Skip to main content
Log in

Laboratory Investigation on Performance of Soil–Cement Columns Under Axisymmetric Condition

  • Research paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The inclusion of soil–cement columns in soft soil is a ground improvement technique that is used to reduce the settlement and improve the bearing capacity of the soft soil ground. In the present study, model tests have been carried out on soft soil improved with groups of end-bearing and floating columns under the axisymmetric condition to evaluate the relative improvement in the stiffness and failure stress of the soft ground due to the installation of soil–cement columns. The effect of various group foundation parameters, such as area ratio, length and diameter of columns and binder content are investigated. The failure mode of end-bearing and floating columns after exhumation are presented. For the same area ratio, of the improved soil–cement columns to the present soft clay deposit, the usage of the smaller sized soil–cement columns rather than large size soil–cement columns is found to be relatively more beneficial in case of both end-bearing and floating columns. The stiffness and failure stress of the composite ground increase with an increase in the length of the columns. However, the increase in strength is only marginal for the increase in column length beyond 10 times the column diameter. In the case of end-bearing columns, area ratio has a significant effect on failure pattern. At an area ratio of 25%, the column failed by outward displacement and bending. On the other hand, at an area ratio of 32%, the columns failed due to bending at approximately one-half to two-third of the column length from the base of the footing. In the case of floating column, the relative strength of columns to the soil \(( {c_{\text{uc}}}/{c_{\text{us}}})\) appears to be the major governing factor. For the high value of \(( {c_{\text{uc}}}/{c_{\text{us}}})\) used in the present study, punching failure was observed with slight outward displacement and some horizontal cracks for area ratios of 25% and 32%. For validation, the failure stresses of model ground were compared with the results obtained using numerical analysis. The results show a good agreement between the bearing capacity value obtained from the experiment and the numerical software.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Ar :

Area ratio

BCF:

Bearing capacity factor

C:

Cement content

CL:

Clay of low plasticity

c uc :

Undrained shear strength of the column

c us :

Undrained shear strength of soil

DMM:

Deep mixing method

l/d:

Ratio of column length to diameter

q u :

Ultimate bearing capacity of the composite ground

w c :

Water content

\(\lambda\) :

Non-dimensional coefficient

δ/B :

Normalized settlement

References

  1. Ali K, Shahu JT, Sharma KG (2014) Model tests on single and groups of stone columns with different geosynthetic reinforcement arrangement. Geosynth Int 21(2):103–118. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.14.00002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bouassida M, Porbaha A (2004) Bearing capacity of foundations resting on soft ground improved by soil cement columns. In: Proceedings of Int. Conf. on Geotechnical Engineering (ICGE 2004) University of Sharjah, UAE, pp 173–180

  3. Coastal Development Institute of Technology (2002) The deep mixing method principle design and construction. A.A. Balkelma, Rotterdam

  4. Dehghanbanadaki A, Ahmad K, Ali N (2016) Experimental investigations on ultimate bearing capacity of peat stabilized by a group of soil-cement column: a comparative study. Acta Geotech 11(2):295–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-014-0328-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gatto MPA, Montrasio L (2020) Analysis of the behaviour of very slender piles: focus on the ultimate load. Int J Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-020-00547-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Larsson S (2003) Mixing processes for ground improvement by deep mixing, Dissertation. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

  7. Kitazume M, Okano K, Miyajima S (2000) Centrifuge model tests on failure envelope of column type deep mixing method improved ground. Soils Found 40:43–55. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.40.4-43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rashid ASA, Black JA, Mohamad H, Noor NM (2015) Behavior of weak soils reinforced with end- bearing soil–cement columns formed by the deep mixing method. Mar Georesour Geotec 33(6):473–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2014.954174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rashid AAS, Black JA, Kueh ABH, Noor NM (2015) Behaviour of weak soils improved with soil cement columns formed by the deep mixing method: rigid and flexible footings. Meas J Int Meas Confeder 68:262–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.02.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rashid ASA, Kueh ABH, Mohamad H (2017) Behaviour of soft soil improved by floating soil–cement columns. Int J Phys Model Geotech 18:95–116. https://doi.org/10.1680/jphmg.15.00041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rashid ASA, Bunawan A, Mat Said KN (2017) The deep mixing method: bearing capacity studies. Geotech Geol Eng 35:1271–1298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0196-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Reddy YR (2009) Soft soil reinforced with granular pile-mat system: analysis and model test. Dissertation Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New delhi

  13. Saeedi Azizkandi A, Rasouli H, Baziar MH (2019) Load sharing and carrying mechanism of piles in non-connected pile rafts using a numerical approach. Int J Civ Eng 17:793–808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-018-0356-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Terashi M, Tanaka H (1981) Ground improved by deep mixing method. In: Proceedings of the 10th ICSMFE, vol 2, pp 777–780

  15. Vesic AS (1963) Bearing capacity of deep foundations in sans, Vol. 39, National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Highway Research Record, Washington, DC, pp 112–153. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/hrr/1963/39/39-007.pdf

  16. Yin JH, Fang Z (2010) Physical modelling of a footing on soft soil ground with deep cement mixed soil columns under vertical loading. Mar Georesour Geotec 28(2):173–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641191003780872

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. T. Shahu.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohanty, M., Shahu, J.T. Laboratory Investigation on Performance of Soil–Cement Columns Under Axisymmetric Condition. Int J Civ Eng 19, 957–971 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-021-00612-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-021-00612-0

Keywords

Navigation