Abstract
The inclusion of soil–cement columns in soft soil is a ground improvement technique that is used to reduce the settlement and improve the bearing capacity of the soft soil ground. In the present study, model tests have been carried out on soft soil improved with groups of end-bearing and floating columns under the axisymmetric condition to evaluate the relative improvement in the stiffness and failure stress of the soft ground due to the installation of soil–cement columns. The effect of various group foundation parameters, such as area ratio, length and diameter of columns and binder content are investigated. The failure mode of end-bearing and floating columns after exhumation are presented. For the same area ratio, of the improved soil–cement columns to the present soft clay deposit, the usage of the smaller sized soil–cement columns rather than large size soil–cement columns is found to be relatively more beneficial in case of both end-bearing and floating columns. The stiffness and failure stress of the composite ground increase with an increase in the length of the columns. However, the increase in strength is only marginal for the increase in column length beyond 10 times the column diameter. In the case of end-bearing columns, area ratio has a significant effect on failure pattern. At an area ratio of 25%, the column failed by outward displacement and bending. On the other hand, at an area ratio of 32%, the columns failed due to bending at approximately one-half to two-third of the column length from the base of the footing. In the case of floating column, the relative strength of columns to the soil \(( {c_{\text{uc}}}/{c_{\text{us}}})\) appears to be the major governing factor. For the high value of \(( {c_{\text{uc}}}/{c_{\text{us}}})\) used in the present study, punching failure was observed with slight outward displacement and some horizontal cracks for area ratios of 25% and 32%. For validation, the failure stresses of model ground were compared with the results obtained using numerical analysis. The results show a good agreement between the bearing capacity value obtained from the experiment and the numerical software.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- Ar :
-
Area ratio
- BCF:
-
Bearing capacity factor
- C:
-
Cement content
- CL:
-
Clay of low plasticity
- c uc :
-
Undrained shear strength of the column
- c us :
-
Undrained shear strength of soil
- DMM:
-
Deep mixing method
- l/d:
-
Ratio of column length to diameter
- q u :
-
Ultimate bearing capacity of the composite ground
- w c :
-
Water content
- \(\lambda\) :
-
Non-dimensional coefficient
- δ/B :
-
Normalized settlement
References
Ali K, Shahu JT, Sharma KG (2014) Model tests on single and groups of stone columns with different geosynthetic reinforcement arrangement. Geosynth Int 21(2):103–118. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.14.00002
Bouassida M, Porbaha A (2004) Bearing capacity of foundations resting on soft ground improved by soil cement columns. In: Proceedings of Int. Conf. on Geotechnical Engineering (ICGE 2004) University of Sharjah, UAE, pp 173–180
Coastal Development Institute of Technology (2002) The deep mixing method principle design and construction. A.A. Balkelma, Rotterdam
Dehghanbanadaki A, Ahmad K, Ali N (2016) Experimental investigations on ultimate bearing capacity of peat stabilized by a group of soil-cement column: a comparative study. Acta Geotech 11(2):295–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-014-0328-x
Gatto MPA, Montrasio L (2020) Analysis of the behaviour of very slender piles: focus on the ultimate load. Int J Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-020-00547-y
Larsson S (2003) Mixing processes for ground improvement by deep mixing, Dissertation. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
Kitazume M, Okano K, Miyajima S (2000) Centrifuge model tests on failure envelope of column type deep mixing method improved ground. Soils Found 40:43–55. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.40.4-43
Rashid ASA, Black JA, Mohamad H, Noor NM (2015) Behavior of weak soils reinforced with end- bearing soil–cement columns formed by the deep mixing method. Mar Georesour Geotec 33(6):473–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2014.954174
Rashid AAS, Black JA, Kueh ABH, Noor NM (2015) Behaviour of weak soils improved with soil cement columns formed by the deep mixing method: rigid and flexible footings. Meas J Int Meas Confeder 68:262–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.02.039
Rashid ASA, Kueh ABH, Mohamad H (2017) Behaviour of soft soil improved by floating soil–cement columns. Int J Phys Model Geotech 18:95–116. https://doi.org/10.1680/jphmg.15.00041
Rashid ASA, Bunawan A, Mat Said KN (2017) The deep mixing method: bearing capacity studies. Geotech Geol Eng 35:1271–1298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0196-x
Reddy YR (2009) Soft soil reinforced with granular pile-mat system: analysis and model test. Dissertation Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New delhi
Saeedi Azizkandi A, Rasouli H, Baziar MH (2019) Load sharing and carrying mechanism of piles in non-connected pile rafts using a numerical approach. Int J Civ Eng 17:793–808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-018-0356-2
Terashi M, Tanaka H (1981) Ground improved by deep mixing method. In: Proceedings of the 10th ICSMFE, vol 2, pp 777–780
Vesic AS (1963) Bearing capacity of deep foundations in sans, Vol. 39, National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Highway Research Record, Washington, DC, pp 112–153. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/hrr/1963/39/39-007.pdf
Yin JH, Fang Z (2010) Physical modelling of a footing on soft soil ground with deep cement mixed soil columns under vertical loading. Mar Georesour Geotec 28(2):173–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641191003780872
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mohanty, M., Shahu, J.T. Laboratory Investigation on Performance of Soil–Cement Columns Under Axisymmetric Condition. Int J Civ Eng 19, 957–971 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-021-00612-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-021-00612-0