Skip to main content
Log in

Capturing regulatory patterns in online collaborative learning: A network analytic approach

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interest in understanding regulation in the context of collaborative learning has increased in the past decade. Existing studies have investigated how regulated learning evolves in collaborative learning by focusing on external behaviors, and how different types and strategies of regulation are effective in promoting collaborative learning. Due to the cyclical and dynamic characteristics of regulation, there is a need for new methods that can trace the dynamic emergence of regulatory processes in diver collaborative learning contexts, so as to provide some insight into effective learning design. In the context of 45 student teachers participating in multi-layered online collaborative activities, this study investigated their regulatory patterns during various stages of online collaborative learning activities over an eight-week semester via content analysis and epistemic network analysis (ENA). Quantitative analyses indicated that student teachers demonstrated active social aspects of regulation and had many regulatory behaviors in content monitoring in the designed online collaborative learning activities. Through identifying and comparing the regulatory patterns of the high-performing group and the low-performing group across the stages of learning activities, the results showed that the group demonstrating ample regulatory patterns in “content monitoring”, “evaluating”, and “social emotional regulatory behavior” performed better on the collective score of group product. Furthermore, the analysis elucidated how groups regulated their collaboration variously in different stages of online learning activities. Suggestions about regulated learning at both cognitive and social emotional aspects are provided to teachers and learning designers for designing and implementing online collaborative learning activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Borge, M., Ong, Y. S., & Rosé, C. P. (2018). Learning to monitor and regulate collective thinking processes. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13, 61–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capdeferro, N., & Romero, M. (2012). Are on-line learners frustrated with collaborative learning experiences? The International Review of Research in Open Distance Learning, 13(2), 26–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, J. W. W., & Pow, J. W. C. (2020). The role of social annotation in facilitating collaborative inquiry-based learning. Computers & Education, 147, 103787.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, H. (2016). Under co-construction: An online community of practice for bilingual pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 92–93, 76–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Do, S. L., & Schallert, D. L. (2004). Emotions and classroom talk: Toward a model of the role of affect in students’ experiences of classroom discussions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 619–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eshuis, E. H., ter Vrugte, J., Anjewierden, A., Bollen, L., Sikken, J., & de Jong, T. (2019). Improving the quality of vocational students’ collaboration and knowledge acquisition through instruction and joint reflection. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14, 53–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gašević, D., Joksimović, S., Eagan, B. R., & Shaffer, D. W. (2019). SENS: Network analytics to combine social and cognitive perspectives of collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 562–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grau, V., & Whitebread, D. (2012). Self and social regulation of learning during collaborative activities in the classroom: The interplay of individual and group cognition. Learning and Instruction, 22(6), 401–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadwin, A., & Oshige, M. (2011). Self-regulation, coregulation, and socially shared regulation: Exploring perspectives of social in self-regulated learning theory. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 240–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadwin, A. F., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2011). Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 65–86). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hod, Y., & Katz, S. (2020). Fostering highly engaged knowledge building communities in socioemotional and sociocognitive hybrid learning spaces. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1117–1135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hod, Y., Katz, S., & Eagan, B. (2020). Refining qualitative ethnographies using epistemic network analysis: A study of socioemotional learning dimensions in a humanistic knowledge building community. Computers & Education, 156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.1039432020.103943.

  • Hou, H. T. (2015). Integrating cluster and sequential analysis to explore learners’ flow and behavioral patterns in a simulation game with situated-learning context for science courses: A video-based process exploration. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 424–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isohätälä, J., Järvenoja, H., & Järvelä, S. (2017). Socially shared regulation of learning and participation in social interaction in collaborative learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 81, 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isohätälä, J., Näykki, P., & Järvelä, S. (2020). Cognitive and socio-emotional interaction in collaborative learning: Exploring fluctuations in students’ participation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(6), 831–851.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, J., & Bodemer, D. (2013). Coordinated computer-supported collaborative learning: Awareness and awareness tools. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 40–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). New Frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., & Malmberg, J. (2019). Capturing the dynamic and cyclical nature of regulation: Methodological progress in understanding socially shared regulation in learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14, 425–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., & Hadwin, A. (2013). Exploring socially shared regulation. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12(3), 186–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P. A., Hadwin, A., Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., Miller, M., & Laru, J. (2016). Socially shared regulation of learning in CSCL: understanding and prompting individual- and group-level shared regulatory activities. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11, 263–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., Isohätälä, J., & Sobocinski, M. (2016). How do types of interaction and phases of self-regulated learning set a stage for collaborative engagement? Learning and Instruction, 43, 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, D., & Zhang, L. J. (2020). Collaborating with ‘familiar’ strangers in mobile-assisted environments: The effect of socializing activities on learning EFL writing. Computers & Education, 150, 103841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, K., Liu, Y.-H., & Johnson, L. P. (2014). Group regulation and social-emotional interactions observed in computer supported collaborative learning: Comparison between good vs. poor collaborators. Computers & Education, 78, 185–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A., O’Donnell, A. M., & Rogat, T. K. (2015). Exploration of the cognitive regulatory sub-processes employed by groups characterized by socially shared and other-regulation in a CSCL context. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 617–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodewyk, K. R., Winne, P. H., & Jamieson-Noel, D. L. (2009). Implications of task structure on self-regulated learning and achievement. Educational Psychology, 29(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmberg, J., Järvelä, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2017). Capturing temporal and sequential patterns of self-, co-, and socially shared regulation in the context of collaborative learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 160–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmberg, J., Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., & Panadero, E. (2015). Promoting socially shared regulation of learning in CSCL: Progress of socially shared regulation among high- and low- performing groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 562–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmberg, J., Järvenoja, H., & Järvelä, S. (2013). Patterns in elementary school students’ strategic actions in varying learning situations. Instructional Science, 41, 933–954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M., & Hadwin, A. (2015). Scripting and awareness tools for regulating collaborative learning: Changing the landscape of support in CSCL. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 573–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, D., Deiglmayr, A., & Spada, H. (2013). Motivation and emotion shaping knowledge co-construction. In M. J. Baker, J. Andriessen, & S. Järvelä (Eds.), Affective learning together: Social and emotional dimensions of collaborative learning (pp. 139–161). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Näykki, P., Isohätälä, J., Järvelä, S., Pöysä-Tarhonen, J., & Häkkinen, P. (2017). Facilitating socio-cognitive and socio-emotional monitoring in collaborative learning with a regulation macro script – an exploratory study. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12, 251–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Näykki, P., Järvenoja, H., Järvelä, S., & Kirschner, P. (2017). Monitoring makes a difference: Quality and temporal variation in teacher education students’ collaborative learning. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(1), 31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, E. M. W. (2016). Fostering pre-service teachers’ self-regulated learning through self- and peer assessment of wiki projects. Computers & Education, 98, 180–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noroozi, O., Alikhani, I., Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P. A., Juuso, I., & Seppänen, T. (2019). Multimodal data to design visual learning analytics for understanding regulation of learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 100, 298–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., Weinberger, A., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2013). Scripting for construction of a transactive memory system in multidisciplinary CSCL environments. Learning and Instruction, 25, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raes, A., Schellens, T., Wever, B. D., & Benoit, D. F. (2016). Promoting metacognitive regulation through collaborative problem solving on the web: When Scripting does not work. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 325–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogat, T. K., & Adams-Wiggins, K. R. (2015). Interrelation between regulatory and socioemotional processes within collaborative groups characterized by facilitative and directive other-regulation. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 589–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolando, L. G. R., Salvador, D. F., Souza, A. H. S., & Luz, M. R. M. P. (2014). Learning with their peers: Using a virtual community to improve an in-service Biology teacher education program in Brazil. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44, 44–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Røkenes, F. M., & Krumsvik, R. J. (2016). Prepared to teach ESL with ICT? A study of digital competence in Norwegian teacher education. Computers & Education, 97, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnaubert, L., & Bodemer, D. (2019). Providing different types of group awareness information to guide collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14, 7–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (1990). Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 25, 71–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, D. W. (2017). Quantitative ethnography. Madison: Cathcart Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, D. W., Collier, W., & Ruis, A. R. (2016). A tutorial on epistemic network analysis: Analyzing the structure of connections in cognitive, social, and interaction data. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(3), 9–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebert-Evenstone, A., Arastoopour Irgens, G., Collier, W., Swiecki, Z., Ruis, A. R., & Williamson Shaffer, D. (2017). In Search of Conversational Grain Size: Modelling Semantic Structure Using Moving Stanza Windows. Journal of Learning Analytics, 4(3), 123–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • So, H. J., & Tan, E. (2014). Designing the situation for pervasive knowledge building: Future school experiences. In S. C. Tan, H. J. So, & J. Yeo (Eds.), Knowledge Creation in Education (pp. 123–142). Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Splichal, J. M., Oshima, J., & Oshima, R. (2018). Regulation of collaborative in project-based learning mediated by CSCL scripting reflection. Computers & Education, 125, 132–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, Y., Li, Y., Hu, H., & Rosé, C. P. (2018). Exploring college English language learners’ self and social regulation of learning during wiki-supported collaborative reading activities. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13, 13–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swiecki, Z., Ruis, A. R., Farrell, C., & Shaffer, D. W. (2020). Assessing individual contributions to collaborative problem solving: A network analysis approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 105876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ucan, S., & Webb, M. (2015). Social regulation of learning during collaborative inquiry learning in science: How does it emerge and what are its functions? International Journal of Science Education, 37(15), 2503–2532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volet, S., & Vauras, M. (2013). Interpersonal regulation of learning and motivation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen, Y. (2019). Computer-supported collaborative Chinese second language learning: Beyond brainstorming. Singapore: Springer Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen, Y., Looi, C. K., & Chen, W., et al. (2011). Towards a model for rapid collaborative knowledge improvement in classroom language learning. In H. Spada (Ed.), International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 836–851). Hong Kong: International Society of the Learning Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen, Y., & Wu, J. (2017). A study on Singapore Chinese language teachers’ professional proficiency and training needs for sustainable development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 19(2), 69–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, J., Khalil, M., Baars, M., de Koning, B. B., & Paas, F. (2019). Exploring sequences of learner activities in relation to self-regulated learning in a massive open online course. Computers & Education, 140, 103595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J. (2015). University students’ motivated attention and use of regulation strategies on social media. Computers & Education, 89, 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y., Chen, Q., Yu, Y., Feng, X., & van Aalst, J. (2020). Collective reflective assessment for shared epistemic agency by undergraduates in knowledge building. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1136–1154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25, 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, L., Cui, P., & Zhang, X. (2020). Does collaborative learning design align with enactment? An innovative method of evaluating the alignment in the CSCL context. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 15, 193–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, X., Kim, H., Lai, W., & Hwang, G. (2020). Cognitive regulations in ICT-supported flipped classroom interactions: An activity theory perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 103–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, J., Xing, W., & Zhu, G. (2019). Examining sequential patterns of self- and socially shared regulation of STEM learning in a CSCL environment. Computers & Education, 136, 34–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S., Wen, Y., & Liu, Q. (2019). Exploring student teachers’ social knowledge construction behaviors and collective agency in an online collaborative learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1674880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, K., & Chan, C. K. K. (2014). Fostering collective and individual learning through knowledge building. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9, 63–95.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 62077016). This work was also conducted as part of a research project that was funded by the Hubei Research Center for Educational Informationization of China (Project No. HRCEI2020F0103).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yun Wen.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 13 Codes of regulation types
Table 14 Codes of regulation process
Table 15 Codes of regulation focus

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, S., Chen, J., Wen, Y. et al. Capturing regulatory patterns in online collaborative learning: A network analytic approach. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn 16, 37–66 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-021-09339-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-021-09339-5

Keywords

Navigation