Skip to main content
Log in

Inverse Design of Flow Distortion Dominated by Shock Wave Interaction with Experimental Verification

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the development of supersonic/hypersonic vehicles, the influence of non-uniform flow has attracted increasing attention. Non-uniform flow exists everywhere in a scramjet, which is a potent engine for supersonic/hypersonic vehicles. Most flows entering the isolator, combustor, and nozzle exhibit high non-uniformity. Thus, several design methods for generating non-uniform flow have been proposed. However, these design methods cannot simulate flow distortion with high accuracy, especially the non-uniform flow caused by shock wave interaction. Thus, a design method for distortion generators, which can generate non-uniform flow associated with flow deflection angles, is proposed in this study to mimic the shock wave-dominated non-uniform flow with shock wave interaction. Numerical simulation and experiment are adopted to verify the effectiveness and reliability of the proposed method. The Mach number on the outlet and the surface pressure distribution on the upper wall of the distortion generator obtained in the experiment show a good agreement with the target one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

None.

Code Availability

None.

References

  1. Bricalli MG, Brown L, Boyce RR, Gollan R, Vanyai T, Pudsey AS (2018) Scramjet performance with nonuniform flow and swept nozzles. AIAA J 56(10):3988–4003. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J056963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bachchan N, Hillier R (2004) Effects of hypersonic inlet flow non-uniformities on stabilising isolator shock systems. In: AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit

  3. Steva TB, Goyne CP, Rockwell RD, Cresci D, Osborne JW (2015) Comparison of a direct-connect and freejet dual-mode scramjet. J Propul Power 31(5):1380–1392. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B35221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mo J, Xu J, Quan Z, Yu K, Lv Z (2015) Design and cold flow test of a scramjet nozzle with nonuniform inflow. Acta Astronaut 108:92–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2014.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang P, Xu J, Quan Z, Mo J (2016) Effects of nonuniform Mach-number entrance on scramjet nozzle flowfield and performance. Acta Astronaut 129:201–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.09.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schindel L (1999) Effect of nommiform nozzle flow on scramjet performance. J Propul Power 15(2):363–364. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tam C-J, Hsu K-Y, Hagenmaier M, Raffoul C (2013) Studies of inlet distortion in a direct-connect axisymmetric scramjet isolator. J Propul Power 29(6):1382–1390. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B34944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gruber M, Hagenmaier M, Mathur T (2006) Simulating inlet distortion effects in a direct-connect scramjet combustor. In: 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit

  9. Hagenmaier M, Eklund D, Milligan R (2011) Improved simulation of inflow distortion for direct-connect scramjet combustor. In: 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition

  10. Yu K, Xu J, Tang L, Mo J (2015) Inverse design of inlet distortion using method of characteristics for direct-connect scramjet studies. Aerosp Sci Technol 46:351–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2015.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yu K, Xu J, Zhang X, Liu S (2016) Inverse design of shock wave distortion for a direct-connect facility. Aerosp Sci Technol 55:220–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2016.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yu K, Xu J, Xu B, Liu S, Zhang X (2017) Inverse design method on facility nozzle for generation of the non-uniform flow. In: 33rd AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference

  13. Degregori E, Ferlauto M (2018) Influence of the facility nozzle design in the unsteady response of direct-connect scramjet combustors. In: 2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting 1143

  14. Degregori E, Ferlauto M (2018) Optimal aerodynamic design of scramjet facility nozzles. In AIP Conference Proceedings Vol. 1978, No. 1, p. 470114. AIP Publishing LLC

  15. Sauer A (1947) General characteristics of the flow through nozzles at near critical speeds. NACA TM-1147

  16. Bell JH, Mehta RD (1988) Contraction design for small low-speed wind tunnels, NASA CR 177488, Contract NAS2-NCC-2-294

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the continued support of the NSFC (National Natural Science Foundation of China) for contract numbers 11802123, 11672346, and the Aeronautics Power Foundation (Grant No. 6141B09050383). In addition, this research is funded by the Hong Kong Scholars Program.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (11802123, 11672346), Aeronautics Power Foundation (6141B09050383), Hong Kong Scholars Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaikai Yu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

No known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, K., Su, P., Chen, Y. et al. Inverse Design of Flow Distortion Dominated by Shock Wave Interaction with Experimental Verification. Int. J. Aeronaut. Space Sci. 22, 866–873 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-021-00363-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-021-00363-1

Keywords

Navigation