Skip to main content
Log in

Technology Adoption and Output Difference Among Groundnut Farmers in Northern Ghana

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The European Journal of Development Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adoption of improved groundnut production technologies is an important avenue for increasing productivity and improving the living standard of farmers. This study seeks to analyze technology adoption and output difference among groundnut farmers in Northern Ghana. The study used primary and cross-sectional data from 250 groundnut farmers. The Probit regression model and t test were used to analyze the objectives of this study. Results of the study reveals that while household size, distance to district capital, farmer-based organization, and access to credit significantly affects adoption of improved groundnut varieties (IGV), only household size and distance to district capital affected the adoption of agrochemical in production. Also, apart from extension and education which affect adoption of mobile phone, factors such as sex, marital status, distance to district capital, household size, farmer-based organization (FBO), and access to credit significantly influenced the adoption of mechanization and mobile phone, respectively. The study revealed that the average output level of adopters of these improved groundnut technologies was relatively higher than non-adopters. The study recommends that projects/programs and policies related to the introduction and dissemination of improved groundnut production technologies in northern Ghana should draw lessons from studies like this to ensure improved technology uptake.

Résumé

L'adoption des techniques de production améliorés des arachides est un moyen important pour augmenter la productivité et améliorer le niveau de vie des agriculteurs. Cet étude cherche à analyser l’adoption de la technologie et les écarts de production parmi les agriculteurs d’arachides au nord du Ghana. L’étude utilise des donnés primaires transversales recueillies auprès de 250 agriculteurs d’arachides, et un modèle a régression probit et des t test pour les analyser. Les résultats de l’étude révèlent que l’adoption de des variétés d’arachides améliorés (en anglais: improved groundnut varieties—IGV) sont significativement affectés par la taille du ménage, la distance de la capitale du district, la présence d’une organisation d’agriculteurs (en anglais: farmer-based organisation, FBO), et l’accès au crédit. Cependant, l’adoption de l’agrochimie en production n’est affectée que par la taille du ménage et la distance de la capitale du district. De plus (laissant à cote les services d’extension et l’éducation, qui affectent l’adoption des téléphones mobiles), il y a d’autres facteurs—tels que le gendre, l’état civil, la distance de la capital du district, la taille du ménage, la présence d’une organisation d’agriculteurs et l’accès au crédit—qui influencent significativement l’adoption de la mécanisation et des téléphones mobiles. L’étude montre que le niveau de production moyen des agriculteurs adoptant ces technologies de production améliorés des arachides est relativement supérieur à ceux qui ne les ont pas adoptées. Cet étude recommande que les projets, les programmes et les politiques visant l’introduction et la dissémination des technologies de production améliorés des arachides au nord du Ghana prennent en compte les résultats des études comme celui-ci afin d’assurer l’adoption des technologies proposés.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The author wants to declare that he can submit the data at any time based on publisher’s request.

References

  • Abay, K.A., G. Berhane, A.S. Taffesse, K. Abay, and B. Koru. 2018. Estimating input complementarities with unobserved heterogeneity: Evidence from Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Economics 69 (2): 495–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdulai, A.C., and C. Binder. 2006. Slash and burn cultivation practice and agricultural input demand and output supply. Journal of Environment & Development Economics 11 (2): 201–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdulai, S., A. Zakariah, and S.A. Donkoh. 2018. Adoption of rice cultivation technologies and its effect on technical efficiency in Sagnarigu District of Ghana. Cogent Food & Agriculture 4 (1): 1424296. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2018.1424296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AGRA. 2018. Africa agriculture status report: Catalyzing government capacity to drive agricultural transformation (issue 6). Nairobi: AGRA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asif, A.S., M.N. Uddin, D.S. Dev, and M.A.M. Miah. 2017. Factors affecting mobile phone usage by the farmers in receiving information on vegetable cultivation in Bangladesh. Journal of Agricultural Informatics 8 (2): 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Askary, B.F., F. Keshavarzshal, M.Z. Haghghadam, and P. Shahinrokhsar. 2017. Rice farmers’ behaviors and attitudes toward agricultural extension programs in healthy food production (case of Lahijan and Amlash Counties, Northern Iran). International Jouranl of Agricultural Management Development 2017 (7): 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Awotide, B.A., T. Abdoulaye, A. Alene, and V.M. Manyong. 2014. Assessing the extent and determinant of adoption of improved cassava varieties in South-western Nigeria. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics 6 (9): 376–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandio, A.A., and J. Yuansheng. 2018. Determinants of adoption of improved rice varieties in Northern Sindh, Pakistan. Rice Science 25 (2): 103–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chekene, M., and T. Chancellor. 2015. Factors affecting the adoption of improved rice varieties in Borno State, Nigeria. The Journal of Agricultural Extension 19 (2): 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danso-Abbeam, G., J. Antwi-Bosiako, D. Sedem-Ehiakpora, and N.F. Mabe. 2017. Adoption of improved maize variety among farm householdsin the northern region of Ghana. Cogent Economics and Finance. 5 (1): 1416896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhraief, M.Z., S. Bedhiaf-Romdhania, B. Dhehibib, M. Oueslati-Zlaouia, O. Jebali, and Y.S. Ben. 2018. Factors affecting the adoption of innovative technologies by livestock farmers in arid area of Tunisia. FARA Research Report 3 (5): 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donkor, E., V. Owusu, and E. Owusu-Sekyere. 2014. Assessing the determinants of adoption of improved cassava varieties among farmers in the Ashanti Region of Ghana. Africa Development and Resource Research Institute Journal 5 (2): 122–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egyir, I.S., E. Owusu-Benoah, F.O. Anno-Nyako, and B. Banful. 2011. Assessing the factors of adoption of agrochemicals by plantain farmers in Ghana. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy 5 (1): 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506201111119617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etwire, P.M., S. Buah, M. Ouédraogo, R. Zougmoré, S.T. Patey, E. Martey, and J. Bayala. 2017. An assessment of mobile phone-based dissemination of weather and market information in the Upper West Region of Ghana. Agriculture and Food Security 6 (8): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-016-0088-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO. 2015. Country Fact Sheet on Food and Agriculture Policy Trends—Ghana, FAO, Rome. www.fao.org/3/a-i4490e.pdf. Accessed 31 Dec 2017.

  • Folitse, B.Y., S.A. Manteaw, L.P. Dzandu, G. Obeng-Koranteng, and S. Bekoe. 2019. The determinants of mobile-phone usage among small-scale poultry farmers in Ghana. Information Development 35 (4): 564–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666918772005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghana Statistical Service (GSS). 2014. Ghana living standard survey round 6 (GLSS 6). Accra: GSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghimire, R.G., H.U. Wen-Chi, and R.B.S. Hrestha. 2015. Factors affecting adoption of improved rice varieties among rural farm households in Central Nepal. Rice Science 22 (1): 35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, M., W.J. Florkowski, and S. Kolavalli. 2012. The determinants of farmer adoption of improved peanut varieties and their impact on farm income: Evidence from Northern Ghana. In Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the agricultural and applied economics association annual meeting. Seattle.

  • Ibrahim, M., and W.J. Florkowski. 2015. Analysis of farmers’ willingness to adopt improved peanut varieties in the northern Ghana with the use of baseline survey data. Selected paper prepared for presentation at the southern agricultural economics association annual meeting, Atlanta, GA, January 31–February 3, 2015.

  • Ilahiane, H. 2007. Impacts of information and communication technologies in agriculture: Farmers and mobile phones in Morocco. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Anthropological Association, December 1, Washington, DC.

  • Kalinda, T., G. Tembo, and E. Kuntashula. 2014. Adoption of improved maize seed varieties in Southern Zambia. Asian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 6 (1): 33–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassie, M., B. Shiferaw, and M. Geoffrey. 2011. Agricultural technology, crop income, and poverty alleviation in Uganda. World Development, forthcoming.

  • Katengeza, S.P., J.J. Okello, and N. Jambo. 2011. Use of mobile phone technology in agricultural marketing: The case of smallholder farmers in Malawi. International Journal of ICT Research and Development in Africa 2 (2): 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konja, D.T., F.N. Mabe, and R. Oteng-Frimpong. 2019. Profitability and profit efficiency of certified groundnut seed and conventional groundnut production in Northern Ghana: A comparative analysis. Cogent Economics & Finance 7: 1631525. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2019.1631525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N., and A.R. Quisumbing. 2010. Access, adoption, and diffusion: Understanding the long-term impacts of improved vegetable and fish technologies in Bangladesh. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Discussion Paper 00995.

  • Kuti, W.I. 2015. The determinants of adoption of improved maize varieties in Osun State, Nigeria. International Journal of Agricultural Economics and Extension. 3 (2): 2329–9797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwarteng, A.T., R. Aidoo, and P. Sarfo-Mensah. 2019. Determinants of the extent of adoption of maize production technologies in Northern Ghana. AJAR. 14 (19): 819–827. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2019.13912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavison, R. 2013. Factors influencing the adoption of organic fertilizers in vegetable production in Accra, Msc Thesis, Accra Ghana.

  • Loevinsohn, M., J. Sumberg, and A. Diagne. 2012. Under what circumstances and conditions does adoption of technology result in increased agricultural productivity? Protocol. London: EPPI Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.

  • Mabe, F.N., D.S. Ehiakpor, B. Adam, and D.E. Dumasi. 2018. Determinants of adoption of improved rice varieties: Effects on output in volta region. UDS International Journal of Development [UDSIJD]. ISSN: 2026–5336 Volume 5 No. 2.

  • Mamun-ur-Rashid, M., M. Karim, M. Islam, and S.B. Mobarak. 2019. The usefulness of cell phones for crop farmers in selected regions of Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development 9 (2): 298–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masuki, K.F.G., R. Kamugisha, J.G. Mowo, J. Tanui, J. Tukahirwa, J. Mogoi, and E.O. Adera. 2010. Role of mobile phones in improving communication and information delivery for agricultural development: Lessons from South Western Uganda. Paper presented to Workshop at Makerere University, Uganda 22–23 March 2010. International Federation of Information Processing (IFIP), Technical Commission 9. http://mak.ac.ug/documents/IFIP/RoleofMobilePhonesAgriculture.pdf. Accessed 24 Feb 2020.

  • Mauceri, M., J. Alwang, G. Norton, and V. Barrera. 2005. Adoption of integrated pest management technologies: A case study of potato farmers in Carchi, Ecuador; Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Providence, Rhode Island, July 24–27, 2005.

  • Mignouna, B., M. Manyong, J. Rusike, S. Mutabazi, and M. Senkondo. 2011. Determinants of adopting Imazapyr-Resistant Maize Technology and its impact on household income in Western Kenya. AgBioforum 14 (3): 158–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Food and Agriculture (MoFA). 2011. Agriculture in Ghana: Facts and figures. Accra: Ministry of Food and Agriculture, Statistics, Research and Information Directorate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mmbando, F.E., and L.J. Baiyegunhi. 2016. Socio-economic and institutional factors influencing adoption of improved maize varieties in Hai District, Tanzania. Journal of Human Ecology 53 (1): 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2016.11906955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MoFA. 2016. Statistics, Research and Information. Directorate (SRID), Ministry of Food and Agriculture. March 2016.

  • Moser, C.M., and C.B. Barrett. 2003. The disappointing adoption dynamics of a yield increasing, low external-input technology: The case of SRI in Madagascar. Agricultural Systems 76: 1085–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myhr, J., and P. Nordstrom. 2008. Livelihood changes enabled by mobile phones: The case of Tanzania Fishermen. Uppsala University: Department of Business Studies. Accessed 26 Feb 2020. www.divaportal.org/smash/get/diva2:131579/FULLTEXT01.pdf.

  • Onyeneke, R.U. 2017. Determinants of adoption of improved technologies in rice production in Imo State, Nigeria. African Journal of Agricultural Research 12 (11): 888–896. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2016.11737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragasa, C., A.A. Dankyi, P. Acheampong, N.A. Wiredu, A. Chapoto, M. Asamoah, and A. Tripp. 2013. Patterns of adoption of improved rice technologies in Ghana, Ghana Strategy Support Program.

  • Rogers, E.M. 2003. Diffusion of innovations, 551. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salifu, H., A. Alhassan, and K. Salifu. 2015. Determinant of farmers adoption of improved maize varieties in the Wa municipality. American International Journal of Contemporary Research 5 (4): 27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ugochukwu, A., and P.W.B. Phillips. 2018. Technology adoption by agricultural producers: A review of literature. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67958-7.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Urassa, N.S., and Z.S.K. Mvena. 2016. Determinants of the use of cell phones in access to beef cattle market information for smallholders in Mpwapwa District, Tanzania, Huria. Journal of the Open University of Tanzania 22 (1): 116–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiredu, A., K. Gyasi, S. Saaka, B. Asante, and A. Mensah-Bonsu. 2012. Factors affecting proportions of land allocated to the mini-sett technology by yam producers in Northern Ghana. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 7 (29): 4158–4166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2012. Africa can help feed the Africa: Removing barriers to regional integration in goods and services, poverty reduction and economic management (PREM), Africa Regions. Washington: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The author received no funding for this research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominic T. Konja.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that there is no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Konja, D.T. Technology Adoption and Output Difference Among Groundnut Farmers in Northern Ghana. Eur J Dev Res 34, 303–320 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-021-00372-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-021-00372-6

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation