Skip to main content
Log in

Ant foraging path use responds to different types of risk and their encounter probabilities

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Insectes Sociaux Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ant colonies are likely able to access food locations by multiple paths that can vary predictably in length or mortality risk. To favor one path over another requires ants to perceive, communicate and act upon important differences in length and risk between paths. Here, we present replicate Linepithema humile colonies with four equal-length paths to a sugar source. The paths vary in probabilities of encountering a risk cue that range from 0 to 100%. The risk cues were either live workers of an aggressive competitor (Liometopum occidentale: LO) or only formic acid (FA), a defensive chemical common in many formicine species. Both the probabilities of encounter and type of cue affected path preferences. Although across both cues the zero-risk path was most used, the use was not exclusive and patterns of response to the cues differed significantly. More ants were on all the paths when the cue was LO rather than FA, leading to a higher success rate at finding food. Worker numbers on paths with LO did decline over time as consistent with recognizing neighbors to be ‘dear enemies’ that are a reduced threat to the colony. Similarly, changes in path usage suggested that the FA cue also became viewed as less threatening over time when competitors were never simultaneously present. The results are consistent with L. humile exhibiting the behavioral plasticity and communicative ability needed to categorize and predict risk to efficiently collect food while defending against other ant species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data will be deposited in Dryad upon acceptance.

References

  • Alonso JC, Alonso JA, Bautista LM, Muñoz-Pulido R (1995) Patch use in cranes: a field test of optimal foraging predictions. Anim Behav 49:1367–1379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckers R, Deneubourg JL, Goss S, Pasteels JM (1990) Collective decision making through food recruitment. Insect Soc 37:258–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum MS (1978) Biochemical defenses of insects. In: Rockstein M (ed) Biochemistry of insects. Academic Press, New York, pp 465–513

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Booksmythe I, Milner RNC, Jennions MD, Backwell PRY (2010) How do weaponless male fiddler craps avoid aggression? Behav EcolSociobiol 64:485–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Denton KK, Nonacs P (2018) Habitat complexity and predictability effects on finding and collecting food when ants search as cooperative groups. Anim Behav 141:77–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detto T, Jennions MD, Backwell PRY (2010) When and why do territorial coalitions occur? Experimental evidence from a fiddler crab. Am Nat 175(5):E119-125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher J (1954) Evolution and bird sociality. In: Huxley J, Hardy A, Ford E (eds) Evolution as a process. Allen & Unwin, London, pp 71–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Hefetz A, Blum MS (1978) Biosynthesis of formic acid by the poison glands of formicine ants. Biochim Biophy Acta 543:484–496

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heller NE, Ingram KK, Gordon DM (2008) Nest connectivity and colony structure in unicolonial Argentine ants. Insect Soc 55:397–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoey-Chamberlain R, Rust M, Klotz J (2013) A review of the biology, ecology and behavior of velvety tree ants of North America. Sociobiology 60:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holway DA (1999) Competitive mechanisms underlying the displacement of native ants by the invasive Argentine ant. Ecology 80:238–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holway DA, Case TJ (2000) Mechanisms of dispersed central-place foraging in polydomous colonies of the Argentine ant. Anim Behav 59:433–441

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaegar RG (1981) Dear enemy recognition and the costs of aggression between salamanders. Am Nat 117:962–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR, Inman AJ (1992) Learning and foraging: individuals, groups, and populations. Am Nat 140:S63–S84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langen T, Tripet F, Nonacs P (2000) The red and black: habituation and the dear-enemy phenomenon in two desert Pheidole ants. Behav EcolSociobiol 48:285–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Latty T, Holmes MJ, Makinson JC, Beekman M (2017) Argentine ants (Linepithema humile) use adaptive transportation networks to track changes in resource quality. J Exp Biol 220:686–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeBrun E, Jones N, Gilbert L (2014) Chemical warfare among invaders: a detoxification interaction facilitates an ant invasion. Science 343:1014–1017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL (1984) Downy woodpecker foraging behaviour: efficient sampling in simple stochastic environments. Ecology 65:166–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL (1985) Sampling behaviour of starlings foraging in simple patchy environments. Behav EcolSociobiol 16:135–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Menke SB, Ward PS, Holway DA (2018) Long-term record of Argentine ant invasions reveals enduring ecological impacts. Ecology 99:1194–1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonacs P (1988) Foraging, mortality risk and colony growth in ants. PhD Thesis, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada

  • Nonacs P (1990) Death in the distance: mortality risk as information for foraging ants. Behaviour 112:23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonacs P, Dill LM (1988) Foraging response of the ant Lasius pallitarsis to food sources with associated mortality risk. Insect Soc 35:293–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonacs P, Dill LM (1990) Mortality risk vs. food quality trade-offs in a common currency: ant patch preferences. Ecology 71:1886–1892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonacs P, Dill LM (1991) Mortality risk versus food quality trade-offs in ants: patch use over time. EcolEntomol 16:73–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonacs P, Soriano JL (1998) Patch sampling behaviour and future foraging expectations in Argentine ants, Linepithema humile. Anim Behav 55:519–527

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson O, Wiktander U, Holmgren NMA, Nilsson SG (1999) Gaining ecological information about Bayesian foragers through their behaviour. II: a field test with woodpeckers. Oikos 87:264–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. [Online.] https://www.r-project.org/. Accessed 2018

  • Stamps JA, Biro PA, Mitchell DJ, Saltz JB (2018) Bayesian updating during development predicts genotypic differences in plasticity. Evolution 72:2167–2180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner CJ (2008) Resource characteristics and competition affect colony and individual foraging strategies of the wood ant Formica integroides. EcolEntomol 33:127–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Temeles EJ (1994) The role of neighbours in territorial systems: when are they “dear enemies”? Anim Behav 47:339–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valone TJ (1991) Bayesian and prescient assessment: foraging with pre-harvest information. Anim Behav 41:569–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valone TJ (1992) Information for patch assessment: a field investigation with black-chinned hummingbirds. Behav Ecol 3:211–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valone TJ (2006) Are animals capable of Bayesian updating? An empirical review. Oikos 112:252–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valone TJ, Brown JS (1989) Measuring patch assessment abilities of desert granivores. Ecology 70:1800–1810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Gils JA, Schenk IW, Bos O, Piersma T, Moore AJ (2003) Incompletely informed shorebirds that face a digestive constraint maximize net energy gain when exploiting patches. Am Nat 161:777–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward P (1987) Distributions of the introduced Argentine ant (Iridomyrmex humilis) in natural habitats of the lower Sacramento Valley and its effects on the indigenous ant fauna. Hilgardia 55(2):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitekamp CA, Hofmann HA (2017) Neuromolecular correlates of cooperation and conflict during territory defense in a cichlid fish. Horm Behav 89:145–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yates AA, Nonacs P (2016) Preference for straight-line paths in recruitment trail formation of the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile. Insect Soc 63:501–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Robin for programming cameras to take behavioral observations, A. Patel, D. Rivas, I. Chung, A. Mahavni, A. Martinez, N. Szombathy, D. Hall, K. Denton, R. Mayet, and J. Christie for research assistance, and Drs. G. Grether and N. Pinter-Wollman for helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

EKL and PN both conceived the experiment and the design. EKL collected and maintained the ants, and supervised and collected the data. EKL and PN jointly analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Nonacs.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Consent for publication

Granted, the material in the manuscript has not been published and is not in submission at any other journal.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 5705 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lessig, E.K., Nonacs, P. Ant foraging path use responds to different types of risk and their encounter probabilities. Insect. Soc. 68, 173–180 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-021-00811-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-021-00811-x

Keywords

Navigation