Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effects of green innovation and environmental management on the environmental performance and value of a firm: an empirical study of energy-intensive listed companies in China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a debate in the literature about the relationship between green innovation, environmental management, environmental performance, and the value of a firm. Herein, the effects of green innovation and environmental management on environmental performance are analysed using a stochastic frontier model for energy-intensive listed companies from 2011 to 2017; the effects thereof on the value of a firm are assessed empirically. The results show that green innovation and environmental management have a positive effect on corporate environmental performance, and green innovation plays a complete mediating role between environmental management and environmental performance. The significant positive effect of green innovation on value of a firm confirms Porter’s hypothesis, but the positive effect of environmental management on value of a firm is not verified. Finally, recommendations that are aimed at improving corporate environmental performance are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Abban AR, Hasan MZ (2020) The causality direction between environmental performance and financial performance in Australian mining companies - a panel data analysis. Res Policy:101894

  • Abu Seman NA, Govindan K, Mardani A, Zakuan N, Mat Saman MZ, Hooker RE, Ozkul S (2019) The mediating effect of green innovation on the relationship between green supply chain management and environmental performance. J Clean Prod 229:115–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amores-Salvadó J, de Castro GM, Navas-López JE (2014) Green corporate image: moderating the connection between environmental product innovation and firm performance. J Clean Prod 83:356–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amores-Salvadó J, Martin-de Castro G, Navas-López JE (2015) The importance of the complementarity between environmental management systems and environmental innovation capabilities: a firm level approach to environmental and business performance benefits. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 96:288–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aigbedo H (2020) An empirical analysis of the effect of financial performance on environmental performance of companies in global supply chains. J Clean Prod

  • Aravind D, Christmann P (2011) Decoupling of standard implementation from certication:does quality of ISO 14001 implementation affect facilities’ environmental performance? Bus Ethics Q 21:73–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri N, Ghisetti C, Gilli M, Marin G, Nicolli F (2016) A survey of the literature on environmental innovation based on main path analysis. J Econ Surv 30:596–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battese GE, Coelli TJ (1995) A model for technical in efficiency effects in astochastic production frontier for panel data. Empir Econ 20:325–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boiral O, Henri JF (2012) Modelling the impact of ISO 14001 on environmental performance: a comparative approach. J Environ Manag 99:84–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai W, Li G (2018) The drivers of eco-innovation and its impact on performance: evidence from China. J Clean Prod 176:110–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai X, Zhu B, Zhang H, Li L, Xie M (2020) Can direct environmental regulation promote green technology innovation in heavily polluting industries? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Sci Total Environ 746:140810

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen F, Zhao T, Liao Z (2020) The impact of technology-environmental innovation on CO2 emissions in China’s transportation sector. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 27:29485–29501

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng CCJ, Yang C-l, Sheu C (2014) The link between eco-innovation and business performance: a Taiwanese industry context. J Clean Prod 64:81–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • China Securities Regulatory Commission (2012) Guidelines for industry classification of listed companies, 2012. http://www.csrc.gov.cn/pub/zjhpublic/G00306201/201211/t20121116_216990.htm

  • Du M, Wang B, Zhang N (2018) National research funding and energy efficiency: evidence from the National Science Foundation of China. Energy Policy 120:335–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du K, Li J (2019) Towards a green world: how do green technology innovations affect total-factor carbon productivity. Energy Policy 131:240–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghisetti C, Quatraro F (2017) Green technologies and environmental productivity: a cross-sectoral analysis of direct and indirect effects in Italian regions. Ecol Econ 132:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall BH, Harhoff D (2012) Recent research on the economics of patents. Ann Rev Econ 4:541–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Q (2012) Research on relationship between environmental performance and financial performance of chinese listed companies. China Popul Resources Environ 22:23–32

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Sousa Jabbour ABL, Jabbour CJC, Latan H, Teixeira AA, de Oliveira JHC (2015) Reprint of “Quality management, environmental management maturity, green supply chain practices and green performance of Brazilian companies with ISO 14001 certification: Direct and indirect effects”. Transp Res Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 74:139–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone L, Hallberg P (2020) ISO 14001 adoption and environmental performance in small to medium sized enterprises. J Environ Manag 266:13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawai N, Strange R, Zucchella A (2018) Stakeholder pressures, EMS implementation, and green innovation in MNC overseas subsidiaries. Int Bus Rev 27:933–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus S, Rehman SU, García FJS (2020) Corporate social responsibility and environmental performance: the mediating role of environmental strategy and green innovation. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 160:120262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Zheng M (2016) Is it substantive innovation or strategic innovation? - Impact of macroeconomic policies on micro-enterprises’ innovation. Econ Res J 51:60–73

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin B, Wang X (2014) Exploring energy efficiency in China’s iron and steel industry: a stochastic frontier approach. Energy Policy 72:87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin BQ, Long HY (2015) A stochastic frontier analysis of energy efficiency of China’s chemical industry. J Clean Prod 87:235–244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin BQ, Du KR (2013) The energy effect of factor market distortion in China. Econ Res J 48:125–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee K-H, Min B (2015) Green R&D for eco-innovation and its impact on carbon emissions and firm performance. J Clean Prod 108:534–542

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lundgren T, Zhou W (2017) Firm performance and the role of environmental management. J Environ Manag 203:330–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meirun T, Mihardjo LW, Haseeb M, Khan SAR, Jermsittiparsert K (2020) The dynamics effect of green technology innovation on economic growth and CO2 emission in Singapore: new evidence from bootstrap ARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int

  • Morrowa D, Rondinellib D (2002) Adopting corporate environmental management systems: motivations and results of ISO 14001 and EMAS certification. Eur Manag J 20:159–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mungai EM, Ndiritu SW, Rajwani T (2020) Do voluntary environmental management systems improve environmental performance? Evidence from waste management by Kenyan firms. J Clean Prod 265

  • Nishitani K, Kaneko S, Fujii H, Komatsu S (2012) Are firms’ voluntary environmental management activities beneficial for the environment and business? An empirical study focusing on Japanese manufacturing firms. J Environ Manag 105:121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang X, Li Q, Du K (2020) How does environmental regulation promote technological innovations in the industrial sector? Evidence from Chinese provincial panel data. Energy Policy 139:111310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang XL, Mao XY, Sun CW, Du KR (2019) Industrial energy efficiency and driving forces behind efficiency improvement: evidence from the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration in China. J Clean Prod 220:899–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phan TN, Baird K (2015) The comprehensiveness of environmental management systems: the influence of institutional pressures and the impact on environmental performance. J Environ Manag 160:45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkse J, Kolk A (2010) Challenges and trade-offs in corporate innovation for climate change. Bus Strateg Environ 19:261–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, Linde C (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 9:97–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potoski M, Prakash A (2005) Covenants with weak swords: ISO 14001 and facilities' environmental performance. J Policy Anal Manag 24:745–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raza Z (2020) Effects of regulation-driven green innovations on short sea shipping's environmental and economic performance. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 84:102340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rondinellia D, Vastagb G (2000) Panacea, common sense, or just a label?: The value of ISO 14001 environmental management systems. Eur Manag J 18:499–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen HT, Zhou YK (2017) Supervision of environmental policy enforcement and firm environmental performance: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. Nankai BusRev 20(06):73–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh M, Brueckner M, Padhy PK (2015) Environmental management system ISO 14001: effective waste minimisation in small and medium enterprises in India. J Clean Prod 102:285–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh SK, Giudice MD, Chierici R, Graziano D (2020) Green innovation and environmental performance: the role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 150:119762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song H, Zhao C, Zeng J (2017) Can environmental management improve financial performance: an empirical study of A-shares listed companies in China. J Clean Prod 141:1051–1056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Bergh JCJM, Truffer B, Kallis G (2011) Environmental innovation and societal transitions: introduction and overview. Environ Innov Soc Trans 1:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Bb, Qi Sz (2016) The effect of market-oriented and command-and-control policy tools on emissions reduction innovation—an empirical analysis based on China’s industrial patents data. China Ind Econ 6:91–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Ang BW, Wang QW, Zhou P (2017) Measuring energy performance with sectoral heterogeneity: a non-parametric frontier approach. Energy Econ 62:70–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Wang L, Qian X (2021) Revisiting firm innovation and environmental performance: new evidence from Japanese firm-level data. J Clean Prod 281:124446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You D, Zhang Y, Yuan B (2019) Environmental regulation and firm eco-innovation: evidence of moderating effects of fiscal decentralization and political competition from listed Chinese industrial companies. J Clean Prod 207:1072–1083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang D, Rong Z, Ji Q (2019a) Green innovation and firm performance: evidence from listed companies in China. Resour Conserv Recycl 144:48–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou P, Ang BW, Zhou DQ (2012) Measuring economy-wide energy efficiency performance: a parametric frontier approach. Appl Energy 90:196–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Zhaoguo Z, Bao L (2020) A study on the interactive and intertemporal influence and mechanism of corporate environmental responsibility and financial performance. Manag Rev 32:76–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang K, Jiang W, Zhang S, Xu Y, Liu W (2019b) The impact of differentiated technological innovation efficiencies of industrial enterprises on the local emissions of environmental pollutants in Anhui province, China, from 2012 to 2016. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 26:27953–27970

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The following are acknowledged for financial support. (1) Major Program of National Fund of Philosophy and Social Science of China (CN). (2) Shanxi philosophy and Social Sciences Planning Project in 2019. (3) Shanxi philosophy and Social Sciences Planning Project in 2019. The role of the funding body is data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Xing Yan: conceptualization, software, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing (original draft preparation), writing (review and editing). Yi Zhang: supervision, project administration.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, X., Zhang, Y. The effects of green innovation and environmental management on the environmental performance and value of a firm: an empirical study of energy-intensive listed companies in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 35870–35879 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12761-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12761-9

Keywords

Navigation