuschka, and Oliver Hinz. 2019. User preferences and willingness to pay for in-vehicle assistance. Electron. Mark. 29, 1 (2019), 37--53. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00330-5Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mateusz Mikusz, Kenny Tsu Wei Choo, Rajesh Krishna Balan, Nigel Davies, and Youngki Lee. 2019. New challenges in display-saturated environments. IEEE Pervas. Comput. 18, 2 (2019), 67--75. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2019.2906992Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thomas M. Mitchell. 1997. Machine Learning (1st ed.). McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Payman Mohassel and Yupeng Zhang. 2017. SecureML: A system for scalable privacy-preserving machine learning. In SP’17. IEEE, 19--38. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/SP.2017.12Google Scholar
- Adam D. Moore. 2003. Privacy: Its meaning and value. Amer. Philos. Quart. 40, 3 (2003), 215--227.Google Scholar
- Richard Mortier, Jianxin Zhao, Jon Crowcroft, Liang Wang, Qi Li, Hamed Haddadi, Yousef Amar, Andy Crabtree, et al. 2016. Personal data management with the databox: What’s inside the box? In CAN’16. ACM, 49--54. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3010079.3010082Google Scholar
- Max Mühlhäuser, Christian Meurisch, Michael Stein, Jörg Daubert, Julius von Willich, Jan Riemann, and Lin Wang. 2020. Street lamps as a platform. Commun. ACM 63, 6 (2020), 75--83. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3376900Google ScholarDigital Library
- Min Mun, Shuai Hao, Nilesh Mishra, Katie Shilton, Jeff Burke, Deborah Estrin, Mark Hansen, et al. 2010. Personal data vaults: A locus of control for personal data streams. In CoNEXT’10. ACM. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1921168.1921191Google Scholar
- Huseyin Naci and John P. A. Ioannidis. 2015. Evaluation of wellness determinants and interventions by citizen scientists. Jama 314, 2 (2015), 121--122. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.6160Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pardis Emami Naeini, Sruti Bhagavatula, Hana Habib, Martin Degeling, Lujo Bauer, Lorrie Faith Cranor, and Norman Sadeh. 2017. Privacy expectations and preferences in an IoT world. In USENIX SOUPS’17. 399--412.Google Scholar
- Arvind Narayanan, Vincent Toubiana, Solon Barocas, Helen Nissenbaum, and Dan Boneh. 2012. A Critical Look at Decentralized Personal Data Architectures. arxiv:1202.4503.Google Scholar
- Milad Nasr, Reza Shokri, and Amir Houmansadr. 2018. Comprehensive Privacy Analysis of Deep Learning: Stand-alone and Federated Learning under Passive and Active White-box Inference Attacks. arxiv:1812.00910.Google Scholar
- Muhammad Naveed, Erman Ayday, Ellen W. Clayton, Jacques Fellay, Carl A. Gunter, Jean-Pierre Hubaux, Bradley A. Malin, and Xiaofeng Wang. 2015. Privacy in the genomic era. Comput. Surv. 48, 1 (2015). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2767007Google Scholar
- The An Binh Nguyen, Christian Meurisch, Stefan Niemczyk, Doreen Böhnstedt, Kurt Geihs, Max Mühlhäuser, and Ralf Steinmetz. 2017. Adaptive task-oriented message template for in-network processing. In NetSys’17. IEEE, 1--8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/NetSys.2017.7903952Google Scholar
- Bettina Nissen, Victoria Neumann, Mateusz Mikusz, Rory Gianni, Sarah Clinch, Chris Speed, and Nigel Davies. 2019. Should I agree? Delegating consent decisions beyond the individual. In CHI’19. 1--13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300745Google Scholar
- Helen Nissenbaum. 2004. Privacy as contextual integrity. Wash. L. Rev. 79 (2004), 119.Google Scholar
- Olga Ohrimenko, Felix Schuster, Cédric Fournet, Aastha Mehta, Sebastian Nowozin, Kapil Vaswani, and Manuel Costa. 2016. Oblivious multi-party machine learning on trusted processors. In USENIX SEC’16. 619--636.Google Scholar
- Oleksii Oleksenko, Bohdan Trach, Robert Krahn, Mark Silberstein, and Christof Fetzer. 2018. Varys: Protecting SGX enclaves from practical side-channel attacks. In USENIX ATC’18. 227--240.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization. 2001. The World Health Report 2001: Mental Health: New Understanding, New Hope. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/whr/2001/en/.Google Scholar
- Seyed Ali Osia, Ali Shahin Shamsabadi, Sina Sajadmanesh, Ali Taheri, Kleomenis Katevas, Hamid R. Rabiee, Nicholas D. Lane, et al. 2017. A Hybrid Deep Learning Architecture for Privacy-Preserving Mobile Analytics. arxiv:1703.02952.Google Scholar
- Sinno Jialin Pan and Qiang Yang. 2009. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 22, 10 (2009), 1345--1359. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2009.191Google ScholarCross Ref
- Elias P. Papadopoulos, Michalis Diamantaris, Panagiotis Papadopoulos, Thanasis Petsas, Sotiris Ioannidis, et al. 2017. The long-standing privacy debate: Mobile websites vs mobile apps. In WWW’17. ACM, 153--162. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3038912.3052691Google Scholar
- Veljko Pejovic and Mirco Musolesi. 2014. InterruptMe: Designing intelligent prompting mechanisms for pervasive applications. In UbiComp’14. ACM, 897--908. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2632048.2632062Google Scholar
- Veljko Pejovic and Mirco Musolesi. 2015. Anticipatory mobile computing: A survey of the state of the art and research challenges. Comput. Surv. 47, 3 (2015). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2693843Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zhenhui Peng, Yunhwan Kwon, Jiaan Lu, Ziming Wu, and Xiaojuan Ma. 2019. Design and evaluation of service robot’s proactivity in decision-making support process. In CHI’19. ACM, 98:1--98:13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300328Google Scholar
- Alex Pentland. 2009. Reality mining of mobile communications: Toward a new deal on data. In Social Computing and Behavioral Modeling. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Charith Perera, Susan Y. L. Wakenshaw, Tim Baarslag, Hamed Haddadi, et al. 2017. Valorising the IoT databox: Creating value for everyone. Trans. Emerg. Telecomm. Technol. 28, 1 (2017), e3125. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/ett.3125Google ScholarCross Ref
- Martin Pielot, Bruno Cardoso, Kleomenis Katevas, Joan Serrà, Aleksandar Matic, and Nuria Oliver. 2017. Beyond interruptibility: Predicting opportune moments to engage mobile phone users. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wear. Ubiq. Technol. 1, 3 (2017), 91. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3130956Google ScholarDigital Library
- Benny Pinkas. 2002. Cryptographic techniques for privacy-preserving data mining. ACM SigKDD Explor. Newslett. 4, 2 (2002), 12--19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/772862.772865Google ScholarDigital Library
- Otto Julio Ahlert Pinno, Andre Ricardo Abed Gregio, and Luis C. E. De Bona. 2017. ControlChain: Blockchain as a central enabler for access control authorizations in the IoT. In GLOBECOM’17. IEEE, 1--6. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOM.2017.8254521Google Scholar
- Moo-Ryong Ra, Ramesh Govindan, and Antonio Ortega. 2013. P3: Toward privacy-preserving photo sharing. In USENIX NSDI’13. 515--528.Google Scholar
- Mashfiqui Rabbi, Min Hane Aung, Mi Zhang, and Tanzeem Choudhury. 2015. MyBehavior: Automatic personalized health feedback from user behaviors and preferences using smartphones. In UbiComp’15. ACM, 707--718. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2805840Google Scholar
- Kiran K. Rachuri, Cecilia Mascolo, Mirco Musolesi, and Peter J. Rentfrow. 2011. SociableSense: Exploring the trade-offs of adaptive sampling and computation offloading for social sensing. In MobiCom’11. ACM, 73--84. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2030613.2030623Google Scholar
- Kiran K. Rachuri, Mirco Musolesi, Cecilia Mascolo, Peter J. Rentfrow, et al. 2010. EmotionSense: A mobile phones based adaptive platform for experimental social psychology research. In UbiComp’10. ACM, 281--290. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1864349.1864393Google Scholar
- Dave Raggett. 2015. The web of things: Challenges and opportunities. Computer 48, 5 (2015), 26--32. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2015.149Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bita Darvish Rouhani, M. Sadegh Riazi, and Farinaz Koushanfar. 2018. DeepSecure: Scalable provably-secure deep learning. In DAC’18. ACM. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3195970.3196023Google Scholar
- Stuart J. Russell and Peter Norvig. 2016. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
- Fariba Sadri. 2011. Ambient intelligence: A survey. Comput. Surv. 43, 4 (2011). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1978802.1978815Google Scholar
- Andrei Vlad Sambra, Essam Mansour, Sandro Hawke, Maged Zereba, Nicola Greco, Abdurrahman Ghanem, Dmitri Zagidulin, Ashraf Aboulnaga, and Tim Berners-Lee. 2016. Solid: A Platform for Decentralized Social Applications Based on Linked Data. Technical Report. MIT CSAIL & Qatar Computing Research Institute.Google Scholar
- Ruhi Sarikaya. 2017. The technology behind personal digital assistants: An overview of the system architecture and key components. IEEE Sig. Proc. Mag. 34, 1 (2017), 67--81. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2016.2617341Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mahadev Satyanarayanan. 2017. The emergence of edge computing. Computer 50, 1 (2017), 30--39. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2017.9Google ScholarDigital Library
- Benedikt Schmidt, Sebastian Benchea, Rüdiger Eichin, and Christian Meurisch. 2015. Fitness tracker or digital personal coach: How to personalize training. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. ACM, 1063--1067. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2800835.2800961Google ScholarDigital Library
- Philipp M. Scholl, Matthias Wille, and Kristof Van Laerhoven. 2015. Wearables in the wet lab: A laboratory system for capturing and guiding experiments. In UbiComp’15. ACM, 589--599. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2807547Google Scholar
- Felix Schuster, Manuel Costa, Cédric Fournet, Christos Gkantsidis, Marcus Peinado, Gloria Mainar-Ruiz, and Mark Russinovich. 2015. VC3: Trustworthy data analytics in the cloud using SGX. In SP’15. IEEE, 38--54. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/SP.2015.10Google Scholar
- Klaus Schwab, Alan Marcus, J. O. Oyola, William Hoffman, and M. Luzi. 2011. Personal data: The emergence of a new asset class. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_ITTC_PersonalDataNewAsset_Report_2011.pdf.Google Scholar
- Sandra Servia-Rodríguez, Liang Wang, Jianxin R. Zhao, Richard Mortier, and Hamed Haddadi. 2018. Privacy-preserving personal model training. In IoTDI’18. IEEE, 153--164. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/IoTDI.2018.00024Google Scholar
- Hossein Shafagh, Lukas Burkhalter, Anwar Hithnawi, and Simon Duquennoy. 2017. Towards blockchain-based auditable storage and sharing of IoT data. In CCSW’17. ACM, 45--50. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3140649.3140656Google Scholar
- Peter Shaw, Mateusz Mikusz, Ludwig Trotter, Mike Harding, and Nigel Davies. 2019. Towards an understanding of emerging cyber security threats in mapping the IoT. In IoT’19. IET Digital Library. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1049/cp.2019.0158Google Scholar
- Reza Shokri and Vitaly Shmatikov. 2015. Privacy-preserving deep learning. In CCS’15. ACM, 1310--1321. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2810103.2813687Google Scholar
- Reza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, and Vitaly Shmatikov. 2017. Membership inference attacks against machine learning models. In SP’17. IEEE, 3--18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/SP.2017.41Google Scholar
- Yan Shvartzshnaider, Zvonimir Pavlinovic, Ananth Balashankar, Thomas Wies, Lakshminarayanan Subramanian, et al. 2019. VACCINE: Using contextual integrity for data leakage detection. In WWW’19. ACM, 1702--1712. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313655Google Scholar
- Daniel J. Solove. 2005. A taxonomy of privacy. U. Pa. L. Rev. 154 (2005), 477.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nili Steinfeld. 2016. “I agree to the terms and conditions”: (How) do users read privacy policies online? An eye-tracking experiment. Comput. Hum. Behav. 55 (2016), 992--1000. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.038Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yu Sun, Nicholas Jing Yuan, Yingzi Wang, Xing Xie, Kieran McDonald, and Rui Zhang. 2016. Contextual intent tracking for personal assistants. In KDD’16. ACM, 273--282. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939676Google Scholar
- Latanya Sweeney. 2002. k-anonymity: A model for protecting privacy. Int.J. Uncert. Fuzz. Knowl.-based Syst. 10, 5 (2002), 557--570. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488502001648Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jun Tang, Yong Cui, Qi Li, Kui Ren, Jiangchuan Liu, and Rajkumar Buyya. 2016. Ensuring security and privacy preservation for cloud data services. Comput. Surv. 49, 1 (2016). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2906153Google Scholar
- Daniel Teghe and Kathryn Rendell. 2005. Social Well-being: A Literature Review. School of Social Work and Welfare Studies, CQU, Rockhampton. DOI:https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28891.26406Google Scholar
- Eran Toch, Yang Wang, and Lorrie Faith Cranor. 2012. Personalization and privacy: A survey of privacy risks and remedies in personalization-based systems. User Model. User-adapt. Interact. 22, 1--2 (2012), 203--220. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-011-9110-zGoogle ScholarDigital Library
- Paul Tran-Van, Nicolas Anciaux, and Philippe Pucheral. 2017. SWYSWYK: A privacy-by-design paradigm for personal information management systems. In ISD’17. AIS.Google Scholar
- Chia-Che Tsai, Donald E. Porter, and Mona Vij. 2017. Graphene-SGX: A practical library OS for unmodified applications on SGX. In USENIX ATC’17. 645--658.Google Scholar
- Kenneth Tung. 2019. AI, the Internet of legal things, and lawyers. J. Manag. Anal. 6, 4 (2019), 390--403. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/23270012.2019.1671242Google Scholar
- Robert van den Hoven van Genderen. 2017. Privacy and data protection in the age of pervasive technologies in AI and robotics. Eur. Data Prot. L. Rev. 3 (2017), 338. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2017/3/8Google ScholarCross Ref
- Max Van Kleek and Kieron O’Hara. 2014. The future of social is personal: The potential of the personal data store. In Social Collective Intelligence. Springer, 125--158. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08681-1_7Google Scholar
- Ricardo Vilalta and Youssef Drissi. 2002. A perspective view and survey of meta-learning. Artif. Intell. Rev. 18, 2 (2002), 77--95. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019956318069Google ScholarDigital Library
- Isabel Wagner and David Eckhoff. 2018. Technical privacy metrics: A systematic survey. Comput. Surv. 51, 3 (2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3168389Google ScholarDigital Library
- Huaiqing Wang, Matthew K. O. Lee, and Chen Wang. 1998. Consumer privacy concerns about Internet marketing. Commun. ACM 41, 3 (1998), 63--70. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/272287.272299Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jiaqiu Wang and Zhongjie Wang. 2014. A survey on personal data cloud. Sci. World J. 2014 (2014). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/969150Google Scholar
- Shiqiang Wang, Tiffany Tuor, Theodoros Salonidis, Kin K. Leung, Christian Makaya, et al. 2018. When edge meets learning: Adaptive control for resource-constrained distributed machine learning. In INFOCOM’18. IEEE, 63--71. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOCOM.2018.8486403Google Scholar
- Xiaofei Wang, Yiwen Han, Chenyang Wang, Qiyang Zhao, Xu Chen, and Min Chen. 2019. In-edge AI: Intelligentizing mobile edge computing, caching and communication by federated learning. IEEE Netw. 33, 5 (2019), 156--165. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2019.1800286Google ScholarDigital Library
- Samuel D. Warren and Louis D. Brandeis. 1890. Right to privacy. Harv. L. Rev. 4 (1890), 193.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mark Weiser. 1991. The computer for the 21st century. Sci. Amer. 265, 3 (1991), 94--105.Google Scholar
- Alan F. Westin. 1968. Privacy and freedom. Wash. Lee Law Rev. 25, 1 (1968), 166. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/13.4.114-aGoogle Scholar
- Jason Wiese, Sauvik Das, Jason I. Hong, and John Zimmerman. 2017. Evolving the ecosystem of personal behavioral data. Hum.-comput. Interact. 32, 5--6 (2017), 447--510. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2017.1295857Google Scholar
- Depeng Xu, Shuhan Yuan, and Xintao Wu. 2019. Achieving differential privacy and fairness in logistic regression. In WWW’19 Comp. ACM, 594--599. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3308560.3317584Google Scholar
- Heng Xu, Xin Robert Luo, John Carroll, and Mary Rosson. 2011. The personalization privacy paradox: An exploratory study of decision making process for location-aware marketing. Decis. Supp. Syst. 51, 1 (2011), 42--52. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.11.017Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zhi Xu and Sencun Zhu. 2015. SemaDroid: A privacy-aware sensor management framework for smartphones. In CODASPY’15. ACM, 61--72. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2699026.2699114Google Scholar
- Zhu Yan, Guhua Gan, and Khaled Riad. 2017. BC-PDS: Protecting privacy and self-sovereignty through blockchains for OpenPDS. In SOSE’17. IEEE, 138--144. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/SOSE.2017.30Google Scholar
- Qiang Yang, Yang Liu, Tianjian Chen, and Yongxin Tong. 2019. Federated machine learning: Concept and applications. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 10, 2 (2019), 12:1--12:19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3298981Google ScholarDigital Library
- Neil Yorke-Smith, Shahin Saadati, Karen L. Myers, and David N. Morley. 2012. The design of a proactive personal agent for task management. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools 21, 01 (2012), 1250004. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218213012500042Google ScholarCross Ref
- Muhammad Bilal Zafar, Isabel Valera, Manuel Gomez Rodriguez, and Krishna P. Gummadi. 2017. Fairness beyond disparate treatment & disparate impact: Learning classification without disparate mistreatment. In WWW’17. 1171--1180. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3038912.3052660Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yan Zhai, Lichao Yin, Jeffrey Chase, Thomas Ristenpart, and Michael Swift. 2016. CQSTR: Securing cross-tenant applications with cloud containers. In SoCC’16. ACM, 223--236. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2987550.2987558Google Scholar
- Rui Zhang, Rui Xue, and Ling Liu. 2019. Security and privacy on blockchain. Comput. Surv. 52, 3 (2019). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3316481Google Scholar
- Wenting Zheng, Ankur Dave, Jethro G. Beekman, Raluca Ada Popa, Joseph E. Gonzalez, and Ion Stoica. 2017. Opaque: An oblivious and encrypted distributed analytics platform. In USENIX NSDI’17. 283--298.Google Scholar
- Zhi Zhou, Xu Chen, En Li, Liekang Zeng, Ke Luo, and Junshan Zhang. 2019. Edge intelligence: Paving the last mile of artificial intelligence with edge computing. Proc. IEEE 107, 8 (2019), 1738--1762. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2019.2918951Google ScholarCross Ref
- Qingyi Zhu, Seng W. Loke, Rolando Trujillo-Rasua, Frank Jiang, and Yong Xiang. 2019. Applications of distributed ledger technologies to the Internet of Things: A survey. Comput. Surv. 52, 6 (2019). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3359982Google Scholar
- M. Tarek Ibn Ziad, Amr Alanwar, Moustafa Alzantot, and Mani Srivastava. 2016. CryptoImg: Privacy preserving processing over encrypted images. In CNS’16. IEEE, 570--575. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/CNS.2016.7860550Google Scholar
- Philip R. Zimmermann. 1995. The Official PGP User’s Guide. Vol. 5. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Guy Zyskind, Oz Nathan, and Alex Pentland. 2015. Enigma: Decentralized Computation Platform with Guaranteed Privacy. arxiv:1506.03471Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Data Protection in AI Services: A Survey
Recommendations
Privacy-preserving AI Services Through Data Decentralization
WWW '20: Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020User services increasingly base their actions on AI models, e.g., to offer personalized and proactive support. However, the underlying AI algorithms require a continuous stream of personal data—leading to privacy issues, as users typically have to share ...
Online anonymity for personalized web services
CIKM '09: Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge managementTo receive personalized web services, the user has to provide personal information and preferences, in addition to the query itself, to the web service. However, detailed personal information could identify the sender of sensitive queries, thus ...
Robotics, intelligent systems, ethics and data protection: the new challenge
APPIS '19: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Applications of Intelligent SystemsThe contribution provides some possible key points in the relationship among robotics, intelligent systems, Artificial Intelligence, Ethics, data protection and privacy. It is relevant to understand that the starting point is the value of personal data ...
Comments