Energy dissipation and suppression of capture cross sections in heavy ion reactions

D. Y. Jeung, D. J. Hinde, E. Williams, M. Dasgupta, E. C. Simpson, R. du Rietz, D. H. Luong, R. Rafiei, M. Evers, I. P. Carter, K. Ramachandran, C. Palshetkar, D. C. Rafferty, C. Simenel, and A. Wakhle
Phys. Rev. C 103, 034603 – Published 3 March 2021

Abstract

Background: At energies above the capture barrier, coupled-channels (CC) calculations with a standard nuclear potential diffuseness (0.65 fm) increasingly overestimate experimental capture cross section as the charge product (Z1Z2) of the colliding nuclei increases. It has been suggested this may be linked to energy dissipation outside the capture barrier.

Purpose: We investigate quantitatively the role of energy dissipation in suppressing capture in heavy ion fusion reactions.

Method: The yields of sequential fission, including that resulting from deep inelastic collisions, and of fission following capture were determined simultaneously for collisions of O18, Si30, S34, and Ca40+Th232 at a range of energies around the respective capture barriers.

Results: The ratio of experimental to CC capture cross sections was found to decrease with increasing Z1Z2. Conversely, the ratio of sequential fission to capture-fission increased with increasing Z1Z2. The sum of sequential and capture fission agrees quite well with the CC cross sections.

Conclusions: The experimental capture fission and sequential fission cross sections, and their comparison with CC calculations, give a consistent picture that the increase in density overlap at the capture barrier with increasing Z1Z2 of the colliding nuclei is correlated with increasing energy dissipative processes. These compete increasingly strongly with capture as the Z1Z2 of the reaction increases. For the Ca40 reaction, the total fission yield exceeds expectations from capture model calculations, indicating that deep inelastic processes occur both from trajectories that would have led to capture and also from more peripheral trajectories.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
11 More
  • Received 26 January 2021
  • Accepted 18 February 2021

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.103.034603

©2021 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

D. Y. Jeung*, D. J. Hinde, E. Williams, M. Dasgupta, E. C. Simpson, R. du Rietz, D. H. Luong, R. Rafiei, M. Evers§, I. P. Carter, K. Ramachandran, C. Palshetkar, D. C. Rafferty, C. Simenel, and A. Wakhle

  • Department of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia

  • *Corresponding author: dongyun.jeung@anu.edu.au
  • Current address: Malmö University, Faculty of Technology and Society, Malmö 205 06, Sweden.
  • Current address: University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
  • §Current address: Evoenergy, 40 Bunda Street, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
  • Permanent address: Nuclear Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400085, India.
  • Current address: ETP Ion Detect Pty Ltd. 2-8 Martha Street Clyde, NSW, Australia.

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 103, Iss. 3 — March 2021

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×