Abstract
There is a debate in the literature about the relationship between green innovation, environmental management, environmental performance, and the value of a firm. Herein, the effects of green innovation and environmental management on environmental performance are analysed using a stochastic frontier model for energy-intensive listed companies from 2011 to 2017; the effects thereof on the value of a firm are assessed empirically. The results show that green innovation and environmental management have a positive effect on corporate environmental performance, and green innovation plays a complete mediating role between environmental management and environmental performance. The significant positive effect of green innovation on value of a firm confirms Porter’s hypothesis, but the positive effect of environmental management on value of a firm is not verified. Finally, recommendations that are aimed at improving corporate environmental performance are given.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Abban AR, Hasan MZ (2020) The causality direction between environmental performance and financial performance in Australian mining companies - a panel data analysis. Res Policy:101894
Abu Seman NA, Govindan K, Mardani A, Zakuan N, Mat Saman MZ, Hooker RE, Ozkul S (2019) The mediating effect of green innovation on the relationship between green supply chain management and environmental performance. J Clean Prod 229:115–127
Amores-Salvadó J, de Castro GM, Navas-López JE (2014) Green corporate image: moderating the connection between environmental product innovation and firm performance. J Clean Prod 83:356–365
Amores-Salvadó J, Martin-de Castro G, Navas-López JE (2015) The importance of the complementarity between environmental management systems and environmental innovation capabilities: a firm level approach to environmental and business performance benefits. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 96:288–297
Aigbedo H (2020) An empirical analysis of the effect of financial performance on environmental performance of companies in global supply chains. J Clean Prod
Aravind D, Christmann P (2011) Decoupling of standard implementation from certication:does quality of ISO 14001 implementation affect facilities’ environmental performance? Bus Ethics Q 21:73–102
Barbieri N, Ghisetti C, Gilli M, Marin G, Nicolli F (2016) A survey of the literature on environmental innovation based on main path analysis. J Econ Surv 30:596–623
Battese GE, Coelli TJ (1995) A model for technical in efficiency effects in astochastic production frontier for panel data. Empir Econ 20:325–332
Boiral O, Henri JF (2012) Modelling the impact of ISO 14001 on environmental performance: a comparative approach. J Environ Manag 99:84–97
Cai W, Li G (2018) The drivers of eco-innovation and its impact on performance: evidence from China. J Clean Prod 176:110–118
Cai X, Zhu B, Zhang H, Li L, Xie M (2020) Can direct environmental regulation promote green technology innovation in heavily polluting industries? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Sci Total Environ 746:140810
Chen F, Zhao T, Liao Z (2020) The impact of technology-environmental innovation on CO2 emissions in China’s transportation sector. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 27:29485–29501
Cheng CCJ, Yang C-l, Sheu C (2014) The link between eco-innovation and business performance: a Taiwanese industry context. J Clean Prod 64:81–90
China Securities Regulatory Commission (2012) Guidelines for industry classification of listed companies, 2012. http://www.csrc.gov.cn/pub/zjhpublic/G00306201/201211/t20121116_216990.htm
Du M, Wang B, Zhang N (2018) National research funding and energy efficiency: evidence from the National Science Foundation of China. Energy Policy 120:335–346
Du K, Li J (2019) Towards a green world: how do green technology innovations affect total-factor carbon productivity. Energy Policy 131:240–250
Ghisetti C, Quatraro F (2017) Green technologies and environmental productivity: a cross-sectoral analysis of direct and indirect effects in Italian regions. Ecol Econ 132:1–13
Hall BH, Harhoff D (2012) Recent research on the economics of patents. Ann Rev Econ 4:541–565
Hu Q (2012) Research on relationship between environmental performance and financial performance of chinese listed companies. China Popul Resources Environ 22:23–32
de Sousa Jabbour ABL, Jabbour CJC, Latan H, Teixeira AA, de Oliveira JHC (2015) Reprint of “Quality management, environmental management maturity, green supply chain practices and green performance of Brazilian companies with ISO 14001 certification: Direct and indirect effects”. Transp Res Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 74:139–151
Johnstone L, Hallberg P (2020) ISO 14001 adoption and environmental performance in small to medium sized enterprises. J Environ Manag 266:13
Kawai N, Strange R, Zucchella A (2018) Stakeholder pressures, EMS implementation, and green innovation in MNC overseas subsidiaries. Int Bus Rev 27:933–946
Kraus S, Rehman SU, García FJS (2020) Corporate social responsibility and environmental performance: the mediating role of environmental strategy and green innovation. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 160:120262
Li W, Zheng M (2016) Is it substantive innovation or strategic innovation? - Impact of macroeconomic policies on micro-enterprises’ innovation. Econ Res J 51:60–73
Lin B, Wang X (2014) Exploring energy efficiency in China’s iron and steel industry: a stochastic frontier approach. Energy Policy 72:87–96
Lin BQ, Long HY (2015) A stochastic frontier analysis of energy efficiency of China’s chemical industry. J Clean Prod 87:235–244
Lin BQ, Du KR (2013) The energy effect of factor market distortion in China. Econ Res J 48:125–136
Lee K-H, Min B (2015) Green R&D for eco-innovation and its impact on carbon emissions and firm performance. J Clean Prod 108:534–542
Lundgren T, Zhou W (2017) Firm performance and the role of environmental management. J Environ Manag 203:330–341
Meirun T, Mihardjo LW, Haseeb M, Khan SAR, Jermsittiparsert K (2020) The dynamics effect of green technology innovation on economic growth and CO2 emission in Singapore: new evidence from bootstrap ARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int
Morrowa D, Rondinellib D (2002) Adopting corporate environmental management systems: motivations and results of ISO 14001 and EMAS certification. Eur Manag J 20:159–171
Mungai EM, Ndiritu SW, Rajwani T (2020) Do voluntary environmental management systems improve environmental performance? Evidence from waste management by Kenyan firms. J Clean Prod 265
Nishitani K, Kaneko S, Fujii H, Komatsu S (2012) Are firms’ voluntary environmental management activities beneficial for the environment and business? An empirical study focusing on Japanese manufacturing firms. J Environ Manag 105:121–130
Ouyang X, Li Q, Du K (2020) How does environmental regulation promote technological innovations in the industrial sector? Evidence from Chinese provincial panel data. Energy Policy 139:111310
Ouyang XL, Mao XY, Sun CW, Du KR (2019) Industrial energy efficiency and driving forces behind efficiency improvement: evidence from the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration in China. J Clean Prod 220:899–909
Phan TN, Baird K (2015) The comprehensiveness of environmental management systems: the influence of institutional pressures and the impact on environmental performance. J Environ Manag 160:45–56
Pinkse J, Kolk A (2010) Challenges and trade-offs in corporate innovation for climate change. Bus Strateg Environ 19:261–272
Porter ME, Linde C (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 9:97–118
Potoski M, Prakash A (2005) Covenants with weak swords: ISO 14001 and facilities' environmental performance. J Policy Anal Manag 24:745–769
Raza Z (2020) Effects of regulation-driven green innovations on short sea shipping's environmental and economic performance. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 84:102340
Rondinellia D, Vastagb G (2000) Panacea, common sense, or just a label?: The value of ISO 14001 environmental management systems. Eur Manag J 18:499–510
Shen HT, Zhou YK (2017) Supervision of environmental policy enforcement and firm environmental performance: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. Nankai BusRev 20(06):73–82
Singh M, Brueckner M, Padhy PK (2015) Environmental management system ISO 14001: effective waste minimisation in small and medium enterprises in India. J Clean Prod 102:285–301
Singh SK, Giudice MD, Chierici R, Graziano D (2020) Green innovation and environmental performance: the role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 150:119762
Song H, Zhao C, Zeng J (2017) Can environmental management improve financial performance: an empirical study of A-shares listed companies in China. J Clean Prod 141:1051–1056
van den Bergh JCJM, Truffer B, Kallis G (2011) Environmental innovation and societal transitions: introduction and overview. Environ Innov Soc Trans 1:1–23
Wang Bb, Qi Sz (2016) The effect of market-oriented and command-and-control policy tools on emissions reduction innovation—an empirical analysis based on China’s industrial patents data. China Ind Econ 6:91–108
Wang H, Ang BW, Wang QW, Zhou P (2017) Measuring energy performance with sectoral heterogeneity: a non-parametric frontier approach. Energy Econ 62:70–78
Wang J, Wang L, Qian X (2021) Revisiting firm innovation and environmental performance: new evidence from Japanese firm-level data. J Clean Prod 281:124446
You D, Zhang Y, Yuan B (2019) Environmental regulation and firm eco-innovation: evidence of moderating effects of fiscal decentralization and political competition from listed Chinese industrial companies. J Clean Prod 207:1072–1083
Zhang D, Rong Z, Ji Q (2019a) Green innovation and firm performance: evidence from listed companies in China. Resour Conserv Recycl 144:48–55
Zhou P, Ang BW, Zhou DQ (2012) Measuring economy-wide energy efficiency performance: a parametric frontier approach. Appl Energy 90:196–200
Zhang C, Zhaoguo Z, Bao L (2020) A study on the interactive and intertemporal influence and mechanism of corporate environmental responsibility and financial performance. Manag Rev 32:76–89
Zhang K, Jiang W, Zhang S, Xu Y, Liu W (2019b) The impact of differentiated technological innovation efficiencies of industrial enterprises on the local emissions of environmental pollutants in Anhui province, China, from 2012 to 2016. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 26:27953–27970
Funding
The following are acknowledged for financial support. (1) Major Program of National Fund of Philosophy and Social Science of China (CN). (2) Shanxi philosophy and Social Sciences Planning Project in 2019. (3) Shanxi philosophy and Social Sciences Planning Project in 2019. The role of the funding body is data collection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Xing Yan: conceptualization, software, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing (original draft preparation), writing (review and editing). Yi Zhang: supervision, project administration.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yan, X., Zhang, Y. The effects of green innovation and environmental management on the environmental performance and value of a firm: an empirical study of energy-intensive listed companies in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 35870–35879 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12761-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12761-9