From disturbance to measurement: Application of Coriolis meter for two-phase flow with gas bubbles
Introduction
In recent decades, Coriolis Mass Flowmeters (CMFs) have been widely used in industry for mass flow and density measurements. The measuring technique has reached a high degree of acceptance and new fields of applications emerge every year. Together with this high acceptance, CMFs are utilized as a multivariable sensor with not only mass flow and density, but also temperature and viscosity measurements [1]. There is a trend to use those additional measured parameters, for example density and viscosity, for monitoring product quality.
Fig. 1 shows a typical CMF, which consists of two parallel measuring tubes, a housing that protects the inner part as well as other components adhering to the measuring tube such as a driver for exciting the tube and sensors for sensing the tube motion. The measuring tube, which in commercial designs can be of various shapes, is the core element of a CMF. In order to be energy efficient, the tube is continuously excited at its natural frequency. This measured natural frequency is a function of the medium density in the tube, therefore, forms the basis of the density measurement. The induced tube vibration generates an angular velocity. Together with the mass flow of a medium inside the tube, Coriolis forces are generated, which causes an anti-symmetrically distortion of the tube. The magnitude of this distortion sensed by the sensors is directly proportional to the mass flow rate and forms the basis of the mass flow measurement.
Similar to many other measuring principles, it is known that accuracy of a CMF can be affected by the existence of entrained gas in a liquid flow. A number of research activities have been carried out in the past to understand the error mechanisms of Coriolis metering under two-phase conditions, which is summarized in some PhD theses, such as in Ref. [2] and in Ref. [3], as well as in some review papers, such as in Ref. [4] and in Ref. [5]. In many industrial applications dealing with liquids, where gas is not intended to be put in and consequently the gas void fraction (GVF) in a CMF is relatively low, the gas phase is usually conveyed in the form of bubbles. Therefore, bubbly flows have been causing one of the biggest challenges for Coriolis metering. In the opinion of Reizner [6], approximately 90–95% of non-hardware CMF problems were due to entrained air issues. Early in the 1980s, various experiments and research activities were already attempted to elucidate the influence of bubbles on CMF. Grumski et al. and Cascetta et al. tested different CMFs with different two-phase flows, analysed these phenomena based on the results of the experiments and gave suggestions for improving the reliability of the meters [7,8]. Hemp and Sultan theoretically addressed this problem related to bubbly flow and proposed the bubble theory to explain the observed errors [9,10]. Since then, more and more CMF manufacturers have become involved in this issue by enterprise R&D or cooperation with other research institutes. Bubble effect was studied intensively in Ref. [3] and renamed as decoupling effect. A digital transmitter with the capability of handling entrained gas flow was proposed by Henry et al. [11], and a method of correcting mass flow errors caused by two-phase flow was developed with the help of neural network [12] based on this digital transmitter. In addition to the bubble effect, another effect, which is named as resonator effect with a significant impact on Coriolis metering, was first disclosed and analysed analytically and numerically in two conference papers [13,14] during the PhD study of [2]. Based on this finding, the resonator effect was further developed theoretically by Hemp et al. [15] and renamed as compressibility effect. However, compressibility is only one of the two major factors that dominate the corresponding effect for Coriolis metering. The other important factor is mass. That is the reason why a single-phase gas does not cause a similar order of effect as a two-phase gas-liquid fluid does, although its compressibility is higher than the latter. Therefore, in this paper, the name resonator effect is still preferred, since the frequency of a resonator consists of the contribution from both compressibility and mass. In order to compensate the resonator effect, a two-mode compensation scheme was proposed in Ref. [2], which formed the basis for Multi-Frequency Technology (MFT) developed later [16].
Very often, bubbles bring a negative effect rather than a benefit to the process industries: they cause additional pressure losses; they can damage the pumps, propellers and impellers when cavitation takes place; more importantly, they cause increased uncertainties to process measurements employing different measuring technologies. However, it has been found that in many industrial applications, especially in Food industry and Life Science, gas is injected into liquid products intentionally, for example for the sake of product flavour such as in cream cheese, or as a special feature such as in shampoo.
According to the effects on Coriolis metering, gas bubbles in liquid flows are classified as “free bubble” and “suspended bubble” that lead to “bubble effect” and “resonator effect”, respectively. The primary goal of the investigation is to reduce or eliminate the negative impacts of the above two effects on the measurement. As the best practice, the bubble effect due to the existence of free bubbles should be suppressed by eliminating the free bubbles with the help of the process optimization, e.g. using gas eliminator or holding tank, since free bubbles are much easier to separate, compared with suspended bubbles. Typically, free bubbles cannot be maintained as a product feature, as they will escape soon from the product anyway after they are put in. The resonator effect, which is caused by suspended bubbles that are difficult to separate from liquid, can be compensated by MFT. The theoretical background of the two effects and MFT is given in the next section of this paper.
The second goal of the investigation is that for applications, where free bubbles and suspended bubble can both exist, or at least one of them can, it is important to detect the existence of entrained gas and identify the type of entrained bubbles that has relevance to the measurement reliability. Furthermore, very often entrained gas bubbles affect product quality in an adverse way, for example in chemical industry when a glue is produced. However, sometimes homogeneous suspended micro-bubbles are wanted as a product feature, for example in food industry when cream cheese is produced, as previously mentioned. Exactly for this product, big free bubbles are unwanted and regarded as being disadvantageous for product quality. In the meanwhile, the existence of big “free bubbles” also indicates a less optimal manufacturing process, in which the injected gas is not well mixed into the cream cheese for generating homogeneous micro-bubbles. Therefore, the detection of gas bubbles and the identification of the bubble types are crucial for product quality control and optimization of production process.
Section snippets
Free bubble and bubble effect
The definition of free bubble is based on the “bubble effect” theory developed by Hemp et al. [9]. According to the theory, a free bubble in the measuring tube of a CMF does not strictly follow the oscillation of the surrounding liquid with the same amplitude because the liquid cannot “hold” the bubble well. The amplitude of the bubble vibration is greater than that of the tube vibration. Based on the viscous bubble effect theory by Hemp [17], a characteristic number that defines the “degree of
Identification of gas bubbles
It has been analysed in the previous section that free bubbles and suspended bubbles have various impact on the meter measurement performance. It is therefore crucial to identify the bubble pattern in the measuring tube of a CMF to make a diagnosis and reduce the negative influence of the disturbance accordingly.
Application of the two indicators
In this section, measurement data taken from an industrial application are shown to validate the two indicators derived for the detection of the two types of bubbles, namely free bubble and suspended bubble. The product under test, which tends to capture large amount of suspended micro bubbles during the manufacturing process due to the its viscosity, is batched from a large vessel to a series of smaller barrels through a CMF, as shown in Fig. 7. In addition to suspended bubbles, free bubbles
Conclusion
Free bubbles and suspended bubbles have different influence on Coriolis metering and also can induce different measurement errors with bubble effect and resonator effect, respectively. The best practice suggests that free bubbles should be eliminated from the process to ensure a good Coriolis measurement accuracy, as they are much easier to separate from liquid phase compared with suspended bubbles. The measurement errors introduced by suspended bubbles can be compensated by MFT. In the
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References (19)
- et al.
Coriolis mass flowmeters: overview of the current state of the art and latest research
Flow Meas. Instrum.
(2006) - et al.
A Coriolis mass flowmeter based on a new type of elastic suspension
Measurement
(1989) - et al.
“A neural network to correct mass flow errors caused by two-phase flow in a digital Coriolis mass flowmeter”
Flow Meas. Instrum.
(2001) - et al.
Theory of errors in Coriolis flowmeter readings due to compressibility of the fluid being metered
Flow Meas. Instrum.
(2006) - et al.
Coriolis mass flow meter with direct viscosity measurement
Flomeko
(2003) Application of Coriolis Mass Flowmeters in Bubbly and Particulate Two-phase Flows
(2009)The Motion of Bubbles and Particles in Oscillating Liquids with Applications to Multiphase Flow in Coriolis Meters
(2008)Basse, “A review of the theory of Coriolis flowmeter measurement errors due to entrained particles”
Flow Meas. Instrum.
(2014)Coriolis - the almost perfect flow meter
In IEE One Day Seminar on Advanced Coriolis Mass Flow Metering
(July 2003)
Cited by (4)
Laboratory and field validation of a new Coriolis metering concept for better measurement uncertainty, reliability and process insight
2023, Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement ConfederationLaboratory and Field Validation of a New Coriolis Metering Concept for Better Measurement Uncertainty, Reliability and Process Insight
2022, 19th International Flow Measurement Conference 2022, FLOMEKO 2022Assessment of Coriolis meters as instrumentation for gas void fraction measurement in air-liquid multiphase flow in a pipeline riser system
2022, 2022 IEEE 2nd International Maghreb Meeting of the Conference on Sciences and Techniques of Automatic Control and Computer Engineering, MI-STA 2022 - Proceeding