Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Vocational Outcomes of the Individual Placement and Support Model in Subgroups of Diagnoses, Substance Abuse, and Forensic Conditions: A Systematic Review and Analysis of Pooled Original Data

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the effect of Individual Placement and Support (IPS) according to diagnoses of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depression, substance use disorders, or forensic psychiatric conditions.

Methods

A systematic search of the literature was conducted in June 2017 and repeated in December 2020. The systematic review included 13 studies. Analyses of pooled original data were based on the six studies providing data (n = 1594). No studies on forensic psychiatric conditions were eligible. Hours and weeks worked were analyzed using linear regression. Employment, and time to employment was analyzed using logistic regression, and cox-regression, respectively.

Results

The effects on hours and weeks in employment after 18 months were comparable for participants with schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder but only statistically significant for participants with schizophrenia compared to services as usual (SAU) (EMD 109.1 h (95% CI 60.5–157.7), 6.1 weeks (95% CI 3.9–8.4)). The effect was also significant for participants with any drug use disorder (121.2 h (95% CI 23.6–218.7), 6.8 weeks (95% CI 1.8–11.8)). Participants with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and any drug use disorder had higher odds of being competitively employed (OR 2.1 (95% CI 1.6–2.7); 2.4 (95% CI 1.3–4.4); 3.0 (95% CI 1.5–5.8)) and returned to work faster than SAU (HR 2.1 (95% CI 1.6–2.6); 1.8 (95% CI 1.1–3.1); 3.0 (95% CI 1.6–5.7)). No statistically significant effects were found regarding depression.

Conclusions

IPS was effective regarding schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and substance use disorder; however, the effect on hours, and weeks worked was not statistically significant regarding bipolar disorder. For people with depression the impact of IPS remains inconclusive. Non-significant results may be due to lack of power.

Trial Registration: PROSPERO protocol nr. CRD42017060524

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data from the study is only available on request due to privacy/ethical restrictions.

References

  1. Kinoshita Y, Furukawa TA, Kinoshita K, et al. Supported employment for adults with severe mental illness. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2013;9(9):CD008297. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008297.pub2

  2. Lehman AF, Anthony F. Vocational rehabilitation in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1995;21(4):645–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/21.4.645.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bond GR, Drake RE, Becker DR. An update on randomized controlled trials of evidence-based supported employment. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2008;31(4):280–90. https://doi.org/10.2975/31.4.2008.280.290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Modini M, Tan L, Brinchmann B, et al. Supported employment for people with severe mental illness: systematic review and meta-analysis of the international evidence. Br J Psychiatry. 2016;209(1):14–22. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.115.165092.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bond GR, Drake RE, Becker DR. Generalizability of the Individual Placement and Support (IPS) model of supported employment outside the US. World Psychiatry. 2012;11(1):32–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpsyc.2012.01.005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Campbell K, Bond GR, Drake RE. Who benefits from supported employment: a meta-analytic study. Schizophr Bull. 2011;37(2):370–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbp066.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Drake RE, Bond GR, Becker DR. Individual placement and support: an evidence-based approach to supported employment. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Bejerholm U, Areberg C, Hofgren C, et al. Individual Placement and Support in Sweden: a randomized controlled trial. Nord J Psychiatry. 2014;69(1):57–66. https://doi.org/10.3109/08039488.2014.929739.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Burns T, Catty J, Becker T, et al. The effectiveness of supported employment for people with severe mental illness: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England). 2007;370(9593):1146–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61516-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Drake RE, McHugo GJ, Bebout RR, et al. A randomized clinical trial of supported employment for inner-city patients with severe mental disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56(7):627–33. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.56.7.627.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cook JA, Blyler CR, Burke-Miller JK, et al. Effectiveness of supported employment for individuals with schizophrenia: results of a multi-site randomized trial. Clin Schizophr Relat Psychoses. 2008;2(1):37–46. https://doi.org/10.3371/CSRP.2.1.2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lehman AF, Goldberg R, Dixon LB, et al. Improving employment outcomes for persons with severe mental illnesses. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002;59(2):165–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Buckley PF. Prevalence and Consequences of Dual Diagnosis 5. Vol 67.; 2006. https://www-psychiatrist-com.ep.fjernadgang.kb.dk/JCP/article/_layouts/ppp.psych.controls/BinaryViewer.ashx?Article=/JCP/article/Pages/2006/v67s07/v67s0702.aspx&Type=Article. Accessed February 21, 2019.

  14. Mueser KT, Campbell K, Drake RE. The effectiveness of supported employment in people with dual disorders. J Dual Diagn. 2011;7:90–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2011.568360.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Fisher WH, Roy-Bujnowski KM, Grudzinskas AJ, Clayfield JC, Banks SM, Wolff N. Patterns and prevalence of arrest in a statewide cohort of mental health care consumers. Psychiatr Serv. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.57.11.1623.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Khalifa N, Talbot E, Schneider J, et al. Individual placement and support (IPS) for patients with offending histories: the IPSOH feasibility cluster randomised trial protocol. BMJ Open. 2016;6(7):e012710. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012710.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Bond GR, Kim SJ, Becker DR, et al. A controlled trial of supported employment for people with severe mental illness and justice involvement. Psychiatr Serv. 2015;66(10):1027–34. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201400510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Guidelines and guidance preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement. http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097&type=printable. Accessed February 26, 2018.

  19. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.

  20. World Health Organization WHO). International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 10. http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd10/browse/2016/en#/XVI.

  21. Association AP. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, (DSM IV). Vol Fourth Ed.; 1994. http://www.psnpaloalto.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Depression-Diagnostic-Criteria-and-Severity-Rating.pdf.

  22. Bond GR, Peterson AE, Becker DR, Drake RE. Validation of the revised individual placement and support fidelity scale (IPS-25). Psychiatr Serv. 2012;63(8):758–63. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201100476.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Covidence-Accelerate your systematic review. https://www.covidence.org/. Accessed May 2, 2018.

  24. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions|Cochrane Training. http://training.cochrane.org/handbook. Accessed February 26, 2018.

  25. Christensen TN, Wallstrøm IG, Stenager E, et al. Effects of individual placement and support supplemented with cognitive remediation and work-focused social skills training for people with severe mental illness: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76(12):1232–40. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.2291.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Michon H, van Busschbach JT, Stant AD, van Vugt MD, van Weeghel J, Kroon H. Effectiveness of individual placement and support for people with severe mental illness in the Netherlands: a 30-month randomized controlled trial. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2014;37(2):129–36. https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000061.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bond GR, Salyers MP, Dincin J, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing two vocational models for persons with severe mental illness. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007;75(6):968–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.75.6.968.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kin Wong K, Chiu R, Tang B, Mak D, Liu J, Chiu SN. A randomized controlled trial of a supported employment program for persons with long-term mental illness in Hong Kong. Psychiatr Serv. 2008;59(1):84–90. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.2008.59.1.84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mueser KT, Clark RE, Haines M, et al. The Hartford study of supported employment for persons with severe mental illness. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004;72(3):479–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.72.3.479.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hoffmann H, Jäckel D, Glauser S, Kupper Z. A randomised controlled trial of the efficacy of supported employment. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2012;125(2):157–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2011.01780.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Viering S, Jäger M, Bärtsch B, et al. Supported employment for the reintegration of disability pensioners with mental illnesses: a randomized controlled trial. Front public Health. 2015;3:237. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2015.00237.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Reme SE, Monstad K, Fyhn T, et al. A randomized controlled multicenter trial of individual placement and support for patients with moderate-to-severe mental illness. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019;45(1):33–41. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3753.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995;273(5):408–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Frey WD, Drake RE, Bond GR, et al. Mental health treatment study final report investigators. 2011. https://www.ssa.gov/disabilityresearch/documents/MHTS_Final_Report_508.pdf. Accessed September 13, 2018.

  35. McGurk SR, Drake RE, Xie H, et al. Cognitive predictors of work among social security disability insurance beneficiaries with psychiatric disorders enrolled in IPS supported employment. Schizophr Bull. 2018;44(1):32–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbx115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bejerholm U, Larsson ME, Johanson S. Supported employment adapted for people with affective disorders: a randomized controlled trial. J Affect Disord. 2016;207:212–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lagerveld SE, Blonk RWB, Brenninkmeijer V, et al. Work-focused treatment of common mental disorders and return to work: a comparative outcome study. J Occup Health Psychol. 2012;17(2):220–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027049.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lones CE, Bond GR, Mark P, et al. Individual placement and support (IPS) for methadone maintenance therapy patients: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Admin Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2017;44:359–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-017-0793-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LFE, TNC, IGW, PP, ABB, ES, and LH participated in the planning and design of the study. TNC, IGW, UB, JvB, HM, KTM, SER, SW provided data for the review. PP and LH reviewed the literature. ABB conducted the analyses and drafting of figures and tables. ABB, PP and LH wrote the manuscript. All authors have participated in the interpretation of the results and have read and critically revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lone Hellström.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interests.

Ethics Approval

Included studies were all performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 44 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hellström, L., Pedersen, P., Christensen, T.N. et al. Vocational Outcomes of the Individual Placement and Support Model in Subgroups of Diagnoses, Substance Abuse, and Forensic Conditions: A Systematic Review and Analysis of Pooled Original Data. J Occup Rehabil 31, 699–710 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-021-09960-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-021-09960-z

Keywords

Navigation