Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ecosystem health status and trophic modeling of an anthropogenically impacted small tropical estuary along India’s west coast

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The tropical estuaries are characterized with high biological production and also impacted by anthropogenic activities. Describing these estuaries in terms of ecological data and trophic dynamics to reveal the ecological impacts is gaining attention recently. In this study, the ecological structure is analyzed for a heavily impacted small macrotidal tropical estuary, Ulhas river estuary (URE), situated near Mumbai megacity in the western coast of India, to delineate the impact of anthropogenic stressors on the ecosystem functioning. The URE is being exploited for sand and fisheries resources, and also faces risks from anthropogenic activities. The ecological data of URE were compiled for 2017-18 together with the most relevant literature estimates to construct an ecosystem model. A trophic organization in 20 functional groups was identified for URE using Ecopath modeling approach. The functional groups identified in the food web ranged from detritus and primary producers (trophic level (TL) = 1) to large pelagics (TL = 4.14). Detritivory: herbivory ratio (1.35) indicated that the detritus chain is dominant over the primary producer’s chain. The total system throughput (TST) was estimated as 16 736.2 t km-2year-1. The indices such as net system production (NSP = 1 398.781 t km-2 year-1), total primary production/total biomass (TPP/TB = 25.17), biomass/total system throughput (TB/TST = 0.01), recycling index (Finn’s Cycling Index = 13.94%), system omnivory index (0.3), relative ascendency (25.6%), and system overhead (74.4%) classified URE as an immature system. The eco-exergy index (30748.54 gm detritus equivalent m-2) showed that the ecosystem is a moderately stable and relatively less organized network. The estuarine fish community index (EFCI) yielded a value of 38 indicating the poor health status of the fish community in URE. The study delivers a comprehensive understanding of the ecosystem setting in URE and characterizes the prevailing condition. The ecological indicators analyzed here point towards a medium to a high level of impact in URE due to anthropogenic activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All of the data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article [and its supplementary information files].

References

  • Abdul WO, Adekoya EO (2016) Preliminary Ecopath model of a tropical coastal estuarine ecosystem around bight of Benin, Nigeria. Environ Biol Fish 99(12):909–923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-016-0532-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen KR (1971) Relation between production and biomass. J Fish Board Can 28(10):1573–1581. https://doi.org/10.1139/f71-236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amara R, Lagardere F, Desaunay Y, Marchand J (2000) Metamorphosis and estuarine colonization in the common sole, Solea solea (L.): implications for recruitment regulation. Oceanol Acta 23(4):469–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0399-1784(00)00134-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • APHA (2005) Standard methods of water and wastewater, 21st edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, pp 2–61

  • Athalye RP, Patil NN, Borkar U, Quadros G, Somani VU (2003) Study of Flora, Intertidal Macrobenthic Fauna and Fishery of Ulhas River Estuary and Thane Creek to assess the pollution status and decide mitigative strategy. BN Bandodkar College of Science, Thane and MMRDA Mumbai project, 211pp.

  • Baird D, Ulanowicz RE (1993) Comparative study on the trophic structure, cycling and ecosystem properties of four tidal estuaries. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 16:221–237. https://people.clas.ufl.edu/ulan/files/4Esturs.pdf. Accessed 14 July 2019

  • Banse K, Mosher S (1980) Adult body mass and annual production/biomass relationships of field populations. Ecol Monogr 50(3):355–379. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck MW, Heck KL, Able KW, Childers DL, Eggleston DB, Gillanders BM, Halpern B, Hays CG, Hoshino K, Minello TJ, Orth RJ (2001) The identification, conservation, and management of estuarine and marine nurseries for fish and invertebrates: a better understanding of the habitats that serve as nurseries for marine species and the factors that create site-specific variability in nursery quality will improve conservation and management of these areas. Bioscience 51(8):633–641. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0633:TICAMO]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beverton RJ, Holt SJ (1957) On the dynamics of exploited fish populations. UK Min Agric Fish, Fish Invest (Ser 2) 19:533

  • Bianchi G (1985) Field guide to the commercial marine and brackish-water species of Pakistan.

  • Blaber SJ, Milton DA, Pang J, Wong P, Boon-Teck O, Nyigo L, Lubim D (1996) The life history of the tropical shad Tenualosa toli from Sarawak: First evidence of protandry in the Clupeiformes? Environ Biol Fish 46(3):225–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00004998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breine JJ, Maes J, Quataert P, Van den Bergh E, Simoens I, Van Thuyne G, Belpaire C (2007) A fish-based assessment tool for the ecological quality of the brackish Schelde estuary in Flanders (Belgium). Hydrobiologia. 575(1):141–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0357-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabral HN, Fonseca VF, Gamito R, Gonçalves CI, Costa JL, Erzini K, Gonçalves J, Martins J, Leite L, Andrade JP, Ramos S (2012) Ecological quality assessment of transitional waters based on fish assemblages in Portuguese estuaries: the Estuarine Fish Assessment Index (EFAI). Ecol Indic 19:144–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.08.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso PG, Pardal MA, Lillebø AI, Ferreira SM, Raffaelli D, Marques JC (2004) Dynamic changes in seagrass assemblages under eutrophication and implications for recovery. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 302(2):233–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2003.10.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso I, Pais MP, Henriques S, da Fonseca LC, Cabral HN (2011) Ecological quality assessment of small estuaries from the Portuguese coast based on fish assemblages indices. Mar Pollut Bull 62(5):992–1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.02.037

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carrassón M, Cartes JE (2002) Trophic relationships in a Mediterranean deep-sea fish community: partition of food resources, dietary overlap and connections within the benthic boundary layer. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 241:41–55. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps241041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandramohan P, Jena BK, Kumar VS (2001) Littoral drift sources and sinks along the Indian coast. Current Science 81(3):292–297. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24106330.

  • Christensen V, Pauly D (1992) ECOPATH II—a software for balancing steady-state ecosystem models and calculating network characteristics. Ecol Model 61(3-4):169–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(92)90016-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen V, Pauly D (1993) Trophic models of aquatic ecosystems. Int Center Living Aquat Resources Manag - ICLARM.

  • Christensen V, Pauly D (2004) Placing fisheries in their ecosystem context, an introduction. Ecol Model 172(2-4):103–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen V, Walters CJ, Pauly D (2005) Ecopath with Ecosim: a user’s guide. Fisheries, Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian RR, Baird D, Luczkovich J, Johnson JC, Scharler UM, Ulanowicz RE (2005) Role of network analysis in comparative ecosystem ecology of estuaries. Aquat Food Webs: An ecosystem approach. Oxford University Press 7:25–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates S, Waugh A, Anwar A, Robson M (2007) Efficacy of a multi-metric fish index as an analysis tool for the transitional fish component of the Water Framework Directive. Mar Pollut Bull 55(1-6):225–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.08.029

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coll M, Palomera I, Tudela S, Sardà F (2006) Trophic flows, ecosystem structure and fishing impacts in the South Catalan Sea, Northwestern Mediterranean. J Mar Syst 59(1-2):63–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2005.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colléter M, Valls A, Guitton J, Gascuel D, Pauly D, Christensen V (2015) Global overview of the applications of the Ecopath with Ecosim modeling approach using the EcoBase models repository. Ecol Model 302:42–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.01.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, d'Arge R, De Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O'neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387(6630):253. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Das I, Hazra S, Das S, Giri S, Chanda A, Maity S, Ghosh S (2018) Trophic-level modelling of the coastal waters of the northern Bay of Bengal, West Bengal, India. Fish Sci 84(6):995–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12562-018-1246-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dauvin JC, Ruellet T, Desroy N, Janson AL (2007) The ecological quality status of the Bay of Seine and the Seine estuary: use of biotic indices. Mar Pollut Bull 55(1-6):241–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.04.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Jonge VN, Elliot M, Brauer VS (2006) Marine monitoring: its shortcomings and mismatch with the EU Water Framework Directive’s objectives. Mar Pollut Bull 53(1-4):5–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.11.026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Delpech C, Courrat A, Pasquaud S, Lobry J, Le Pape O, Nicolas D, Boët P, Girardin M, Lepage M (2010) Development of a fish-based index to assess the ecological quality of transitional waters: the case of French estuaries. Mar Pollut Bull 60(6):908–918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.01.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz RJ, Rosenberg R (2008) Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems. Science 321(5891):926–929. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1156401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich JC, Zijlema M, Westerink JJ, Holthuijsen LH, Dawson C, Luettich RA Jr, Stone GW (2011) Modeling hurricane waves and storm surge using integrally-coupled, scalable computations. Coast Eng 58(1):45–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2010.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du X, García-Berthou E, Wang Q, Liu J, Zhang T, Li Z (2015) Analyzing the importance of top-down and bottom-up controls in food webs of Chinese lakes through structural equation modelling. Aquat Ecol 49(2):199–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-015-9518-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duan LJ, Li SY, Liu Y, Jiang T, Failler P (2009) A trophic model of the Pearl River Delta coastal ecosystem. Ocean Coast Manag 52(7):359–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2009.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta S, Chakraborty K, Hazra S (2017) Ecosystem structure and trophic dynamics of an exploited ecosystem of Bay of Bengal, Sundarban Estuary, India. Fish Sci 83(2):145–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12562-016-1060-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot M, Hemingway KL (2002) Fishes in estuaries. Blackwell Science, Ltd, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott M, Quintino V (2007) The estuarine quality paradox, environmental homeostasis and the difficulty of detecting anthropogenic stress in naturally stressed areas. Mar Pollut Bull 54(6):640–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.02.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott M, Whitfield AK, Potter IC, Blaber SJ, Cyrus DP, Nordlie FG, Harrison TD (2007) The guild approach to categorizing estuarine fish assemblages: a global review. Fish Fish 8(3):241–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2003) Fisheries management. The ecosystem approach to fisheries. FAO Tech Guide Respons Fish 4(Suppl. 2):112

    Google Scholar 

  • Fath BD (2015) Quantifying economic and ecological sustainability. Ocean Coast Manag 108:13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.06.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finn JT (1976) Measures of ecosystem structure and function derived from analysis of flows. J Theor Biol 56(2):363–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(76)80080-X

  • Fischer W, Bianchi G (1984) FAO species identification sheets for fishery purposes: Western Indian Ocean (Fishing Area 51). v. 1: Introductory material. Bony fishes, families: Acanthuridae to Clupeidae.-v. 2: Bony fishes, families: Congiopodidae to Lophotidae.-v. 3:... families: Lutjanidae to Scaridae.-v. 4:... families: Scatophagidae to Trichiuridae.-v. 5: Bony fishes, families: Triglidae to Zeidae. Chimaeras. Sharks. Lobsters. Shrimps and prawns. Sea turtles. v. 6: Alphabetical index of scientific names and vernacular names

  • Flores CP, Muñoz JM, Scherer ME (2017) Management of transboundary estuaries in Latin America and the Caribbean. Mar Policy 76:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.11.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froese R, Pauly D (2016) Fishbase World Wide Web electronic publication. http://www.fishbase.org

  • Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1990) Science for policy: uncertainty and quality. In: In Uncertainty and quality in science for policy. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0621-1_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison LP, Link JS (2000) Dietary guild structure of the fish community in the Northeast United States continental shelf ecosystem. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 202:231–240. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps202231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasalla MA, Rossi-Wongtschowski CL (2004) Contribution of ecosystem analysis to investigating the effects of changes in fishing strategies in the South Brazil Bight coastal ecosystem. Ecol Model 172(2-4):283–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.09.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulland JA (1969) Manual of methods for fish stock assessment. Part 1. Fish population analysis.

  • Hajisamae S, Chou LM, Ibrahim S (2003) Feeding habits and trophic organization of the fish community in shallow waters of an impacted tropical habitat. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 58(1):89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7714(03)00062-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han R, Chen Q, Wang L, Tang X (2016) Preliminary investigation on the changes in trophic structure and energy flow in the Yangtze estuary and adjacent coastal ecosystem due to the Three Gorges Reservoir. Ecol Inform 36:152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2016.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris JH, Silveira R (1999) Large-scale assessments of river health using an Index of Biotic Integrity with low-diversity fish communities. Freshw Biol 41(2):235–252. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.1999.00428.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison TD, Whitfield AK (2004) A multi-metric fish index to assess the environmental condition of estuaries. J Fish Biol 65(3):683–710. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-1112.2004.00477.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison TD, Whitfield AK (2006) Application of a multimetric fish index to assess the environmental condition of South African estuaries. Estuaries and Coasts 6:1108–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02781813

  • Harrison TD, Kelly FL (2013) Development of an estuarine multi-metric fish index and its application to Irish transitional waters. Ecological Indicators 34:494–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.06.018

  • Jagtap TG, Untawale AG, Inamdar SN (1994) Study of mangrove environment of Maharashtra coast using remote sensing data. Indian J Mar Sci 23:90–93

    Google Scholar 

  • John DM, Lawson GW (1990) A review of mangrove and coastal ecosystems in West Africa and their possible relationships. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 31(5):505–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7714(90)90009-G

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen SE (1992) Exergy and ecology. In: In Integration of Ecosystem Theories: A Pattern. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 157–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2682-3_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen SE (2007) Description of aquatic ecosystem’s development by eco-exergy and exergy destruction. Ecol Model 204(1-2):22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.12.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantharajan G, Pandey PK, Krishnan P, Ragavan P, Jeevamani JJ, Purvaja R, Ramesh R (2018) Vegetative structure and species composition of mangroves along the Mumbai coast, Maharashtra, India. Reg Stud Mar Sci 19:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2018.02.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr JR (1986) Assessing biological integrity in running waters: a method and its rationale. Special publication/Illinois Natural History Survey (USA). http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US9013973

  • Kiranya B, Pramila S, Mullasseri S (2018) The diversity of finfish population in Poonthura estuary, south-west coast of India, Kerala. Environ Monit Assess 190(12):743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-7094-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kroetz AM, Drymon JM, Powers SP (2017) Comparative dietary diversity and trophic ecology of two estuarine mesopredators. Estuar Coasts 40(4):1171–1182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-016-0188-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumawat T (2014) Study on compliance of bagnet fishery of Maharashtra coast India with the provision of FAO CCRF. M. F. Sc. Dissertation, ICAR- Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Versova, Mumbai.

  • Lad D, Patil S (2016) Diversity of intertidal meiobenthos from estuary of Bhayander and Naigaon, Thane, Maharashtra, India. Int J Sci Res 5(8)

  • Lala KD (2004) Water supply of thane municipal corporation. InProceedings of One Day Seminar on-Pollution of Water Bodies In urban Area (Case Study), Vidya Prasarak Mandal’s Polytechnic, Thane. Sponsored by AICTE, N. Delhi.

  • Lauretta MV, Camp EV, Pine WE III, Frazer TK (2013) Catchability model selection for estimating the composition of fishes and invertebrates within dynamic aquatic ecosystems. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 70(3):381–392. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-20120319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lercari D, Horta S, Martínez G, Calliari D, Bergamino L (2015) A food web analysis of the Río de la Plata estuary and adjacent shelf ecosystem: trophic structure, biomass flows, and the role of fisheries. Hydrobiologia 742(1):39–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-014-1964-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Libralato S, Christensen V, Pauly D (2006) A method for identifying keystone species in food web models. Ecol Model 195(3-4):153–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.11.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindeman RL (1942) The trophic-dynamic aspect of ecology. Ecology 23(4):399–417. https://doi.org/10.2307/1930126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lira A, Angelini R, Le Loc'h F, Ménard F, Lacerda C, Frédou T, Frédou FL (2018) Trophic flow structure of a neotropical estuary in northeastern Brazil and the comparison of ecosystem model indicators of estuaries. J Mar Syst 182:31–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2018.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maes J, Van Damme S, Meire P, Ollevier F (2004) Statistical modelling of seasonal and environmental influences on the population dynamics of an estuarine fish community. Mar Biol 145(5):1033–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-004-1394-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malherbe W, Wepener V, van Vuren JH (2008) Aspects of the ecological state of the Mvoti River in the Stanger area, KwaZulu-Natal. J South Afr Acad Sci Art 27:44–56

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matich P, Ault JS, Boucek RE, Bryan DR, Gastrich KR, Harvey CL, Heithaus MR, Kiszka JJ, Paz V, Rehage JS, Rosenblatt AE (2017) Ecological niche partitioning within a large predator guild in a nutrient-limited estuary. Limnol Oceanogr 62(3):934–953. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra V (2002) Study of macrofauna of mangrove mudflats of Ulhas River Estuary, Ph. D. Thesis, University of Mumbai. 253pp.

  • Mohamed KS, Zacharia PU, Muthiah C, Abdurahiman KP, Nayak TH (2008) Trophic modelling of the Arabian Sea ecosystem off Karnataka and simulation of fishery yields. Bull Cent Mar Fish Res Inst 51:140 ISSN 0972-236X

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohapatra BC, Rengarajan K (2000) Heavy metal toxicity in the estuarine, coastal and marine ecosystems of India. CMFRI Special Publ 69:1–21 http://eprints.cmfri.org.in/id/eprint/3514

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee J, Karan S, Chakrabarty M, Banerjee A, Rakshit N, Ray S (2019) An approach towards quantification of ecosystem trophic status and health through ecological network analysis applied in Hooghly-Matla estuarine system, India. Ecol Indic 100:55–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.08.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murugan S, Joseph AP, Khan SA (2012) Ecological niche of Mugil Cephalus—an ECOPATH with ECOSIM approach in Vellar Estuary (Southeast coast of India). Int J Pharm Bio Sci 3(1):662–676. https://doi.org/10.1163/74878&rep.rep1&type.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikam VS 2019. Challenges in managing urban catchment: case study of Thane city. Science and Innovation for Catchment Management, Presentation at University of Warwick, UK, 8 - 10 May, 2019

  • Nikam VS, Kumar A, Lalla K, Gupta K (2008) Conservation of Wetlands and Mangroves in Thane Creek and Ulhas River Estuary, India. In Proceedings of Taal 2007: The 12th World Lake Conference 2008 (Vol. 1635, p. 1642).

  • O'Brien GC, Swemmer R, Wepener V (2009) Ecological integrity assessment of the fish assemblages of the Matigulu/Nyoni and Umvoti estuaries, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Afr J Aquat Sci 34(3):293–302. https://doi.org/10.2989/AJAS.2009.34.3.11.987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP (1969) The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164:723–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP (1971) Fundamentals of ecology. Saunders, Philadelphia, p 574

    Google Scholar 

  • Palomares MLD, Pauly D (1998) Predicting food consumption of fish populations as functions of mortality, food type, morphometrics, temperature and salinity. Mar Freshw Res 49(5):447–453. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF98015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patil Y, Ingle S (2016) Status of the Ulhas River with reference to water pollution at Badlapur City, Dist Thane. Int J Sci Res 5(4):453–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrício J, Marques JC (2006) Mass balanced models of the food web in three areas along a gradient of eutrophication symptoms in the south arm of the Mondego estuary (Portugal). Ecol Model 197(1-2):21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrıcio J, Ulanowicz R, Pardal MA, Marques JC (2004) Ascendency as an ecological indicator: a case study of estuarine pulse eutrophication. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 60(1):23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2003.11.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauly D (1980) On the interrelationships between natural mortality, growth parameters, and mean environmental temperature in 175 fish stocks. ICES J Mar Sci 39(2):175–92

  • Pauly D, Christensen V, Dalsgaard J, Froese R, Torres F (1998a) Fishing down marine food webs. Science 279(5352):860–863. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.279.5352.860

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pauly D, Trites AW, Capuli E, Christensen V (1998b) Diet composition and trophic levels of marine mammals. ICES J Mar Sci 55(3):467–481. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.1997.0280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauly D, Christensen V, Walters C (2000) Ecopath, Ecosim, and Ecospace as tools for evaluating ecosystem impact of fisheries. ICES J Mar Sci 57(3):697–706. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.2000.0726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira HM, Navarro LM, Martins IS (2012) Global biodiversity change: the bad, the good, and the unknown. Annu Rev Environ Resour 37:25–50. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-042911-093511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira TJ, Manique J, Quintella BR, Castro N, de Almeida PR, Costa JL (2017) Changes in trophic ecology of fish assemblages after no-take Marine Protected Area designation in the southwestern coast of Portugal. Ocean Coast Manag 137:144–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.12.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson L (1990) Predicting ontogenetic niche shifts in the field: what can be gained by foraging theory? In: Hughes RN (ed) Behavioural mechanisms of food selection. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 303, 886 pp–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75118-9_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Polis GA, Strong DR (1996) Food web complexity and community dynamics. Am Nat 147(5):813–846. https://doi.org/10.1086/285880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post JC, Lundin CG (1996) Guidelines for integrated coastal zone management. eds. The World Bank. 28pp.

  • Power ME (1992) Top-down and bottom-up forces in food webs: do plants have primacy. Ecology. 73(3):733–746. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power ME, Tilman D, Estes JA, Menge BA, Bond WJ, Mills LS, Daily G, Castilla JC, Lubchenco J, Paine RT (1996) Challenges in the quest for keystones: identifying keystone species is difficult—but essential to understanding how loss of species will affect ecosystems. BioScience 46(8):609–620. https://doi.org/10.2307/1312990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard DW (1967) What is an estuary: physical viewpoint. Am Assoc Adv Sci. http://hdl.handle.net/1969.3/24383

  • Rakshit N, Banerjee A, Mukherjee J, Chakrabarty M, Borrett SR, Ray S (2017) Comparative study of food webs from two different time periods of Hooghly Matla estuarine system, India through network analysis. Ecol Model 356:25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathod S D (2012) Effect of pollution on mudskipper fishery Of Ulhas River Estuary with a special reference to the biology Of Boleophthalmus dussumieri (CUV. & VAL.). dspace.vpmthane.org:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/2927/1/S.D.R. Accessed 25 Feb 2017

  • Rathod SD, Patil NN (2009) Assessment of some hydrological parameters of Ulhas River Estuary, in the vicinity of Thane city, Maharashtra State. J Aqua Biol 24(2):103–108. http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2922. Accessed 2 Mar 2017

  • Rathod SD, Quadros G and Athalye RP (2003) Qualitative study of fin fish and shell fish fauna of Thane creek and Ulhas river estuary. VPM’sB. N. Bandodkar College of Science, Thane (National Seminar).

  • Ray S (2008) Comparative study of virgin and reclaimed islands of Sundarban mangrove ecosystem through network analysis. Ecol Model 215(1-3):207–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.02.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross ST (1986) Resource partitioning in fish assemblages: a review of field studies. Copeia 72:352–388. https://doi.org/10.2307/144499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharler UM, Fath BD (2009) Comparing network analysis methodologies for consumer–resource relations at species and ecosystems scales. Ecol Model 220(22):3210–3218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.02.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selleslagh J, Amara R, Laffargue P, Lesourd S, Lepage M, Girardin M (2009) Fish composition and assemblage structure in three Eastern English Channel macrotidal estuaries: a comparison with other French estuaries. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 81(2):149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2008.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selleslagh J, Lobry J, Amara R, Brylinski JM, Boët P (2012) Trophic functioning of coastal ecosystems along an anthropogenic pressure gradient: a French case study with emphasis on a small and low impacted estuary. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 112:73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2011.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shetye SR, Dileep Kumar M, Shankar D (2007) Mandovi and Zuari estuaries. CSIR-National Institute of Oceanography, Goa, p 145

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon TP (2000) The use of biological criteria as a tool for water resource management. Environ Sci Pol 3:43–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-9011(00)00026-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singare PU, Trivedi MP, Mishra RM, Dagli DV (2012) Pollution impact assessment along Vasai Creek of Mumbai: measurement of physico-chemical parameters. Interdiscip Environ Rev 13(2-3):220–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sreekanth GB, Chakraborty SK, Jaiswar AK, Zacharia PU (2018) An inventory on the coastal finfish and shellfish species of Zuari estuary, south-west coast of India. Indian J Geo-Mar Sci 47(5):945–958

    Google Scholar 

  • Sreekanth GB, Jaiswar AK, Zacharia PU, Pazhayamadom DG, Chakraborty SK (2019) Effect of environment on spatio-temporal structuring of fish assemblages in a monsoon-influenced tropical estuary. Environ Monit Assess 191(5):305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7436-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sreekanth GB, Chakraborty SK, Jaiswar AK, Zacharia PU (2020) Trophic network and food web characteristics in a small tropical monsoonal estuary: a comparison with other estuarine systems. Indian J Geo-Mar Sci 47(5):945–958 http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/54731/1/IJMS%2049%285%29%20774-789.pdf

  • Srinath M, Kuriakose S, Ammini PL, Prasad CJ, Ramani K, Beena MR (2006) Marine fish landings in India 1985-2004. CMFRI Special Publ 89:1–61 http://eprints.cmfri.org.in/id/eprint/3905

  • Suresh I, Shetye SR (2007) An analytical model for the propagation of tides in the Mandovi and Zuari estuaries. west coast of India, Goa

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz RE (1986) Growth and development: ecosystems phenomenology. Excel Press, Lincoln, NE.

  • Ulanowicz RE, Puccia CJ (1990) Mixed trophic impacts in ecosystems. Coenoses 1:7–16 https://www.jstor.org/stable/43461017

  • Ulanowlcz RE, Norden JS (1990) Symmetrical overhead in flow networks. Int J Syst Sci 21(2):429–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207729008910372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2000) Estuarine and coastal marine waters: bioassessment and biocriteria technical guidance. In: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Report EPA-822-B-00– 024. Office of Water, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Vassallo P, Fabiano M, Vezzulli L, Sandulli R, Marques JC, Jørgensen SE (2006) Assessing the health of coastal marine ecosystems: a holistic approach based on sediment micro and meio-benthic measures. Ecol Indic 6(3):525–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivekanandan E, Srinath M, Pillai VN, Immanuel S, Kurup KN (2003) Trophic model of the coastal fisheries ecosystem of the south-west coast of India. InAssessment, Management and Future Directions for Coastal Fisheries in Asian Countries (Silvestre, C., Garces, L., Stobutzki, I., Ahmed, M., Valmonte-Santos, RA, Luna, C., Lachica-Alino, L., Munro, P., Christensen, V. and Pauly, D. Eds.) World Fish Center Conference Proceedings, Penang (Vol. 67, pp. 281-298).

  • Walsh JJ, Rowe GT, Iverson RL, McRoy CP (1981) Biological export of shelf carbon is a sink of the global CO 2 cycle. Nature 291(5812):196–201. https://doi.org/10.1038/291196a0

  • Wasserman RJ, Noyon M, Avery TS, Froneman PW (2013) Trophic level stability-inducing effects of predaceous early juvenile fish in an estuarine mesocosm study. PLoS One 8(4):e61019. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xie DM, Zou QP, Cannon JW (2016) Application of SWAN+ ADCIRC to tide-surge and wave simulation in Gulf of Maine during Patriot's Day storm. Water Sci Eng 9(1):33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2016.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zingde MD (2002) Proceedings of the ‘National Seminar on Creeks, Estuaries and Mangroves - Pollution and Conservation, 28th to 30th November, 2002, Thane.’ Ed. by: Quadros, G.; 3-7pp

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Director ICAR- CIFE Mumbai for providing the necessary facilities and financial support to carry out this work. The authors are also grateful to the Directors of ICAR-CMFRI, Regional Research Centre, Mumbai, and ICAR-CCARI, Goa, for the support in site selection, field sampling, and the provision of laboratory facilities. The authors are thankful to the faculty and staff of Fisheries Resource Harvest and Post-Harvest management Division, ICAR-CIFE Mumbai, and ICAR-CMFRI Mumbai, for their valuable services and support. The authors express their heartfelt thanks to the fishermen along Naigaon, Vasai for their kind co-operation with the fishing experiments. The authors acknowledge colleagues from the Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay, for their help in obtaining modeled current data. Thanks, are also to the four anonymous reviewers for their critical comments and useful suggestions on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Funding

Part of the research work is supported by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) Doctoral fellowship granted to one of the authors, Ms. Dhanya M. Lal for her PhD Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dhanya M. Lal: Collection of data, analysis and Preparation of MS

Sreekanth G. B: Data analysis and interpretation

Avadootha Shivakrishna: Field sampling and manuscript editing

Ratheesh Kumar R: Site selection and technical Guidance

Binaya Bhusan Nayak: Technical guidance

Zeba Jaffer Abidi*: Overall supervision, guidance and manuscript correction

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zeba Jaffer Abidi.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The authors hereby declare that the research article entitled “Ecosystem health status and trophic modeling of an anthropogenically impacted small macrotidal tropical estuary along India’s west coast” is based on the field sampling in participatory mode, onboard with the traditional fishermen in the study site and performed in accordance with the relevant ethical standards in field sampling and data collection.

Consent to participate

NA

Consent to publish

All the authors have consented for the communication and subsequent publication of the manuscript entitled “Ecosystem health status and trophic modeling of an anthropogenically impacted small macrotidal tropical estuary along India’s west coast” in the Journal: Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests in the publication of the manuscript entitled “Ecosystem health status and trophic modeling of an anthropogenically impacted small macrotidal tropical estuary along India’s west coast” in the Journal: Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: V. V.S.S. Sarma

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 89 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lal, D.M., Sreekanth, G.B., Shivakrishna, A. et al. Ecosystem health status and trophic modeling of an anthropogenically impacted small tropical estuary along India’s west coast. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 35073–35093 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12857-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12857-2

Keywords

Navigation