Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton October 6, 2020

A cross-linguistic study of metacommunication in online hotel reviews

  • Irene Cenni

    Irene Cenni is a PhD Candidate in Applied Linguistics at Ghent University (Belgium). Her research interests include discourse analysis, pragmatics, intercultural communication, CMC and language of tourism. She is currently working on a dissertation about digital tourism discourse in Italian, English and Dutch.Her research has appeared in international peer-reviewed journals such as Discourse Context and Media. She also teaches courses for the department of Translation, Interpreting and Communication of Ghent University, both at the Bachelor and Master level.

    EMAIL logo
    , Patrick Goethals

    Patrick Goethals is an Associate Professor in Spanish linguistics and multilingual communication at the Department of Translation, Interpreting and Communication, Faculty of Arts and Philosophy, Ghent University. His research interests include translation theory, discourse analysis, intercultural and multilingual communication, and tourism communication. He has published widely in peer-reviewed international journals.

    and Camilla Vásquez

    Camilla Vásquez is Professor of Applied Linguistics at the University of South Florida. She is the author of The Discourse of Online Reviews (Bloomsbury, 2014) and Language, Creativity and Humor (Routledge, 2019). Her research on online reviews has appeared in journals such as Current Issues in Tourism, Discourse Context & Media, Food & Foodways, Journal of Pragmatics, Language@Internet, Narrative Inquiry and Visual Communication.

From the journal Intercultural Pragmatics

Abstract

In this study, we focus on a specific form of metacommunication found in an emerging digital genre: Hotel reviews posted on TripAdvisor. In particular, we investigate how tourists represent their service encounter interactions. The main goal of the present study is to identify what these digital metacommunicative practices reveal about communicative norms and expectations among groups of reviewers writing in three different languages. We analyzed a multilingual dataset of 1800 reviews written in English, Dutch, and Italian. The results reveal that reviewers commented upon a broad range of aspects when evaluating service encounters interactions, for instance, describing the quality of the interaction (e.g. polite, correct), or a lack of communication when a specific type of communication is expected (e.g. absence of greetings, or apologies after a service failure). Further, we found similar cross-linguistic patterns, such as appreciation for being able to communicate in one’s mother tongue during the hotel-guest encounter. At the same time, a few differences across languages emerged, such as the preference for precise and correct information within British reviews. Since service interactions are of fundamental importance for customer satisfaction, our findings contribute not only to the current research on metacommunication in digital contexts, but may also be significant for service providers in the hospitality industry.


Corresponding author: Irene Cenni, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium, E-mail:

About the authors

Irene Cenni

Irene Cenni is a PhD Candidate in Applied Linguistics at Ghent University (Belgium). Her research interests include discourse analysis, pragmatics, intercultural communication, CMC and language of tourism. She is currently working on a dissertation about digital tourism discourse in Italian, English and Dutch.Her research has appeared in international peer-reviewed journals such as Discourse Context and Media. She also teaches courses for the department of Translation, Interpreting and Communication of Ghent University, both at the Bachelor and Master level.

Patrick Goethals

Patrick Goethals is an Associate Professor in Spanish linguistics and multilingual communication at the Department of Translation, Interpreting and Communication, Faculty of Arts and Philosophy, Ghent University. His research interests include translation theory, discourse analysis, intercultural and multilingual communication, and tourism communication. He has published widely in peer-reviewed international journals.

Camilla Vásquez

Camilla Vásquez is Professor of Applied Linguistics at the University of South Florida. She is the author of The Discourse of Online Reviews (Bloomsbury, 2014) and Language, Creativity and Humor (Routledge, 2019). Her research on online reviews has appeared in journals such as Current Issues in Tourism, Discourse Context & Media, Food & Foodways, Journal of Pragmatics, Language@Internet, Narrative Inquiry and Visual Communication.

References

Barton, David & Carmen Lee. 2013. Language online: Investigating digital texts and practices. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203552308Search in Google Scholar

Bateson, Gregory. 1951. Information and codification: A philosophical approach. In Jurgen Ruesch & Gregory Bateson (eds.), Communication: The social matrix of psychiatry, 168–211. New York: Norton.Search in Google Scholar

Bateson, Gregory. 1972. Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.Search in Google Scholar

Bridges, Judith & Camilla Vásquez. 2016. If nearly all Airbnb reviews are positive, does that make them meaningless? Current Issues in Tourism 19(1), 1–19.10.1080/13683500.2016.1267113Search in Google Scholar

Bridges, Judith. 2017. Gendering metapragmatics in online discourse: “Mansplaining man gonna mansplain…”. Discourse, Context & Media 20. 94–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.09.010.Search in Google Scholar

Bublitz, Wolfram & Axel Hübler (eds.). 2007. Metapragmatics in use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/pbns.165Search in Google Scholar

Cameron, Deborah. 2000. Good to talk? Living and working in a communication culture. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446217993Search in Google Scholar

Cenni, Irene & Patrick Goethals. 2017. Negative hotel reviews on TripAdvisor: A cross-linguistic analysis. Discourse Context & Media 16. 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.01.004.Search in Google Scholar

Chan, Mei Yuit & Uma Chandra-Sagaran. 2019. Scripted communication for service standardisation? What analysis of conversation can tell us about the fast-food service encounter. Discourse & Communication 13(1). 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481318801625.Search in Google Scholar

De Ascaniis, Silvia & Ulrike Gretzel. 2013. Communicative functions of Online Travel Review titles: A pragmatic and linguistic investigation of destination and attraction OTR titles. Studies in Communication Sciences 13. 156–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scoms.2013.11.001.Search in Google Scholar

De Carlos, Pablo, Elisa Alén, Ana Pérez-González & Beatriz Figueroa. 2019. Cultural differences, language attitudes and tourist satisfaction: A study in the Barcelona hotel sector. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 40. 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2018.1493114.Search in Google Scholar

Feng, Wei & Wei Ren. 2019. “This is the destiny, darling”: Relational acts in Chinese management responses to online consumer reviews. Discourse, Context & Media 28. 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.09.003.Search in Google Scholar

Goethals, Patrick. 2016. Multilingualism and international tourism: A content-and discourse based approach to language-related judgments in web 2.0 hotel reviews. Language and Intercultural Communication 16 (2). 235–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2015.1103249.Search in Google Scholar

Hall, Edward Twitchell. 1976. Beyond culture. New York: Anchor.Search in Google Scholar

Holmqvist, Jonas & Christian Grönroos. 2012. How does language matter for services? Challenges and propositions for service research. Journal of Service Research 15(4). 430–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670512441997.Search in Google Scholar

Holmqvist, Jonas, Yves Van Vaerenbergh & Christian Grönroos. 2017. Language use in services: Recent advances and directions for future research. Journal of Business Research 72. 114–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.10.005.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 2017. Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? Journal of Pragmatics 113. 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007.Search in Google Scholar

Incelli, Ersilia. 2017. A cross-cultural contrastive analysis of interpersonal markers in promotional discourse in travel agency websites. In: Giuseppe Palumbo (ed), Testi, corpora, confronti interlinguistici: approcci qualitativi e quantitativi, 65–86. Trieste: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste.Search in Google Scholar

Jaworski, Adam, Nikolas Coupland & Dariusz Galasinski (eds.). 2012. Metalanguage: Social and ideological perspectives. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Jones, Graham M., Bambi B. Schieffelin & Rachel E. Smith. 2011. When friends who talk together stalk together: Online gossip as metacommunication. In Crispin Thurlow & Kristine Mroczek (eds.), Digital discourse: Language in the new media, 26–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Jung, Hyo Sun & Hye Hyun Yoon. 2011. The effects of nonverbal communication of employees in the family restaurant upon customers’ emotional responses and customer satisfaction. International Journal of Hospitality Management 30 (3). 542–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2010.09.005.Search in Google Scholar

Kang, Juhee & Sunghyup Sean Hyun. 2012. Effective communication styles for the customer-oriented service employee: Inducing dedicational behaviors in luxury restaurant patrons. International Journal of Hospitality Management 31(3). 772–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.09.014.Search in Google Scholar

Keymeulen, Tessa & Patrick Goethals. 2018. Las excursiones guiadas multilingües en contextos urbanos : Un enfoque basado en reseñas 2.0. Pasos 16(2). 465–474. https://doi.org/10.25145/j.pasos.2018.16.033.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Carmen. 2016. Multilingualism online. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315707211Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Ping & Xiaoye You. 2019. Metapragmatic comments in web-based intercultural peer evaluation. Intercultural Pragmatics 16(1). 57–83. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2019-0003.Search in Google Scholar

Lucy, John A. 1993. Reflexive language and the human disciplines. Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. 9–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511621031.003.Search in Google Scholar

Malenkina, Nadezhda & Stanislav Ivanov. 2018. A linguistic analysis of the official tourism websites of the seventeen Spanish Autonomous Communities. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 9. 204–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2018.01.007.Search in Google Scholar

Manning, Paul. 2008. Barista rants about stupid customers at Starbucks: What imaginary conversations can teach us about real ones. Language & Communication 28(2). 101–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2008.02.004.Search in Google Scholar

Mapelli, Giovanna. 2016. Guías de viaje 2.0: Léxico y metadiscurso. Iberica 31. 149–174.Search in Google Scholar

Mariani, Marcello M., Matteo Borghi & Sergey Kazakov. 2019. The role of language in the online evaluation of hospitality service encounters: An empirical study. International Journal of Hospitality Management 78. 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.11.012.Search in Google Scholar

Mauranen, Anna. 2010. Discourse reflexivity-a discourse universal? The case of ELF. Nordic Journal of English Studies 9(2). 13–40. https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.216.Search in Google Scholar

Qin, Wenjuan & Paola Uccelli. 2019. Metadiscourse: Variation across communicative contexts. Journal of Pragmatics 139. 22–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.10.004.Search in Google Scholar

Ren, Wei. 2018. Mitigation in Chinese online consumer reviews. Discourse, Context & Media 26. 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.01.001.Search in Google Scholar

Schiffrin, Deborah. 1980. Meta‐talk: Organizational and evaluative brackets in discourse. Sociological Inquiry 50(3). 199–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682x.1980.tb00021.x.Search in Google Scholar

Sparks, Beverley A. & Victoria Browning. 2010. Complaining in cyberspace: The motives and forms of hotel guests’ complaints online. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management 19(7). 797–818. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2010.508010.Search in Google Scholar

Suau-Jiménez, Francisca. 2019. Engagement of readers/customers in the discourse of e-tourism promotional genres. In Carmen Sancho Guinda (ed.), Engagement in professional genre, 341–358. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.301.18suaSearch in Google Scholar

Van Vaerenbergh, Yves & Jonas Holmqvist 2014. Examining the relationship between divergence and word-of-mouth intentions. Journal of Business Research 67(8). 1601–1608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.09.008.Search in Google Scholar

Vásquez, Camilla. 2011. Complaints online: The case of TripAdvisor. Journal of Pragmatics 43. 1707–1717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.007.Search in Google Scholar

Vásquez, Camilla. 2012. Narrativity and involvement in online consumer reviews. The case of TripAdvisor. Narrative Inquiry 22(1). 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.22.1.07vas.Search in Google Scholar

Vásquez, Camilla. 2014. The discourse of online consumer reviews. London: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar

Virtanen, Tuija. 2017. Adaptability in online consumer reviews: Exploring genre dynamics and interactional choices. Journal of Pragmatics 116. 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.011.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Chen-Ya, Li Miao & Anna S. Mattila. 2015. Customer responses to intercultural communication accommodation strategies in hospitality service encounters. International Journal of Hospitality Management 51. 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.09.001.Search in Google Scholar

Wikström, Peter. 2016. When I need/want to: Normativity, identity, and form in user construals of ‘talk-like’ tweeting. Discourse, Context & Media 14. 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2016.09.003.Search in Google Scholar

Zakaria, Norhayati. 2017. Emergent patterns of switching behaviors and intercultural communication styles of global virtual teams during distributed decision making. Journal of International Management 23(4). 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2016.09.002.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-10-06
Published in Print: 2020-09-25

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 26.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ip-2020-4003/html
Scroll to top button